Upper Airway Stimulation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Primary Purpose
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
upper airway stimulation
continuous positive airway pressure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Obstructive Sleep Apnea focused on measuring obstructive sleep apnea, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, upper airway stimulation, surgical treatment sleep apnea
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All consecutive patients who either received UAS implantation (Inspire therapy) in our Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the Klinikum rechts der Isar and all patients who received a CPAP therapy since July 2013, are invited to participate in this clinical examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with the age under 18 years
Sites / Locations
- Technical University of Munich
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Group 1 (CPAP)
Group 2 (UAS)
Arm Description
Patient, who are receiving a CPAP
Patient, who are receiving a device for upper airway stimulation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
AHI
Apnea Hypopnea Index measured in events per hour
ODI
Oxygen desaturation index measured in events per hour
Secondary Outcome Measures
ESS
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
FOSQ
Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire
Usage
Usage Hour per Night
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03756805
First Posted
November 27, 2018
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Sponsor
Technical University of Munich
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03756805
Brief Title
Upper Airway Stimulation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Official Title
Selective Upper Airway Stimulation Compared to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Prospective Cohort Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 6, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Technical University of Munich
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Standard therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). 30% to 50% are not adherent to this therapy and need an alternative treatment. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation or selective upper airway stimulation has been developed since several years. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare both treatments with each other.
Detailed Description
6% to 13% of the western industrialized population suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). During sleep in the pharyngeal airway a relaxation of the muscles occurs with increasing depth of sleep. Finally, this relaxation, due to the anatomical conditions, lead to obstructions of the respiratory tract, resulting in respiratory arrest (apnea) and minor respiratory changes such as hypopneas or flow limitations. The symptoms of this disease manifest themselves with varying degrees. Increased daytime sleepiness, snoring, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease can result. A significant reduction in overall quality of life can be associated with OSAS. The gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea is CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure). But only about 50% to 70% of patients continue to use their device after 2 years of initial CPAP therapy. This means that 30% to 50% of patients are no longer cared for their obstructive sleep apnea. A certain proportion of younger patients, in particular, reject nocturnal ventilation therapy with CPAP from the beginning. For these patients selective upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a therapy option.
Therefore the patient receives surgically a subcutaneous stimulation device under the clavicle, which receives a signal from a respiratory sensor to selectively stimulate the hypoglossal nerve. The respiratory sensor is located in the 4th or 5th intercostal space between the patient's external and internal rib muscles. This can be used to record the patient's breathing, which allows a matched stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. The actual stimulation lead is attached to the medial branches of the hypoglossal nerve, which are responsible for the protrusion of the tongue, in order to enable appropriate stimulation.
In this prospective cohort study, selective upper airway stimulation (UAS) will now be compared with CPAP therapy. Patients receiving CPAP therapy are compared to UAS patients who receive an upper airway stimulation. Both methods are procedures established in clinical routine, and during this investigation, the general clinical course is not deviated. Randomization does not occur because CPAP therapy is a conservative therapy and UAS therapy is a surgical therapy. Furthermore, for UAS therapy, there must be a CPAP incompliance, so that a surgical concept is justified. The CPAP group should comply with the body mass index and age of the UAS group.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, upper airway stimulation, surgical treatment sleep apnea
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients with moderate to severe sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) between 15 / h and 65 / h) are included in the period 2014-2018. The patients are assigned to two groups: group 1, who are receiving PAP therapy and group 2, who are receiving upper airway stimulation. All patients receive polysomnography (PSG) in the sleep laboratory prior to therapy and are followed up on average 12 months after initiation of therapy by PSG or a home sleep test. This protocol is close to the daily clinical routine.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
227 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group 1 (CPAP)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patient, who are receiving a CPAP
Arm Title
Group 2 (UAS)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient, who are receiving a device for upper airway stimulation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
upper airway stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inspire
Intervention Description
One group of patients with UAS
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
continuous positive airway pressure
Intervention Description
One group of patients with CPAP
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
AHI
Description
Apnea Hypopnea Index measured in events per hour
Time Frame
reduction from baseline to 12 months
Title
ODI
Description
Oxygen desaturation index measured in events per hour
Time Frame
reduction from baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ESS
Description
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame
improvement from baseline to 12 months
Title
FOSQ
Description
Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame
improvement from baseline to 12 months
Title
Usage
Description
Usage Hour per Night
Time Frame
usage hours per night at 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All consecutive patients who either received UAS implantation (Inspire therapy) in our Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the Klinikum rechts der Isar and all patients who received a CPAP therapy since July 2013, are invited to participate in this clinical examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
patients with the age under 18 years
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Technical University of Munich
City
Munich
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
81667
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35779166
Citation
Heiser C, Steffen A, Strollo PJ Jr, Giaie-Miniet C, Vanderveken OM, Hofauer B. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2023 May;27(2):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s11325-022-02663-6. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.schlaf-hno.de
Description
Official Website of the Department
Learn more about this trial
Upper Airway Stimulation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs