search
Back to results

PeRcutaneous cOronary Intervention of Native Coronary arTery Versus Venous Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior CABG (PROCTOR)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Sponsored by
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Dysfunctional venous bypass graft, Second generation DES, CABG

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A significant stenosis (>50% on angiography) in a venous bypass graft

    • The native lesion must be bypassed by a single graft or must be connected to a jump graft at the most distal anastomosis of that graft
    • In jumpgraft lesions, the lesion must be located distally to the second-to-last anastomosis
  • Clinical indication for revascularization as determined by the local heart team (based on symptoms, documented ischemia, and viability).
  • Both the native lesion and the venous graft lesion must be deemed suitable for PCI with a commercially available second generation DES.
  • Informed consent must be obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age
  • Target vessel diameter < 2.5 mm
  • CABG performed less than 1 year prior to inclusion
  • Diameter of the graft > 5.5 mm
  • Aneurysm formation in the bypass graft
  • Heavy burden of thrombus in the bypass graft (>50% of the bypass graft lumen in ≥2 out of 3 of the proximal, middle or distal third of the bypass graft).
  • STEMI at presentation
  • NSTEMI patients with ongoing ischemia
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Severe kidney disease defined as an eGFR < 30 ml/min.
  • Pregnancy
  • Estimated life expectancy < 3 year
  • Contraindications to PCI

Sites / Locations

  • University HospitalRecruiting
  • Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) MiddelheimRecruiting
  • Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruiting
  • UZ LeuvenRecruiting
  • Universitäts Herzzentrum
  • Universitair Medische CentraRecruiting
  • Academic Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Amphia ZiekenhuisRecruiting
  • Catharina ZiekenhuisRecruiting
  • Medisch Centrum LeeuwardenRecruiting
  • Sint Antonius ZiekenhuisRecruiting
  • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum (Radboud UMC)Recruiting
  • Universitair Medisch CentrumRecruiting
  • Narodowy Instytut Kardiologii Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego Państwowy Instytut BadawczyRecruiting
  • Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals (Essex CTC)
  • Health and Social Care Trust
  • The Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • UH Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Heart Institute
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Native Vessel PCI

Graft PCI

Arm Description

All patients with a significant stenosis (>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Percutaneous coronary intervention of the native vessel will be performed according to current standard. In case of a CTO lesion, the aforementioned hybrid approach will be applied.This approach uses several angiographic characteristics to guide strategical planning of the procedure, using four complementary techniques to cross a CTO: antegrade wire escalation, antegrade dissection reentry, retrograde wire escalation and retrograde dissection reentry.

All patients with a significant stenosis (>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Percutaneous coronary intervention of the bypass graft will be performed following current standards and at the discretion of the operating interventional cardiologist. Only commercially available second generation DES will be used in the treatment of bypass grafts. The second generation DES used in this study will be the XIENCE Sierra stent. The use of a filter-wire during the procedure will be left at the discretion of the operator.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
Amount of patients that have passed away
Mortality score, all-cause mortality
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed
Number of clinically driven target lesion revascularizations
Any clinically driven target lesion revascularization noticed
Number of target vessel revascularizations
Any target vessel revascularization noticed.
Number of target vessel failure.
Any target vessel failure noticed
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions.
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed.
Number of PCI-related myocardial infarctions.
Any PCI-related myocardial infarction noticed.
Specific angiographic outcome
Any of the following outcomes: Late lumen loss In-stent binary restenosis (≥50%) In-stent re-occlusion Difference in in-stent diameter stenosis between index procedure at inclusion, and at 3-year follow-up
Quality of life assessed by SAQ
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire where patients' physical limitations caused by angina are quantified, as well as the frequency of and changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment and how they perceive their Quality of Life. Each scale is transformed to a 0-100 scale. the higher the score, the better the patients functions/the higher the Quality of Life.
Quality of life assessed by CCS
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Grading Scale measures whether patient have angina pectoris complaints, and to what extent patients experienced this. It uses a scale of 1-4 where 1 means angina pectoris (chest pain) only occurs with streneous, rapid or prolonged exertion, and 4 means angina is present during little physical effort or even during rest.
Quality of life assessed by RDS
Rose dyspnea scale questionnaire (RDS) measures dyspnea complaints, or shortness of breath. It consists of 4 questions about dysnpea complaints in the everyday life of patients. For every patient, a score is compiled of the highest limitation in daily life, resulting in a score of 0-4, where 0 means no dyspnea complaints and 4 means the patient has complaints during no or minimal physical effort. The scores from these questionnaires will be combined by summing the total scores.
Composite score of quality of life
Composite of all quality of life questionnaires, where all outcomes are summed to provide a total score

Full Information

First Posted
January 7, 2019
Last Updated
September 13, 2021
Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03805048
Brief Title
PeRcutaneous cOronary Intervention of Native Coronary arTery Versus Venous Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior CABG
Acronym
PROCTOR
Official Title
PeRcutaneous cOronary Intervention of Native Coronary arTery Versus Venous Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior cORonary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery - the PROCTOR Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 22, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Multi-centre, randomised clinical trial with anticipated 17 European centres: in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and UK. Patients with a dysfunctional bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization will be randomized to either PCI of the native vessel or PCI of the dysfunctional venous bypass graft. 584 patients with a a clinical indication for percutaneous coronary intervention and a dysfunctional graft on the target vesselional venous bypass graft are planned to be enrolled during 3 years.Study objectives: to investigate the clinical and angiographic outcome of native vessel PCI compared to PCI of venous bypass graft in patients with a dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization. 1 year and 5 years, follow-up will be performed by means of a telephonic visit. After 3 years patients will be admitted to undergo a control invasive angiography.The CT-substudy and the PROCTOR registry is planned to be conducted too.
Detailed Description
Multi-centre, randomised clinical trial with anticipated 17 European centres: in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and UK. Patients with a dysfunctional bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization will be randomized to either PCI of the native vessel or PCI of the dysfunctional venous bypass graft. The CT-substudy and the PROCTOR registry is planned to be conducted too (details included in the flow chart). CCTA substudy Selected patients will be approached for participation in the CCTA substudy of the trial. Participation in this substudy is optional. After written informed consent is obtained patients will undergo a CCTA in an out-patient setting. The CCTA will be performed before the PCI procedure. PROCTOR registry Patients can be approached for the registry when : PCI have been deemed clinically indicated by the local hartteam, and both the lesions in the native vessel and the dysfunctional graft have been deemed technically feasible by the local hartteam, the patient does not meet the in- and exclusion criteria for the randomized PROCTOR study or declines to participate in the randomized study. Patients will be approached for participation and will have one week to consider. Written informed consent is mandatory for participating in the registry. Patients will be followed by telephonic follow-up after 1, 3, and 5 years. No additional study procedures will be performed. Study objectives:to investigate the clinical and angiographic outcome of native vessel PCI compared to PCI of venous bypass graft in patients with a dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization. PROCTOR main study - Investigate the clinical outcome of native vessel PCI vs. PCI of dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularisation CCTA substudy Investigate prognostic value of CT-derived plaque characteristics for occurrence of MACE following bypass graft PCI Investigate value of CCTA in guidance of CTO PCI procedures PROCTOR Registry - Investigate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with dysfunctional venous bypass graft and an indication for PCI whom are not included in randomised main study. All patients with a significant stenosis (>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Patients will be eligible for inclusion if revascularization is deemed clinically indicated and technically feasible for PCI by the local heart team. The indication for revascularization will be based on symptoms and evidence of ischemia and viability in the target vessel territory. The lesion in the native vessel must be bypassed by a single venous graft or must be connected to a jump graft at the most distal anastomosis of that graft. In jump grafts, the lesion must be located distally to the second-to-last anastomosis. In case both the lesion in the native vessel and the lesion in the graft are deemed technically feasible for PCI, patients will be eligible for inclusion in the randomized study after consideration of in- and exclusion criteria. Patients who do not meet these criteria or decline to participate in the randomized study will be approached for inclusion in the registry. Subsequently patients will be approached for study participation. After being informed, patients will have at least 24 hours to consider participation. An independent physician will be available for extra information, if desired. After obtaining written informed consent, patients will be randomized to either native vessel PCI or PCI of the venous bypass graft. In case of PCI failure, a second attempt can be performed by the operator within one month. If feasible, it is possible to perform a second attempt in another high-volume center. When successful PCI cannot be accomplished in one or two attempts, cross-over to the other treatment arm may be used as bailout strategy to restore myocardial blood flow to the distal vascular bed of the vessel. Randomization will be performed using an interactive Web-based randomization system, Open Clinica. After 1 and 5 years, follow-up will be performed by means of a telephonic visit. After 3 years patients will be admitted to undergo a control invasive angiography.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Dysfunctional venous bypass graft, Second generation DES, CABG

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomized to either native vessel PCI or PCI of the venous bypass graft in a 1:1 fashion. Randomization will be performed using an interactive Web-based randomization system, Open Clinica
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
584 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Native Vessel PCI
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All patients with a significant stenosis (>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Percutaneous coronary intervention of the native vessel will be performed according to current standard. In case of a CTO lesion, the aforementioned hybrid approach will be applied.This approach uses several angiographic characteristics to guide strategical planning of the procedure, using four complementary techniques to cross a CTO: antegrade wire escalation, antegrade dissection reentry, retrograde wire escalation and retrograde dissection reentry.
Arm Title
Graft PCI
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All patients with a significant stenosis (>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Percutaneous coronary intervention of the bypass graft will be performed following current standards and at the discretion of the operating interventional cardiologist. Only commercially available second generation DES will be used in the treatment of bypass grafts. The second generation DES used in this study will be the XIENCE Sierra stent. The use of a filter-wire during the procedure will be left at the discretion of the operator.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Intervention Description
PCI of the bypass graft will be performed by current standards and at the discretion of the operator. Only commercially available second generation DES - XIENCE Sierra will be used. In case of a CTO lesion, the aforementioned hybrid approach will be applied.This approach uses several angiographic characteristics to guide strategical planning of the procedure, using 4 complementary techniques to cross a CTO: antegrade wire escalation, antegrade dissection reentry, retrograde wire escalation, retrograde dissection reentry. In case of PCI failure, a second attempt can be performed within 1 month. Patients will be hospitalized for a min. of 6-8 hours after PCI and receive DAPT prior to the procedure or triple therapy in case of indication for oral anticoagulation, their duration according to the current guidelines of the ESC for stable coronary disease or ACS.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Description
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
Time Frame
3 year follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Description
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
Time Frame
1 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Amount of patients that have passed away
Description
Mortality score, all-cause mortality
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions
Description
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Number of clinically driven target lesion revascularizations
Description
Any clinically driven target lesion revascularization noticed
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Number of target vessel revascularizations
Description
Any target vessel revascularization noticed.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Number of target vessel failure.
Description
Any target vessel failure noticed
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions.
Description
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed.
Time Frame
>48 hours after PCI
Title
Number of PCI-related myocardial infarctions.
Description
Any PCI-related myocardial infarction noticed.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Specific angiographic outcome
Description
Any of the following outcomes: Late lumen loss In-stent binary restenosis (≥50%) In-stent re-occlusion Difference in in-stent diameter stenosis between index procedure at inclusion, and at 3-year follow-up
Time Frame
3-year follow up
Title
Quality of life assessed by SAQ
Description
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire where patients' physical limitations caused by angina are quantified, as well as the frequency of and changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment and how they perceive their Quality of Life. Each scale is transformed to a 0-100 scale. the higher the score, the better the patients functions/the higher the Quality of Life.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Quality of life assessed by CCS
Description
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Grading Scale measures whether patient have angina pectoris complaints, and to what extent patients experienced this. It uses a scale of 1-4 where 1 means angina pectoris (chest pain) only occurs with streneous, rapid or prolonged exertion, and 4 means angina is present during little physical effort or even during rest.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Quality of life assessed by RDS
Description
Rose dyspnea scale questionnaire (RDS) measures dyspnea complaints, or shortness of breath. It consists of 4 questions about dysnpea complaints in the everyday life of patients. For every patient, a score is compiled of the highest limitation in daily life, resulting in a score of 0-4, where 0 means no dyspnea complaints and 4 means the patient has complaints during no or minimal physical effort. The scores from these questionnaires will be combined by summing the total scores.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Title
Composite score of quality of life
Description
Composite of all quality of life questionnaires, where all outcomes are summed to provide a total score
Time Frame
3-year follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A significant stenosis (>50% on angiography) in a venous bypass graft The native lesion must be bypassed by a single graft or must be connected to a jump graft at the most distal anastomosis of that graft In jumpgraft lesions, the lesion must be located distally to the second-to-last anastomosis Clinical indication for revascularization as determined by the local heart team (based on symptoms, documented ischemia, and viability). Both the native lesion and the venous graft lesion must be deemed suitable for PCI with a commercially available second generation DES. Informed consent must be obtained Exclusion Criteria: < 18 years of age Target vessel diameter < 2.5 mm CABG performed less than 1 year prior to inclusion Diameter of the graft > 5.5 mm Aneurysm formation in the bypass graft Heavy burden of thrombus in the bypass graft (>50% of the bypass graft lumen in ≥2 out of 3 of the proximal, middle or distal third of the bypass graft). STEMI at presentation NSTEMI patients with ongoing ischemia Cardiogenic shock Severe kidney disease defined as an eGFR < 30 ml/min. Pregnancy Estimated life expectancy < 3 year Contraindications to PCI
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Paul Knaapen, Prof
Phone
+31 20 4440123
Email
p.knaapen@amsterdamumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Iris Vegting
Phone
+31 20 4444445
Email
i.vegting1@amsterdamumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Knaapen
Organizational Affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Antwerp
State/Province
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
B 2650
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steven Haine, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nathalie Brosens
Facility Name
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim
City
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2020
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Dr
Facility Name
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
City
Genk
ZIP/Postal Code
B-3600
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jo Dens, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caroline Swijsen
Facility Name
UZ Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johan Bennett, Prof
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sabine Van Roey
Facility Name
Universitäts Herzzentrum
City
Bad Krozingen
ZIP/Postal Code
79189
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kambis Mashayekhi, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefanie Kittler
Facility Name
Universitair Medische Centra
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Knaapen, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Iris Vegting
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1105
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
José Henriques, Prof.
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna Van Veelen
Facility Name
Amphia Ziekenhuis
City
Breda
ZIP/Postal Code
4818 CK
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bas Schölzel, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Saskia van Roij
Facility Name
Catharina Ziekenhuis
City
Eindhoven
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Koen Teeuwen, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esther van Dooren
Facility Name
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
City
Leeuwarden
ZIP/Postal Code
8934
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sjoerd Hofma, Dr
Facility Name
Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis
City
Nieuwegein
ZIP/Postal Code
3435
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Dr
Facility Name
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum (Radboud UMC)
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Jan van Geuns, Prof.
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sophie Bogaerts
Facility Name
Universitair Medisch Centrum
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adriaan Kraaijeveld, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmita Junger
Facility Name
Narodowy Instytut Kardiologii Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
04-628
Country
Poland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maksymilian Opolski, MD PhD
Facility Name
Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals (Essex CTC)
City
Basildon
ZIP/Postal Code
SS16 5NL
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Davies, MD, PhDss
Facility Name
Health and Social Care Trust
City
Belfast
ZIP/Postal Code
BT8 8BH
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simon Walsh, MD
Facility Name
The Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Bournemouth
ZIP/Postal Code
BH7 7DW
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter O'Kane, MD
Facility Name
UH Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Heart Institute
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS1 3NU
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julian Strange, MD
Facility Name
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G81 4HX
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margaret Mc Entegart, MD, PhD
Facility Name
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW17 0QT
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Spratt, MD
Facility Name
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Saqib Chowdhary, MD,PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

PeRcutaneous cOronary Intervention of Native Coronary arTery Versus Venous Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior CABG

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs