search
Back to results

Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair

Primary Purpose

Shoulder Pain Chronic, Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tear

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tensor Tunnler
Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Shoulder Pain Chronic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults age 18-75 years old
  • Full thickness rotator cuff tears of any size (documented by MRI or ultrasound)
  • Patients planning surgical repair with Dr. Uma Srikumaran (PI of this study) at Johns Hopkins Shoulder Service (Columbia, Odenton Clinic sites; Howard County General Hospital/Bayview/Johns Hopkins Hospital operative sites)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with partial tears, massive rotator cuff tears that are irreparable, isolated subscapularis tears, and associated pathology (advanced degenerative changes)
  • Patients undergoing revision rotator cuff tears will be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tensor Tunnler

Smith and Nephew PEEK Helicoil Anchor

Arm Description

The Tensor Tunneler (Chattanooga, TN) will be used to create the bone tunnels during the arthroscopic procedure. This is an FDA approved device and is used currently in routine clinical practice.

The anchors used in this trial are FDA approved and are used currently in routine clinical practice (Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in condition of the shoulder as assessed by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score
10 separate questions is scored on an ordinal scale from 0-3 for a maximal raw functional score of 30 (no difficulties).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in shoulder pain as assessed by Visual Analog Pain Score
Patients are asked to identify whether they are having pain in the shoulder and are asked to record the location of their pain on a 10 cm line that ranges from 0(no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be)
Change in Range of Motion (ROM)
Total (combined glenohumeral and scapulothoracic) shoulder motion is measured. Both active and passive motion for both shoulders is recorded. Forward elevation is measured as the maximum arm-trunk angle viewed from any direction. External rotation is measured with the arm comfortably at the side and also with the arm at 90° of abduction. Internal rotation is measured by noting the highest segment of spinal anatomy reached with the thumb. Cross-body adduction is measured by measuring the distance of the antecubital fossa from the opposite acromion.
Change in Strength Testing
Strength is graded according to the Medical Research Council grade. Strength is measured in forward elevation, abduction, external rotation with the arm comfortably at the side, and internal rotation with the arm comfortably at the side. A perfect score is a 5 in each category.
Change in quality of life as assessed by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index
Quality of Life Measurement tool for patients with rotator cuff disease where patients mark a line on 21 visual analogue scale (VAS) lines labeled 0 (not affected) - 100 (affected). These items will ask about physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, social function, and emotions. The maximum score is 2100 for worst possible symptoms and 0 represents no symptoms at all.
Change in health related quality of life as assessed by Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D)
Measures of health related quality of life (HRQoL) using 11 items from the SF-36 or SF-12. Patients are asked about their physical functioning, role limitations, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality. A score of 1 represents full health.
Implant Cost
Review of costs through our billing department

Full Information

First Posted
January 7, 2019
Last Updated
May 29, 2019
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03797287
Brief Title
Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair
Official Title
Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
IRB will be terminated
Study Start Date
February 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will compare arthroscopic transosseous versus anchored rotator cuff repairs in terms of clinical outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, and cost-effectiveness. With the collection of patient-reported outcomes the health of patients undergoing each rotator cuff repair technique will be assessed. The aims of this study will be achieved through a clinical randomized controlled trial and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Detailed Description
Study Design: After the decision to proceed with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, patients will be asked to participate in this prospective randomized clinical trial. Study Procedures: Before Surgery: The Informed Consent process will be completed prior to any data collection. Consent will be completed after explanation of each treatment group and the data to be collected. Baseline and demographic data will be collected prior to surgery: Randomization: Subjects will be randomized prior to surgery into one of the two rotator cuff repair technique groups using REDCap software. Randomization will be stratified by gender. Patient Visits: Patients will complete their questionnaires and testing before surgery then within 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years After the first week of surgery, patients will be given a pain diary to record all narcotic pain medications they consume during the 1st week post-op. An ultrasound will be done during their 6 month, 1 year, and 2 year follow up.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Shoulder Pain Chronic, Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tear, Rotator Cuff Injury

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tensor Tunnler
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Tensor Tunneler (Chattanooga, TN) will be used to create the bone tunnels during the arthroscopic procedure. This is an FDA approved device and is used currently in routine clinical practice.
Arm Title
Smith and Nephew PEEK Helicoil Anchor
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The anchors used in this trial are FDA approved and are used currently in routine clinical practice (Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Tensor Tunnler
Intervention Description
Create the bone tunnels during the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedure
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair
Intervention Description
The suture anchors (Smith and Nephew PEEK Helicoil Anchor) are inserted in bone and the sutures are then used to sew the tendons to bone arthroscopically.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in condition of the shoulder as assessed by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score
Description
10 separate questions is scored on an ordinal scale from 0-3 for a maximal raw functional score of 30 (no difficulties).
Time Frame
Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in shoulder pain as assessed by Visual Analog Pain Score
Description
Patients are asked to identify whether they are having pain in the shoulder and are asked to record the location of their pain on a 10 cm line that ranges from 0(no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be)
Time Frame
Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
Title
Change in Range of Motion (ROM)
Description
Total (combined glenohumeral and scapulothoracic) shoulder motion is measured. Both active and passive motion for both shoulders is recorded. Forward elevation is measured as the maximum arm-trunk angle viewed from any direction. External rotation is measured with the arm comfortably at the side and also with the arm at 90° of abduction. Internal rotation is measured by noting the highest segment of spinal anatomy reached with the thumb. Cross-body adduction is measured by measuring the distance of the antecubital fossa from the opposite acromion.
Time Frame
Before surgery, within 1 month after surgery, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Title
Change in Strength Testing
Description
Strength is graded according to the Medical Research Council grade. Strength is measured in forward elevation, abduction, external rotation with the arm comfortably at the side, and internal rotation with the arm comfortably at the side. A perfect score is a 5 in each category.
Time Frame
Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
Title
Change in quality of life as assessed by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index
Description
Quality of Life Measurement tool for patients with rotator cuff disease where patients mark a line on 21 visual analogue scale (VAS) lines labeled 0 (not affected) - 100 (affected). These items will ask about physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, social function, and emotions. The maximum score is 2100 for worst possible symptoms and 0 represents no symptoms at all.
Time Frame
Before surgery, 1 year after surgery, 2 years after surgery
Title
Change in health related quality of life as assessed by Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D)
Description
Measures of health related quality of life (HRQoL) using 11 items from the SF-36 or SF-12. Patients are asked about their physical functioning, role limitations, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality. A score of 1 represents full health.
Time Frame
Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery
Title
Implant Cost
Description
Review of costs through our billing department
Time Frame
Within 1 month after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults age 18-75 years old Full thickness rotator cuff tears of any size (documented by MRI or ultrasound) Patients planning surgical repair with Dr. Uma Srikumaran (PI of this study) at Johns Hopkins Shoulder Service (Columbia, Odenton Clinic sites; Howard County General Hospital/Bayview/Johns Hopkins Hospital operative sites) Exclusion Criteria: Patients with partial tears, massive rotator cuff tears that are irreparable, isolated subscapularis tears, and associated pathology (advanced degenerative changes) Patients undergoing revision rotator cuff tears will be excluded.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Uma Srikumaran, MD, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins
City
Columbia
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21044
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs