Clinical Feasibility Study of Preoperative Surgical Planning
Primary Purpose
Craniosynostoses
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
iCSPlan
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Craniosynostoses focused on measuring Shape analysis, Computer-assisted surgical plan, Surgical planning, Computational anatomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients under 18 years of age.
- Diagnosis of craniosynostosis.
- Scheduled for open crania vault reconstruction.
- Patients seen in Children's National Medical Center.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of interest in participating and refusal to consent.
- Plan for endoscopic craniectomy of synostosis.
Sites / Locations
- Childrens National HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Presurgical planning
Arm Description
Undergo crania-vault reconstruction following the presurgical planning (iCSPlan)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To evaluate the feasibility of a surgical planning software (iCSPlan) for open cranial vault reconstructions assessed by how often will the surgeon use or discard the surgical plan
Preoperative planning for cranial vault reconstruction will be built in patients under 18 years old with craniosynostosis. We will document the number of times the surgical plan is followed by the surgeon.
Secondary Outcome Measures
To evaluate the utility of the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) assessed by a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
Surgeons will review the iCSPlan. To evaluate the utility of the plan, they will complete a questionnaire ranging from 1-5:
Not at all useful;
Slightly useful;
Moderately useful;
Very useful;
Extremely useful.
To evaluate the quality of the surgical strategy and the surgical outcome built by the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) surgeons will complete a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
After reviewing the iCSPlan, surgeons will evaluate the quality of the surgical strategy and outcome by completing a questionnaire ranging from 1-5.
1: Very poor 2. Poor 3. Fair 4. Good 5. Excellent
To evaluate the impact of the surgical planning software (iCSplan) assessed by the difference in the length of surgery if the plan is used.
Intra-operative variables such as time of surgery is a quantitative measure that would represent the effect of the use of the iCSPlan. We will compare this value in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
To evaluate the intra-operative impact of using a surgical planning software (iCSPlan) assessed by the amount of blood loss, and thus, the amount of transfusion needed.
One of the major concern during an open cranial vault reconstruction is the amount of blood loss. Measuring this variable and the number of blood units transfused will let us evaluate the impact of the iCSPlan.
To evaluate the postoperative impact of undergoing a cranial vault reconstruction following the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) measured by the complications encountered 30-days after the surgery.
Complications such as infection, bleeding, reintervention, brain injury, cranial bone loss, among others, will be recorded in a period of 30 days after the surgery. We will compare the number of complications encountered in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
To evaluate the postoperative impact of undergoing a cranial vault reconstruction following the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) measured by the length of stay.
We will compare the length of stay in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03812159
First Posted
December 20, 2018
Last Updated
December 28, 2021
Sponsor
Gary F. Rogers, MD
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03812159
Brief Title
Clinical Feasibility Study of Preoperative Surgical Planning
Official Title
Clinical Feasibility Study of Preoperative Surgical Planning for Craniosynostosis Procedures
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 20, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 20, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Gary F. Rogers, MD
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Most children diagnosed with craniosynostosis undergo a relatively extensive cranial vault remodeling procedure. The decision of performing surgical cranial shape correction for patients with craniosynostosis typically rests on a subjective visual assessment of the severity of the cranial malformation and the main goal of this procedure is to reduce the risk of elevated intracranial pressure and to provide a more normal cranial shape and volume. Personalized surgical planning systems to optimize intervention and leverage surgical expertise in the reconstruction of the cranial vault do not exist. Thus, the expertise of the surgeon is paramount for the success of the surgical correction of craniosynostosis. The goal of our project is to evaluate the feasibility and utility of a surgical plan derived from software developed at Children's National, iCSPlan.
Detailed Description
Presurgical planning will be performed in patients that require an open crania-vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis. The participants will come from the outpatient clinics of neurosurgery and plastic surgery. The treating physician/study team member will explain and give a copy of Institutional review board (IRB) approved study information letter to the participant's legally authorized representative (LAR).
The investigators will acquire a pre-operative CT-scan, per standard of care, to help assess the synostosis severity, within 4 weeks before the procedure. A week before the surgery, a routine preoperative visit will be done where the participant and/or LAR, if agree to participate in the study, will sign the informed consent document(s).
A presurgical plan will be built and will be recorded in a software, iCSPlan. Although this plan will not be integrated in the OR workflow, if needed, it would be visualized on a desktop monitor, which will be available to the surgical team. This tool will not influence any clinical decision making in the study. Instead, it will work as a rely-on tool in the preparation of the surgery, which may or may not be followed by the surgeon.
Demographic information (sex, age), as well as intraoperative information (Anesthesia length, anesthesia medications, length of surgery, blood loss, # of blood units transfused, complications), will be recorded for analysis. These variables are generally recorded during surgery and add no additional operative time.
Following the surgery, the specialists will evaluate the feasibility of the use of the presurgical plan by completing a questionnaire to report their options on (1): Quality of the surgical outcome; (2) the quality of the surgical strategy, and (3) the utility of the surgical planning in the treatment. The questions will be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "not useful/strongly dislike" to "very useful/strongly like".
All study team pre-screening materials that contain participants information will be maintained on password protected computers. Only authorized study team members will have access to the pre-screening materials. Any pre-screening protected health information (PHI) that is collected will be destroyed once study enrollment is completed.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Craniosynostoses
Keywords
Shape analysis, Computer-assisted surgical plan, Surgical planning, Computational anatomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
128 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Presurgical planning
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Undergo crania-vault reconstruction following the presurgical planning (iCSPlan)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
iCSPlan
Intervention Description
The Investigator will acquire a routine pre-operative CT-scan to help assess the synostosis severity. A week before the surgery a routine preoperative visit will be done. If the potential subject agrees to participate in the study, a presurgical plan will be built, and based on the CT scan, it will (1) quantify shape differences between pathological and healthy cranial shapes; (2) compensates for brain and cranial growth during the months between diagnosis, treatment and recovery; and (3) guides bone-cuts and bone-placement for the simplest and optimal surgical procedure.
Finally this plan will be recorded in a software, iCSPlan, which will be reviewed by the surgeon. If it is accepted, it will be available during the surgery as a rely-on tool which may or may not be followed.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the feasibility of a surgical planning software (iCSPlan) for open cranial vault reconstructions assessed by how often will the surgeon use or discard the surgical plan
Description
Preoperative planning for cranial vault reconstruction will be built in patients under 18 years old with craniosynostosis. We will document the number of times the surgical plan is followed by the surgeon.
Time Frame
a week before surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the utility of the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) assessed by a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
Description
Surgeons will review the iCSPlan. To evaluate the utility of the plan, they will complete a questionnaire ranging from 1-5:
Not at all useful;
Slightly useful;
Moderately useful;
Very useful;
Extremely useful.
Time Frame
A week before surgery
Title
To evaluate the quality of the surgical strategy and the surgical outcome built by the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) surgeons will complete a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
Description
After reviewing the iCSPlan, surgeons will evaluate the quality of the surgical strategy and outcome by completing a questionnaire ranging from 1-5.
1: Very poor 2. Poor 3. Fair 4. Good 5. Excellent
Time Frame
a week before surgery
Title
To evaluate the impact of the surgical planning software (iCSplan) assessed by the difference in the length of surgery if the plan is used.
Description
Intra-operative variables such as time of surgery is a quantitative measure that would represent the effect of the use of the iCSPlan. We will compare this value in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
Time Frame
The day of surgery (One day)
Title
To evaluate the intra-operative impact of using a surgical planning software (iCSPlan) assessed by the amount of blood loss, and thus, the amount of transfusion needed.
Description
One of the major concern during an open cranial vault reconstruction is the amount of blood loss. Measuring this variable and the number of blood units transfused will let us evaluate the impact of the iCSPlan.
Time Frame
The day of surgery (One day)
Title
To evaluate the postoperative impact of undergoing a cranial vault reconstruction following the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) measured by the complications encountered 30-days after the surgery.
Description
Complications such as infection, bleeding, reintervention, brain injury, cranial bone loss, among others, will be recorded in a period of 30 days after the surgery. We will compare the number of complications encountered in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
Time Frame
30 days after surgery.
Title
To evaluate the postoperative impact of undergoing a cranial vault reconstruction following the surgical planning software (iCSPlan) measured by the length of stay.
Description
We will compare the length of stay in patients for whom the surgical plan was used and was not used.
Time Frame
One month.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients under 18 years of age.
Diagnosis of craniosynostosis.
Scheduled for open crania vault reconstruction.
Patients seen in Children's National Medical Center.
Exclusion Criteria:
Lack of interest in participating and refusal to consent.
Plan for endoscopic craniectomy of synostosis.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gary Rogers, MD
Phone
202-476-6767
Email
grogers@cnmc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Esperanza Mantilla Rivas, MD
Phone
202-476-4548
Email
emantillar@childrensnational.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gary Rogers, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Children's National Health System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Childrens National Hospital
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gary F Rogers, MD
Phone
202-476-4548
Email
grogers@childrensnational.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esperanza Mantilla Rivas, MD
Phone
2024764548
Email
emantillar@childrensnational.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gary F Rogers, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esperanza Mantilla Rivas, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29969419
Citation
Porras AR, Paniagua B, Ensel S, Keating R, Rogers GF, Enquobahrie A, Linguraru MG. Locally Affine Diffeomorphic Surface Registration and Its Application to Surgical Planning of Fronto-Orbital Advancement. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jul;37(7):1690-1700. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816402.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28149960
Citation
Porras AR, Zukic D, Equobahrie A, Rogers GF, Linguraru MG. Personalized Optimal Planning for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis. Clin Image Based Proced. 2016;2016:60-67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46472-5_8. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29527598
Citation
Porras AR, Paniagua B, Enquobahrie A, Ensel S, Shah H, Keating R, Rogers GF, Linguraru MG. Locally affine diffeomorphic surface registration for planning of metopic craniosynostosis surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2017 Sep;10434:479-487. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_54. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Feasibility Study of Preoperative Surgical Planning
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs