search
Back to results

A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - PILOTSTUDY (selfBACK)

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Usual care + selfBACK
Sponsored by
University of Southern Denmark
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring Digital Decision Support System, App, Self-management

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Seeking care from primary health-care practice or a specialised outpatient hospital facility (DK) for non-specific LBP within the past 8 weeks
  • LBP of any duration
  • Mild-to severe pain-related disability rated as 16 or below on the PROMIS-PF4 function scale.
  • Age: ≥18 years
  • Own and regularly use a smart phone (with at least Android 7.0 or iOS11.0) with internet access (Wi-Fi and/or mobile data)
  • Have a working email address and have access to a computer with internet access to complete questionnaires in a web browser.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not interested
  • Unable to speak, read or write in the national language (Danish/ Norwegian)
  • Cognitive impairment or learning disabilities
  • Pathology, such as fracture, cancer, inflammatory diseases, and signs of radiculopathy (severe leg pain, loss of leg strength, or loss of or altered sensation in a myotomal or dermatomal distribution)
  • Serious mental illness, such as major depression, schizophrenia, and psychosis
  • Terminal illness
  • Unable to take part in exercise/physical activity (such as non-ambulatory patients, use of walking aids/assistance, unable to get down and up from the floor independently)
  • Fibromyalgia (diagnosed by a Health Care Professional)
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous back surgery
  • Ongoing participation in other research trials for LBP management

Sites / Locations

  • Physical Activity and Health at Work, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark
  • Norwegian University of Science and Techonology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Usual care + selfBACK

Arm Description

Participants will use the selfBACK system and app

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
The primary outcome is the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assessing pain-related disability. The questionnaire includes 24 items asking participants to indicate if they experience functional impairments by answering "yes" or "no" to a series of descriptions of functional abilities with higher scores indicating higher level of disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain intensity
Pain intensity measured as average and worst within the past week. Measured on a 0 - 10 Numerical Rating Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable. Pain duration measures patients' selfreported length of current pain episode. Pain medication measures the frequency of the non-prescription pain medication use for low back pain.
The Fear avoidance Belief Questionnaire
The FABQ is a 5-item questionnaire, where the participants score their beliefs about their LBP on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [completely disagree] to six [completely agree]
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
The questionnaire assesses the participant's level of confidence in carrying out specific activities despite their pain [52, 53]. The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [completely disagree] to six [completely agree].
Activity limitation
Activity Limitation evaluates if LBP has limited work and leisure time activities. The questionnaire consists of two single items with response options "yes" and "no".
Workability
Work Ability is measured by a single-item and rated on an 11-point NRS scale ranging from zero [completely unable to work] to 10 [work ability at its best].
Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale
Participants indicate their amount of time per week performing leisure activities with four levels of intensity ranging from sedentary to vigorous physically active
Patient Specific Functional Scale
Participants rate their function on up to two self-selected activities, are asked to rate if they are unable to do or are having difficulty with the their ability to perform self-selected activities regarded as important by the participants themselves
Sleep
Sleep is assessed by self-report using four items concerning problems with falling asleep, waking up repeatedly, waking up too early, and feeling sleepy during the day.
Perceived Stress Scale
a 10-item questionnaire asking about frequency of thoughts and feelings related to perceived stress
Health-related Quality of Life
The EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire is used to asses quality of life within each of the five dimension (i.e., mobility, self-care, activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression).
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
the questionnaire evaluates the participants' illness perception in an 8-item questionnaire. Items are scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [no problems] to 10 [worst severity].
Patient Health Questionnaire-8
the questionnaire is an 8-item questionnaire used to evaluate the participants' depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale scoring frequency of experiencing symptoms of depression.
Patients Global Perceived effect
a single item question for Patient's Global Perceived Effect will be asked at follow-up, where participants are asked to rate improvement or deterioration of their LBP compared to before the intervention
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
a single item question on whether or not the patient considers their current symptom state as acceptable or not
Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire
The Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire concerns patients' perceived support for autonomy in a virtual care setting.
User ratings
Three rating questions on overall rating, ease of use and recommendation to others scored on a 5-point system

Full Information

First Posted
August 10, 2018
Last Updated
February 27, 2019
Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Collaborators
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark, University of Glasgow, Robert Gordon University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03697759
Brief Title
A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - PILOTSTUDY
Acronym
selfBACK
Official Title
A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - PILOTSTUDY
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 20, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 5, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 17, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Collaborators
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark, University of Glasgow, Robert Gordon University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The pilot study precedes a larger randomized controlled trial, to be starting in February 2019. In this pilot study all participants are allocated to the intervention group. The intervention consists of a digital decision support system delivering a weekly plan of suggested activities that the participant can use to self-manage their low back pain. The plan is presented to the participant in the selfBACK app.
Detailed Description
The selfBACK intervention consists of the selfBACK system, that provides the participants with an individually tailored weekly plan of suggested activities to use in their self-management of low back pain. The SELFBACK system constitutes a data-driven predictive decision support system that uses Case-Based Reasoning methodology to capture and reuse participant cases in order to suggest the most suitable self-management plan for participants. The selfBACK system is an intelligent system that will adjust the suggested self-management plan to the individual participants by using the information available on the participant (baseline questionnaires), weekly self-reported of changes in health status through the app, and data on physical activity via the step-detecting wristband. The weekly plan includes three categories of content; 1) information/education, 2) physical activity monitoring through wearing a step-detecting wristband, and 3) strength and flexibility exercises.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain
Keywords
Digital Decision Support System, App, Self-management

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
This study is a pilot study preceding a randomized controlled trial. In the pilot study all enrolled participants are offered the intervention.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Since there is no randomization, all participants receive the intervention. Consequently, there is no blinding.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
51 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Usual care + selfBACK
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will use the selfBACK system and app
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual care + selfBACK
Other Intervention Name(s)
selfBACK digital decision support system
Intervention Description
The selfBACK intervention is a digital Decision Support System (DSS) for self-management of LBP provided to the participant via a smartphone app (selfBACK app). In addition, the participant is provided with a step-detecting wristband (Xiaomi Mi Band 2) that interacts with the selfBACK app. The DSS provides individually tailored self-management plans including content from three categories; 1) information/education, 2) physical activity monitoring through wearing the step-detecting wristband, and 3) strength and flexibility exercises. The weekly plans are individually tailored to the specific patient, using the data available from the patient, and each week the patients report back their progress on physical activity (step count) and exercise (volume completed). These data are matched with the patients follow-up data to create a self-management plan that is up to date and adaptable to variation in health-status of the individual patient.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Description
The primary outcome is the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assessing pain-related disability. The questionnaire includes 24 items asking participants to indicate if they experience functional impairments by answering "yes" or "no" to a series of descriptions of functional abilities with higher scores indicating higher level of disability.
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensity
Description
Pain intensity measured as average and worst within the past week. Measured on a 0 - 10 Numerical Rating Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable. Pain duration measures patients' selfreported length of current pain episode. Pain medication measures the frequency of the non-prescription pain medication use for low back pain.
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
The Fear avoidance Belief Questionnaire
Description
The FABQ is a 5-item questionnaire, where the participants score their beliefs about their LBP on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [completely disagree] to six [completely agree]
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Description
The questionnaire assesses the participant's level of confidence in carrying out specific activities despite their pain [52, 53]. The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [completely disagree] to six [completely agree].
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Activity limitation
Description
Activity Limitation evaluates if LBP has limited work and leisure time activities. The questionnaire consists of two single items with response options "yes" and "no".
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Workability
Description
Work Ability is measured by a single-item and rated on an 11-point NRS scale ranging from zero [completely unable to work] to 10 [work ability at its best].
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale
Description
Participants indicate their amount of time per week performing leisure activities with four levels of intensity ranging from sedentary to vigorous physically active
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Patient Specific Functional Scale
Description
Participants rate their function on up to two self-selected activities, are asked to rate if they are unable to do or are having difficulty with the their ability to perform self-selected activities regarded as important by the participants themselves
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Sleep
Description
Sleep is assessed by self-report using four items concerning problems with falling asleep, waking up repeatedly, waking up too early, and feeling sleepy during the day.
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Perceived Stress Scale
Description
a 10-item questionnaire asking about frequency of thoughts and feelings related to perceived stress
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Health-related Quality of Life
Description
The EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire is used to asses quality of life within each of the five dimension (i.e., mobility, self-care, activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression).
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
Description
the questionnaire evaluates the participants' illness perception in an 8-item questionnaire. Items are scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero [no problems] to 10 [worst severity].
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Description
the questionnaire is an 8-item questionnaire used to evaluate the participants' depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale scoring frequency of experiencing symptoms of depression.
Time Frame
change from baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Patients Global Perceived effect
Description
a single item question for Patient's Global Perceived Effect will be asked at follow-up, where participants are asked to rate improvement or deterioration of their LBP compared to before the intervention
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Description
a single item question on whether or not the patient considers their current symptom state as acceptable or not
Time Frame
6 weeks.
Title
Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire
Description
The Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire concerns patients' perceived support for autonomy in a virtual care setting.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
User ratings
Description
Three rating questions on overall rating, ease of use and recommendation to others scored on a 5-point system
Time Frame
6 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Tailoring variables
Description
Participants in the intervention are on a weekly basis asked a set of tailoring questions. These are tracked over the intervention period. The tailoring questions include items on pain (NRS for pain intensity), function, fear-avoidance, work ability, sleep, pain self-efficacy, stress, symptoms of depression, and barriers for self-management. Note. not all questions are asked on a weekly basis
Time Frame
Weekly for 6 weeks
Title
Physical activity
Description
The patients' weekly recommended step count goal, and the actual achieved step count per. day
Time Frame
weekly for 6 weeks
Title
Exercise volume
Description
The patients report back their completed exercise volume as number of set and repetitions for their suggested exercises, when they perform them
Time Frame
weekly for 6 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Seeking care from primary health-care practice or a specialised outpatient hospital facility (DK) for non-specific LBP within the past 8 weeks LBP of any duration Mild-to severe pain-related disability rated as 16 or below on the PROMIS-PF4 function scale. Age: ≥18 years Own and regularly use a smart phone (with at least Android 7.0 or iOS11.0) with internet access (Wi-Fi and/or mobile data) Have a working email address and have access to a computer with internet access to complete questionnaires in a web browser. Exclusion Criteria: Not interested Unable to speak, read or write in the national language (Danish/ Norwegian) Cognitive impairment or learning disabilities Pathology, such as fracture, cancer, inflammatory diseases, and signs of radiculopathy (severe leg pain, loss of leg strength, or loss of or altered sensation in a myotomal or dermatomal distribution) Serious mental illness, such as major depression, schizophrenia, and psychosis Terminal illness Unable to take part in exercise/physical activity (such as non-ambulatory patients, use of walking aids/assistance, unable to get down and up from the floor independently) Fibromyalgia (diagnosed by a Health Care Professional) Pregnancy Previous back surgery Ongoing participation in other research trials for LBP management
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Søgaard, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Southern Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Physical Activity and Health at Work, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5230
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Norwegian University of Science and Techonology
City
Trondheim
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
Bach K, Szczepanski T, Aamodt A, Gundersen OE, Mork. PJ. Case Representation and Similarity Assessment in the selfBACK Decision Support System ICCBR 2016: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development pp 32-46
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32489674
Citation
Sandal LF, Overas CK, Nordstoga AL, Wood K, Bach K, Hartvigsen J, Sogaard K, Mork PJ. A digital decision support system (selfBACK) for improved self-management of low back pain: a pilot study with 6-week follow-up. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 23;6:72. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00604-2. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.selfback.eu
Description
project webpage

Learn more about this trial

A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - PILOTSTUDY

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs