search
Back to results

Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers.

Primary Purpose

Muscle Disorder, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dry Needling in upper trapezius
Dry Needling in lower trapezius
Sponsored by
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Muscle Disorder focused on measuring surface electromyographic, dry needling

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence latent myofascial trigger point in the upper/lower trapezius asymptomatic subjects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neck or shoulder pain at the moment or 6 month ago. whiplash injury previous spine or shoulder surgery pregnancy diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy

Sites / Locations

  • Universidad Francisco de VitoriaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Dry needling in upper trapezius

Dry needling in lower trapezius

Arm Description

Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in upper trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs

Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in lower trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Changes in surface electromyographic before and after the intervention.
Root mean square values (RMS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 22, 2019
Last Updated
April 12, 2019
Sponsor
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03813485
Brief Title
Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers.
Official Title
Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Latent Myofascial Trigger Point in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers of Trapezius
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 11, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 10, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 10, 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the surface electromyography (EGM) changes between dry needling in the upper trapezius, is a prevalence tonic fiber or lower trapezius is a prevalence phasic fiber.
Detailed Description
Several studies already found a disturbed surface electromyography activity in myalgic muscle tissue and in the vicinity of myofascial trigger points, however studies about the effect of dry needling in this fibers type on these disturbances in EMG activity are scarce. The surface electromyography of upper trapezius is related with a tonic muscle dysfunction, for example muscle contracture; and the lower fiber of trapezius is related with atrophy muscle. Dry needling is an effective method for the treatment of myofascial trigger points for immediate reduction of pain. There are some studies about latent myofascial trigger point and motor activity, but we don't know any research about the effect of dry needling in the differences fibers.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Muscle Disorder, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial
Keywords
surface electromyographic, dry needling

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dry needling in upper trapezius
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in upper trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Arm Title
Dry needling in lower trapezius
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in lower trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Dry Needling in upper trapezius
Intervention Description
The following criteria are required for a patient to have latent TrPs: the presence of a palpable taut band in the upper trapezius muscle, the presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band, a palpable or visible local twitch on snapping palpation, and a no familiar reproduction of referred pain elicited by palpation of the sensitive spot. Dry needling is performed with solid filiform needles (0.30x30 mm), these needles are sterile and separately packaged. Needles are not reused and are immediately deposited in a needle container after usage. Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point (LTRs) in upper trapezius. The needle is penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Dry Needling in lower trapezius
Intervention Description
The following criteria are required for a patient to have latent TrPs: the presence of a palpable taut band in the lower trapezius muscle, the presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band, a palpable or visible local twitch on snapping palpation, and a no familiar reproduction of referred pain elicited by palpation of the sensitive spot. Dry needling is performed with solid filiform needles (0.30x 30 mm), these needles are sterile and separately packaged. Needles are not reused and are immediately deposited in a needle container after usage. Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point (LTRs) in lower trapezius. The needle is penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in surface electromyographic before and after the intervention.
Description
Root mean square values (RMS)
Time Frame
Baseline and 10 minutes after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Presence latent myofascial trigger point in the upper/lower trapezius asymptomatic subjects Exclusion Criteria: neck or shoulder pain at the moment or 6 month ago. whiplash injury previous spine or shoulder surgery pregnancy diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sandra Sánchez Jorge, Pt, PhD
Phone
+34 91 7091887
Email
s.sjorge.prof@ufv.es
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jaime Salom Moreno, Pt, PhD
Phone
+34 91 7091905
Email
jaime.salom@ufv.es
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
City
Madrid
State/Province
Pozuelo De Alarcón
ZIP/Postal Code
28223
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sandra Sancjez, PhD
Email
s.sjorge.prof@ufv.es

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs