Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide
Primary Purpose
Peripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve Hand
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SilkBridge
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve Hand focused on measuring peripheral nerve injury, nerve guide, silk fibroin, silk, nerve regeneration
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- male & female patients between 18 and 65 years of age
- a traumatic injury or a post-traumatic neuroma of a digital nerve on the palmar side of the hand, between the metacarpophalangeal joint and the distal interphalangeal joint
- single lesion per finger
- nerve defect of >5mm
- nerve treatment initiated within 24 months after nerve injury
- signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- disorders known to affect the peripheral nervous system, such as, but not only, diabetes mellitus, chronic heavy alcohol use, or toxic nerve lesions, or any polyneuropathy
- an additional injury that could compromise nerve regeneration
- clinically significant (as defined by the investigator) renal, hepatic, cardiac, endocrine, metabolic, hematologic, autoimmune, or any systemic disease, which may make implementation/interpretation of the protocol or results difficult
- previous conditions of the hand that could affect the healing of the actual nerve injury
- complete amputation injury
- extensive crush injury
- grossly contaminated wound
- receiving immunosuppressive or antineoplastic agents within 30 days prior to the enrolment
- known to be HIV positive
- known pregnant and lactating females
- participated in another clinical investigation using an investigational new drug or device (or in the present study) within 30 days prior to enrolment into this investigation
- uncooperative or unsuitable, e.g. language problems or a suspicion to be unable to attend follow up appointments, for completion of the investigation
- absence of a healthy opposite finger
- suspected allergy to silk
- need of emergency surgery (within 24 hours from injury)
Sites / Locations
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie - UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
SilkBridge treatment
Arm Description
Surgery for digital nerve reconstruction with SilkBridge
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Safety of SilkBridge
Assess type and severity of adverse device effects related to SilkBridge and surgical procedure throughout the follow-up period
Secondary Outcome Measures
Performance - assess at each study visit versus baseline
Sensory recovery after nerve reconstruction by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing Pain evaluation via a visual analog scale (VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no pain while 10 represents the highest level.)
Performance - assess at V5 and at last visit versus opposite control finger
Sensory recovery by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing
Performance - assess at the last visit
Patient's satisfaction through the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire (Patient has to describe the change (if any) in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life, in relation to its painful condition. 0 value represent no change, 7 a considerable improvement).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03673449
First Posted
September 12, 2018
Last Updated
March 17, 2020
Sponsor
Silk Biomaterials srl
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03673449
Brief Title
Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide
Official Title
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 22, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Silk Biomaterials srl
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to ascertain the feasibility and safety of the procedure using SilkBridge - a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold - for the regeneration of sensory nerve fibres and follow it up together with the reinnervation of the target organs (sensory receptors in the skin).
Detailed Description
This is a pre-market, monocentre, first-in-human pilot on adult patients with digital nerve defects. Category C clinical trial, medical devices. The study will be performed in Switzerland.
SilkBridge is a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold, which recruits the patients' own cells to remodel or regenerate the nerve, without pre-seeding of the scaffold nor biological/chemical treatments.
SilkBridge will provide surgeons with an implant with unique features, such as easy suturability, full biocompatibility and specific biomimetic properties that enhance cells adhesion and integration of the device with the surrounding tissue.
The study will have a 12 months and 1 week duration per patient, including the follow-up period, and with an expected enrollment period of 15 months.
The study will evaluate 15 adult patients, aged 18-65 years, diagnosed with digital nerve defects (> 5 mm gap) in whom surgical repair may not allow direct suture.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve Hand
Keywords
peripheral nerve injury, nerve guide, silk fibroin, silk, nerve regeneration
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Open Label Monocentre Study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
4 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
SilkBridge treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Surgery for digital nerve reconstruction with SilkBridge
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
SilkBridge
Intervention Description
SilkBridge is a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold, which recruits the patients' own cells to remodel or regenerate the nerve, without pre-seeding of the scaffold nor biological/chemical treatments.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety of SilkBridge
Description
Assess type and severity of adverse device effects related to SilkBridge and surgical procedure throughout the follow-up period
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance - assess at each study visit versus baseline
Description
Sensory recovery after nerve reconstruction by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing Pain evaluation via a visual analog scale (VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no pain while 10 represents the highest level.)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Performance - assess at V5 and at last visit versus opposite control finger
Description
Sensory recovery by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
Performance - assess at the last visit
Description
Patient's satisfaction through the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire (Patient has to describe the change (if any) in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life, in relation to its painful condition. 0 value represent no change, 7 a considerable improvement).
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
male & female patients between 18 and 65 years of age
a traumatic injury or a post-traumatic neuroma of a digital nerve on the palmar side of the hand, between the metacarpophalangeal joint and the distal interphalangeal joint
single lesion per finger
nerve defect of >5mm
nerve treatment initiated within 24 months after nerve injury
signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
disorders known to affect the peripheral nervous system, such as, but not only, diabetes mellitus, chronic heavy alcohol use, or toxic nerve lesions, or any polyneuropathy
an additional injury that could compromise nerve regeneration
clinically significant (as defined by the investigator) renal, hepatic, cardiac, endocrine, metabolic, hematologic, autoimmune, or any systemic disease, which may make implementation/interpretation of the protocol or results difficult
previous conditions of the hand that could affect the healing of the actual nerve injury
complete amputation injury
extensive crush injury
grossly contaminated wound
receiving immunosuppressive or antineoplastic agents within 30 days prior to the enrolment
known to be HIV positive
known pregnant and lactating females
participated in another clinical investigation using an investigational new drug or device (or in the present study) within 30 days prior to enrolment into this investigation
uncooperative or unsuitable, e.g. language problems or a suspicion to be unable to attend follow up appointments, for completion of the investigation
absence of a healthy opposite finger
suspected allergy to silk
need of emergency surgery (within 24 hours from injury)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maurizio Calcagni, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie - UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie - UniversitätsSpital Zürich
City
Zürich
ZIP/Postal Code
8091
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25446133
Citation
Faroni A, Mobasseri SA, Kingham PJ, Reid AJ. Peripheral nerve regeneration: experimental strategies and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23303520
Citation
Konofaos P, Ver Halen JP. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Mar;29(3):149-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333316. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29349931
Citation
Wieringa PA, Goncalves de Pinho AR, Micera S, van Wezel RJA, Moroni L. Biomimetic Architectures for Peripheral Nerve Repair: A Review of Biofabrication Strategies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018 Apr;7(8):e1701164. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701164. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18804584
Citation
Ichihara S, Inada Y, Nakamura T. Artificial nerve tubes and their application for repair of peripheral nerve injury: an update of current concepts. Injury. 2008 Oct;39 Suppl 4:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17565531
Citation
Pfister LA, Papaloizos M, Merkle HP, Gander B. Nerve conduits and growth factor delivery in peripheral nerve repair. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007 Jun;12(2):65-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2007.00125.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22090283
Citation
Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Feb 7;9(67):202-21. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0438. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15363160
Citation
Meek MF, Varejao AS, Geuna S. Use of skeletal muscle tissue in peripheral nerve repair: review of the literature. Tissue Eng. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(7-8):1027-36. doi: 10.1089/ten.2004.10.1027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19543442
Citation
Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8-9):991-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26322725
Citation
Thurber AE, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. Biomaterials. 2015 Dec;71:145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25422034
Citation
De Vita R, Buccheri EM, Pozzi M, Zoccali G. Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI, preliminary report. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 25;33(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13046-014-0078-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26045909
Citation
Lee JH, Lee JS, Kim DK, Park CH, Lee HR. Clinical outcomes of silk patch in acute tympanic membrane perforation. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;8(2):117-22. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.117. Epub 2015 May 13.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs