search
Back to results

CBT-I on Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Among Veterans (Project SAVE)

Primary Purpose

Insomnia, Alcohol Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia
Sleep Hygiene
Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment as Usual
Sponsored by
University of Missouri-Columbia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Insomnia focused on measuring veteran, alcohol, insomnia, sleep, drinking

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in alcohol treatment at the Truman VA (Columbia, MO)
  • DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe Alcohol Use Disorder
  • Substance use in the past 2 months
  • DSM-5 episodic criterion (duration at least 1 month) for Insomnia Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to provide informed consent
  • cognitive impairment
  • continuous sobriety for 2+ months at baseline
  • manic episode or seizure in the past year (contraindications for CBT-I)
  • severe psychiatric disorder that requires immediate clinical attention
  • initiation of a sleep medication in the past six (6) weeks

Sites / Locations

  • University of Missouri-Columbia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

CBT-I + AUD-TAU

Sleep Hygiene + AUD-TAU

Arm Description

Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) delivered once a week for five (5) weeks.

Sleep hygiene education delivered once to all participants

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Insomnia severity
Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); ISI will be used as a 7-item measure of insomnia severity in the past two weeks. Items assess difficulty falling or staying asleep, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, the extent to which others notice their sleep problems, and worry/distress related to sleep problems. Response options range from 0 (not at all worried) to 4 (very much worried), with possible total scores ranging from 0 to 28. Participants scoring 10 or higher will be classified as screening positive for insomnia (Morin et al., 2011).114 Notably, self-report is the recommended method of assessment for symptoms of insomnia in adults (Schutte-Rodin et al., 2008).
Percent of heavy-drinking days
Assessed using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) for alcohol; TLFB allows participants to trace their alcohol use back 30 days.
Alcohol problems
Assessed using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP); SIP measures adverse consequences of substance use.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Sleep efficiency
Assessed using daily sleep diaries. Sleep Diaries are quotidian questionnaires that measure self-reported sleep quality, sleep & wake time, and daily habits concerning substance use.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms
Assessed using the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (PCL-5); PCL-5 is a 20-item measure of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). On a scale of not at all (0) to extremely (4), participants indicate how frequently in the past month they were bothered by stressful experiences such as disturbing dreams, hyper-alertness, strong negative beliefs, and irritability. PCL-5 is scored by summing the responses. Possible scores range from 0-80, where higher scores indicate higher PTSD severity. Symptoms may also be gleaned into clusters of Intrusion, Avoidance, Negative alterations in cognition/mood, and Alterations in arousal/reactivity.
Symptoms of depression
Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); PHQ-9 will be used as a 9-item measure of depressed mood and functioning that has demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity across adult samples. Participants will indicate how many days in the past two weeks (not at all, several days, more than half the days, or every day or nearly every day) they have experienced each problem. Scores will be summed and classified as minimal symptoms of depressed mood (<10), moderate levels of depressed mood (10-14), high levels of depressed mood (15-19), or very high levels of depressed mood (20-27)
Symptoms of anxiety
Assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7); GAD-7 is a 7-item measure of anxiety with strong criterion and predictive validity. On a scale from not at all (0) to nearly every day (3), participants indicate how often in the past two weeks they have experienced problems such as having trouble relaxing and being so restless that it is hard to sit still. Possible total scores range from 0-21. Scores will be summed and classified as minimal anxiety (<3), moderate anxiety (4-7), high anxiety (12-15), or severe anxiety (16-21).
Treatment-Related Learning
Assessed using the Project SAVE alcohol quiz
Use of alcohol to help with sleep
Assessed using the daily sleep diary; Did you use alcohol specifically to help with sleep?
Alcohol craving
Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS); The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale is a 5-item measure of alcohol craving in the past week. Participants rate the intensity, frequency, and duration of cravings, as well as their ability to resist acting on those cravings and their overall "average alcohol craving" for the past week. This measure has demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity (Flannery, Volpicelli, & Pettinati, 1999)
Negative affect
Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); Negative affect subscale scores range from 10-50, with higher scores indicating more extreme negative affect (measured "right now").
Emotion regulation
Assessed using the Brief Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16). The 16-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale has demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity in clinical and community samples (Bjureberg et al., 2015). On a scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), participants will indicate how often in the past 6 weeks they would endorse items such as, "I have difficulty making sense out of my feelings," and, "When I am upset, I become out of control."
Attention
Assessed using the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT); PVT measures behavioral alertness by analyzing the reaction to visual stimuli
Working memory
Assessed using the N-back task; N-Back measures the capacity for working memory
Delay discounting
Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ); The MCQ (Kirby, Petry, & Bickel, 1999) will be used as a self-report measure of delay discounting. In 27 trials, participants will be asked to choose between a smaller, immediate reward or a larger, delayed reward. For example, "Would you prefer $54 today or $55 in 117 days?" Data will be used to calculate participants' discounting-rate parameter (k).
Impulsivity
Assessed using the 20-item UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviors Scale; UPPS is a 20-item measure of impulsivity and self-control. Participants indicate on a scale of not at all (0) to very (4) if statements such as "I like to stop and think things over before I do them," "When I am upset I often act without thinking," and "I have a reserved and cautious attitude towards life" are representative of him/her. Scoring is completed by summing items in the five subscales (sensation seeking, premeditation, perseverance, positive/negative urgency).

Full Information

First Posted
January 8, 2019
Last Updated
October 6, 2022
Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Collaborators
Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03806491
Brief Title
CBT-I on Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Among Veterans
Acronym
Project SAVE
Official Title
The Impact of CBT for Insomnia on Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Among Veterans
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Collaborators
Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Project SAVE aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a CBT-I supplement to alcohol treatment of Veterans.
Detailed Description
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are prevalent among Veterans and result in significant physical and psychological burden. Among those who receive treatment for AUDs, 1 in 3 relapses to problematic drinking within one year of treatment. Thus, additional strategies are needed to enhance alcohol treatment outcomes. One promising approach involves providing concurrent treatment for a common complaint - difficulty falling or staying asleep. Up to 74% of Veterans seeking treatment for AUD report co-occurring symptoms of insomnia. Given the negative impact of insomnia on attention and emotion regulation, insomnia symptoms may decrease patients' abilities to attend to alcohol treatment and manage negative emotions that lead to craving and relapse. Moreover, approximately 50% of individuals with AUDs report using alcohol to help them sleep, making relapse more likely for those with no other tools or skills to help them sleep. Indeed, sleep disturbance has been identified as a risk factor for relapse among individuals in alcohol treatment. Thus, effective treatment of sleep problems may enhance alcohol treatment. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) has been effective in reducing insomnia severity in individuals with AUDs; however, no investigations have examined the efficacy of CBT-I delivered concurrently with AUD treatment to determine its impact on treatment outcomes. This R21 aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a CBT-I supplement to ongoing alcohol treatment. A randomized pilot trial with 80 Veterans who meet diagnostic criteria for AUD and Insomnia Disorder will be conducted. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) or minimal treatment (educational handout only; EDU) in addition to alcohol treatment as usual. Outcomes will be assessed at the end of the active intervention period (6 weeks) and 6 weeks post-intervention. Preliminary process outcomes include recruitment/retention rates and treatment satisfaction (feasibility and acceptability, respectively). Primary outcomes are insomnia severity, percentage of heavy drinking days, and alcohol-related problems; and we plan to examine post-treatment changes in insomnia severity as a mediator of treatment effects on alcohol use outcomes. We will also assess treatment effects on a variety of secondary clinical and mechanistic outcomes (e.g., PTSD symptoms, attention, working memory, treatment-related learning). Multiple imputation will be used for missing data, and analyses will be intent-to-treat.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Insomnia, Alcohol Use Disorder
Keywords
veteran, alcohol, insomnia, sleep, drinking

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
In addition to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder (CBT-AUD), participants will be randomized to receive sleep education or to participate in 5 individual sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I).
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The project manager will inform study therapists of participant assignment to conditions. PI Miller and study therapists will be blinded to assessment outcomes, and the assessment RA will be blinded to participant condition.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
67 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CBT-I + AUD-TAU
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) delivered once a week for five (5) weeks.
Arm Title
Sleep Hygiene + AUD-TAU
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Sleep hygiene education delivered once to all participants
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia
Intervention Description
Study therapists will follow the 2014 CBT-I in Veterans manual developed by leading researchers in the behavioral sleep medicine field. Intervention components include (1) sleep hygiene: limiting naps; avoiding caffeine, tobacco, alcohol, and rich/heavy foods before bedtime; exercising; establishing a bedtime routine; and creating a comfortable sleep environment; (2) sleep restriction: limiting time in bed in order to improve sleep efficiency, or the percentage of time in bed that is actually spent sleeping; time in bed will be titrated each week based on sleep efficiency; (3) stimulus control: strengthening association between bedroom and sleep to decrease conditioned arousal; (4) relaxation: diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and visual imagery to reduce arousal; and (5) cognitive therapy: identifying and challenging thoughts that interfere with sleep.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sleep Hygiene
Intervention Description
Study therapists will review a one-page handout on sleep hygiene with all participants. This is the only intervention that participants assigned to the sleep hygiene condition will receive. This is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment as Usual
Other Intervention Name(s)
AUD-TAU
Intervention Description
CBT-based groups for Alcohol Use Disorder will focus on the acquisition of skills needed to cope effectively with urges and cravings to drink and manage high-risk situations.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Insomnia severity
Description
Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); ISI will be used as a 7-item measure of insomnia severity in the past two weeks. Items assess difficulty falling or staying asleep, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, the extent to which others notice their sleep problems, and worry/distress related to sleep problems. Response options range from 0 (not at all worried) to 4 (very much worried), with possible total scores ranging from 0 to 28. Participants scoring 10 or higher will be classified as screening positive for insomnia (Morin et al., 2011).114 Notably, self-report is the recommended method of assessment for symptoms of insomnia in adults (Schutte-Rodin et al., 2008).
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Percent of heavy-drinking days
Description
Assessed using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) for alcohol; TLFB allows participants to trace their alcohol use back 30 days.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow-up (week 12)
Title
Alcohol problems
Description
Assessed using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP); SIP measures adverse consequences of substance use.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow-up (week 12)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sleep efficiency
Description
Assessed using daily sleep diaries. Sleep Diaries are quotidian questionnaires that measure self-reported sleep quality, sleep & wake time, and daily habits concerning substance use.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms
Description
Assessed using the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (PCL-5); PCL-5 is a 20-item measure of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). On a scale of not at all (0) to extremely (4), participants indicate how frequently in the past month they were bothered by stressful experiences such as disturbing dreams, hyper-alertness, strong negative beliefs, and irritability. PCL-5 is scored by summing the responses. Possible scores range from 0-80, where higher scores indicate higher PTSD severity. Symptoms may also be gleaned into clusters of Intrusion, Avoidance, Negative alterations in cognition/mood, and Alterations in arousal/reactivity.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Symptoms of depression
Description
Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); PHQ-9 will be used as a 9-item measure of depressed mood and functioning that has demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity across adult samples. Participants will indicate how many days in the past two weeks (not at all, several days, more than half the days, or every day or nearly every day) they have experienced each problem. Scores will be summed and classified as minimal symptoms of depressed mood (<10), moderate levels of depressed mood (10-14), high levels of depressed mood (15-19), or very high levels of depressed mood (20-27)
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Symptoms of anxiety
Description
Assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7); GAD-7 is a 7-item measure of anxiety with strong criterion and predictive validity. On a scale from not at all (0) to nearly every day (3), participants indicate how often in the past two weeks they have experienced problems such as having trouble relaxing and being so restless that it is hard to sit still. Possible total scores range from 0-21. Scores will be summed and classified as minimal anxiety (<3), moderate anxiety (4-7), high anxiety (12-15), or severe anxiety (16-21).
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Treatment-Related Learning
Description
Assessed using the Project SAVE alcohol quiz
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6)
Title
Use of alcohol to help with sleep
Description
Assessed using the daily sleep diary; Did you use alcohol specifically to help with sleep?
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Alcohol craving
Description
Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS); The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale is a 5-item measure of alcohol craving in the past week. Participants rate the intensity, frequency, and duration of cravings, as well as their ability to resist acting on those cravings and their overall "average alcohol craving" for the past week. This measure has demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity (Flannery, Volpicelli, & Pettinati, 1999)
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Negative affect
Description
Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); Negative affect subscale scores range from 10-50, with higher scores indicating more extreme negative affect (measured "right now").
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Emotion regulation
Description
Assessed using the Brief Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16). The 16-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale has demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity in clinical and community samples (Bjureberg et al., 2015). On a scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), participants will indicate how often in the past 6 weeks they would endorse items such as, "I have difficulty making sense out of my feelings," and, "When I am upset, I become out of control."
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Attention
Description
Assessed using the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT); PVT measures behavioral alertness by analyzing the reaction to visual stimuli
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Working memory
Description
Assessed using the N-back task; N-Back measures the capacity for working memory
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Delay discounting
Description
Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ); The MCQ (Kirby, Petry, & Bickel, 1999) will be used as a self-report measure of delay discounting. In 27 trials, participants will be asked to choose between a smaller, immediate reward or a larger, delayed reward. For example, "Would you prefer $54 today or $55 in 117 days?" Data will be used to calculate participants' discounting-rate parameter (k).
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)
Title
Impulsivity
Description
Assessed using the 20-item UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviors Scale; UPPS is a 20-item measure of impulsivity and self-control. Participants indicate on a scale of not at all (0) to very (4) if statements such as "I like to stop and think things over before I do them," "When I am upset I often act without thinking," and "I have a reserved and cautious attitude towards life" are representative of him/her. Scoring is completed by summing items in the five subscales (sensation seeking, premeditation, perseverance, positive/negative urgency).
Time Frame
Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 6) to follow up (week 12)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participation in alcohol treatment at the Truman VA (Columbia, MO) DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe Alcohol Use Disorder Substance use in the past 2 months DSM-5 episodic criterion (duration at least 1 month) for Insomnia Disorder Exclusion Criteria: unable to provide informed consent cognitive impairment continuous sobriety for 2+ months at baseline manic episode or seizure in the past year (contraindications for CBT-I) severe psychiatric disorder that requires immediate clinical attention initiation of a sleep medication in the past six (6) weeks
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Beth Miller, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Missouri-Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Missouri-Columbia
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65212
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After all data have been collected and the results of the study have been published, de-identified data will be made available to other qualified investigators upon request. The request will be evaluated by the research team to ensure that it meets reasonable demands of scientific integrity.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be shared after data collection is complete and results have been published (anticipated July 2022).
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
De-identified data will be made available to other qualified investigators who aim to verify data, conduct meta-analyses, or collaborate with the research team on analyses that are not already planned.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34103317
Citation
Miller MB, Metrik J, McGeary JE, Borsari B, McCrae CS, Maddoux J, Arnedt JT, Merrill JE, Carey KB. Protocol for the Project SAVE randomised controlled trial examining CBT for insomnia among veterans in treatment for alcohol use disorder. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e045667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045667.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

CBT-I on Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Among Veterans

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs