SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial
Primary Purpose
Leg Length Inequality
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SYNOSTE Nitinail System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Leg Length Inequality focused on measuring distraction osteogenesis, bone lengthening, leg length discrepancy, callotasis, Intramedullary distraction nail
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for femoral lengthening from different etiologies of max. 70 mm at single lengthening
- 18 to 65 years regardless of gender
- Suitable anatomy for SNS
- Able and willing to comply with study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other electronic implants
- Other Metallic implants in the affected limb below the osteotomy level
- Need for Magnetic Resonance imaging during the study
- BMI>30kg/m2 or weight>100kg
- Smoker
- Known hypersensitivity to Co, Ni, Cr or Ti metals
- Known hypersensitivity to Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) or Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Poly-Ethylene (UHMWPE)
- Open growth plates
- Malignancy or tumor in bone
- Osteitis or soft tissue infection
- Significant existing deficit in range of motion of the adjacent joints
- Pseudoarthrosis
- Pregnancy
- Low psychological compliance (e.g. drug abuse)
- Simultaneous bilateral lengthening
- Need for osteotomies at multiple levels
Sites / Locations
- HUCH Ortopedics and Traumatology, Töölö Hospital
- Şişli Florence Nightingale Hospital, Şişli/İstanbul
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
SYNOSTE Nitinail System
Arm Description
The intended purpose of the SNS in this trial is lengthening of the femur by callotasis.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Lengthening control index (LCI)
The primary objective is to verify whether the leg-lengthening procedure can be adequately controlled with the SNS system as measured with the lengthening control index (LCI) at the end of the distraction period defined as LCI = DIachieved / DIscheduled
,where DIachieved = Achieved distraction index, ie. the daily rate of distraction has on average occurred during the lengthening phase in mm/d. DIscheduled = mean scheduled lengthening rate in mm/day.
Analyzed at primary analysis.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Performance of Nitinail/Mechanical stability of Nitinail
Mechanical stability of Nitinail as defined by the ratio of the numbers of breakages (nail and screws) to total nails implanted (% and absolute values) at the end of consolidation
Performance of Nitinail/Nitinail lengthening target achieved (%)
Nitinail lengthening target achieved as defined by % of targeted lengthening achieved by Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Performance of Nitinail/Nitinail lengthening target achieved (absolute value)
Nitinail lengthening target achieved as defined by absolute value of targeted lengthening achieved by Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Performance of Nitinail/Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening (%)
Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening as % of the Bone gap increase from achieved lengthening of Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Performance of Nitinail/Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening (absolute value)
Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening as absolute value of the Bone gap increase from achieved lengthening of Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Performance of Nitinail/Retention of achieved length by Nitinail
Retention of achieved length by Nitinail as change of achieved lengthening of Nitinail between end of distraction and end of consolidation
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction as the overall satisfaction value from Numeric Rating Scale at end of consolidation and final follow-up. The NRS for overall outcomes is a undimensional measure of satisfaction intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their overall satisfaction with the treatment outcomes on a horizontal line. "0" represents completely dissatisfied and "10" fully satisfied
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient Satisfaction (aesthetic outcomes)
Patient satisfaction as the aesthetic outcomes value from Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at end of consolidation and final follow-up. The NRS for aesthetic outcomes is a undimensional measure of satisfaction intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their satisfaction with the aesthetic outcomes on a horizontal line. "0" represents completely dissatisfied and "10" fully satisfied.
Patient Reported Outcomes/Change in scores of 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Change in scores of SF-36 from preoperative baseline to end of consolidation for Primary analysis and to last visit for the Follow-up analysis. The used version of the SF-36 is the RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 (1993) with a time frame of 4 weeks. The SF-36 is an established and widely used set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures in adults. Scoring will be done according to the instructions provided by RAND. Single item scores as well as health concept scale scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score defines a more favorable health state, with a value of 100 representing full health.
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status
Patient pain status as change of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from preoperative baseline to End of distraction (2,5 months). The NRS for pain is a undimensional measure of pain intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their pain on a horizontal line. "0" represents no pain and "10" worst possible pain.
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status
Patient pain status as the pain profile of the Numeric Rating Scale (as described above) during the treatment (until 24 months)
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status (consumption of pain medication)
Patient pain status as consumption of pain medication
Patient Reported Outcomes/Length of sick leave due to treatment
Length of sick leave due treatment in days assessed until the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses, respectively
Clinical Success of Treatment/Femur lengthening target achieved (%)
Femur lengthening target achieved as % of the achieved femoral length increase of the targeted femoral length increase in mm determined at the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses
Clinical Success of Treatment/Femur lengthening target achieved (absolute value)
Femur lengthening target achieved as absolute value of the achieved femoral length increase of the targeted femoral length increase in mm determined at the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses
Clinical Success of Treatment/Weight bearing index
Weight bearing index as time to final full weight bearing (in days) per the achieved femoral length increase (in cm)
Clinical Success of Treatment/Consolidation index
Consolidation index as time to radiological confirmation of 3 cortices bridging the bony gap (in days) per the achieved femoral length increase (in cm)
Clinical Success of Treatment/Knee and hip joint Range of Motion (ROM)
Knee and hip joint Range of Motion (ROM) as flexion and extension at preoperative baseline, End of distraction and End of consolidation and compared to normal population values
Nitinail System Safety/Number and type of device related (Serious)Adverse Events
Number and type of device related (Serious)Adverse Events reported until the end of consolidation and end of treatment.
Nitinail System Safety/Duration of surgery
Duration of surgery of Nitinail related surgeries from cut-to- closure in minutes
Nitinail System Safety/Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay of Nitinail related surgeries in days the patient spent in hospital perioperatively.
Nitinail System Safety/Patient compliance to lengthening protocol
Patient compliance to lengthening protocol as ratio of lengthening periods with non- compliance to protocol with all lengthening periods with one patient.
Nitinail System Safety/Release of metallic ions from the Nitinail
Release of metallic ions from the Nitinail as Cobalt and Chromium ion concentrations in blood from preoperative baseline to end of distraction.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03752814
First Posted
November 16, 2018
Last Updated
March 7, 2023
Sponsor
SYNOSTE Oy
Collaborators
MVZ Labor Dr. Limbach, Technical University of Munich
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03752814
Brief Title
SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial
Official Title
SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study was stopped due to administrative reasons.
Study Start Date
November 12, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 10, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 10, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
SYNOSTE Oy
Collaborators
MVZ Labor Dr. Limbach, Technical University of Munich
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial is an international multicenter open label single-arm equivalence study to verify whether the leg-lengthening procedure can be adequately controlled with the SNS system as measured with the lengthening control index (LCI) at the end of the distraction period.
Detailed Description
The SYNOSTE Nitinail System (SNS) is an assembly of an active implantable distraction nail (SYNOSTE Nitinail), Locking screws, accessory instruments for surgery and the home care unit (also External control unit (ECU) or Halo). It includes also, a software tool, Syndex, that supports setting up the number of lengthening activations needed per day.
The SNS is intended for lengthening of the femur by distraction osteogenesis.
The study will consist of a recruitment period of 3 months and an observation period of roughly 24 months (6 months after explantation). The observation period is split in two parts: The first part contains the most critical treatment phases from implantation surgery of the device through the actual lengthening phase up to the end of the bone healing. The second part contains only two visits: the explantation surgery of the device and a control at 6 months of further follow-up.
After the fist part of the trial, a primary analysis of the data including the hypothesis testing will be carried out. After the second part of the trial a follow-up analysis will be done.
16 (max 20) patients will be recruited in Finland and Turkey.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Leg Length Inequality
Keywords
distraction osteogenesis, bone lengthening, leg length discrepancy, callotasis, Intramedullary distraction nail
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
9 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
SYNOSTE Nitinail System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intended purpose of the SNS in this trial is lengthening of the femur by callotasis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
SYNOSTE Nitinail System
Intervention Description
Mode of application: 1. Implantation surgery: osteotomy and antegrade implantation of SNS in femur for distraction osteogenesis (callotasis), 2. distraction osteogenesis (implant lengthening phase), 3. Bone healing (implant as stabilizing element during consolidation phase), 4. Explantation after consolidation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lengthening control index (LCI)
Description
The primary objective is to verify whether the leg-lengthening procedure can be adequately controlled with the SNS system as measured with the lengthening control index (LCI) at the end of the distraction period defined as LCI = DIachieved / DIscheduled
,where DIachieved = Achieved distraction index, ie. the daily rate of distraction has on average occurred during the lengthening phase in mm/d. DIscheduled = mean scheduled lengthening rate in mm/day.
Analyzed at primary analysis.
Time Frame
2,5 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Mechanical stability of Nitinail
Description
Mechanical stability of Nitinail as defined by the ratio of the numbers of breakages (nail and screws) to total nails implanted (% and absolute values) at the end of consolidation
Time Frame
6-9 months
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Nitinail lengthening target achieved (%)
Description
Nitinail lengthening target achieved as defined by % of targeted lengthening achieved by Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Nitinail lengthening target achieved (absolute value)
Description
Nitinail lengthening target achieved as defined by absolute value of targeted lengthening achieved by Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening (%)
Description
Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening as % of the Bone gap increase from achieved lengthening of Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening (absolute value)
Description
Translation of nail lengthening to bone lengthening as absolute value of the Bone gap increase from achieved lengthening of Nitinail determined at the end of lengthening period
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Performance of Nitinail/Retention of achieved length by Nitinail
Description
Retention of achieved length by Nitinail as change of achieved lengthening of Nitinail between end of distraction and end of consolidation
Time Frame
6-9 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient Satisfaction
Description
Patient satisfaction as the overall satisfaction value from Numeric Rating Scale at end of consolidation and final follow-up. The NRS for overall outcomes is a undimensional measure of satisfaction intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their overall satisfaction with the treatment outcomes on a horizontal line. "0" represents completely dissatisfied and "10" fully satisfied
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient Satisfaction (aesthetic outcomes)
Description
Patient satisfaction as the aesthetic outcomes value from Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at end of consolidation and final follow-up. The NRS for aesthetic outcomes is a undimensional measure of satisfaction intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their satisfaction with the aesthetic outcomes on a horizontal line. "0" represents completely dissatisfied and "10" fully satisfied.
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Change in scores of 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Description
Change in scores of SF-36 from preoperative baseline to end of consolidation for Primary analysis and to last visit for the Follow-up analysis. The used version of the SF-36 is the RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 (1993) with a time frame of 4 weeks. The SF-36 is an established and widely used set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures in adults. Scoring will be done according to the instructions provided by RAND. Single item scores as well as health concept scale scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score defines a more favorable health state, with a value of 100 representing full health.
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status
Description
Patient pain status as change of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from preoperative baseline to End of distraction (2,5 months). The NRS for pain is a undimensional measure of pain intensity, where the patient selects among 0-10 integers to describe the intensity of their pain on a horizontal line. "0" represents no pain and "10" worst possible pain.
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status
Description
Patient pain status as the pain profile of the Numeric Rating Scale (as described above) during the treatment (until 24 months)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Patient pain status (consumption of pain medication)
Description
Patient pain status as consumption of pain medication
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes/Length of sick leave due to treatment
Description
Length of sick leave due treatment in days assessed until the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses, respectively
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Clinical Success of Treatment/Femur lengthening target achieved (%)
Description
Femur lengthening target achieved as % of the achieved femoral length increase of the targeted femoral length increase in mm determined at the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Clinical Success of Treatment/Femur lengthening target achieved (absolute value)
Description
Femur lengthening target achieved as absolute value of the achieved femoral length increase of the targeted femoral length increase in mm determined at the end of consolidation and end of treatment for Primary and Follow-up analyses
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Clinical Success of Treatment/Weight bearing index
Description
Weight bearing index as time to final full weight bearing (in days) per the achieved femoral length increase (in cm)
Time Frame
6-9 months
Title
Clinical Success of Treatment/Consolidation index
Description
Consolidation index as time to radiological confirmation of 3 cortices bridging the bony gap (in days) per the achieved femoral length increase (in cm)
Time Frame
6-9 months
Title
Clinical Success of Treatment/Knee and hip joint Range of Motion (ROM)
Description
Knee and hip joint Range of Motion (ROM) as flexion and extension at preoperative baseline, End of distraction and End of consolidation and compared to normal population values
Time Frame
6-9 months AND 24 months
Title
Nitinail System Safety/Number and type of device related (Serious)Adverse Events
Description
Number and type of device related (Serious)Adverse Events reported until the end of consolidation and end of treatment.
Time Frame
(6-9 months AND 24 months)
Title
Nitinail System Safety/Duration of surgery
Description
Duration of surgery of Nitinail related surgeries from cut-to- closure in minutes
Time Frame
10 days and 18 months
Title
Nitinail System Safety/Length of hospital stay
Description
Length of hospital stay of Nitinail related surgeries in days the patient spent in hospital perioperatively.
Time Frame
10 days and 18 months
Title
Nitinail System Safety/Patient compliance to lengthening protocol
Description
Patient compliance to lengthening protocol as ratio of lengthening periods with non- compliance to protocol with all lengthening periods with one patient.
Time Frame
2,5 months
Title
Nitinail System Safety/Release of metallic ions from the Nitinail
Description
Release of metallic ions from the Nitinail as Cobalt and Chromium ion concentrations in blood from preoperative baseline to end of distraction.
Time Frame
3 months/further monitoring up to 24 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Indication for femoral lengthening from different etiologies of max. 70 mm at single lengthening
18 to 65 years regardless of gender
Suitable anatomy for SNS
Able and willing to comply with study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Other electronic implants
Other Metallic implants in the affected limb below the osteotomy level
Need for Magnetic Resonance imaging during the study
BMI>30kg/m2 or weight>100kg
Smoker
Known hypersensitivity to Co, Ni, Cr or Ti metals
Known hypersensitivity to Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) or Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Poly-Ethylene (UHMWPE)
Open growth plates
Malignancy or tumor in bone
Osteitis or soft tissue infection
Significant existing deficit in range of motion of the adjacent joints
Pseudoarthrosis
Pregnancy
Low psychological compliance (e.g. drug abuse)
Simultaneous bilateral lengthening
Need for osteotomies at multiple levels
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Metin Küçükkaya, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Şişli Florence Nightingale Hospital, Şişli/İstanbul, Turkey
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Lindahl, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
HUCH Ortopedics and Traumatology, Töölö Hospital, Finland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
HUCH Ortopedics and Traumatology, Töölö Hospital
City
Helsinki
State/Province
Uusimaa
ZIP/Postal Code
00260
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Şişli Florence Nightingale Hospital, Şişli/İstanbul
City
Istanbul
Country
Turkey
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs