search
Back to results

(SGB) in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Improve Hot Flashes

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer, Hot Flashes

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
.5% Bupivacaine
Sponsored by
Northwestern University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Stelate Ganglion Block

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men with prostate cancer (with or without metastatic disease) on ADT for at least 2 months
  2. Age less than 65 years
  3. Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 32
  4. Willingness to undergo image guided intervention
  5. Greater than 28 hot flashes per week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Conditions that preclude SGB or sham intervention (e.g., anatomic abnormalities of the anterior neck or cervical spine; metastatic disease in or near the cervical spine; goiter;cardiac/pulmonary compromise; sleep apnea; acute illness/infection; coagulopathy or bleeding disorder; allergic reactions/contraindications to a local anesthetic or contrast dye)
  2. Current treatment of prostate cancer with radium or chemotherapy
  3. Use of treatments in the past two months that can affect HF (e.g., testosterone or androgen supplementation) Note: SSRIs, serotonin norepinephrine uptake inhibitors, and membrane stabilizers will be allowed but must be on stable unchanged dose for at least 8 weeks)
  4. Inability to write, speak, or read in English

Sites / Locations

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

.5% Bupivacaine

Arm Description

Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hot Flash Frequency Change Baseline to 3 Months After Treatment.
Change in mean daily hot flashes using a self-report hot flash diary from baseline to 3 months after stellate ganglion block.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Hot Flash Severity Baseline to 3 Months After Stellate Ganglion Block
The change in hot flash severity (hot flash frequency x hot flash intensity) between baseline and 3 months after SGB. Hot flash severity is determined using the mean frequency= ((Fmo+Fse))7 where FMi, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe HF events. The mean severity= (Fmi+2x Fmo + 3 x Fse)/7 where FMI, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe/very severe hot flash events in the case of mean severity, frequency of mild vasomotor symptoms is not counted at baseline.
PROMIS SF4a Score 4 Weeks After Stellate Ganglion Block.
PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reportee Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy and satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality).
Patient Global Impression of Change Score (PGIC)
The PGIC assesses the participants improvement in hot flashes from the time of the stellate ganglion block to 4 weeks after the procedure. The PGIC queries how much the hot flashes have improved on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Full Information

First Posted
January 3, 2019
Last Updated
January 3, 2023
Sponsor
Northwestern University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03796195
Brief Title
(SGB) in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Improve Hot Flashes
Official Title
Does Stellate Ganglion Blockade (SGB) in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Improve Hot Flashes? A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Enrollment issues
Study Start Date
November 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 16, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 16, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Northwestern University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is a critical component of advanced prostate cancer treatment but causes numerous adverse effects including decreased bone mass, decreased muscle mass, gynecomastia, erectile dysfunction, loss of sexual desire, depression, disordered sleep, urinary symptoms, and hot flashes (HF). HF are unpleasant paroxysmal episodes of flushing, sweating with vasodilation of the face, neck, and chest. These episodes can last for seconds to minutes and are often associated with night sweats, anxiety, and insomnia and have negative effects on quality of life. Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) with local anesthetic may be an effective treatment of HF in men on ADT, but has not been studied in any published clinical trials. The stellate ganglion is a neural structure in the anterior cervical spine region and is part of the sympathetic nervous system. It has been injected safely in the practice of pain management for more than 50 years in cases of post herpetic neuralgia (shingles), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and other painful neuropathies as well as some types of cardiac dysrhythmias. Given the frequency and severity and interference of HF in men on ADT for prostate cancer, in addition to the negative effects HF impose on this patient population and a paucity of effective treatments, finding alternative treatments for HF in this population is needed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer, Hot Flashes
Keywords
Stelate Ganglion Block

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
.5% Bupivacaine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
.5% Bupivacaine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Right sided stelate ganglion block (SGB)
Intervention Description
Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hot Flash Frequency Change Baseline to 3 Months After Treatment.
Description
Change in mean daily hot flashes using a self-report hot flash diary from baseline to 3 months after stellate ganglion block.
Time Frame
3 months after SGB procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Hot Flash Severity Baseline to 3 Months After Stellate Ganglion Block
Description
The change in hot flash severity (hot flash frequency x hot flash intensity) between baseline and 3 months after SGB. Hot flash severity is determined using the mean frequency= ((Fmo+Fse))7 where FMi, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe HF events. The mean severity= (Fmi+2x Fmo + 3 x Fse)/7 where FMI, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe/very severe hot flash events in the case of mean severity, frequency of mild vasomotor symptoms is not counted at baseline.
Time Frame
3 months after stellate ganglion block
Title
PROMIS SF4a Score 4 Weeks After Stellate Ganglion Block.
Description
PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reportee Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy and satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality).
Time Frame
4 weeks after stellate ganglion block
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change Score (PGIC)
Description
The PGIC assesses the participants improvement in hot flashes from the time of the stellate ganglion block to 4 weeks after the procedure. The PGIC queries how much the hot flashes have improved on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Time Frame
4 weeks after stellate ganglion block

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Men with prostate cancer with bothersome hot flashes.
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men with prostate cancer (with or without metastatic disease) on ADT for at least 2 months Age less than 65 years Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 32 Willingness to undergo image guided intervention Greater than 28 hot flashes per week. Exclusion Criteria: Conditions that preclude SGB or sham intervention (e.g., anatomic abnormalities of the anterior neck or cervical spine; metastatic disease in or near the cervical spine; goiter;cardiac/pulmonary compromise; sleep apnea; acute illness/infection; coagulopathy or bleeding disorder; allergic reactions/contraindications to a local anesthetic or contrast dye) Current treatment of prostate cancer with radium or chemotherapy Use of treatments in the past two months that can affect HF (e.g., testosterone or androgen supplementation) Note: SSRIs, serotonin norepinephrine uptake inhibitors, and membrane stabilizers will be allowed but must be on stable unchanged dose for at least 8 weeks) Inability to write, speak, or read in English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Walega, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Northwestern University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29072790
Citation
Gonzalez BD, Small BJ, Cases MG, Williams NL, Fishman MN, Jacobsen PB, Jim HSL. Sleep disturbance in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: The role of hot flashes and nocturia. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):499-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31024. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28712786
Citation
Dosani M, Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Pickles T. The Relationship between Hot Flashes and Testosterone Recovery after 12 Months of Androgen Suppression for Men with Localised Prostate Cancer in the ASCENDE-RT Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Oct;29(10):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27294289
Citation
Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS, Yousaf O. Men's experience of a guided self-help intervention for hot flushes associated with prostate cancer treatment. Psychol Health Med. 2017 Apr;22(4):425-433. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1195504. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11872028
Citation
Kouriefs C, Georgiou M, Ravi R. Hot flushes and prostate cancer: pathogenesis and treatment. BJU Int. 2002 Mar;89(4):379-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01761.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15379937
Citation
Nishiyama T, Kanazawa S, Watanabe R, Terunuma M, Takahashi K. Influence of hot flashes on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):735-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00896.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19962840
Citation
Frisk J. Managing hot flushes in men after prostate cancer--a systematic review. Maturitas. 2010 Jan;65(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.10.017. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23021559
Citation
Trump DL. Commentary on "association of androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular death in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials." Nguyen PL, Je Y, Schutz FA, Hoffman KE, Hu JC, Parekh A, Beckman JA, Choueiri TK, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA: JAMA 2011;306(21):2359-66. Urol Oncol. 2012 Sep;30(5):746-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.06.007. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27993906
Citation
Gavin AT, Donnelly D, Donnelly C, Drummond FJ, Morgan E, Gormley GJ, Sharp L. Effect of investigation intensity and treatment differences on prostate cancer survivor's physical symptoms, psychological well-being and health-related quality of life: a two country cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 19;6(12):e012952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012952. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 23;7(1):e012952corr1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23893467
Citation
Eziefula CU, Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS. 'You know I've joined your club... I'm the hot flush boy': a qualitative exploration of hot flushes and night sweats in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Dec;22(12):2823-30. doi: 10.1002/pon.3355. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

(SGB) in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Improve Hot Flashes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs