The Effect of Light Therapy on Chronic Pain
Primary Purpose
Chronic Pain
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exposure to green LED light
Exposure to white LED light
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Chronic Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults ages 18 - 80 able to understand English and comply with study protocol
- Peripheral neuropathy from HIV or chemotherapy.
- History of fibromyalgia
- Headaches
- Chronic Pain
- 7-day average numeric pain score of 5/10 or greater at baseline evaluation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects receiving remuneration for their pain treatment
- Subjects that are incarcerated
- Subjects unable to read English and complete assessments
- Addictive behavior, severe clinical depression, or psychotic features
Sites / Locations
- Banner University Medical Center SouthRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
Exposure to white LED light.
Exposure to green LED light
Cross over
Arm Description
Subjects will exposed to white light provided to them, in their homes in a dark room for approximately 2 hours for 10 weeks
Subjects will exposed to green light provided to them, in their homes in a dark room for approximately 2 hours for 10 weeks.
Subject will be exposed to white light (sham) for 10 weeks, then have a wash out period for 2 weeks, then exposed to green light (experimental) for 10 weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
For fibromyalgia pain.
reduction in the intensity of fibromyalgia pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS). The NPS has a value ranging from 0 to 10 out of a maximum of 10. ) means no pain. 10 means the most severe pain.
For migraine headache pain.
Reduction of number of headache days/month.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Health-related quality of life using Using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five-dimension scale)
Using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five-dimension scale) assessment questionnaire, this questionnaire consists of five questions assessing the mobility, self care, ability to perform daily activity and overall functionality, pain discomfort, and anxiety are all scales that have 5 different answers to choose from consisting of one, to having no problems, to five being unable to. This will be a weekly questionnaire that will be assessed at the end of the study to check for improvements. Values of these assessments are scored, lower values are better.
Visual Analog Score (VAS)
VAS, which is a scale of 0 -100, 100 meaning the best health you can imagine and 0 means the worst health you can imagine. This will be a weekly questionnaire that will be assessed at the end of the study to check for improvements.
Pain Intensity
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain intensity using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Pain Episode Frequency
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain episode frequency using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Pain Episode Duration
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain episode duration using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Ability to Fall Asleep
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to fall asleep using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Ability to Stay Asleep
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to stay asleep using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Ability to Work
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to work using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Ability to Excersize
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to excersize using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Ability to Do Chores
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to do chores using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
For Migraine Headache pain
reduction in the perceived intensity of the headache phase of the migraine episodes. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Decrease use of analgesics using self-reported survey.
Decrease in use of analgesics from baseline. Medications and doses of analgesics will be documented at baseline, during the study the subjects will document their daily analgesic usage, at the end of the study the analgesic usage will be compared to baseline usage.
Short form McGill pain questionnaire
A survey to analyze the different types of pain using different descriptive (burning, sharp, shooting,...etc). The value ranges from 0-3. 0 means no pain. 3 means severe pain.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questioner
A survey to evaluate the effects of Fibromyalgia. The scale ranges from 0-100. 0 means no impact. 100 means there is a severe negative impact secondary to fibromyalgia. The scale is subjective in nature
Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
A survey to evaluate the impact of headache. The value ranges from 36-78 points. 36 indicates no impact from headache. 78 indicates worst possible impact from headache.
Migraine diary
A diary to document the severity of migraine
Sleep Quality Assessment
A survey to analyze the quality of sleep. The value range from 0-21. 0 means the best quality of sleep. 21 means the worst quality of asleep. The survey is subjective in nature.
O'Leary/Sant Voiding and Pain Indices
A subjective survey designed to investigate the impact of voiding on people with interstitial cystitis. The value ranges from 0-21. 0 means no negative impact. 21 means the worst possible impact.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03677206
Brief Title
The Effect of Light Therapy on Chronic Pain
Official Title
The Effect of Light Therapy on Chronic Pain
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Arizona
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Chronic pain is a major problem in the USA and the rest of the world, currently, all available pharmacological interventions carry with them significant side effects. Pain clinics are specially equipped to perform intentional pain procedures to manage pain. However, there remain groups of patients what neither benefit from pharmacological nor from interventional pain procedures. Other methods have shown only minor benefits such as hypnosis or cognitive behavioral therapy. Therefore, other techniques need to be investigated.
Light therapy has been shown to have significant biological effects on humans. For example, light therapy is used to manage depression. Several clinical trials have shown that certain wavelengths of light can improve wound healing, decrease temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ) pain, and decrease fear of back pain. In these trials, light was directed at the site of pain. In an attempt to better understand the effect of different wavelengths of light, pre-clinical studies were conducted using rats. The investigators have shown green and blue Light emitting diode, (LED) light produced antinociception (analgesia) and reversed neuropathic pain associated with several models of chronic pain. The analgesic effect of light was completely blocked when rats had their eyes covered, this suggests that the analgesic effects seen are mainly due to systemic effect through the visual system.
Preliminary experiments on rats suggest that this effect is mediated through the endogenous opioids and cannabinoid system.
The investigators believe that LED light is a safe alternative to pharmacological intervention to manage pain by stimulating the endogenous endorphin and cannabinoid systems. The investigators initial target participants with history of HIV, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy and fibromyalgia. Participants will be divided into 2 groups. The first group will be a control group exposed to white LED light. The second group will be exposed to green LED light, respectively. Participants will be asked to take LED light home and will be asked to set in a dark room for 2 hours daily for 3 months with their LED light on. At the end of the 3 months trial, the investigator will assess their pain intensity, analgesic use, and overall quality of life. The investigators hypothesis is that participants exposed to green and blue light will have less use of analgesics and will have better life quality.
Detailed Description
During the initial visit, the investigator will collect several pieces of data from participants that are considered part of the routine care, if you are being seen in the clinic, this information will also be used for research purposes. Initially the investigator will ask participants to provide their age, gender, work status, disability status, type of work, whether a previous pain physician has evaluated or provided treatment in the past, if there is any ongoing litigation, a detailed description of the pain (burning, electrical, shooting…etc.) and its location. If the participants are being seen in the clinic for their normal care a detailed physical examination assessing the motor strength of the upper extremities, sensation to light touch and reflexes that is part of the standard of care will be provided for the participants. The participants will be asked to give a numerical value for their pain (a scale from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imagined). Two questionnaires will be provided for the participants to complete which are not standard of care. The first one is the EuroQol Group (EQ-5D) which provide an over assessment of the quality of life. The second is a medication log to document their analgesics use. If the participants are being evaluated via telephone call, the same questions will be conducted, but no physical exam will be provided.
The participants will be assigned to either a white, or green light group. The participants have 50% chance of being in either group. Once the participants are assigned a light group, the participants will be given a strip of Light emitting diode, (LED) light that correspond to their color group. The participants will be asked to take and use the LED strip in a dark room in their house every day for two hours to be exposed to the light, the participants will do this for 10 weeks. The study start date and the outcome assessment timeline will begin from the date of your first exposure to the assigned light. The participants will be asked to complete their weekly questionnaires and daily log, these will be given to the participants on their first clinic visit or sent to the participants if they live out of town. There will be several follow up appointments as detailed below. There is a chance the participants may be asked to cross over into a different group from the one the participants were assigned, there will we a 2 week washout period, then return to clinic for light assignment then light exposure for 10 week, similar visits as described below.
For the follow up clinic visit or phone call (Week 10), data similar to the information gathered at the initial visit will be collected. The description of the pain (burning, electrical, shooting…etc.) and its location will be reviewed. A physical examination assessing for pain and sensation to light touch that is part of the standard of care will be provided for the participants. At the end of the study, the participants will be asked to return the LED strip, their logs and questionnaires.
There is an optional blood draw and saliva sample collection for patients that consent to this. Blood and saliva samples will be collected at baseline and end of study, blood draws will be done to look for inflammatory mediators, increased anti inflammatory mediators and endocannabinoids. Saliva samples will be collected to check for melatonin.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Initially, patients will receive White LED exposure, then they will be crossed over to Green LED exposure. The patients will not be told which one is the treatment and which one is the control.
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Exposure to white LED light.
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will exposed to white light provided to them, in their homes in a dark room for approximately 2 hours for 10 weeks
Arm Title
Exposure to green LED light
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will exposed to green light provided to them, in their homes in a dark room for approximately 2 hours for 10 weeks.
Arm Title
Cross over
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Subject will be exposed to white light (sham) for 10 weeks, then have a wash out period for 2 weeks, then exposed to green light (experimental) for 10 weeks.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Exposure to green LED light
Intervention Description
Participants will be exposed to green LED strip lights in a dark room for 2 hours a day.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Exposure to white LED light
Intervention Description
Participants will be exposed to white LED strip lights in a dark room for 2 hours a day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
For fibromyalgia pain.
Description
reduction in the intensity of fibromyalgia pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS). The NPS has a value ranging from 0 to 10 out of a maximum of 10. ) means no pain. 10 means the most severe pain.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
For migraine headache pain.
Description
Reduction of number of headache days/month.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health-related quality of life using Using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five-dimension scale)
Description
Using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five-dimension scale) assessment questionnaire, this questionnaire consists of five questions assessing the mobility, self care, ability to perform daily activity and overall functionality, pain discomfort, and anxiety are all scales that have 5 different answers to choose from consisting of one, to having no problems, to five being unable to. This will be a weekly questionnaire that will be assessed at the end of the study to check for improvements. Values of these assessments are scored, lower values are better.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Visual Analog Score (VAS)
Description
VAS, which is a scale of 0 -100, 100 meaning the best health you can imagine and 0 means the worst health you can imagine. This will be a weekly questionnaire that will be assessed at the end of the study to check for improvements.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Pain Intensity
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain intensity using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Pain Episode Frequency
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain episode frequency using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Pain Episode Duration
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the pain episode duration using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Ability to Fall Asleep
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to fall asleep using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Ability to Stay Asleep
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to stay asleep using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Ability to Work
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to work using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Ability to Excersize
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to excersize using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Ability to Do Chores
Description
Evaluating the percentage change in the ability to do chores using the provided survey. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
For Migraine Headache pain
Description
reduction in the perceived intensity of the headache phase of the migraine episodes. The scale ranges from 0-100%. This is a reported value by the patient which is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Decrease use of analgesics using self-reported survey.
Description
Decrease in use of analgesics from baseline. Medications and doses of analgesics will be documented at baseline, during the study the subjects will document their daily analgesic usage, at the end of the study the analgesic usage will be compared to baseline usage.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Short form McGill pain questionnaire
Description
A survey to analyze the different types of pain using different descriptive (burning, sharp, shooting,...etc). The value ranges from 0-3. 0 means no pain. 3 means severe pain.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Fibromyalgia Impact Questioner
Description
A survey to evaluate the effects of Fibromyalgia. The scale ranges from 0-100. 0 means no impact. 100 means there is a severe negative impact secondary to fibromyalgia. The scale is subjective in nature
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
Description
A survey to evaluate the impact of headache. The value ranges from 36-78 points. 36 indicates no impact from headache. 78 indicates worst possible impact from headache.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Migraine diary
Description
A diary to document the severity of migraine
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
Sleep Quality Assessment
Description
A survey to analyze the quality of sleep. The value range from 0-21. 0 means the best quality of sleep. 21 means the worst quality of asleep. The survey is subjective in nature.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
Title
O'Leary/Sant Voiding and Pain Indices
Description
A subjective survey designed to investigate the impact of voiding on people with interstitial cystitis. The value ranges from 0-21. 0 means no negative impact. 21 means the worst possible impact.
Time Frame
10 - 22 weeks, depending on study arm
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults ages 18 - 80 able to understand English and comply with study protocol
Peripheral neuropathy from HIV or chemotherapy.
History of fibromyalgia
Headaches
Chronic Pain
7-day average numeric pain score of 5/10 or greater at baseline evaluation
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects receiving remuneration for their pain treatment
Subjects that are incarcerated
Subjects unable to read English and complete assessments
Addictive behavior, severe clinical depression, or psychotic features
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mohab Ibrahim, PhD., MD
Phone
(520) 874-7246
Email
mibrahim@anesth.arizona.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Virginia Ellis
Phone
(520) 626-3099
Email
virginiaellis@arizona.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohab Ibrahim, PhD., MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Arizona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Banner University Medical Center South
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85713
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohab Ibrahim, PhD., MD
Phone
520-871-7246
Email
mibrahim@anesth.arizona.edu
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22553896
Citation
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91497/
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24916035
Citation
Hooley JM, Franklin JC, Nock MK. Chronic pain and suicide: understanding the association. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(8):435. doi: 10.1007/s11916-014-0435-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24952608
Citation
Hassett AL, Aquino JK, Ilgen MA. The risk of suicide mortality in chronic pain patients. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(8):436. doi: 10.1007/s11916-014-0436-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10499210
Citation
Smith AA, Friedemann ML. Perceived family dynamics of persons with chronic pain. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Sep;30(3):543-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01123.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25057525
Citation
Gray D, Coon H, McGlade E, Callor WB, Byrd J, Viskochil J, Bakian A, Yurgelun-Todd D, Grey T, McMahon WM. Comparative analysis of suicide, accidental, and undetermined cause of death classification. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Jun;44(3):304-16. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12079.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25557915
Citation
Hwang MH, Shin JH, Kim KS, Yoo CM, Jo GE, Kim JH, Choi H. Low level light therapy modulates inflammatory mediators secreted by human annulus fibrosus cells during intervertebral disc degeneration in vitro. Photochem Photobiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;91(2):403-10. doi: 10.1111/php.12415. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33155057
Citation
Martin L, Porreca F, Mata EI, Salloum M, Goel V, Gunnala P, Killgore WDS, Jain S, Jones-MacFarland FN, Khanna R, Patwardhan A, Ibrahim MM. Green Light Exposure Improves Pain and Quality of Life in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Preliminary One-Way Crossover Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):118-130. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa329.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32903062
Citation
Martin LF, Patwardhan AM, Jain SV, Salloum MM, Freeman J, Khanna R, Gannala P, Goel V, Jones-MacFarland FN, Killgore WD, Porreca F, Ibrahim MM. Evaluation of green light exposure on headache frequency and quality of life in migraine patients: A preliminary one-way cross-over clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):135-147. doi: 10.1177/0333102420956711. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
The Effect of Light Therapy on Chronic Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs