Exoskeleton-assisted Training to Accelerate Walking Recovery Early After Stroke: the TARGET Phase II Study (TARGET)
Primary Purpose
Stroke, Paresis, Gait, Hemiplegic
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exoskeleton-assisted gait training
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, rehabilitation, robotics
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- First-ever, MRI- or CT-confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic, anterior circulation stroke
- Age: 18 - 90 years
- Baseline assessments within the first 14 days after stroke onset
- Unable to walk independently at baseline (FAC <3)
- Moderate to severe weakness of the lower limb at baseline (MI </=75)
- Pre-morbid independence in activities of daily living (mRS </=2) and gait (FAC >3)
- Able to communicate and comprehend
- Sufficient motivation to participate
- Provided a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- No other neurological condition affecting motor functions of the lower limbs
- Pre-existing musculoskeletal impairment severely affecting the gait pattern
- Body weight > 100 kg
- Severe spasticity or contractures that prevent safe use of the exoskeleton
- Medically unstable to participate in additional therapy sessions
Sites / Locations
- GZA Ziekenhuis - campus St Augustinus & Campus St Vincentius
- Antwerp University Hospital
- RevArte Rehabilitation Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Early Experimental Group
Delayed Experimental Group
Arm Description
N = 20 Intervention = 1-hour sessions of exoskeleton-assisted gait training, using the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, CA, USA) in addition to standard care Frequency = 4 times per week for 4 weeks, provided within the first 6 weeks post-stroke
N = 20 Intervention = 1-hour sessions of exoskeleton-assisted gait training, using the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, CA, USA) in addition to standard care Frequency = 4 times per week for 4 weeks, provided between week 8 and week 12 post-stroke
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change on the Fugl Meyer motor assessment - subscale lower extremity (FM-LE)
This scale measures the level of of volitional, selective control of muscles of the paretic lower limb.
Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no reflex activity) to 34 (volitional movement out of synergies).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Trunk Control Test - item sitting balance
Sitting balance is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients at baseline.
Scoring: 0 - 1 (able to sit independently without support of the legs or trunk 30 seconds)
Motricity Index - subscale lower extremity (MI-LE)
Strength of major muscle groups of the paretic lower limb is assessed. At baseline this is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients.
Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no muscle activity) to 99 (normal strength over full range of motion in hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle dorsiflexors).
Berg Balance Scale - item standing unsupported
This item of the BBS indicates the ability to stand independently and therefore reflects the process of functional walking recovery within the first 6 months post-stroke.
Scoring: This scale includes 5 levels (0-4), ranging from "unable to stand 30 seconds unassisted" (0) to "able to stand safely 2 minutes" (5).
Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)
This scale indicates the ability to walk independently and therefore reflects the process of functional walking recovery within the first 6 months post-stroke.
Scoring: This scale includes 6 levels (0-5), ranging from "nonfunctional ambulation" (0) to "ambulate independently, on level and non-level surfaces including stairs and inclines" (5).
Kinetic analyses of standing balance & gait
Dual-force plate measurements are able to indicate the adopted control strategies for standing balance and walking. These analyses are used to distinguish between behavioral restitution and the use of compensation strategies.
EMG analyses of standing balance & gait
EMG analyses will be performed to gain insights in the muscle recruitment of patients during standing and walking. These analyses are used to distinguish between behavioral restitution and the use of compensation strategies.
Spatio-temporal analyses of gait
Assessing comfortable (self-selected) speed and spatial/temporal symmetry of gait over a short distance.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03727919
First Posted
October 24, 2018
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Sponsor
Universiteit Antwerpen
Collaborators
University Hospital, Antwerp
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03727919
Brief Title
Exoskeleton-assisted Training to Accelerate Walking Recovery Early After Stroke: the TARGET Phase II Study
Acronym
TARGET
Official Title
A Temporal Analysis of the Robustness of Hemiplegic Gait and Standing Balance Early After sTroke - the TARGET Research Project
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 7, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 7, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universiteit Antwerpen
Collaborators
University Hospital, Antwerp
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Phase II: Investigating the effects of additional robot-assisted gait training either initiated early (2 weeks post-stroke) or delayed (8 weeks post-stroke) after stroke onset.
Detailed Description
GENERAL:
Pre-clinical research has pointed towards a time window of enhanced responsiveness to therapy early after stroke. For example, training has led to substantial recovery if initiated 5 or 14, but not 30 days post-stroke in a rodent model (Biernaski 2004). It is suggested that this early period is characterized by heightened levels of plasticity and that training can exploit this leading to improved outcome. The typically observed non-linear recovery pattern in stroke survivors (Kwakkel 2004) might suggest that similar mechanisms are induced in the human brain, however clinical research on this is disappointingly sparse.
In two closely inter-related phases, we aim to examine the biomechanical changes related to walking recovery in general (Phase I) and the specific effects of robot-assisted training (Phase II). By that, we aim to detect a time window in stroke survivors which resembles the same characteristics as observed in animal models. To initiate gait training at an early stage, when patients usually present severe weakness and balance deficits, a mobile exoskeleton is used which is developed to provide intensive walking practice.
OBJECTIVES:
(II.a) Are stroke survivors who train with the assistance of a robot at an early stage more likely to achieve independent walking?
(II.b) Does additional robot-assisted training modulate the recovery of standing and walking ability by enhancing behavioral restitution?
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Paresis, Gait, Hemiplegic
Keywords
stroke, rehabilitation, robotics
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the "early group" or "delayed group". Both groups will be provided a dose- and content-controlled intervention in addition to usual care. The early group will receive this intervention at approximately 2 weeks post-stroke and the delayed group at 8 weeks post-stroke. As such, this study is explicitly designed to investigate the effects of time to initiate rehabilitation on recovery outcomes.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
A blinded assessor will be allocated to a certain participant when she/he was succesfully enrolled. This means that the same assessor will perform the clinical assessments (i.e., FAC, 10-m Walk Test, FM, MI) at the different measurement occasions for this participant to avoid inter-assessor variability effects on longitudinal recovery trajectories.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
19 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Early Experimental Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
N = 20 Intervention = 1-hour sessions of exoskeleton-assisted gait training, using the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, CA, USA) in addition to standard care Frequency = 4 times per week for 4 weeks, provided within the first 6 weeks post-stroke
Arm Title
Delayed Experimental Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
N = 20 Intervention = 1-hour sessions of exoskeleton-assisted gait training, using the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, CA, USA) in addition to standard care Frequency = 4 times per week for 4 weeks, provided between week 8 and week 12 post-stroke
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exoskeleton-assisted gait training
Intervention Description
In the experimental groups, participants are provided with 1-hour sessions of gait training with robot assistance, 4 times per week for 4 weeks. Assistance is provided by the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, Richmond, CA, USA), an exoskeleton consisting of fitted metal braces that supports the legs, feet, and trunk of the patient. Powered motors drive knee and hip joints in the sagittal plane to assist during standing up and walking over level surfaces. Steps are initiated if an active weight-shift towards the stance leg is performed by the patient. The provided assistance in stance and swing is adaptable to the patient's ability and can be adjusted for each leg separately.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change on the Fugl Meyer motor assessment - subscale lower extremity (FM-LE)
Description
This scale measures the level of of volitional, selective control of muscles of the paretic lower limb.
Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no reflex activity) to 34 (volitional movement out of synergies).
Time Frame
Longitudinal change is determined between the following time points: Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Trunk Control Test - item sitting balance
Description
Sitting balance is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients at baseline.
Scoring: 0 - 1 (able to sit independently without support of the legs or trunk 30 seconds)
Time Frame
Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke)
Title
Motricity Index - subscale lower extremity (MI-LE)
Description
Strength of major muscle groups of the paretic lower limb is assessed. At baseline this is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients.
Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no muscle activity) to 99 (normal strength over full range of motion in hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle dorsiflexors).
Time Frame
Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Title
Berg Balance Scale - item standing unsupported
Description
This item of the BBS indicates the ability to stand independently and therefore reflects the process of functional walking recovery within the first 6 months post-stroke.
Scoring: This scale includes 5 levels (0-4), ranging from "unable to stand 30 seconds unassisted" (0) to "able to stand safely 2 minutes" (5).
Time Frame
Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Title
Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)
Description
This scale indicates the ability to walk independently and therefore reflects the process of functional walking recovery within the first 6 months post-stroke.
Scoring: This scale includes 6 levels (0-5), ranging from "nonfunctional ambulation" (0) to "ambulate independently, on level and non-level surfaces including stairs and inclines" (5).
Time Frame
Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Title
Kinetic analyses of standing balance & gait
Description
Dual-force plate measurements are able to indicate the adopted control strategies for standing balance and walking. These analyses are used to distinguish between behavioral restitution and the use of compensation strategies.
Time Frame
3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Title
EMG analyses of standing balance & gait
Description
EMG analyses will be performed to gain insights in the muscle recruitment of patients during standing and walking. These analyses are used to distinguish between behavioral restitution and the use of compensation strategies.
Time Frame
3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke
Title
Spatio-temporal analyses of gait
Description
Assessing comfortable (self-selected) speed and spatial/temporal symmetry of gait over a short distance.
Time Frame
3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
First-ever, MRI- or CT-confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic, anterior circulation stroke
Age: 18 - 90 years
Baseline assessments within the first 14 days after stroke onset
Unable to walk independently at baseline (FAC <3)
Moderate to severe weakness of the lower limb at baseline (MI </=75)
Pre-morbid independence in activities of daily living (mRS </=2) and gait (FAC >3)
Able to communicate and comprehend
Sufficient motivation to participate
Provided a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
No other neurological condition affecting motor functions of the lower limbs
Pre-existing musculoskeletal impairment severely affecting the gait pattern
Body weight > 100 kg
Severe spasticity or contractures that prevent safe use of the exoskeleton
Medically unstable to participate in additional therapy sessions
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonas Schröder, PhD Student
Organizational Affiliation
Dept. Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wim Saeys, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Dept. Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steven Truijen, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Dept. Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GZA Ziekenhuis - campus St Augustinus & Campus St Vincentius
City
Wilrijk
State/Province
Antwerp
ZIP/Postal Code
2610
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Antwerp University Hospital
City
Antwerp
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
RevArte Rehabilitation Hospital
City
Antwerp
Country
Belgium
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Exoskeleton-assisted Training to Accelerate Walking Recovery Early After Stroke: the TARGET Phase II Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs