search
Back to results

The PrEliMS Feasibility Trial (PrEliMS)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MS Nurse Support
Peer Support
Sponsored by
University of Nottingham
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring Diagnosis, Emotional support, Peer support

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be eligible to join the trial if they:

  • are 18 years or over
  • have recently received a diagnosis of MS (any type of MS) or currently going through MS diagnosis process)
  • can communicate in English
  • able and willing to give consent
  • not receiving psychological intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they:

  • have a severe co-morbid psychiatric condition (e.g. dementia), as reported by patients or their carers or confirmed by the clinical team making the initial approach
  • are currently receiving psychological interventions or received this within the last three months (we will not exclude those on medication for their mood problems but will record this information).
  • do not have mental capacity to consent to take part in the trial
  • are unable to communicate in English

Sites / Locations

  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1 (Usual care)

Group 2 (Usual care plus Support 1)

Group 3 (Usual care plus Support 2)

Arm Description

Receives usual care only.

Receives usual care plus Support 1 (MS Nurse Support) which includes one one-to-one, face-to-face session with an MS Nurse Specialist in a hospital setting (or via Skype). The session will include answering newly diagnosed patients' questions about MS, providing psychoeducation and teaching Acceptance and Commitment strategies (Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, 1999), and referring to other services (based on needs). Participants will also be given a self-help workbook ('Better living with a diagnosis of MS: Patient Workbook') by the nurses. This session will take place within 2 weeks of diagnosis and last up to 90 minutes. It will be supplemented by phone calls (depending on participant needs). MS Nurses will receive training and on-going supervision from experienced clinical psychologists.

Receives usual care plus Support 2 (i.e. MS Nurse Support plus Peer Support). In addition to receiving the MS Nurse Support (i.e. Support 1, as described in Group 2), this group will also receive peer support which will be provided by Peer Support Workers who are patients/carers with lived experience and who are recruited and trained to deliver peer support under supervision from experienced clinical psychologists. It will be delivered one-to-one, face-to-face (in a community setting or via Skype, based on participants' preferences). Patients in this group will be triaged to a Peer Support Worker by the MS Nurse during the 2-week MS Nurse Support session. The sessions will be scheduled to a convenient time between weeks 2-6 after diagnosis and each session will last up to 60 minutes.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of trial procedures
[Note: As feasibility studies are used to estimate important parameters to inform the design of a full trial (NIHR, 2018), we outline the key outcomes related to feasibility. These are described below. Please see Outcome 1-15.] Feasibility of trial procedures will be assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data from participants and service providers (i.e., questions about the research process/procedures, and suggested changes to the study).
Acceptability of trial procedures
Assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data from participants and service providers on the trial procedures.
Feasibility of randomisation protocol
Assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data on randomisation protocol and willingness and acceptance of patients to be randomised.
Feasibility of recruitment
Number of those eligible who expressed interest/discussed with researcher, number of consenting/randomised patients, reasons for non-participation, retention rates, feedback interview (qualitative) data.
Estimating sample size needed for a Phase III RCT
Sample size calculated through effect sizes from ANOVAs, standard deviations and attrition rates.
Appropriateness of measures
Completion rates of outcome measures, number of missing online and postal data, estimates of time (minutes) taken to complete measures (from online/phone data or feedback interview data).
Feasibility of self-report data collection
Number of missing online and postal data
Feasibility of audio recording support sessions
Number of participants consenting to audio recording of sessions and feedback interview data
Acceptability of interventions (Support 1 and Support 2)
Drop-out rates (and reasons for withdrawal), number of Support 1 and Support 2 sessions completed, feedback interview data.
Feasibility of delivering Support 1 intervention
Number of missed and rescheduled sessions, length of sessions (minutes), operational issues in delivering intervention through feedback interview data.
Feasibility of delivering Support 2 intervention
Number of missed and rescheduled sessions, length of sessions (minutes), operational issues in delivering intervention through feedback interview data.
Credibility of interventions
Assessed through qualitative feedback interview data (i.e., questions about the content of the intervention, changes experienced).
Fidelity of intervention
Fidelity rating on audio data from a sample of support sessions against criteria for PrEliMS model consistency.
Documentation of usual care
Data obtained through service use questionnaire and feedback interviews.
Feasibility of collecting data for an economic evaluation using a bespoke service use questionnaire
Number of missing or clearly invalid service use questionnaire data, completion rates, exploration of possible ceiling effects, feedback interview (qualitative) data.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
September 21, 2018
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Sponsor
University of Nottingham
Collaborators
Multiple Sclerosis Society UK, Swansea University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03735056
Brief Title
The PrEliMS Feasibility Trial
Acronym
PrEliMS
Official Title
Providing Emotional Support Around the Point of Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis (PrEliMS): A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 30, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Nottingham
Collaborators
Multiple Sclerosis Society UK, Swansea University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The PrEliMS study is a mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial of a point of diagnosis intervention programme which aims to provide emotional support for newly diagnosed people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This feasibility study will enable us to plan for a definitive trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of this point of diagnosis intervention programme. The aim is to assess the feasibility of the trial procedures and intervention, and to evaluate the key feasibility parameters before proceeding to a definitive trial. Participants (N=60) will be randomised into three groups: (1) usual care; (2) usual care + Support 1 (MS Nurse Support); (2) usual care + Support 2 (MS Nurse Support plus Peer Support).
Detailed Description
Potential participants will be people who have been recently diagnosed with MS (or currently going through diagnosis process), and who are aged 18 years or over, recruited through MS clinics. Participants, after consent, will complete baseline measures before being randomised into to one of three groups: (1) usual care; (2) usual care + Support 1 (MS Nurse Support); (2) usual care + Support 2 (MS Nurse Support plus Peer Support). Group 1 (20 patients) will not receive any intervention. Group 2 (20 patients) will receive Support 1 which will include one face-to-face support session delivered by an MS Nurse. Group 3 (20 patients) will receive Support 2 which includes MS Nurse Support (i.e., Support 1) plus Peer Support. Peer Support will include a minimum of two peer support session delivered by Peer Support Workers (i.e. patients with lived experiences). All groups will receive usual care. The outcome measures will be collected at 3 and 6 months after randomisation by all participants. Feedback interviews with up to 21 participants (7 from each group) and up to 10 service providers (5 MS Nurses who delivered the MS Nurse Support and 5 Peer Support Workers who delivered the Peer Support) will be conducted to assess what parts of the intervention were helpful or unhelpful, the acceptability of randomisation and trial procedures, and the appropriateness of the measures used.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
Diagnosis, Emotional support, Peer support

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1 (Usual care)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Receives usual care only.
Arm Title
Group 2 (Usual care plus Support 1)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receives usual care plus Support 1 (MS Nurse Support) which includes one one-to-one, face-to-face session with an MS Nurse Specialist in a hospital setting (or via Skype). The session will include answering newly diagnosed patients' questions about MS, providing psychoeducation and teaching Acceptance and Commitment strategies (Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, 1999), and referring to other services (based on needs). Participants will also be given a self-help workbook ('Better living with a diagnosis of MS: Patient Workbook') by the nurses. This session will take place within 2 weeks of diagnosis and last up to 90 minutes. It will be supplemented by phone calls (depending on participant needs). MS Nurses will receive training and on-going supervision from experienced clinical psychologists.
Arm Title
Group 3 (Usual care plus Support 2)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receives usual care plus Support 2 (i.e. MS Nurse Support plus Peer Support). In addition to receiving the MS Nurse Support (i.e. Support 1, as described in Group 2), this group will also receive peer support which will be provided by Peer Support Workers who are patients/carers with lived experience and who are recruited and trained to deliver peer support under supervision from experienced clinical psychologists. It will be delivered one-to-one, face-to-face (in a community setting or via Skype, based on participants' preferences). Patients in this group will be triaged to a Peer Support Worker by the MS Nurse during the 2-week MS Nurse Support session. The sessions will be scheduled to a convenient time between weeks 2-6 after diagnosis and each session will last up to 60 minutes.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
MS Nurse Support
Intervention Description
MS Nurse Support intervention is multi-faceted, involving various components (i.e. information provision and emotional support), and a range of strategies and techniques (e.g. psychoeducation, acceptance and commitment), delivered by MS Nurse Specialists, to provide standardised support and advice to patients at diagnosis, to establish and sustain coping strategies. MS Nurse Support intervention is person-centred and tailored to the needs and lifestyle of each participant.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Peer Support
Intervention Description
Peer Support will be delivered by Peer Support Workers using information provision and supportive listening to provide support and advice to patients at diagnosis, and to provide patients the opportunity to talk freely, extensively and confidentially about their experiences, thoughts and feelings about MS diagnosis and its effects on their lives in a non-judgmental and safe environment. Peer Support intervention is person-centred and tailored to the needs and lifestyle of each participant.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of trial procedures
Description
[Note: As feasibility studies are used to estimate important parameters to inform the design of a full trial (NIHR, 2018), we outline the key outcomes related to feasibility. These are described below. Please see Outcome 1-15.] Feasibility of trial procedures will be assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data from participants and service providers (i.e., questions about the research process/procedures, and suggested changes to the study).
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Acceptability of trial procedures
Description
Assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data from participants and service providers on the trial procedures.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Feasibility of randomisation protocol
Description
Assessed through feedback interview (qualitative) data on randomisation protocol and willingness and acceptance of patients to be randomised.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Feasibility of recruitment
Description
Number of those eligible who expressed interest/discussed with researcher, number of consenting/randomised patients, reasons for non-participation, retention rates, feedback interview (qualitative) data.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Estimating sample size needed for a Phase III RCT
Description
Sample size calculated through effect sizes from ANOVAs, standard deviations and attrition rates.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Appropriateness of measures
Description
Completion rates of outcome measures, number of missing online and postal data, estimates of time (minutes) taken to complete measures (from online/phone data or feedback interview data).
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Feasibility of self-report data collection
Description
Number of missing online and postal data
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Feasibility of audio recording support sessions
Description
Number of participants consenting to audio recording of sessions and feedback interview data
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Acceptability of interventions (Support 1 and Support 2)
Description
Drop-out rates (and reasons for withdrawal), number of Support 1 and Support 2 sessions completed, feedback interview data.
Time Frame
Daily throughout intervention delivery
Title
Feasibility of delivering Support 1 intervention
Description
Number of missed and rescheduled sessions, length of sessions (minutes), operational issues in delivering intervention through feedback interview data.
Time Frame
Daily throughout intervention delivery
Title
Feasibility of delivering Support 2 intervention
Description
Number of missed and rescheduled sessions, length of sessions (minutes), operational issues in delivering intervention through feedback interview data.
Time Frame
Daily throughout intervention delivery
Title
Credibility of interventions
Description
Assessed through qualitative feedback interview data (i.e., questions about the content of the intervention, changes experienced).
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Fidelity of intervention
Description
Fidelity rating on audio data from a sample of support sessions against criteria for PrEliMS model consistency.
Time Frame
Daily throughout intervention delivery
Title
Documentation of usual care
Description
Data obtained through service use questionnaire and feedback interviews.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Title
Feasibility of collecting data for an economic evaluation using a bespoke service use questionnaire
Description
Number of missing or clearly invalid service use questionnaire data, completion rates, exploration of possible ceiling effects, feedback interview (qualitative) data.
Time Frame
Daily throughout data collection
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Perceived stress
Description
Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS4; Cohen, Kamarck, & Mersmelstein, 1983; Cohen & Williamson, 1988) to measure the level of perceived stress among people with MS by assessing their level of perceived uncontrollability and unpredictability on a 5 point scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often, 4=very often). The scores for each question are added (after reverse scoring two of the four questions) to give a total score ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating higher stress.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Title
Mood
Description
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983) will be used to measure the level of mood disturbances. It is a 14-item scale and each item is scored from 0 to 3. The total scores range from 0 to 21 for the anxiety subscale and also for the depression subscale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety or depression.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Title
Psychological impact of MS
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29 (MSIS-29) - psychological subscale (Rasch, version 2; Hobart, Lamping, Fitzpatrick, Riazi, & Thompson, 2001; Ramp, Khan, Misajon, & Pallant, 2009) will be used to assess the perceived psychological impact of MS. Psychological subscale has 9 items with 4-point response categories for each item ("not at all", "a little", "moderately", "extremely"). The total score range from 9 to 36, with lower scores indicating little impact of MS and higher scores indicating greater impact.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Title
Self-efficacy
Description
Multiple Sclerosis Self-efficacy Scale (MSSE; Rigby, Domenech, Thornton, Tedman, & Young, 2003) will be used to assess the extent to which participants feel in control of their condition. The scale has 14 items. Each item is presented with a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree". The scores for each item are added (after reverse scoring six of the 14 items) to give a total score ranging from 14-84, with higher scores indicating an elevated level of self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
EQ-5D-5L (Herdman et al., 2011) will be used as a generic patient-reported measure of health-related quality of life and to derive health utilities.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Title
Service use questionnaire
Description
Service use questionnaire was adapted from the service use questionnaire used in the CRAMMS trial (Lincoln et al. 2015).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients will be eligible to join the trial if they: are 18 years or over have recently received a diagnosis of MS (any type of MS) or currently going through MS diagnosis process) can communicate in English able and willing to give consent not receiving psychological intervention Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded if they: have a severe co-morbid psychiatric condition (e.g. dementia), as reported by patients or their carers or confirmed by the clinical team making the initial approach are currently receiving psychological interventions or received this within the last three months (we will not exclude those on medication for their mood problems but will record this information). do not have mental capacity to consent to take part in the trial are unable to communicate in English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roshan das Nair, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nottingham
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gogem Topcu, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nottingham
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Nottingham
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The PrEliMS Feasibility Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs