search
Back to results

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Pulse Widths in Spinal Cord Stimulation

Primary Purpose

Back Pain, Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System
Sponsored by
Kettering Health Network
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be eligible for SCS therapy according to the Algovita® SCS system Indications for Use statement
  • be undergoing a SCS trial using Algovita® SCS system
  • sign a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form.
  • be 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • be contraindicated for an Algovita® SCS system
  • have a cognitive impairment or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit the study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or complete study assessments
  • have a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • be participating in another clinical study that would confound data analysis
  • have a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings
  • have a significant psychiatric disorder

Sites / Locations

  • The Ohio Pain Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Low Pulse Width (<500 μsec)

High Pulse Width (>1000 μsec)

Arm Description

Spinal Cord Stimulation System will be programmed to pulse widths <500 μsec.

Spinal Cord Stimulation System will be programmed to pulse widths >1000 μsec

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Effect of Pulse Widths on Pain Clinical Outcomes
To evaluate the effect of conventional pulse widths <500 μsec and pulse widths >1000 μsec on clinical outcomes during temporary trial as measured by patient defined pain maps.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Targeted Pain
To evaluate the effect of conventional pulse widths <500μsecand pulse widths and >1000μsecon clinical outcomes during temporary trial as measured by the number of participants that reported significant change in targeted pain compared to baseline using the NRS at the end of the trial period.
Distribution of Paesthesia
At end of each arm, subjects will be asked to complete a diagram that shows distribution of paresthesia.
Research Participant Program Preference
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to select their favorite program.
Quality of Pain Relief
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to rate the quality of the pain relief achieved during the trial (from either arm) using the following ordinal scale; Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor
Research Participant Pain Relief Satisfaction
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the pain relief achieved during the trial (from either arm) using the following ordinal scale; Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Unsatisfied, Unsatisfied or Very Unsatisfied
≥ 50% Pain Relief
Number of patients who achieved ≥ 50% pain relief during the trial (from either arm)
Rate of AEs
Rate of device-related and/or procedure-related AEs from SCS implant through study completion or study exit.

Full Information

First Posted
November 26, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2021
Sponsor
Kettering Health Network
Collaborators
Ohio Pain Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03756012
Brief Title
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Pulse Widths in Spinal Cord Stimulation
Official Title
Multi-Center Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Pulse Widths <500 μsec and >1000 μsec During a Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 27, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kettering Health Network
Collaborators
Ohio Pain Clinic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pulse widths <500 μsec and >1000 μsec on clinical outcomes during a temporary SCS trial.
Detailed Description
The proposed study is a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, randomized, crossover design to be conducted at up to 10 sites. The study will enroll up to 100 subjects in order to include up to 10 subjects in the study per site. Subjects selected to participate in the trial have back and/or leg pain, have been evaluated as a candidate for SCS and have agreed to undergo a temporary SCS trial using the Algovita® system with percutaneous leads. Each subject will be followed during the trial period of approximately 7+/-2 days. The study will end when the last subject has completed the trial period and exited. The expected enrollment period for this study is approximately six months. After exit from the clinical study, subjects will continue to be followed by their physician per usual care. All device and procedure-related AEs will be collected and reported per the study protocol.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Back Pain, Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
15 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Low Pulse Width (<500 μsec)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Spinal Cord Stimulation System will be programmed to pulse widths <500 μsec.
Arm Title
High Pulse Width (>1000 μsec)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Spinal Cord Stimulation System will be programmed to pulse widths >1000 μsec
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System
Intervention Description
The Algovita™ SCS system is indicated as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs, including unilateral or bilateral pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome, intractable low back pain and leg pain.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effect of Pulse Widths on Pain Clinical Outcomes
Description
To evaluate the effect of conventional pulse widths <500 μsec and pulse widths >1000 μsec on clinical outcomes during temporary trial as measured by patient defined pain maps.
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Targeted Pain
Description
To evaluate the effect of conventional pulse widths <500μsecand pulse widths and >1000μsecon clinical outcomes during temporary trial as measured by the number of participants that reported significant change in targeted pain compared to baseline using the NRS at the end of the trial period.
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
Distribution of Paesthesia
Description
At end of each arm, subjects will be asked to complete a diagram that shows distribution of paresthesia.
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
Research Participant Program Preference
Description
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to select their favorite program.
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
Quality of Pain Relief
Description
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to rate the quality of the pain relief achieved during the trial (from either arm) using the following ordinal scale; Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
Research Participant Pain Relief Satisfaction
Description
At the end of the trial period, subjects will be asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the pain relief achieved during the trial (from either arm) using the following ordinal scale; Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Unsatisfied, Unsatisfied or Very Unsatisfied
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
≥ 50% Pain Relief
Description
Number of patients who achieved ≥ 50% pain relief during the trial (from either arm)
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention
Title
Rate of AEs
Description
Rate of device-related and/or procedure-related AEs from SCS implant through study completion or study exit.
Time Frame
For 7 days following intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: be eligible for SCS therapy according to the Algovita® SCS system Indications for Use statement be undergoing a SCS trial using Algovita® SCS system sign a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form. be 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained Exclusion Criteria: be contraindicated for an Algovita® SCS system have a cognitive impairment or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit the study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or complete study assessments have a life expectancy of less than 2 years be participating in another clinical study that would confound data analysis have a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings have a significant psychiatric disorder
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ohio Pain Clinic
City
Centerville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45458
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Pulse Widths in Spinal Cord Stimulation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs