search
Back to results

Mini-AFTERc Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence (Mini-AFTERc)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mini-AFTERc
Sponsored by
University of St Andrews
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring fear of recurrence, cancer, brief intervention, telephone counselling, following primary cancer treatment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Patient inclusion criteria for screening:

  • Completed primary cancer treatment.
  • Cancer-free.
  • Female.
  • Responsible clinician agrees to their participation.

Patient inclusion criteria for trial:

  • Score 'moderate' (≥10 and <15) on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence 4-item scale (FCR4) during screening.

Patient exclusion criteria:

  • Not completed primary cancer treatment.
  • Not cancer-free.
  • Male.
  • A diagnosed psychotic disorder, known to the cancer service, for which the patient is currently receiving treatment.

Sites / Locations

  • Queen Margaret Hospital
  • Raigmore Hospital
  • Western General Hospital
  • Perth Royal Infirmary

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention group

Control group

Arm Description

Patient will receive the Mini-AFTERc intervention after completion of primary breast cancer treatment.

Patients will receive usual care after completion of primary breast cancer treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient satisfaction with nurse communication during the Mini-AFTERc intervention
Assessed using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, validated for use in secondary care (Mercer et al. 2004). The CARE measure asks patient to rate their nurses' communication skills on 10 communication and empathy domains (e.g. 'How was your nurse at fully understanding your concerns?'). Patients rate nurses from 1 ('Poor') to 5 ('Excellent') for each of the 10 domains.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Fear of cancer recurrence level - FCR4
The FCR4 is a 4-item measure designed to assess patient anxiety, worry and strong feelings associated with the return of cancer (e.g. 'I am afraid that my cancer may recur'). The research group has validated the FCR4 as an accurate measure of cancer recurrence fears in breast cancer patients that is fit for routine use in clinical services (Humphris, Watson, Sharpe, & Ozakinci, 2018). Each question in the FCR4 is rated by the patient on a scale of 1 ('Not at all') to 5 ('All the time'). A cumulative score of ≥10 (60 Percentile) across all 4 items is defined as 'moderate' fear of cancer recurrence and a cumulative score of ≥15 is defined as 'high' fear of cancer recurrence.
Depression and anxiety symptoms - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The HADS is a 14-item assessment tool used to screen for anxiety and depression the general medical population (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The HADS is well established tool and has been employed in a multitude of medical settings, including oncology, to assess patients' mental health (Hartung et al., 2017; Vodermaier & Millman, 2011). The HADS assesses two domains, depressionand anxiety. Patients report symptoms of depression and anxiety in the last week on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (e.g. "Not at all") to 3 (e.g. "Most of the time").
Health-related quality of life - EuroQol 5 Dimension Measure of Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
The EQ-5D is a standardised instrument of health-related quality of life, developed by the EuroQol Group (Herdman et al., 2011). The EQ-5D assesses 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D contains 6-items, 5 of these items assess each of the 5 dimensions and are rated on a 5-level (5L) scale. The final item is a measure of health state, which is rated on a scale of 0 ('worst imaginable health state') to 100 (Best imaginable health state').
Nurses' perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews
Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of breast cancer nurses. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010).
Recruitment rate
Assess number of patients recruited at each site, including those who decline to participate.
Retention rate
Assess number of patients who complete the trial.
Attrition rate
Assess number of patients who do not complete the trial, withdraw or drop-out.
Patient perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews
Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of patients. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010).

Full Information

First Posted
October 23, 2018
Last Updated
May 30, 2019
Sponsor
University of St Andrews
Collaborators
University of Stirling, University of Surrey, Swansea University, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03763825
Brief Title
Mini-AFTERc Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence
Acronym
Mini-AFTERc
Official Title
A Pilot Trial of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention to Manage Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 13, 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of St Andrews
Collaborators
University of Stirling, University of Surrey, Swansea University, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
People treated for breast cancer often live with an ongoing fear that the cancer will recur. This fear may develop and impact on their mental health and quality of life. The Mini-AFTERc study is a pilot trial of a brief cognitive behavioural communication intervention, designed to reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in breast cancer patients. This pilot trial aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of introducing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into everyday practice, and inform the development of a full randomised controlled trial.
Detailed Description
The objectives of this pilot trial are as follows: To develop a procedure for training breast cancer nurses (BCN) in the delivery of the Mini-AFTERc intervention and introduce the intervention into current NHS service provision for breast cancer patients. To collect data to pilot and test recruitment (of breast cancer nurses and breast cancer patients), the fidelity of intervention elements, the acceptability to participants (primary and secondary outcomes) and detailed economic indicators for a full trial. Apply a formal decision making framework (ADePT) to determine a profile of factors to reveal potential difficulties and appraise solutions prior to a full trial. This study is a multicentre controlled pilot trial of the Mini-AFTERc intervention and will take place in 4 breast cancer centres in NHS Scotland health boards, including Fife, Highlands, Lothian and Tayside. Two centres will deliver the intervention (Fife and Lothian) and 2 centres will deliver usual care to patients, acting as control centres (Highlands and Tayside). The project will be delivered in 3 phases: Phase 1 will include the development and delivery of the Mini-AFTERc intervention training package for breast cancer nurses. Phase 2 will include patient recruitment and data collection. There will be 2 intervention centres and 2 control centres across NHS Scotland. Patients who have completed their primary breast cancer treatment, will be screened for moderate FCR (scoring ≥10 and <15 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence 4-item Scale; FCR4). Breast cancer nurses will deliver the intervention by telephone in intervention centres, which will be audio recorded. Patients will complete a satisfaction questionnaire after the intervention (CARE and MISS). Follow-up questionnaires measuring fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and depression and quality of life outcomes (FCR4, HADS, EQ-5D) will be delivered via a smartphone app at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months following intervention or 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 13 weeks following screening for the control group. Semi-structured interviews with 20% of patients and all nurses will be conducted to assess experiences and acceptability of the intervention. Phase 3 will conduct data analysis and trial evaluation. Screening and follow-up data will be quantitatively analysed, including structured equation modelling. Interviews will be subject to framework analysis based on normalisation process theory (NPT). The pilot trial will be systematically evaluated using a process of decision making after pilot and feasibility trials (ADePT). The findings will help to understand if this brief intervention can be implemented in everyday practice and can reduce FCR. They will also inform the practicality of implementation of a larger-scale randomised trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer
Keywords
fear of recurrence, cancer, brief intervention, telephone counselling, following primary cancer treatment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
133 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will receive the Mini-AFTERc intervention after completion of primary breast cancer treatment.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will receive usual care after completion of primary breast cancer treatment.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Mini-AFTERc
Intervention Description
Structured 30-45 minute telephone discussion based on health psychology theory and CBT principles.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient satisfaction with nurse communication during the Mini-AFTERc intervention
Description
Assessed using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, validated for use in secondary care (Mercer et al. 2004). The CARE measure asks patient to rate their nurses' communication skills on 10 communication and empathy domains (e.g. 'How was your nurse at fully understanding your concerns?'). Patients rate nurses from 1 ('Poor') to 5 ('Excellent') for each of the 10 domains.
Time Frame
1 week post intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fear of cancer recurrence level - FCR4
Description
The FCR4 is a 4-item measure designed to assess patient anxiety, worry and strong feelings associated with the return of cancer (e.g. 'I am afraid that my cancer may recur'). The research group has validated the FCR4 as an accurate measure of cancer recurrence fears in breast cancer patients that is fit for routine use in clinical services (Humphris, Watson, Sharpe, & Ozakinci, 2018). Each question in the FCR4 is rated by the patient on a scale of 1 ('Not at all') to 5 ('All the time'). A cumulative score of ≥10 (60 Percentile) across all 4 items is defined as 'moderate' fear of cancer recurrence and a cumulative score of ≥15 is defined as 'high' fear of cancer recurrence.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Depression and anxiety symptoms - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Description
The HADS is a 14-item assessment tool used to screen for anxiety and depression the general medical population (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The HADS is well established tool and has been employed in a multitude of medical settings, including oncology, to assess patients' mental health (Hartung et al., 2017; Vodermaier & Millman, 2011). The HADS assesses two domains, depressionand anxiety. Patients report symptoms of depression and anxiety in the last week on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (e.g. "Not at all") to 3 (e.g. "Most of the time").
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Health-related quality of life - EuroQol 5 Dimension Measure of Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
Description
The EQ-5D is a standardised instrument of health-related quality of life, developed by the EuroQol Group (Herdman et al., 2011). The EQ-5D assesses 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D contains 6-items, 5 of these items assess each of the 5 dimensions and are rated on a 5-level (5L) scale. The final item is a measure of health state, which is rated on a scale of 0 ('worst imaginable health state') to 100 (Best imaginable health state').
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Nurses' perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews
Description
Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of breast cancer nurses. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010).
Time Frame
Within 1 month of delivering final intervention
Title
Recruitment rate
Description
Assess number of patients recruited at each site, including those who decline to participate.
Time Frame
Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years)
Title
Retention rate
Description
Assess number of patients who complete the trial.
Time Frame
Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years)
Title
Attrition rate
Description
Assess number of patients who do not complete the trial, withdraw or drop-out.
Time Frame
Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years)
Title
Patient perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews
Description
Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of patients. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010).
Time Frame
Within 1 month of final follow-up questionnaire

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Patient inclusion criteria for screening: Completed primary cancer treatment. Cancer-free. Female. Responsible clinician agrees to their participation. Patient inclusion criteria for trial: Score 'moderate' (≥10 and <15) on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence 4-item scale (FCR4) during screening. Patient exclusion criteria: Not completed primary cancer treatment. Not cancer-free. Male. A diagnosed psychotic disorder, known to the cancer service, for which the patient is currently receiving treatment.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gerry M Humphris, PhD
Phone
+44 (0) 1334463565
Email
gmh4@st-andrews.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Calum T McHale, PhD
Phone
+44 (0)1334461895
Email
ctm2@st-andrews.ac.uk
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Queen Margaret Hospital
City
Dunfermline
State/Province
NHS Fife
ZIP/Postal Code
KY12 0SU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Raigmore Hospital
City
Inverness
State/Province
NHS Highlands
ZIP/Postal Code
IV2 3UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Western General Hospital
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
NHS Lothain
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Perth Royal Infirmary
City
Perth
State/Province
NHS Tayside
ZIP/Postal Code
PH1 1NX
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29624779
Citation
Davidson J, Malloch M, Humphris G. A single-session intervention (the Mini-AFTERc) for fear of cancer recurrence: A feasibility study. Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2668-2670. doi: 10.1002/pon.4724. Epub 2018 Apr 30. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29471823
Citation
Humphris GM, Watson E, Sharpe M, Ozakinci G. Unidimensional scales for fears of cancer recurrence and their psychometric properties: the FCR4 and FCR7. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 9;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0850-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6880820
Citation
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21479777
Citation
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15528286
Citation
Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh621. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28748105
Citation
Cruickshank S, Steel E, Fenlon D, Armes J, Scanlon K, Banks E, Humphris G. A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jul 20;4:22. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8. eCollection 2018. Erratum In: Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Oct 24;3:48.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18492319
Citation
Humphris G, Ozakinci G. The AFTER intervention: a structured psychological approach to reduce fears of recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Health Psychol. 2008 May;13(Pt 2):223-30. doi: 10.1348/135910708X283751.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24160371
Citation
Bugge C, Williams B, Hagen S, Logan J, Glazener C, Pringle S, Sinclair L. A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20961442
Citation
Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O'Donnell C, Ong BN, Rapley T, Rogers A, May C. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28654189
Citation
Hartung TJ, Friedrich M, Johansen C, Wittchen HU, Faller H, Koch U, Brahler E, Harter M, Keller M, Schulz H, Wegscheider K, Weis J, Mehnert A. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as screening instruments for depression in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4236-4243. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30846. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21898134
Citation
Vodermaier A, Millman RD. Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1899-908. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1251-4. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33324299
Citation
Brandt NG, McHale CT, Humphris GM. Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:601813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32399254
Citation
McHale CT, Cruickshank S, Torrens C, Armes J, Fenlon D, Banks E, Kelsey T, Humphris GM. A controlled pilot trial of a nurse-led intervention (Mini-AFTERc) to manage fear of cancer recurrence in patients affected by breast cancer. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 7;6:60. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00610-4. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Mini-AFTERc Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs