Evaluation of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Infants (EEStiVeN)
Primary Purpose
Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
urinary catheterization
manual bladder stimulation technique
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial focused on measuring Urine Specimen Collection/methods, Infant, Newborn, Feasibility Studies, Bladder stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants under the age of 6 months
For whom an urine sample is required for the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection as follows:
- fever > 39 °C without symptoms
- fever > 38°C and uropathy or urinary tract infection
- fever > 38°C and < 3 months
- fever > 38 °C and > 48h
- fever > 38 °C with sepsis signs
- Obtaining the authorization of the holders of parental authority
- Affiliation to French social security
Exclusion Criteria:
- Do exhibiting signs of vital distress (respiratory or circulatory or neurological)
- contraindication to bladder catheterization
- antibiotic therapy in the last 48 hours
- antibiotic prophylaxis in the last 48 hours
Sites / Locations
- CH Antibes Juans les PinsRecruiting
- CH GrasseRecruiting
- CHRU LilleRecruiting
- Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LenvalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Urinary catheterization
manual bladder stimulation Technique
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Bacterial contamination rates of urine samples per bladder stimulation and urinary catheterization
Bacterial contamination of urine sample is defined by:
the growth of two or more micro-organisms,
or the presence of a non-uropathogenic germ (lactobacilli, Staphylococcus Coagulase negative, Corynebacterium),
or a bacteriuria> 0 colony forming unit(CFU)/ml but <104 CFU / ml for bladder catheterization and <105 CFU / ml for clean catch urine collected by bladder stimulation, or leukocyturia <104 / ml
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain of bladder stimulation
pain is measured by Evaluation ENfant DOuLeur (EVENDOL) scale while the technique is performed. EVENDOL is a pain scale for children under 7. A pain scale validated for children from birth to 7 years. Score ranges from 0 to 15. Treatment threshold: 4/15.
Pain of bladder catheterization
pain is measured by Evaluation ENfant DOuLeur (EVENDOL) scale while the technique is performed. EVENDOL is a pain scale for children under 7. A pain scale validated for children from birth to 7 years. Score ranges from 0 to 15. Treatment threshold: 4/15.
Diagnostic performance of the dipstick urine test
The diagnostic performance of the urinary dipstick will be established through sensitivity , specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value taking as Gold Standard cytobacteriological examination of the urine (ECBU). Diagnostic performance, as well as accuracy, will be established in each of the two groups.
The sensitivity and specificity will be calculated as well as their 95% confidence intervals calculated using the method of the Wilson score
Risk factors associated with the failure of the bladder stimulation technique
for a urinary sample quantity < 2 ml or no urinary sample collected; potential risk factors for failure will be collected (pain, Wight, sex, age, last food and time since las collect urine)
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03801213
Brief Title
Evaluation of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Infants
Acronym
EEStiVeN
Official Title
Evaluation of the Bladder Stimulation, a Non-invasive Technique of Urine Collection, in Infant Less Than 6 Months to Diagnose Urinary Tract Infection: a Randomized Multicenter Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 12, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fondation Lenval
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common serious bacterial infection among infants. Suprapubic aspiration and bladder catheterization are considered as the gold standard by the American Academy of Pediatrics for the diagnosis, yet it is painful and invasive. In contrast, the bladder stimulation technique has been shown to be a quick and non-invasive approach to collect urine in young infants. Actually, the investigators don't have data on bacterial contamination rates for clean-catch midstream urine collections using this technique
Detailed Description
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in infants and needs to be diagnosed quickly. The risk for urinary tract infection before the age of 2 years is about 1-4% in boys and 3-8% in girls. A delay in diagnosis exposes to severe complications. In infants, the symptoms are not specific. A good urinalysis quality is therefore necessary for the diagnosis of UTI. Different techniques exist to collect urine samples in these children who do not control their urination yet: supra pubic aspiration, catheterization, urine collection bag and clean catch urine. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends supra pubic aspiration (1-9 % bacterial contamination) and urinary catheterization (8-14 % contamination) for collecting urine but these techniques are invasive and painful. The sterile bag is a non-invasive method of urine collection, with a high bacterial contamination rates (26-62%) leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. Finally, clean catch urine is an accepted urine sample to diagnose UTI according to the recommendations (13-27 % of bacterial contamination) but this method is only possible for potty-trained children. Recent studies (Herreros et al, Altuntas et al, Tran et al.) have shown that bladder stimulation, which consists of pubic tapping and lumbar massage, would be a new, effective, non-invasive and safe method of collecting urine in infants.
Bladder stimulation may be performed by a nurse or a physician. The steps of the bladder stimulation technique are as follows: (a) cleaning the genital area with warm water and soap b) bladder stimulation technique, requires the presence of 3 people: infants will be held under their armpits by a parent over the bed, with legs dangling in males and hips flexed in females. The nurse or technician will then alternate between bladder stimulation maneuvers: gentle tapping in the suprapubic area at a frequency of 100 taps per minute for 30 seconds followed by lumbar paravertebral massage maneuvers for 30 seconds. These two stimulation maneuvers will be repeated until micturition begins, or for a maximum of of 3 minutes.
However, the investigators do not have data on the bacterial contamination rate for urine sample using this new technique. the investigators hypothesize that the bladder stimulation is a technique for obtaining urine with a contamination rate equivalent to those obtained by bladder catheterization, in the diagnosis of febrile urinary tract infection in infants under 6 months of age.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial
Keywords
Urine Specimen Collection/methods, Infant, Newborn, Feasibility Studies, Bladder stimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
770 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Urinary catheterization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
manual bladder stimulation Technique
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
urinary catheterization
Intervention Description
Urinary catheterization with pain controlled
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
manual bladder stimulation technique
Intervention Description
manual gentle tapping in the suprapubic area at a frequency of 100 taps per minute for 30 seconds followed by lumbar paravertebral massage maneuvers for 30 seconds. The renal and bladder stimulation will be performed in less than 3 minutes, with a maximum of two attempts spaced about 20 minutes
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bacterial contamination rates of urine samples per bladder stimulation and urinary catheterization
Description
Bacterial contamination of urine sample is defined by:
the growth of two or more micro-organisms,
or the presence of a non-uropathogenic germ (lactobacilli, Staphylococcus Coagulase negative, Corynebacterium),
or a bacteriuria> 0 colony forming unit(CFU)/ml but <104 CFU / ml for bladder catheterization and <105 CFU / ml for clean catch urine collected by bladder stimulation, or leukocyturia <104 / ml
Time Frame
at 48 hours after inclusion date
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain of bladder stimulation
Description
pain is measured by Evaluation ENfant DOuLeur (EVENDOL) scale while the technique is performed. EVENDOL is a pain scale for children under 7. A pain scale validated for children from birth to 7 years. Score ranges from 0 to 15. Treatment threshold: 4/15.
Time Frame
through intervention completion, an average 30 min
Title
Pain of bladder catheterization
Description
pain is measured by Evaluation ENfant DOuLeur (EVENDOL) scale while the technique is performed. EVENDOL is a pain scale for children under 7. A pain scale validated for children from birth to 7 years. Score ranges from 0 to 15. Treatment threshold: 4/15.
Time Frame
through intervention completion, an average 30 min
Title
Diagnostic performance of the dipstick urine test
Description
The diagnostic performance of the urinary dipstick will be established through sensitivity , specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value taking as Gold Standard cytobacteriological examination of the urine (ECBU). Diagnostic performance, as well as accuracy, will be established in each of the two groups.
The sensitivity and specificity will be calculated as well as their 95% confidence intervals calculated using the method of the Wilson score
Time Frame
through intervention completion, an average 30 min
Title
Risk factors associated with the failure of the bladder stimulation technique
Description
for a urinary sample quantity < 2 ml or no urinary sample collected; potential risk factors for failure will be collected (pain, Wight, sex, age, last food and time since las collect urine)
Time Frame
through intervention completion, an average 30 min
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Infants under the age of 6 months
For whom an urine sample is required for the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection as follows:
fever > 39 °C without symptoms
fever > 38°C and uropathy or urinary tract infection
fever > 38°C and < 3 months
fever > 38 °C and > 48h
fever > 38 °C with sepsis signs
Obtaining the authorization of the holders of parental authority
Affiliation to French social security
Exclusion Criteria:
Do exhibiting signs of vital distress (respiratory or circulatory or neurological)
contraindication to bladder catheterization
antibiotic therapy in the last 48 hours
antibiotic prophylaxis in the last 48 hours
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
DEMONCHY DIANE, MD
Phone
+33(0)492030502
Email
demonchy.d@pediatrie-chulenval-nice.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
TRAN ANTOINE, MD
Email
tran.a@pediatrie-chulenval-nice.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
DEMONCHY DIANE, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Fondation Lenval - Nice Children Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CH Antibes Juans les Pins
City
Antibes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clara Fortier, MD
Facility Name
CH Grasse
City
Grasse
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan Desmontils, MD
Facility Name
CHRU Lille
City
Lille
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
François Dubos, Pr
Facility Name
Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval
City
Nice
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Demonchy Diane
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31881992
Citation
Demonchy D, Ciais C, Fontas E, Berard E, Breaud J, Rohrlich PS, Dubos F, Fortier C, Desmontils J, Herisse AL, Donzeau D, Haas H, Tran A. Evaluation of bladder stimulation as a non-invasive technique for urine collection to diagnose urinary tract infection in infants under 6 months: a randomized multicenter study ("EE-Sti.Ve.N"). Trials. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3914-2.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Infants
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs