search
Back to results

Vortioxetine in the Elderly vs. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): a Pragmatic Assessment (VESPA)

Primary Purpose

Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vortioxetine
Sertraline
citalopram
Escitalopram
Paroxetine
Fluoxetine
Fluvoxamine
Sponsored by
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Major Depressive Disorder focused on measuring vortioxetine, SSRI, depression, elderly

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 65 years old or above;
  2. willing to participate by signing an informed consent;
  3. suffering from an episode of major depression, based on clinical judgment (guided by DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) criteria);
  4. treatment with an antidepressant is clinically appropriate, based on clinical/medical judgment;
  5. agreement between investigator and patient to discontinue any current antidepressant, second generation antipsychotic, or lithium. According to the pragmatic design of the study, the discontinuation will be performed according to common routine practice. No specific protocols for discontinuation will be applied. All other concomitant medications are allowed;
  6. uncertainty about which trial treatment would be best for the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. dementia, of any type and stage, as formally diagnosed by a specialist (geriatrician, neurologist, or others);
  2. diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder;
  3. clinical conditions or treatments which contraindicate the use of oral vortioxetine or SSRIs, according to clinical/medical judgment (for example conditions or treatments at high risk of bleeding, convulsions, serotoninergic syndrome, hyponatraemia, etc.). All concomitant medications will be prescribed according to routine clinical practice, in compliance with the synthesis of the product characteristics (Riassunto delle Caratteristiche del Prodotto - RCP) registered in the databank of the AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco) (available at https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/cerca-farmaco).

Sites / Locations

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Università Magna Grecia
  • Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Neurologia e Psichiatria
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Verona

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

vortioxetine

SSRIs

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants withdrawing from treatment due to adverse events (tolerability)
Participants withdrawing from allocated treatment due to adverse events on the number of randomized patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of participants withdrawing from treatment due to any cause (acceptability)
Participants withdrawing from allocated treatment due to any cause on the number of randomized patients
Overall mortality
The number of deaths on the number of randomized patients
Number of participants with at least one episode of self-harm
Number of participants with at least one episode of self-harm on the number of randomized patients
Number of participants died by suicide
Number of participants died by suicide on the number of randomized patients
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the ASEC
The mean change score at the Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC). ASEC is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 21 adverse events of antidepressants drugs. For each side effect, a score between 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) is reported. Also, the likelihood of its association with antidepressants is assessed with a yes/no question. Single side-effects scores are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 63).
Number of participants with a reduction of at least 50% of the baseline score of the MADRS (responders)
The number of participants with a reduction of at least 50% of the baseline score of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 10 symptomatic dimensions of depression. For each dimension, a score between 0 (normal, no symptoms) to 6 (severely impaired) is reported. Single scores for each dimension are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 60).
Efficacy on depressive symptoms as assessed by the MADRS
Mean change scores at MADRS. The MADRS is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 10 symptomatic dimensions of depression. For each dimension, a score between 0 (normal, no symptoms) to 6 (severely impaired) is reported. Single scores for each dimension are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 60).
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D
Mean change scores at the EQ-5D. The EQ-5D is a validated rating scale, self-administered, measuring the quality of life according to 5 dimensions. In addition, the overall health status on the day of the interview is measured on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst possible health status) to 100 (best possible health status). When interpreting the scale, dimensions are to be considered separately and not summed in a total score.
Cognitive performance as assessed by the SBT
Mean change scores at the Short Blessed Scale (SBT). The SBT is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the cognitive performance. The SBT is a screening tool that aids in detecting early cognitive changes associated with dementia disorders. Further testing is warranted if dementia is suspected, the SBT should not be used to diagnose dementia. This is a weighted six-item instrument that evaluates orientation, registration, and attention.

Full Information

First Posted
December 12, 2018
Last Updated
May 18, 2023
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Collaborators
University of Catania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03779789
Brief Title
Vortioxetine in the Elderly vs. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): a Pragmatic Assessment
Acronym
VESPA
Official Title
Assessing Tolerability and Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus SSRIs in Elderly Patients With Depression: a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-group, Superiority, Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Collaborators
University of Catania

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background. Depression is a highly frequent condition in the elderly, with a huge impact on quality of life, life expectancy, and medical outcomes. SSRIs are commonly prescribed in elderly depressed patients and, although generally safe, they may be associated with tolerability issues. Based on available studies, vortioxetine is likely to have a promising tolerability profile in the elderly, as it does not adversely affect psychomotor or cognitive performance, wakefulness, body weight, and electrocardiogram parameters. Objectives. Assessing the comparative tolerability, safety and efficacy of vortioxetine compared with the SSRIs as a group (including sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine) in elderly patients affected by major depression. The primary outcome will be the withdrawal rate due to adverse events. Methods. This is a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial. Twelve Italian Community Psychiatric Services will consecutively enrol elderly patients suffering from an episode of major depression who get in contact over a period of 12 months. By employing the web-based application RedCap, doctors will be able to randomize patients to vortioxetine or one of the SSRIs, chosen on the basis of clinical judgment, and to collect basic socio-demographic and clinical data. Trained and blinded assessors will administer five validated rating scales: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC), EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI), and Short Blessed Test (SBT). Patients will be assessed after 1, 3 and 6 months. Expected results. On the basis of current literature, the investigators hypothesize vortioxetine to be superior to SSRIs as a group in terms of tolerability. As vortioxetine is expected to reduce the withdrawal rates due to adverse events of about 12% compared to SSRIs, and assuming that about 23% of the participants could be lost within 6 months, the investigators aim to enrol 358 patients (179 in each group).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Major Depressive Disorder
Keywords
vortioxetine, SSRI, depression, elderly

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
362 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
vortioxetine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
SSRIs
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vortioxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Brintellix, Trintellix
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "other antidepressants" according to the ATC/DDD index [ATC=Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System; DDD=Defined Daily Dose]. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 5-20 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sertraline
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zoloft
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 50-200 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
citalopram
Other Intervention Name(s)
Elopram
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 10-20 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Escitalopram
Other Intervention Name(s)
Entact
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 5-10 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paroxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Daparox
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 20-40 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fluoxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prozac
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 20-60 mg/day).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fluvoxamine
Intervention Description
Antidepressant classified under the category "Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors" according to the ATC/DDD index. The dose will be flexible according to the clinical evaluation and in accordance with doses reported for elderly in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (available: https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home) (namely: 100-300 mg/day).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants withdrawing from treatment due to adverse events (tolerability)
Description
Participants withdrawing from allocated treatment due to adverse events on the number of randomized patients.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants withdrawing from treatment due to any cause (acceptability)
Description
Participants withdrawing from allocated treatment due to any cause on the number of randomized patients
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Overall mortality
Description
The number of deaths on the number of randomized patients
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with at least one episode of self-harm
Description
Number of participants with at least one episode of self-harm on the number of randomized patients
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants died by suicide
Description
Number of participants died by suicide on the number of randomized patients
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the ASEC
Description
The mean change score at the Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC). ASEC is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 21 adverse events of antidepressants drugs. For each side effect, a score between 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) is reported. Also, the likelihood of its association with antidepressants is assessed with a yes/no question. Single side-effects scores are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 63).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with a reduction of at least 50% of the baseline score of the MADRS (responders)
Description
The number of participants with a reduction of at least 50% of the baseline score of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 10 symptomatic dimensions of depression. For each dimension, a score between 0 (normal, no symptoms) to 6 (severely impaired) is reported. Single scores for each dimension are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 60).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Efficacy on depressive symptoms as assessed by the MADRS
Description
Mean change scores at MADRS. The MADRS is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the occurrence and severity of 10 symptomatic dimensions of depression. For each dimension, a score between 0 (normal, no symptoms) to 6 (severely impaired) is reported. Single scores for each dimension are summed to obtain a total score (ranging from 0 to 60).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D
Description
Mean change scores at the EQ-5D. The EQ-5D is a validated rating scale, self-administered, measuring the quality of life according to 5 dimensions. In addition, the overall health status on the day of the interview is measured on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst possible health status) to 100 (best possible health status). When interpreting the scale, dimensions are to be considered separately and not summed in a total score.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Cognitive performance as assessed by the SBT
Description
Mean change scores at the Short Blessed Scale (SBT). The SBT is a validated rating scale, administered by the clinician, measuring the cognitive performance. The SBT is a screening tool that aids in detecting early cognitive changes associated with dementia disorders. Further testing is warranted if dementia is suspected, the SBT should not be used to diagnose dementia. This is a weighted six-item instrument that evaluates orientation, registration, and attention.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 65 years old or above; willing to participate by signing an informed consent; suffering from an episode of major depression, based on clinical judgment (guided by DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) criteria); treatment with an antidepressant is clinically appropriate, based on clinical/medical judgment; agreement between investigator and patient to discontinue any current antidepressant, second generation antipsychotic, or lithium. According to the pragmatic design of the study, the discontinuation will be performed according to common routine practice. No specific protocols for discontinuation will be applied. All other concomitant medications are allowed; uncertainty about which trial treatment would be best for the participant. Exclusion Criteria: dementia, of any type and stage, as formally diagnosed by a specialist (geriatrician, neurologist, or others); diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; clinical conditions or treatments which contraindicate the use of oral vortioxetine or SSRIs, according to clinical/medical judgment (for example conditions or treatments at high risk of bleeding, convulsions, serotoninergic syndrome, hyponatraemia, etc.). All concomitant medications will be prescribed according to routine clinical practice, in compliance with the synthesis of the product characteristics (Riassunto delle Caratteristiche del Prodotto - RCP) registered in the databank of the AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco) (available at https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/cerca-farmaco).
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Università Magna Grecia
City
Catanzaro
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Neurologia e Psichiatria
City
Roma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Verona
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32746941
Citation
Ostuzzi G, Gastaldon C, Barbato A, D'Avanzo B, Tettamanti M, Monti I, Aguglia A, Aguglia E, Alessi MC, Amore M, Bartoli F, Biondi M, Bortolaso P, Callegari C, Carra G, Caruso R, Cavallotti S, Crocamo C, D'Agostino A, De Fazio P, Di Natale C, Giusti L, Grassi L, Martinotti G, Nose M, Papola D, Purgato M, Rodolico A, Roncone R, Tarsitani L, Turrini G, Zanini E, Amaddeo F, Ruggeri M, Barbui C. Tolerability and efficacy of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in elderly with major depression. Study protocol of the VESPA study: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Aug 3;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04460-6.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Vortioxetine in the Elderly vs. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): a Pragmatic Assessment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs