search
Back to results

Transcranial Electrostimulation and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery

Primary Purpose

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES)
Sponsored by
Stanford University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Transcranial Electrical Stimulation focused on measuring electrical stimulation, electric anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, presenting for PPP and MMA surgeries. All patients will be American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status II-III. The subjects should understand informed consent and study instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a known or suspected genetic susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia, or known sensitivity to Sevoflurane, an inhaled anesthetic agent.
  2. Pregnant patients.
  3. Patients who are unable to understand the questionnaires or the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, or to keep home diaries.
  4. Patients with clinically-significant psychological disorders, psychiatric illness or treatment.
  5. Alcohol and drug-abusing patients.
  6. Patients with the history of seizures.
  7. Patients with the documented or suspected organic brain or psychiatric disease, in particular with the history of hallucinations and delusions.
  8. Patients with history of significant eye disease, or head or eye injury, which led to alteration of the cranial anatomy or metallic intracranial implants.
  9. Patients with the history of significant surgery of the head and/or eye.
  10. Patients with skin lesions and/or defects over the areas where TES electrodes will be applied.
  11. Patients with implanted medical devices, including cardiac pacemakers.
  12. Patients who participate in other research protocols that may interfere with the study outcomes and objectives.
  13. Other patients that may be excluded by the investigator, based on medical history and physical examination.

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford Univeristy Medical CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

TES 60 Hz DC:AC

TES 100 Hz DC:AC

TES with DC current

Arm Description

Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC, 60 Hz) current

Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC, 100 Hz) current

Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with direct current (DC) only

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Opioid requirements during first postoperative TES session
IV morphine milligram equivalents
Pain scores during first postoperative TES session
VAS pain scores (Pain measured using 11-point visual analog scale 0-10, 0 no pain, 10 worst pain imaginable).
Postoperative opioid consumption during recovery room stay
IV morphine milligram equivalents
Postoperative pain scores during recovery room stay
VAS pain scores

Secondary Outcome Measures

Postoperative opioid consumption during hospital stay
PO morphine milligram equivalents
Post-discharge postoperative opioid consumption
PO morphine milligram equivalents
Time to start of soft diet
Time to return to daily activities
Time to return to work
Change from baseline in QoR15 score (Quality of Recovery 15-question score)
Validated multidimensional questionnaire assessing recovery profile. Each scale is scored from 0-10, overall score from 0 to 150. The higher scores indicate better recovery.

Full Information

First Posted
November 5, 2018
Last Updated
April 23, 2023
Sponsor
Stanford University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03735004
Brief Title
Transcranial Electrostimulation and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery
Official Title
The Effects of Transcranial Electrostimulation (TES) on Postoperative Pain and Functional Patient Outcomes After Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 18, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Stanford University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Postoperative pain after major surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), such as palatopharyngoplasty (PPP) and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is moderate-to-severe, and may persist for weeks. Control of this pain may be difficult, because OSA patients are very sensitive to traditional opioid pain medications, and their side effects. Poorly controlled pain slows down patients' recovery after surgery, including a return to normal daily activities and work, and may also delay wound healing. This study will investigate whether pain relief and recovery after surgery may be improved with the application of a weak electrical current to the skin of the patient's head (transcranial electrostimulation, TES). The TES works by blocking pain in the central nervous system through multiple mechanisms, which result in non-pharmacological pain relief, without drug-associated side effects.
Detailed Description
The incidence and severity of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major airway surgery for OSA, such as palatopharyngoplasty (PPP) and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is high, and may persist for days, significantly contributing to patient's morbidity. High doses of intravenous and oral opioids are frequently required to achieve adequate pain relief. Yet, the increased sensitivity of OSA patients to opioid analgesics, and associated high risk of postoperative respiratory depression and upper airway obstruction limit the traditional therapeutic options, frequently making pain control after PPP and MMA surgery suboptimal. The effect of significant postoperative pain on surgical outcomes is multifold. Poorly controlled post-surgical pain increases patient morbidity, impairs wound healing, and negatively affects patient recovery and functional outcomes, such as ambulation, a resumption of a normal oral intake, a return to normal daily activities, a return to work, and others. Side effects of opioid medications, such as urinary retention, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and itching may further adversely affect recovery and cause patient dissatisfaction with the surgical procedure. The development of the new, effective analgesic modalities, is therefore highly desirable for OSA surgical patients, and particularly those undergoing PPP and MMA surgeries. Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that employs administration of a weak electrical current (≤ 5 mA) through the electrodes positioned on the skin of the patient's head. TES is a safe procedure, with a low risk of associated, minor side effects It is widely believed that TES with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC) current (TES DC:AC) triggers the release of endogenous opioids and other central neurotransmitters (e.g. norepinephrine) that interrupt nociceptive processing. The investigator's previous studies have demonstrated that TES DC:AC produces quickly evolving, effective non-pharmacological analgesia, without associated respiratory depression or other opioid-induced side effects. If analgesic effect of TES can be demonstrated in this study, the TES may become an attractive adjunct for postoperative analgesic treatment for OSA patients, allowing for improved quality of analgesia and enhanced recovery. Moreover, demonstrating TES analgesic effect may facilitate its widespread use as a non-pharmacological analgesic adjunct postoperatively, especially in elderly patients, who have a high incidence of associated OSA and sensitivity to systemic opioids. The incidence of OSA in general surgical population reaches over 20%.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Keywords
electrical stimulation, electric anesthesia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TES 60 Hz DC:AC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC, 60 Hz) current
Arm Title
TES 100 Hz DC:AC
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC, 100 Hz) current
Arm Title
TES with DC current
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with direct current (DC) only
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES)
Intervention Description
Transcranial electrostimulation (TES) with combined direct (DC) and alternating (AC) current, or TES with DC only will be administered through the skin electrodes positioned on the patient's head
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Opioid requirements during first postoperative TES session
Description
IV morphine milligram equivalents
Time Frame
Recorded during a 20 min TES session administered for first moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in the recovery room
Title
Pain scores during first postoperative TES session
Description
VAS pain scores (Pain measured using 11-point visual analog scale 0-10, 0 no pain, 10 worst pain imaginable).
Time Frame
Recorded during a 20 min TES session administered for first moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in the recovery room
Title
Postoperative opioid consumption during recovery room stay
Description
IV morphine milligram equivalents
Time Frame
Through the recovery room stay, on average 2.5 hours
Title
Postoperative pain scores during recovery room stay
Description
VAS pain scores
Time Frame
Through the recovery room stay, on average 2.5 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Postoperative opioid consumption during hospital stay
Description
PO morphine milligram equivalents
Time Frame
From "floor ready" until hospital discharge, on average 2 days
Title
Post-discharge postoperative opioid consumption
Description
PO morphine milligram equivalents
Time Frame
From hospital discharge to up to 4 weeks postoperatively
Title
Time to start of soft diet
Time Frame
Day of surgery to starting a soft diet (up to 7 days)
Title
Time to return to daily activities
Time Frame
Day of surgery to return to daily activities (up to 10 days)
Title
Time to return to work
Time Frame
From the day of surgery to return to work (up to 21 days)
Title
Change from baseline in QoR15 score (Quality of Recovery 15-question score)
Description
Validated multidimensional questionnaire assessing recovery profile. Each scale is scored from 0-10, overall score from 0 to 150. The higher scores indicate better recovery.
Time Frame
Baseline (before surgery) to postoperative week 4.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, presenting for PPP and MMA surgeries. All patients will be American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status II-III. The subjects should understand informed consent and study instructions. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a known or suspected genetic susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia, or known sensitivity to Sevoflurane, an inhaled anesthetic agent. Pregnant patients. Patients who are unable to understand the questionnaires or the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, or to keep home diaries. Patients with clinically-significant psychological disorders, psychiatric illness or treatment. Alcohol and drug-abusing patients. Patients with the history of seizures. Patients with the documented or suspected organic brain or psychiatric disease, in particular with the history of hallucinations and delusions. Patients with history of significant eye disease, or head or eye injury, which led to alteration of the cranial anatomy or metallic intracranial implants. Patients with the history of significant surgery of the head and/or eye. Patients with skin lesions and/or defects over the areas where TES electrodes will be applied. Patients with implanted medical devices, including cardiac pacemakers. Patients who participate in other research protocols that may interfere with the study outcomes and objectives. Other patients that may be excluded by the investigator, based on medical history and physical examination.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vladimir Nekhendzy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford Univeristy Medical Center
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vladimir Nekhendzy, MD
Phone
650-498-4055
Email
nek@stanford.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Transcranial Electrostimulation and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs