search
Back to results

Tonsillectomy Using BiZact™ - a Randomized Side-controlled Clinical Trial

Primary Purpose

Tonsillitis Chronic, Tonsillectomy, Hemorrhage

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider
Sponsored by
Medical University of Vienna
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tonsillitis Chronic

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 85 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 14 and older
  • Written informed consent (in case of underage participant also parental informed consent)
  • Assigned for Tonsillectomy on both sides due to chronic tonsillitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of abscesses in tonsillar region
  • Coagulation disorder (as assessed by a coagulation questionnaire and blood results)
  • Suspicion of untreated malignancy of any kind
  • Planned removal of only one tonsil

Sites / Locations

  • Medical University of Vienna

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

BiZact™ device

Cold steel dissection (CD)

Arm Description

BiZact™ device will be used appropriately to its purpose to remove one tonsil by: Incision of the anterior palatal arch Locating of the cranial pole of the tonsil Dissection of the tonsil capsule Localized coagulation of bleeding vessels Detaching of the inferior pole from the pharynx tissue

Cold steel dissection (CD) with localized cauterization for hemostasis serves as the comparative procedure within each patient (cross-over).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

surgical time
For the aim of the study surgical time is defined as time from superior mucosal incision to the moment when the removed tonsil is placed on instrument table (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to stop bleeding
Time to stop bleeding per side after tonsil removal (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch)
intraoperative blood loss
intraoperative blood loss as measured by A) secretion/blood volume in suction device side separately B) number of used swabs C) swab weight (documented by surgical assistant, side separately at the earliest time point after removal out of the oral cavity - weighing scale provided only for this investigation)
Postoperative pain assessment
Postoperative pain assessment A) using a side specific questionnaire (visual analogue scales (VAS-Scale) 0-100mm: differences of more than 16mm can be judged as significant in style of Bijur et al. 2001) on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10. B) follow-up phone call 2 months after surgery (or in-visit as preferred by the patient) assesses for swallowing difficulties and residual pain in side comparison.
Wound healing
Wound healing on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 very nice tissue / no inflammation to 100mm scale very thick fibrin / strong inflammation as seen by redness/secretion) (evaluated by ENT specialist not familiar with previous randomized side in course of postoperative follow-up visit including review of histological findings)
Tonsil mobility intraoperatively
Tonsil mobility intraoperatively on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 not mobile to 100mm very easy to move)

Full Information

First Posted
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 2, 2021
Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03793816
Brief Title
Tonsillectomy Using BiZact™ - a Randomized Side-controlled Clinical Trial
Official Title
Tonsillectomy Using BiZact™ - a Randomized Side-controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 23, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 21, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tonsillectomies are frequently followed by severe postoperative pain, hence high analgetics consumption and prolonged hospitalization. Also, postoperative hemorrhages can be hazardous. Constant evaluation of surgical techniques is paramount to improve safety and cost-effectiveness. Frequently tonsillectomies are performed in cold steel technique. Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates using the BiZactTM-Device in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used. The primary objective will be the surgical time. Regardless of surgeon handedness, surgeons will randomly be assigned to either start with the left or right tonsil, and randomly either to start with the BiZact™ Device or with "cold steel" methods. Additionally, time to stop bleeding, intraoperative blood loss, tonsil mobility, device handling, as well as wound healing will be assessed.
Detailed Description
Although stricter indication criteria have been implanted (especially in Austria since 2008), tonsillectomies are still performed very frequently. Post-surgical bleeding can potentially be life-threatening, and occur within 3 weeks after tonsillectomy. A broad survey in Great Britain revealed a postoperative hemorrhage rate in 33.921 patients between 1.5 and 5.4 %, varying on hospital size. Small collectives also showed rates up to 21.7%. Worldwide, different techniques are used. Generally, "cold" steel and "hot" techniques can be distinguished, although often current-carrying ("hot") and "cold" instruments are used alternately. Postoperative pain seems to be uninfluenced by technique, whereas postoperative hemorrhage rates seem to be higher in "hot" techniques. LigaSure® is a bipolar "current-carrying" device, which is able to seal vessels. Simultaneously tissue impedance is measured to control energy application. In this way only the required energy levels are applied. Therefore LigaSure® can also be referred as a "softened hot" technique. In 2005 Lachanas et al. compared the LigaSure®-technique with the "cold" steel technique in 200 patients and found significantly less postoperative pain in favor of the LigaSure®-technique. Postoperative hemorrhage rates were not higher with LigaSure®. Based on the LigaSure®-scissors, Medtronic introduced a device specifically developed and licensed for tonsillectomies (BiZactTM). Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used. This side-controlled evaluation of surgical techniques in tonsillectomies has been proven successfully in previous studies.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tonsillitis Chronic, Tonsillectomy, Hemorrhage, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Hemorrhage, Surgery--Complications, Handling, Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Cross-over block design with block sizes of 12, such that after 12 patients every group was chosen three times. 48 patients in 4 groups (BiZactTM first / BiZactTM second, BiZactTM right / BiZactTM left side).
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Patients will not be informed which side was operated with the BiZact™ device. Surgeons however inevitably know side. The side will also be documented in the surgical report. Follow-up specialists must refrain from reading through surgical reports, thus not know which technique was used for which side. Discharging letters will not include technique information.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BiZact™ device
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
BiZact™ device will be used appropriately to its purpose to remove one tonsil by: Incision of the anterior palatal arch Locating of the cranial pole of the tonsil Dissection of the tonsil capsule Localized coagulation of bleeding vessels Detaching of the inferior pole from the pharynx tissue
Arm Title
Cold steel dissection (CD)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Cold steel dissection (CD) with localized cauterization for hemostasis serves as the comparative procedure within each patient (cross-over).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider
Intervention Description
The BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider creates a seal by application of radiofrequency (RF) electrosurgical energy to blood and lymphatic vessels or tissue bundles interposed between the jaws of the instrument. A cutting blade within the instrument is surgeon-activated to divide tissue. It is a single-use device and will not be reused in other patients.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
surgical time
Description
For the aim of the study surgical time is defined as time from superior mucosal incision to the moment when the removed tonsil is placed on instrument table (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch).
Time Frame
1 hour (intraoperative)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to stop bleeding
Description
Time to stop bleeding per side after tonsil removal (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch)
Time Frame
1 hour (intraoperative)
Title
intraoperative blood loss
Description
intraoperative blood loss as measured by A) secretion/blood volume in suction device side separately B) number of used swabs C) swab weight (documented by surgical assistant, side separately at the earliest time point after removal out of the oral cavity - weighing scale provided only for this investigation)
Time Frame
1 hour (intraoperative)
Title
Postoperative pain assessment
Description
Postoperative pain assessment A) using a side specific questionnaire (visual analogue scales (VAS-Scale) 0-100mm: differences of more than 16mm can be judged as significant in style of Bijur et al. 2001) on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10. B) follow-up phone call 2 months after surgery (or in-visit as preferred by the patient) assesses for swallowing difficulties and residual pain in side comparison.
Time Frame
Day of surgery until 2 months after surgery
Title
Wound healing
Description
Wound healing on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 very nice tissue / no inflammation to 100mm scale very thick fibrin / strong inflammation as seen by redness/secretion) (evaluated by ENT specialist not familiar with previous randomized side in course of postoperative follow-up visit including review of histological findings)
Time Frame
approx. 10 days after surgery
Title
Tonsil mobility intraoperatively
Description
Tonsil mobility intraoperatively on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 not mobile to 100mm very easy to move)
Time Frame
intraoperative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 14 and older Written informed consent (in case of underage participant also parental informed consent) Assigned for Tonsillectomy on both sides due to chronic tonsillitis Exclusion Criteria: History of abscesses in tonsillar region Coagulation disorder (as assessed by a coagulation questionnaire and blood results) Suspicion of untreated malignancy of any kind Planned removal of only one tonsil
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical University of Vienna
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
individual participant data (IPD) is not to be shared with third party members
Citations:
Citation
Österreichische Gesellschaften für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie und Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde. Joint recommendation on tonsillectomy. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde. 2008;156(3):268-271.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lowe D, van der Meulen J. National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2003;85(10):352-353.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21373896
Citation
Sarny S, Habermann W, Ossimitz G, Schmid C, Stammberger H. Tonsilar haemorrhage and re-admission: a questionnaire based study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Dec;268(12):1803-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1541-y. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27619026
Citation
Dadgarnia MH, Aghaei MA, Atighechi S, Behniafard N, Vahidi MR, Meybodian M, Zand V, Vajihinejad M, Ansari A. The comparison of bleeding and pain after tonsillectomy in bipolar electrocautery vs cold dissection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;89:38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Riegler M, Cosentini E. Aktueller Stand der LigaSure®/Atlas®-Technologie zur Gefäßversiegelung in der Allgemeinchirurgie. European Surgery. 2004;36(2):85-88.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16148700
Citation
Lachanas VA, Prokopakis EP, Bourolias CA, Karatzanis AD, Malandrakis SG, Helidonis ES, Velegrakis GA. Ligasure versus cold knife tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope. 2005 Sep;115(9):1591-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000172044.57285.b6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25241816
Citation
Izny Hafiz Z, Rosdan S, Mohd Khairi MD. Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: a comparison of intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss and post-operative pain. Med J Malaysia. 2014 Apr;69(2):74-8.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Chettri ST, Bhandary S, Nepal A, et al. A single blind controlled study comparing bipolar elecrocautery tonsillectomy to cold dissection method in pediatric age groups. Health Renaissance. 2014;11(3):270-272.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11733293
Citation
Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34338876
Citation
Besser G, Grasl S, Meyer EL, Schnoell J, Bartosik TJ, Brkic FF, Heiduschka G. A novel electrosurgical divider: performance in a self-controlled tonsillectomy study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):2109-2115. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07008-9. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tonsillectomy Using BiZact™ - a Randomized Side-controlled Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs