Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Congestive Heart Failure
Primary Purpose
Congestive Heart Failure, Electric Muscle Stimulation, Severe Decondition
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Electrical muscle devise
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Congestive Heart Failure
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥ 60 years
- hospitalized due to heart failure
- left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%
- NYHA class II to IV
- willingness to complete the 6-week EMS training programme
- tolerability of the electrical stimulation
- provision of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe neuromuscular or oncologic diseases with inability to perform exercise testing and EMS training
- inotropic intravenous agents used (≤10 days)
- implanted pacemaker/ICD
- unstable angina
- severe uncontrolled arrhythmias
- patients with severe pulmonary limitation (Tiffeneau ratio <70%, or vital capacity <70% of predicted value)
Sites / Locations
- Kantonsspital OltenRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Low Intensity EMS
High Intensity EMS
Placebo
Arm Description
Conventional Stimulation
Russian Stimulation
no Stimulation, supported by phone contact
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Difference in 6 minutes walking distance after EMS training
The primary outcome of the study is the difference in 6 minutes walking distance (m) between baseline and after 6-weeks EMS training in all groups (high intensity vs low intensity vs control).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03793647
Brief Title
Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Congestive Heart Failure
Official Title
Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Severely Deconditioned Congestive Heart Failure Patients- a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kantonsspital Olten
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This trial is to evaluate two types of electrical muscle Stimulation (EMS) stimulation (low intensity "conventional stimulation" vs. high intensity "Russian" stimulation) of legs in comparison with a control group without EMS in a cohort of elderly patients with severe deconditioning after CHF decompensation.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND:
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasingly prevalent worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Poor exercise capacity is well known as a risk factor for poor prognosis. The deconditioning is mainly associated with a decrease in leg muscle mass and loss of leg strength as well as loss of muscle endurance. This affects especially elderly patients. To improve this condition in CHF electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a suitable method of training, which hardly affects the heart. However, most EMS existing stimulation protocols are uncomfortable and not user-friendly, especially for elderly patients. The Russian space medicine has many years' experience in specific EMS stimulation protocols, which are well tolerated by cosmonauts for hours even during working activities. Therefore, a research project has been established between the Russian Academy of Sciences (Laboratory for Biomedical Problems) and the ARTORG Research Center for Biomedical Engineering to study the effects of new developed EMS procedures in elderly persons.
Aims:
The aim of trial is to evaluate two types of EMS stimulation (low intensity "conventional stimulation" vs. high intensity "Russian" stimulation) of legs in comparison with a control group without EMS in a cohort of elderly patients with severe deconditioning after CHF decompensation.
METHOTOLOGY:
This prospective, randomized controlled study will use commercially available electronic stimulator devices (Medel GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for EMS. For the "Russian" stimulation, an especial developed stimulator (Amplidin-EST No.5) will be used for frequency modulation of the stimulation impulse, which is supposed to make stimulation sensation more comfortable. Supervised EMS training will be performed 5 times per week (weekdays) during 30 minutes over a period of 6 weeks in elderly deconditioned CHF patients, starting at the Kantonsspital Olten during the hospitalisation and continued at home. We will include 20 patients in each group (20 in control group, 20 in low intensity "conventional group and 20 in high intensity "Russian" group). The control group was preformed to exclude an attention bias in the study results. The primary endpoint of the study is the difference in maximum oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and in 6 minutes walking distance between baseline and after 6-weeks EMS training in all groups (high intensity vs low intensity vs control). The follow-up period is planned for 2 years.
POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Exercise capacity and quality of life in severely deconditioned patients with CHF is poor and life expectancy is low. While the possibilities to improve the poor condition and function of the heart by pharmaceutical therapies are limited, there is potential to improve the condition of the peripheral muscles by exercise training. However, a successful aerobic training is rarely feasible in these patients. Therefore, EMS training may prove to be ideal tool to improve leg muscle mass and function of elderly patients. Because, CHF patients do not tolerate most of the existing EMS stimulation protocols, we have developed a new EMS stimulation protocol. The application is virtually painless and therefore well tolerated over hours due to a sophisticated stimulation protocol. Therefore, we hope that, this especial for elderly CHF patients developed training protocol, may improve their daily activity as well as their quality of life.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Congestive Heart Failure, Electric Muscle Stimulation, Severe Decondition, Elderly Person, Exercise Capacity, Activities of Daily Living
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, randomized controlled study
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Low Intensity EMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional Stimulation
Arm Title
High Intensity EMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Russian Stimulation
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
no Stimulation, supported by phone contact
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Electrical muscle devise
Intervention Description
evaluate two types of EMS stimulation of legs
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in 6 minutes walking distance after EMS training
Description
The primary outcome of the study is the difference in 6 minutes walking distance (m) between baseline and after 6-weeks EMS training in all groups (high intensity vs low intensity vs control).
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
age ≥ 60 years
hospitalized due to heart failure
left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%
NYHA class II to IV
willingness to complete the 6-week EMS training programme
tolerability of the electrical stimulation
provision of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
severe neuromuscular or oncologic diseases with inability to perform exercise testing and EMS training
inotropic intravenous agents used (≤10 days)
implanted pacemaker/ICD
unstable angina
severe uncontrolled arrhythmias
patients with severe pulmonary limitation (Tiffeneau ratio <70%, or vital capacity <70% of predicted value)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Nisha Arenja, Dr
Phone
0041 62 311 49 45
Email
nisha.arenja@spital.so.ch
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hugo Saner, Prof.
Email
Hugo.Saner@insel.ch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nisha Arenja
Organizational Affiliation
Kantonsspital Olten
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kantonsspital Olten
City
Olten
ZIP/Postal Code
4600
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nisha Arenja, Dr
Phone
0041 62 311 49 45
Email
nisha.arenja@spital.so.ch
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15942420
Citation
Deley G, Kervio G, Verges B, Hannequin A, Petitdant MF, Salmi-Belmihoub S, Grassi B, Casillas JM. Comparison of low-frequency electrical myostimulation and conventional aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Jun;12(3):226-33. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000166455.23346.a5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16377928
Citation
Dobsak P, Novakova M, Siegelova J, Fiser B, Vitovec J, Nagasaka M, Kohzuki M, Yambe T, Nitta S, Eicher JC, Wolf JE, Imachi K. Low-frequency electrical stimulation increases muscle strength and improves blood supply in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J. 2006 Jan;70(1):75-82. doi: 10.1253/circj.70.75.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12727155
Citation
Harris S, LeMaitre JP, Mackenzie G, Fox KA, Denvir MA. A randomised study of home-based electrical stimulation of the legs and conventional bicycle exercise training for patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2003 May;24(9):871-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00822-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20490656
Citation
Karavidas A, Arapi SM, Pyrgakis V, Adamopoulos S. Functional electrical stimulation of lower limbs in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2010 Nov;15(6):563-79. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9171-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24093858
Citation
Karavidas A, Driva M, Parissis JT, Farmakis D, Mantzaraki V, Varounis C, Paraskevaidis I, Ikonomidis I, Pirgakis V, Anastasiou-Nana M, Filippatos G. Functional electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles improves endothelial function and clinical and emotional status in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Am Heart J. 2013 Oct;166(4):760-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12665986
Citation
Nuhr M, Crevenna R, Gohlsch B, Bittner C, Pleiner J, Wiesinger G, Fialka-Moser V, Quittan M, Pette D. Functional and biochemical properties of chronically stimulated human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;89(2):202-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0792-8. Epub 2003 Feb 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10378936
Citation
Quittan M, Sochor A, Wiesinger GF, Kollmitzer J, Sturm B, Pacher R, Mayr W. Strength improvement of knee extensor muscles in patients with chronic heart failure by neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Artif Organs. 1999 May;23(5):432-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06372.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20560163
Citation
Sbruzzi G, Ribeiro RA, Schaan BD, Signori LU, Silva AM, Irigoyen MC, Plentz RD. Functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Jun;17(3):254-60. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328339b5a2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22236510
Citation
Smart NA, Dieberg G, Giallauria F. Functional electrical stimulation for chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.019. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9721054
Citation
Vaquero AF, Chicharro JL, Gil L, Ruiz MP, Sanchez V, Lucia A, Urrea S, Gomez MA. Effects of muscle electrical stimulation on peak VO2 in cardiac transplant patients. Int J Sports Med. 1998 Jul;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971924.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Congestive Heart Failure
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs