search
Back to results

Care Coordination in Oncology, Quality Among Patients With Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Care coordination tool
Sponsored by
Geisinger Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Lung Cancer focused on measuring Care Coordination, Oncology Care, Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients:

  • Patients who are 18 years of age or older and diagnosed with lung cancer who 1) are scheduled to start Oncology Care (chemo and/or radiation-therapies) OR 2) on active Oncology Care and recently started within 3 weeks (<27 days for experimental arm; <56 days control arm)
  • Receive care at GMC, GWV, or GCMC
  • English-speaking
  • Established/intends to establish a MyGeisinger Account (cases only)

Caregivers:

  • Recognized/intends to be recognized as proxy for patient's MyGeisinger Account (cases only)
  • English-speaking

Providers:

- Any health care provider within Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology at GMC, where care coordination tool is standard of care, who has a patient enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients:

  • Patients who are not diagnosed with lung cancer.
  • Patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer and are on active Oncology Care exceeding 3 weeks (>27 days experimental arm; >56 days control arm).

Providers:

  • Any healthcare provider not within the Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology departments.
  • Any healthcare provider within Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology who does not have a patient enrolled (Case Dyad).

Sites / Locations

  • Geisinger Health System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Care coordination patients, caregivers

Standard of care patients, caregivers

Oncology Care Providers

Arm Description

Patients and caregivers enroll in using care coordination tool during oncology care and treatment.

Patients and caregivers receive oncology care and treatment.

Oncology care providers with patients enrolled in care coordination tool.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient Satisfaction
To evaluate the difference in patient satisfaction associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of satisfaction associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient satisfaction associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in satisfaction perceptions based on role.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Caregiver Satisfaction
To evaluate the difference in caregiver satisfaction associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of satisfaction associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver satisfaction associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in satisfaction perceptions based on role.
Patient Quality of Life
To evaluate the difference in patient quality of life associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of quality of life associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient quality of life associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in quality of life perceptions based on role.
Caregiver Quality of Life
To evaluate the difference in caregiver quality of life associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of quality of life associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver quality of life associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in quality of life perceptions based on role.
Family Centered Care
To evaluate the difference in family centered care associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient and caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of family centered care associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in family centered care associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in family centered care perceptions based on role.
Patient Experience
To evaluate the difference in patient experience associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of experience associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient experience associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in experience perceptions based on role.
Caregiver Burden
To evaluate the difference in caregiver burden associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of burden associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver burden associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver burden associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution.

Full Information

First Posted
September 11, 2018
Last Updated
April 5, 2019
Sponsor
Geisinger Clinic
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03694054
Brief Title
Care Coordination in Oncology, Quality Among Patients With Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers
Official Title
Exploratory Evaluation of Family Caregiver Application (FCA) on Quality Among Persons With Lung Cancer and Their Family Caregivers
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 4, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Geisinger Clinic
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Oncology Care Coordination study is designed to evaluate use of a care coordination tool for lung cancer patients and their caregiver on quality of care and performance outcomes. Eligible patients need to be receiving treatment at Geisinger. Participation in the study involves completion of surveys, permission to review information from the patient's electronic health record, and for some enrollment in the care coordination tool called Harmonized Care. Geisinger oncology care providers who have patients enrolled the study will be invited for interviews.
Detailed Description
The case-matched controlled design, exploratory evaluation study will look at how exposure to a care coordination tool impacts quality and performance indicators associated with oncology care from the perspective of patients, caregivers, and providers. Geisinger research staff will recruit lung cancer patients and their caregivers across three Geisinger locations: Geisinger Medical Center (GMC), Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center (GWV) and Geisinger Community Medical Center (GCMC). GMC will serve as the intervention site and GWV and GCMC as control sites. Eligible participants will be identified by the study staff through the electronic health record as well as through clinical staff and approached in the oncology clinic as part of a schedule office visit and/or treatment. For the purpose of study awareness, informational flyers will be available to patients in the exam rooms, waiting rooms, and through Oncology Care's Multi-Disciplinary clinic. Participants will asked to identify a caregiver who will participate in the study as well, however this is not required. Case dyads enrolled at the intervention site (GMC) will be asked to complete a survey when they join the study and at the end of the study. Participants will also be asked to enroll in the care coordination tool, a health information solution that integrates the patient, caregiver, and clinical data to enhance communication and improve quality of care and performance outcomes. Patients will also be asked to give permission to the study team to access their health information via the e electronic health record. Participants will be in the research study for about 8-10 weeks. Control dyads enrolled at the control site (GWV and GCMC) will be asked to complete a survey eight weeks after consenting to participate. Patients will be asked to give permission to the study team to access their health information via the electronic health record. Participants will be in the research study for about 8-10 weeks. The study will also enroll oncology care providers within the Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology departments at GMC and who have patients enrolled in the study. Providers will be asked to participate in a 30-minute interview to get their feedback and insights on the care coordination tool.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer
Keywords
Care Coordination, Oncology Care, Lung Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
57 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Care coordination patients, caregivers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients and caregivers enroll in using care coordination tool during oncology care and treatment.
Arm Title
Standard of care patients, caregivers
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients and caregivers receive oncology care and treatment.
Arm Title
Oncology Care Providers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Oncology care providers with patients enrolled in care coordination tool.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Care coordination tool
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to enroll in the care coordination tool, a health information technology solution that integrates cross-sector data to enhance communication and improve quality of care and performance outcomes. Patients will also be asked to provide consent to allow the study team to access additional health information via the electronic health record.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Satisfaction
Description
To evaluate the difference in patient satisfaction associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of satisfaction associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient satisfaction associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in satisfaction perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Caregiver Satisfaction
Description
To evaluate the difference in caregiver satisfaction associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of satisfaction associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver satisfaction associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in satisfaction perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Patient Quality of Life
Description
To evaluate the difference in patient quality of life associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of quality of life associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient quality of life associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in quality of life perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Caregiver Quality of Life
Description
To evaluate the difference in caregiver quality of life associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of quality of life associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver quality of life associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in quality of life perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Family Centered Care
Description
To evaluate the difference in family centered care associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient and caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of family centered care associated with FCA exposure. To evaluate the association of the change in family centered care associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in family centered care perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Patient Experience
Description
To evaluate the difference in patient experience associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean patient and caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control patient analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of experience associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in patient experience associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. Within Case Dyads, patient means will be compared with caregiver means to detect difference in experience perceptions based on role.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Caregiver Burden
Description
To evaluate the difference in caregiver burden associated with FCA exposure (Case v. Control) will be evaluated using chi-square test, t-tests and non-parametric univariate tests distribution dependent. Mean caregiver scores will be calculated for each dyad and compared between groups. Sensitivity analyses may stratify by level of FCA use (low-moderate-high) per dyad and opportunity time for FCA exposure. Case to Control caregiver analyses will also be performed to detect role-level differences in perceptions of burden associated with FCA exposure.To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver burden associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution. To evaluate the association of the change in caregiver burden associated with FCA use difference in response between pre- and post- surveys paired t-test or ANCOVA depending on data type and distribution.
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients: Patients who are 18 years of age or older and diagnosed with lung cancer who 1) are scheduled to start Oncology Care (chemo and/or radiation-therapies) OR 2) on active Oncology Care and recently started within 3 weeks (<27 days for experimental arm; <56 days control arm) Receive care at GMC, GWV, or GCMC English-speaking Established/intends to establish a MyGeisinger Account (cases only) Caregivers: Recognized/intends to be recognized as proxy for patient's MyGeisinger Account (cases only) English-speaking Providers: - Any health care provider within Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology at GMC, where care coordination tool is standard of care, who has a patient enrolled. Exclusion Criteria: Patients: Patients who are not diagnosed with lung cancer. Patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer and are on active Oncology Care exceeding 3 weeks (>27 days experimental arm; >56 days control arm). Providers: Any healthcare provider not within the Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology departments. Any healthcare provider within Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology who does not have a patient enrolled (Case Dyad).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Bailey-Davis, DEd, RD
Organizational Affiliation
Geisinger Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Geisinger Health System
City
Danville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17822
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Care Coordination in Oncology, Quality Among Patients With Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs