search
Back to results

A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CleanCision Wound Retraction and Protection System
Alexis O Wound Protector
Sponsored by
The Cleveland Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Colorectal Surgery focused on measuring wound irrigation, cleancision, colorectal surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years old and above.
  2. Elective colorectal surgery with a planned resection including open or laparoscopic surgeries.
  3. Clean -contaminated, contaminated and dirty wounds per the definition above.
  4. Patients undergoing Standard of care SSI reduction bundle including Prophylactic AB and mechanical bowel preparation.
  5. Anticipated incision length of 3-17 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients younger than 18 years old.
  2. Patients with a preexisting stoma.
  3. Patiens with prior laparotomy within 15 days.
  4. Patients with an active infection or systemic antibiotic therapy within 1 week prior to surgery with the exception of preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.
  5. Emergent/ urgent surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic Main CampusRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Alexis O Wound Protector

CleanCision Wound Protector

Arm Description

Participants will undergo standard surgical procedure using the Alexis O wound protector.

Participants will undergo standard surgical procedure using the CleanCision Wound Retraction and Protection System

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Surgical Site Infection rate
To evaluate the 30 day post-operative SSI rate in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgical procedures after intraoperative usage of Alexis O wound protector vs. CleanCision continuous irrigation wound protector.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 23, 2019
Last Updated
January 3, 2023
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03816995
Brief Title
A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery
Official Title
A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 12, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a problem in colorectal surgery. Strategies to reduce the incidence of SSI following colorectal surgery are important to improve overall patient outcomes, reduce healthcare-associated costs and provide value-based healthcare to surgical patients. Preventing contamination of the wound through the use of barrier wound protectors or intraoperative wound irrigation has shown significant promise individually and is an ongoing focus to reduce wound infections SSI.
Detailed Description
Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a persistent and morbid problem in colorectal surgery with published rates ranging from 7 to 25%. The negative outcomes of SSI are well reported and include a significant increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay, readmissions and healthcare-associated cost. Therefore, strategies to reduce the incidence of SSI following colorectal surgery are important to improve overall patient outcomes, reduce healthcare-associated costs and provide value-based healthcare to surgical patients. Key to the pathogenesis of SSI is the degree of bacterial contamination of the surgical wound. Preventing contamination of the wound or reducing the bacterial load through the use of barrier wound protectors or intraoperative wound irrigation has shown significant promise individually and is an ongoing strategic focus to reduce wound infections after surgery. The usage of intraoperative wound irrigation has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of SSI via multiple RTC. A surgical device that combines continuous wound irrigation and barrier protection will have an important SSI prevention advantage. CleanCision is a recently developed apparatus that serves this purpose and was found to reduce bacterial wound contamination in preclinical and clinical trials. This study aims to investigate the effect of using CleanCision wound protector on the rates of postoperative Surgical Site Infections in comparison to the current wound protector (Alexis O) being used at our institute.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Surgery
Keywords
wound irrigation, cleancision, colorectal surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
702 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Alexis O Wound Protector
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will undergo standard surgical procedure using the Alexis O wound protector.
Arm Title
CleanCision Wound Protector
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will undergo standard surgical procedure using the CleanCision Wound Retraction and Protection System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CleanCision Wound Retraction and Protection System
Intervention Description
wound retraction and irrigation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Alexis O Wound Protector
Intervention Description
wound retraction
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical Site Infection rate
Description
To evaluate the 30 day post-operative SSI rate in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgical procedures after intraoperative usage of Alexis O wound protector vs. CleanCision continuous irrigation wound protector.
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients 18 years old and above. Elective colorectal surgery with a planned resection including open or laparoscopic surgeries. Clean -contaminated, contaminated and dirty wounds per the definition above. Patients undergoing Standard of care SSI reduction bundle including Prophylactic AB and mechanical bowel preparation. Anticipated incision length of 3-17 cm Exclusion Criteria: Patients younger than 18 years old. Patients with a preexisting stoma. Patiens with prior laparotomy within 15 days. Patients with an active infection or systemic antibiotic therapy within 1 week prior to surgery with the exception of preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Emergent/ urgent surgery.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Holly Renner
Phone
216-299-9529
Email
rennerh@ccf.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Scott Steele, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Cleveland Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Holly M Renner, BS
Phone
216-299-9529
Email
rennerh@ccf.org

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17043280
Citation
Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM, Heard SO. Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg. 2006 Oct;141(10):1014-8; discussion 1018. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.10.1014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15082963
Citation
Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, Foley EF. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):599-605; discussion 605-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000124292.21605.99.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17060769
Citation
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):758-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000219017.78611.49.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16679177
Citation
de Oliveira AC, Ciosak SI, Ferraz EM, Grinbaum RS. Surgical site infection in patients submitted to digestive surgery: risk prediction and the NNIS risk index. Am J Infect Control. 2006 May;34(4):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.12.011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27559437
Citation
Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y, Shimada R, Okamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Nozawa K, Matsuda K, Hashiguchi Y. Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jul 15;8(7):573-82. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i7.573.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21576613
Citation
Serra-Aracil X, Garcia-Domingo MI, Pares D, Espin-Basany E, Biondo S, Guirao X, Orrego C, Sitges-Serra A. Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures. Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):606-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.90.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19398246
Citation
de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19446918
Citation
Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C, Ball J, Thomas M, Bankart J. Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect. 2009 Jul;72(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 May 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19333034
Citation
Wick EC, Vogel JD, Church JM, Remzi F, Fazio VW. Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame? Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819a5e45.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29215475
Citation
Gorgun E, Rencuzogullari A, Ozben V, Stocchi L, Fraser T, Benlice C, Hull T. An Effective Bundled Approach Reduces Surgical Site Infections in a High-Outlier Colorectal Unit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jan;61(1):89-98. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000929.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28124278
Citation
Sajid MS, Rathore MA, Sains P, Singh KK. A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Updates Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0415-2. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22265220
Citation
Ruiz-Tovar J, Santos J, Arroyo A, Llavero C, Armananzas L, Lopez-Delgado A, Frangi A, Alcaide MJ, Candela F, Calpena R. Effect of peritoneal lavage with clindamycin-gentamicin solution on infections after elective colorectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25681239
Citation
Mueller TC, Loos M, Haller B, Mihaljevic AL, Nitsche U, Wilhelm D, Friess H, Kleeff J, Bader FG. Intra-operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):167-81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1279-x. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28244389
Citation
Solomkin J, Gastmeier P, Bischoff P, Latif A, Berenholtz S, Egger M, Allegranzi B. WHO Guidelines to prevent surgical site infections-Authors' reply. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17(3):262-264. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30081-6. Epub 2017 Feb 23. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29523908
Citation
Papaconstantinou HT, Ricciardi R, Margolin DA, Bergamaschi R, Moesinger RC, Lichliter WE, Birnbaum EH. A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination in Colorectal Surgery. World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):3000-3007. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4568-z.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs