search
Back to results

Efficacy and Analgesic Use During the Therapy of Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Using Pleuralvent™ and Chest Tube (ASPIRATE)

Primary Purpose

Pneumothorax

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pleuralvent™
Chest tube
Sponsored by
University Hospital Olomouc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pneumothorax focused on measuring Pneumothorax, Iatrogenic, Chest tube, Pleuralvent

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Iatrogenic pneumothorax indicated for invasive therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic analgesic therapy
  • Contraindications for Pleuralvent™ use
  • Non-compliance of patients
  • Clinically significant hepatopathy (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 times normal values)
  • Clinically significant renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration < 0.5 ml/kg/min)
  • Allergy to metamizole/tramadol

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital OlomoucRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Pleuralvent™

Chest tube

Arm Description

Patients treated with Pleuralvent™ device

Patients treated with Chest tube

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Treatment efficiency
Condition with no need for further therapy modes defined as a absence of pneumothorax on chest X-ray

Secondary Outcome Measures

Analgesic use
Comparison of analgesic use in groups - with Pleuralvent™ or large bore chest tube therapy
The time to lung re-expansion
The treatment duration needed to lung re-expansion
Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale
Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (scale 0-10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 excruciating pain)

Full Information

First Posted
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital Olomouc
Collaborators
Thomayer University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03700554
Brief Title
Efficacy and Analgesic Use During the Therapy of Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Using Pleuralvent™ and Chest Tube
Acronym
ASPIRATE
Official Title
ASPIRATE Study- Comparison of Efficacy and Analgesic Use During the Therapy of Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Using Pleuralvent™ and Large Bore Chest Tube (16F)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 3, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital Olomouc
Collaborators
Thomayer University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficiency and analgesic use in the therapy of iatrogenic Pneumothorax when using the Pleuralvent™ system in comparison with large bore chest tubes (catheter 16F).
Detailed Description
Rationale: Pneumothorax is a common, usually invasively treated, disorder. The usual methods of treatment are needle aspiration (14-16 G needles) or chest drainage (16+ F catheters). A third therapeutic option is the use of small calibre catheters (< 16F). According to some studies, the success rates of these methods are comparable. These catheters have the same success rate as large bore chest tubes and treatment with them is less painful for patients. The use of Heimlich valves allows for increased patient mobility - or even out-patient treatment. According to a review by the European Respiratory Society, nowadays there is an availability of systems which are part of advanced intervention techniques. These devices are designed for ease of insertion allowing for the full mobility of patients. It is, however, not clear whether treatment with these new systems is less painful. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficiency and analgesic use in the therapy of iatrogenic Pneumothorax when using the Pleuralvent™ system in comparison with large bore chest tubes (catheter 16F). Process: Following the completion of the initial screening (fulfilling of both inclusion and exclusion criteria) and the signing of informed consent, a patient with iatrogenic pneumothorax (PNO) will be treated with, according to randomisation, either the Pleuralvent™ system or with a large bore chest tube - 16F. A control chest X-ray will be performed immediately after the introduction of the therapeutic method and following 3 days of therapy. If no signs of PNO are present, the therapy will be terminated. In cases where the lung will not be completely expanded, the control X-ray will be repeated on the 5th, 7th and 10th day of therapy. If, following this, the PNO will persist without resolution, the therapy will be declared non-effective and other therapy modes will be used (conversion to large bore chest drainage in the Pleuralvent™group and surgical treatment in the chest drainage group).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pneumothorax
Keywords
Pneumothorax, Iatrogenic, Chest tube, Pleuralvent

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomised, non-blinded, actively controlled clinical trial.
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
Method of closed envelopes
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
126 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pleuralvent™
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients treated with Pleuralvent™ device
Arm Title
Chest tube
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients treated with Chest tube
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Pleuralvent™
Intervention Description
Pneumothorax treatment with Pleuralvent™ device (Heimlich valve device)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chest tube
Intervention Description
Chest tube insertion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment efficiency
Description
Condition with no need for further therapy modes defined as a absence of pneumothorax on chest X-ray
Time Frame
up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Analgesic use
Description
Comparison of analgesic use in groups - with Pleuralvent™ or large bore chest tube therapy
Time Frame
up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated
Title
The time to lung re-expansion
Description
The treatment duration needed to lung re-expansion
Time Frame
up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated
Title
Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale
Description
Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (scale 0-10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 excruciating pain)
Time Frame
up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Iatrogenic pneumothorax indicated for invasive therapy Exclusion Criteria: Chronic analgesic therapy Contraindications for Pleuralvent™ use Non-compliance of patients Clinically significant hepatopathy (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 times normal values) Clinically significant renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration < 0.5 ml/kg/min) Allergy to metamizole/tramadol
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Milan Sova, MD, Ph.D.
Phone
+420588445326
Email
milan.sova@fnol.cz
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Milan Sova, MD, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Olomouc
City
Olomouc
Country
Czechia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Milan Sova, MD.,

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Raw data will be available upon legitimate request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will be available after completion of the study
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Upon request
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20696690
Citation
MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii18-31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136986. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17167009
Citation
Horsley A, Jones L, White J, Henry M. Efficacy and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1857-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1857.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21326805
Citation
Funaki B. Pneumothorax treated by small-bore chest tube. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jun;24(2):272-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-980051. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14656251
Citation
Vedam H, Barnes DJ. Comparison of large- and small-bore intercostal catheters in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Intern Med J. 2003 Nov;33(11):495-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00467.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12407390
Citation
Akowuah E, Ho EC, George R, Brennan K, Tennant S, Braidley P, Cooper G. Less pain with flexible fluted silicone chest drains than with conventional rigid chest tubes after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Nov;124(5):1027-8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.125641. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27246597
Citation
Bhatnagar R, Corcoran JP, Maldonado F, Feller-Kopman D, Janssen J, Astoul P, Rahman NM. Advanced medical interventions in pleural disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):199-213. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0020-2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32153301
Citation
Sova M, Poruba M, Genzor S, Jakubec P, Zatloukal J, Kolek V, Urbanek K, Vasakova M, Stehlik L, Zackova P, Asswad AG. Efficacy and analgesic use during the therapy of iatrogenic pneumothorax using Pleuralvent and Chest Tube (ASPIRATE): A randomised controlled trial protocol. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2020 Jun;164(2):213-215. doi: 10.5507/bp.2020.008. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Analgesic Use During the Therapy of Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Using Pleuralvent™ and Chest Tube

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs