search
Back to results

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation(PNS) for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome(SIS)

Primary Purpose

Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Shoulder Tendinitis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Non Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Physical Therapy
Sponsored by
MetroHealth Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Shoulder Pain focused on measuring peripheral nerve stimulation, Sprint, stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Shoulder pain of >3 months
  2. Age>=21
  3. Worst pain in the last week>=4 (0-10 scale)
  4. Ability to check skin and perform dressing changes, independently or with assistance
  5. Stable dose of pain medication (Not taking more than than 1 opioid or 1 non-opioid analgesic)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current shoulder joint or overlying skin infection, or current bacterial infection requiring antibiotics
  2. Other chronic pain syndrome (Pain in another area of the body 15 or more days in the last 30 (more than half of the time) or taking daily analgesics for another pain syndrome)
  3. Prior shoulder surgery to ipsilateral shoulder joint (glenohumeral, rotator cuff, acromioclavicular (AC) Joint, etc.)
  4. Corticosteroid injection in the ipsilateral shoulder or any other pain relieving treatment in last 12 weeks
  5. Uncontrolled bleeding disorder
  6. Medical instability based on physician opinion after review of medical information
  7. Pregnancy
  8. Neurological condition affecting ipsilateral upper limb (such as central neurologic injury/illness, radiculopathy, diabetic amyotrophy, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, etc.)
  9. Current Worker's compensation claim for the ipsilateral shoulder
  10. Shoulder instability, severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis(OA) based on patient symptoms and physical examination
  11. Ipsilateral shoulder injury due to severe trauma (Fall from greater than standing height; Motor vehicle crashes; Struck by vehicle or other fast-moving projectile (e.g., bullet, baseball, etc.); Assault (i.e., injuries intentionally inflicted by another person))
  12. Current osseus fracture in ipsilateral arm
  13. Ipsilateral upper limb amputation other than a single digit (digits 2-5, partial or full)
  14. Surgical indication for shoulder treatment based on physician opinion
  15. Compromised immune system (immunodeficiency or immunosuppression)
  16. Current use of a Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system, implanted active cardiac implant (e.g. pacemaker or defibrillator), any other implantable neuro-stimulator whose stimulus current pathway may overlap with that of the SPRINT System
  17. Patients who have a tape or adhesive allergy
  18. Contraindication to Magnetic resonance imaging (metal in body, claustrophobia, body habitus, etc) - exclude from Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only

Sites / Locations

  • MetroHealth Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Univerity of Texas SouthwesternRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Contraction Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Non Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Arm Description

This group will receive: 1) muscle contraction producing peripheral nerve stimulation treatment (which will produce muscle contraction) for three weeks (6 hours daily); and, 2) physical therapy.

This group will receive: 1) non contraction producing peripheral nerve stimulation treatment (which will not produce muscle contraction) for three weeks (6 hours daily); and, 2) physical therapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in - Short Form (SF) question 3 (BPI-SF3)
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)has excellent psychometrics. The developers of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) recommend Brief Pain Inventory (BPI )3, the "pain worst" rating, as the primary response metric. The question asks participants to rate their worst pain in the prior 24-hours OR prior 7-day on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine."

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Short Form (SF)
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning. The question asks participants to rate their pain in the prior 24-hours OR prior 7-day on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine." ." In addition, the question asks the participant to rate how their pain interferes with daily activities where "0" indicates "does not interfere and "10" indicates "completely interferes".
Change in Activities of Daily Living(ADL( capacity - Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA)
The Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) is a laboratory based objective measure of ADL capacity. The Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) is a timed test that provides a brief measure of functional ability of the upper limb while performing multi-level tasks that require grip/manipulation of the hand, elbow/shoulder reaching, sustained overhead work, and sustained positioning with an emphasis on assessing the limitations in functional capacity attributable to shoulder and neck disorders
Change in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) performance -Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use.The question asks severity of pain based on an 0-10 numerical Rating Scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. In addition, it asks how much difficulty the participant has on a numerical rating scale where 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help. Total disability score: _____/ 80 x 100 = % Total SPADI score: _____ 130 x 100 = % Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence) = 13 points (Change less than this may be attributable to measurement error). lower score is better.
Change in Quality of life - Short form - 12(QoL - SF 12)
Quality of life - Short form - 12 (QoL - SF 12) is a health related Quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses physical functioning, role limitation because of physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role. Scoring: Two summary scores are a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. Lower score is better.
Change Mechanical Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
used to evaluate central sensitization

Full Information

First Posted
November 20, 2018
Last Updated
January 20, 2023
Sponsor
MetroHealth Medical Center
Collaborators
University of Texas
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03752619
Brief Title
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation(PNS) for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome(SIS)
Official Title
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation(PNS) for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome(SIS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
MetroHealth Medical Center
Collaborators
University of Texas

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Shoulder pain accounts for 16% of all musculoskeletal complaints in the healthy adult population. Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common cause of shoulder pain. Many patients with chronic pain from subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) will fail treatment efforts and have longstanding pain. This project will evaluate the efficacy of a novel approach to treatment, percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, for participants with chronic shoulder pain due to subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).
Detailed Description
The medical and socioeconomic impact of subacute and chronic shoulder pain is high, resulting in 12 million visits to physicians and over $7 billion in direct costs in the United States. The most common cause is subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS), which accounts for 30% of all shoulder pain. Approximately 35% of patients who present with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are refractory to conservative management. For patients who have failed conservative management, there are no established treatments to reduce the pain. The long-term goal is to develop a therapeutic intervention to reduce pain related to subacromial impingement syndrome(SIS). A pilot trial of 3-week percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for participants with chronic shoulder pain due to subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) that was refractory to conservative treatment that showed 60% of participants had successful treatment of pain that lasted at least 3 months. Thus, the primary objective of this 2 site randomized control trial (RCT) is to confirm the findings of this preliminary trial and determine the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). The secondary objectives of this multisite randomized control trial (RCT) is to explore mechanisms of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS), and to determine which characteristics can predict successful treatment with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). In order to accomplish these objectives, this trial is a multi-site, placebo controlled, double-blinded randomized control trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to sham peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). Measures of pain, pain interference with activities of daily living (ADLs), capacity for activities of daily living (ADLs), Quality of life (QoL), and measures of central sensitization (pain thresholds, secondary hyperalgesia, and temporal summation) will be measured. Participants will be followed for a total of 24 weeks after treatment has concluded.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Shoulder Tendinitis, Shoulder Bursitis, Pain, Shoulder
Keywords
peripheral nerve stimulation, Sprint, stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
116 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Contraction Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will receive: 1) muscle contraction producing peripheral nerve stimulation treatment (which will produce muscle contraction) for three weeks (6 hours daily); and, 2) physical therapy.
Arm Title
Non Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive: 1) non contraction producing peripheral nerve stimulation treatment (which will not produce muscle contraction) for three weeks (6 hours daily); and, 2) physical therapy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intramuscular Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, Intramuscular Electrical Nerve Stimulation, SMARTPATCH System
Intervention Description
The stimulation system includes an external stimulator, percutaneous lead and pad. The stimulator snaps onto the pad. The pad has an embedded power source but also serves as the anode. The 1-channel stimulator outputs a biphasic current waveform with current pulse parameter ranges suitable for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS). The percutaneous lead is inserted using an introducer (like a hypodermic needle) which is withdrawn and the lead is retained in the muscle by a barb at its tip. After a 1-week stabilization period, stimulation is initiated (6 hrs/day). The duty cycle and daily dose remain constant, but stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period is 3 weeks after which the lead will be removed.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Non Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Intervention Description
The stimulation system includes an external stimulator, percutaneous lead and pad. The stimulator snaps onto the pad. The pad has an embedded power source but also serves as the anode. The 1-channel stimulator outputs a biphasic current waveform with current pulse parameter ranges suitable for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS). The percutaneous lead is inserted using an introducer (like a hypodermic needle) which is withdrawn and the lead is retained in the muscle by a barb at its tip. After a 1-week stabilization period, stimulation is initiated (6 hrs/day). The duty cycle and daily dose remain constant, but stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period is 3 weeks after which the lead will be removed.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Physical Therapy
Intervention Description
All participants receive eight 1.0 hr. sessions of physical therapy (PT) over a 4-wk period from a therapist blinded to Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) treatment assignment. Each participant also performs home exercises. The primary objective of physical therapy (PT) and the home exercise program is to prevent re-injury by educating and training participants in the biomechanics and proper use of the shoulder and upper limb. During each in-lab session, participants are trained in the implementation of these exercises, which are individually adjusted and progressed with increasing external loads by using weights and elastic rubber bands.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in - Short Form (SF) question 3 (BPI-SF3)
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)has excellent psychometrics. The developers of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) recommend Brief Pain Inventory (BPI )3, the "pain worst" rating, as the primary response metric. The question asks participants to rate their worst pain in the prior 24-hours OR prior 7-day on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine."
Time Frame
Prior 7-days] ; Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Short Form (SF)
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning. The question asks participants to rate their pain in the prior 24-hours OR prior 7-day on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine." ." In addition, the question asks the participant to rate how their pain interferes with daily activities where "0" indicates "does not interfere and "10" indicates "completely interferes".
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living(ADL( capacity - Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA)
Description
The Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) is a laboratory based objective measure of ADL capacity. The Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) is a timed test that provides a brief measure of functional ability of the upper limb while performing multi-level tasks that require grip/manipulation of the hand, elbow/shoulder reaching, sustained overhead work, and sustained positioning with an emphasis on assessing the limitations in functional capacity attributable to shoulder and neck disorders
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) performance -Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Description
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use.The question asks severity of pain based on an 0-10 numerical Rating Scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. In addition, it asks how much difficulty the participant has on a numerical rating scale where 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help. Total disability score: _____/ 80 x 100 = % Total SPADI score: _____ 130 x 100 = % Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence) = 13 points (Change less than this may be attributable to measurement error). lower score is better.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Title
Change in Quality of life - Short form - 12(QoL - SF 12)
Description
Quality of life - Short form - 12 (QoL - SF 12) is a health related Quality of life (QoL) measure that assesses physical functioning, role limitation because of physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role. Scoring: Two summary scores are a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The scores may be reported as Z-scores (difference compared to the population average, measured in standard deviations). The United States population average PCS-12 and MCS-12 are both 50 points. Lower score is better.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Title
Change Mechanical Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Description
used to evaluate central sensitization
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Occurrence of Adverse events
Description
Related adverse events are documented as Safety data.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 1), End of Treatment(week 5), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Shoulder pain of >3 months Age>=21 Worst pain in the last week>=4 (0-10 scale) Ability to check skin and perform dressing changes, independently or with assistance Stable dose of pain medication (Not taking more than than 1 opioid or 1 non-opioid analgesic) Exclusion Criteria: Current shoulder joint or overlying skin infection, or current bacterial infection requiring antibiotics Other chronic pain syndrome (Pain in another area of the body 15 or more days in the last 30 (more than half of the time) or taking daily analgesics for another pain syndrome) Prior shoulder surgery to ipsilateral shoulder joint (glenohumeral, rotator cuff, acromioclavicular (AC) Joint, etc.) Corticosteroid injection in the ipsilateral shoulder or any other pain relieving treatment in last 12 weeks Uncontrolled bleeding disorder Medical instability based on physician opinion after review of medical information Pregnancy Neurological condition affecting ipsilateral upper limb (such as central neurologic injury/illness, radiculopathy, diabetic amyotrophy, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, etc.) Current Worker's compensation claim for the ipsilateral shoulder Shoulder instability, severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis(OA) based on patient symptoms and physical examination Ipsilateral shoulder injury due to severe trauma (Fall from greater than standing height; Motor vehicle crashes; Struck by vehicle or other fast-moving projectile (e.g., bullet, baseball, etc.); Assault (i.e., injuries intentionally inflicted by another person)) Current osseus fracture in ipsilateral arm Ipsilateral upper limb amputation other than a single digit (digits 2-5, partial or full) Surgical indication for shoulder treatment based on physician opinion Compromised immune system (immunodeficiency or immunosuppression) Current use of a Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system, implanted active cardiac implant (e.g. pacemaker or defibrillator), any other implantable neuro-stimulator whose stimulus current pathway may overlap with that of the SPRINT System Patients who have a tape or adhesive allergy Contraindication to Magnetic resonance imaging (metal in body, claustrophobia, body habitus, etc) - exclude from Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kristine Hansen, PT
Phone
216-957-3584
Email
khansen1@metrohealth.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard D Wilson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
MetroHealth Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
MetroHealth Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Hansen, PT
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Wilson, MD
Facility Name
Univerity of Texas Southwestern
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samantha Frost, PT
Phone
214-648-6562
Email
Samantha.frost@utsouthwestern.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Newman
Email
Mark.Newman@UTSouthwestern.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nitin B Jain, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9924205
Citation
Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Nov;57(11):649-55. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.11.649.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Johnson MP, Crossley KL, O'neil ME, Al-Zakwani IS. Estimates of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Shoulder Dysfunction in the United States J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 2005;35(1,A4).
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21619663
Citation
Cadogan A, Laslett M, Hing WA, McNair PJ, Coates MH. A prospective study of shoulder pain in primary care: prevalence of imaged pathology and response to guided diagnostic blocks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 May 28;12:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-119.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8546527
Citation
van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959-64. doi: 10.1136/ard.54.12.959.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15808040
Citation
Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F. Corticosteroid injections for painful shoulder: a meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Mar;55(512):224-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20584793
Citation
Crawshaw DP, Helliwell PS, Hensor EM, Hay EM, Aldous SJ, Conaghan PG. Exercise therapy after corticosteroid injection for moderate to severe shoulder pain: large pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2010 Jun 28;340:c3037. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3037.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19095464
Citation
Cummins CA, Sasso LM, Nicholson D. Impingement syndrome: temporal outcomes of nonoperative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11885825
Citation
Johansson K, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Foldevi M. A combination of systematic review and clinicians' beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Feb;52(475):145-52.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11129754
Citation
Litaker D, Pioro M, El Bilbeisi H, Brems J. Returning to the bedside: using the history and physical examination to identify rotator cuff tears. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1633-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03875.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9160946
Citation
Morrison DS, Frogameni AD, Woodworth P. Non-operative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May;79(5):732-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32143732
Citation
Cleland T, Jain NB, Chae J, Hansen KM, Hisel TZ, Gunzler DD, Whitehair VC, Kim CH, Wilson RD. The protocol for a multisite, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of axillary nerve stimulation for chronic shoulder pain. Trials. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4174-x.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://fescenter.org/index.php
Description
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)Center
URL
http://www.metrohealth.org
Description
Metrohealth clinic trials

Learn more about this trial

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation(PNS) for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome(SIS)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs