search
Back to results

The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines

Primary Purpose

Impaction of Tooth

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Syrian Arab Republic
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Corticotomy
Traditional withdrawal techniques
Sponsored by
Damascus University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Impaction of Tooth

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - 30 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Palatal or Mid-alveolar impacted canine.
  2. There is no previous orthodontic treatment.
  3. Healthy periodontal tissues and good oral health (i.e., Plaque Index is less or equal to 1 according to Loe and Silness(1963)).
  4. No consumption of any drug that may interfere with the tooth movement (Cortisone, NSAIDs, …).
  5. Mild or no crowding in the upper jaw.
  6. No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any systemic diseases that would affect tooth movement
  2. Antidepressant prevents oral surgery
  3. Any congenital syndromes or cleft lip and palate cases
  4. Bad oral health
  5. Previous orthodontic treatment

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Acceleration

Traditional Traction

Arm Description

The impacted canines will undergo acceleration by corticotomy accompanied with traditional traction techniques.

Traditional traction will be employed in this group of patients with impacted canines. Traditional withdrawal techniques will be used.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Duration of Canine Traction
The time required in days will be calculated from the beginning of canine traction till the end of canine alignment in its place in the dental arch.
Change in Canine Location in the Axial View
The distance between the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the palatal mid-line in the axial view using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Change in Canine Inclination in the Coronal View
The mesiodistal inclination of the impacted canine will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and the mid-sagittal plane in the coronal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Change in the Canine Inclination in the Sagittal View
The labiopalatal inclination of the impacted canine: will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and a line perpendicular to the horizontal plane in the sagittal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Change in the 3D Canine Location
The vertical distance from the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the upper occlusion plane is measured using the 3D volumetric rendered model of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Relation to adjacent teeth
The contact between the impacted canine and the central and/or the lateral incisor will be evaluated by looking at the shortest distance between the impacted canine crown and the adjacent incisors' roots This will be done using sequential axial views on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Change in the Absorption to the adjacent roots
Absorption of adjacent roots will be evaluated as follows: In the axial views: an estimation of root damage will be taken into account and will be combined with an estimation of the vertical root damage using 3D volumetric rendered models and then will be classified into one of the four categories Class I: cementum involvement only and located at the apical third of the root Class II: involvement reaching the dentin but vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class III: involvement reaching the dentin and partially the pulp but still vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class IV: involvement reaching the root pulp and damaging more than one third of the root length vertically.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
September 17, 2018
Last Updated
February 7, 2023
Sponsor
Damascus University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03678805
Brief Title
The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines
Official Title
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Minimally-invasive Surgically-assisted Withdrawal of Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines in Terms of Movement Velocity and Dento-alveolar Changes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 20, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 5, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Damascus University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Impacted canine causes many problems for patients, such as absorption and damages to the adjacent teeth roots, as well as aesthetic problems. Correction of this problem requires a lengthy time. Therefore, many methods have been suggested to accelerate the movement of impacted canines with the help of surgical procedures.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Impaction of Tooth

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Acceleration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The impacted canines will undergo acceleration by corticotomy accompanied with traditional traction techniques.
Arm Title
Traditional Traction
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Traditional traction will be employed in this group of patients with impacted canines. Traditional withdrawal techniques will be used.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Corticotomy
Intervention Description
Perforations in the areas close to the impacted canines will be performed in order to accelerate tooth movement.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Traditional withdrawal techniques
Intervention Description
The impacted canines will be withdrawn using elastic modules.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Canine Traction
Description
The time required in days will be calculated from the beginning of canine traction till the end of canine alignment in its place in the dental arch.
Time Frame
The required time (in days) to achieve complete alignment of the impacted canine will be calculated which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group
Title
Change in Canine Location in the Axial View
Description
The distance between the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the palatal mid-line in the axial view using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Time Frame
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
Title
Change in Canine Inclination in the Coronal View
Description
The mesiodistal inclination of the impacted canine will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and the mid-sagittal plane in the coronal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Time Frame
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
Title
Change in the Canine Inclination in the Sagittal View
Description
The labiopalatal inclination of the impacted canine: will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and a line perpendicular to the horizontal plane in the sagittal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Time Frame
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
Title
Change in the 3D Canine Location
Description
The vertical distance from the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the upper occlusion plane is measured using the 3D volumetric rendered model of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Time Frame
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
Title
Relation to adjacent teeth
Description
The contact between the impacted canine and the central and/or the lateral incisor will be evaluated by looking at the shortest distance between the impacted canine crown and the adjacent incisors' roots This will be done using sequential axial views on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Time Frame
Just one day before the beginning of treatment
Title
Change in the Absorption to the adjacent roots
Description
Absorption of adjacent roots will be evaluated as follows: In the axial views: an estimation of root damage will be taken into account and will be combined with an estimation of the vertical root damage using 3D volumetric rendered models and then will be classified into one of the four categories Class I: cementum involvement only and located at the apical third of the root Class II: involvement reaching the dentin but vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class III: involvement reaching the dentin and partially the pulp but still vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class IV: involvement reaching the root pulp and damaging more than one third of the root length vertically.
Time Frame
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Palatal or Mid-alveolar impacted canine. There is no previous orthodontic treatment. Healthy periodontal tissues and good oral health (i.e., Plaque Index is less or equal to 1 according to Loe and Silness(1963)). No consumption of any drug that may interfere with the tooth movement (Cortisone, NSAIDs, …). Mild or no crowding in the upper jaw. No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions. Exclusion Criteria: Any systemic diseases that would affect tooth movement Antidepressant prevents oral surgery Any congenital syndromes or cleft lip and palate cases Bad oral health Previous orthodontic treatment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mahran Mousa, DDS MSc
Organizational Affiliation
PhD Student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Omar Heshmeh, DDS MSc PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
City
Damascus
ZIP/Postal Code
DM20AM18
Country
Syrian Arab Republic

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17465647
Citation
Fischer TJ. Orthodontic treatment acceleration with corticotomy-assisted exposure of palatally impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2007 May;77(3):417-20. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0417:OTAWCE]2.0.CO;2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25395776
Citation
Sukh R, Singh GP, Tandon P. Interdisciplinary approach for the management of bilaterally impacted maxillary canines. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):539-44. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142828.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24963263
Citation
Shastri D, Nagar A, Tandon P. Alignment of palatally impacted canine with open window technique and modified K-9 spring. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Apr;5(2):272-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.132362.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18524761
Citation
Baccetti T, Leonardi M, Armi P. A randomized clinical study of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):381-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn023. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15529490
Citation
Leonardi M, Armi P, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines: a prospective longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):581-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22105680
Citation
Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J, Dibart S. [Accelerated orthodontic treatment with piezocision: a mini-invasive alternative to conventional corticotomies]. Orthod Fr. 2011 Dec;82(4):311-9. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011142. Epub 2011 Nov 23. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16214621
Citation
Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.033.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23349422
Citation
Smailiene D, Kavaliauskiene A, Pacauskiene I, Zasciurinskiene E, Bjerklin K. Palatally impacted maxillary canines: choice of surgical-orthodontic treatment method does not influence post-treatment periodontal status. A controlled prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):803-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs102. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24987661
Citation
Alqerban A, Jacobs R, van Keirsbilck PJ, Aly M, Swinnen S, Fieuws S, Willems G. The effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction and its impact on the orthodontic treatment outcome. J Orthod Sci. 2014 Apr;3(2):34-40. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.132911.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs