search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool (EVIDENT)

Primary Purpose

Essential Tremor, Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool
Sponsored by
Abbott Medical Devices
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Essential Tremor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Parkinson's disease patients:

  1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure.
  2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age.
  3. Patient is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease for at least 4 years according to standard practice.
  4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-Parkinson's disease medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
  5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study.
  6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) within the last 12 months.
  7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.

Essential tremor patients:

  1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure.
  2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age.
  3. Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 4 years according to standard practice.
  4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
  5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study.
  6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamus within the last 12 months.
  7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Individuals unable to make the decision to participate in a clinical investigation on their own.
  2. Patient is currently programmed with segmented electrodes, and cannot tolerate omnidirectional programming.
  3. Patient is being evaluated for a lead revision.
  4. Patient has untreated clinically significant depression.
  5. Patient has dementia that interferes with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent, as determined by the investigator.
  6. Patient abuses drugs or alcohol.
  7. Patient is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another concurrent study that may confound the results of this clinical investigation.
  8. Patient has a confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival <12 months.
  9. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the clinical study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical study results.
  10. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical study follow-up period.

Sites / Locations

  • Albany Medical Center
  • The University of Texas Health Science at San Antonio
  • Inland Northwest Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Single Arm

Arm Description

Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Mean Duration of Programming
Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months
Change in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months
Change in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline

Full Information

First Posted
December 18, 2018
Last Updated
March 28, 2022
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03794661
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool
Acronym
EVIDENT
Official Title
Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 26, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 16, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 16, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to characterize the clinical performance of Abbott's Clinician Programmer Electrode Screening Mode tool (InformityTM tool) in programming InfinityTM deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET).
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center, post-market clinical investigation designed to evaluate Abbott's Informity tool for Infinity DBS systems. This clinical investigation will be conducted at up to 5 centers in the United States. Up to 40 patients were intended to enroll in the study. However the study was stopped after enrolling 8 subjects at 3 sites. Subjects participating in this clinical investigation will be followed for 6 months. The expected duration of enrollment is 6 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 18 months. The primary and secondary endpoints will be evaluated when all subjects have completed their 6 month follow-up visits

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Essential Tremor, Parkinson's Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Outcomes assessor will be masked to subjects' deep brain stimulation programming.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
8 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Single Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool
Other Intervention Name(s)
Informity tool
Intervention Description
Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Description
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Time Frame
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Title
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Description
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Time Frame
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Title
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Description
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Time Frame
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Title
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Description
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Time Frame
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months
Description
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Time Frame
At 3 months compared to baseline
Title
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months
Description
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Time Frame
At 6 months compared to baseline
Title
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline
Description
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months
Description
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time Frame
At 3 months
Title
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months
Description
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time Frame
At 6 months
Title
Mean Duration of Programming
Description
Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment
Time Frame
At Day 21
Title
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months
Description
Change in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Time Frame
At 3 months compared to baseline
Title
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months
Description
Change in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Time Frame
At 6 months compared to baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA Parkinson's disease patients: Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. Patient is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease for at least 4 years according to standard practice. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-Parkinson's disease medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) within the last 12 months. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Essential tremor patients: Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 4 years according to standard practice. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamus within the last 12 months. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Individuals unable to make the decision to participate in a clinical investigation on their own. Patient is currently programmed with segmented electrodes, and cannot tolerate omnidirectional programming. Patient is being evaluated for a lead revision. Patient has untreated clinically significant depression. Patient has dementia that interferes with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent, as determined by the investigator. Patient abuses drugs or alcohol. Patient is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another concurrent study that may confound the results of this clinical investigation. Patient has a confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival <12 months. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the clinical study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical study results. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical study follow-up period.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bradley White
Organizational Affiliation
Abbott
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Binith Cheeran
Organizational Affiliation
Abbott Medical Devices Neuromodulation
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Albany Medical Center
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Texas Health Science at San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inland Northwest Research
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99202
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs