search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered DS107 in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Primary Purpose

Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DS107
Placebo
Sponsored by
DS Biopharma
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atopic Dermatitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD according to the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria that had been present for at least 6 months before the screening visit.
  2. Patients with moderate to severe AD at baseline as defined by a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 3 Or 4 at baseline.
  3. Patients with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≥16 at screening and baseline.
  4. Patients with AD covering a minimum 10% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at baseline.
  5. Patients with a worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score in a day of ≥4 (on 11-point NRS) at the screening and baseline visits.
  6. Patients whose pre-study clinical laboratory findings did not interfere with their participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
  7. Patients who were able and willing to stop all current treatments for AD throughout the study (except for allowed emollients).
  8. Patients who were on a stable dose of a bland emollient for at least 7 days prior to baseline.
  9. Male or female patients aged 18 years and older on the day of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  10. Female patients and male patients with female partners of child bearing potential had to use highly effective birth control methods or have a sterilised partner for the duration of the study.
  11. Recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments were otherwise medically inadvisable (e.g. because of important side effects or safety risks).
  12. Patients who were able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and understand and sign the written informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific activities or procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other skin conditions that might interfere with AD diagnosis and/or evaluation (such as psoriasis or current active viral, bacterial and fungal topical skin infections) as assessed by the investigator.
  2. Patients who had used systemic treatments that could affect AD less than 4 weeks prior to Baseline Visit (Day 0), e.g. retinoids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea), azathioprine and oral/injectable corticosteroids.

    Intranasal corticosteroids and inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions were allowed.

  3. Patients with previous exposure to DS107.
  4. Patients who had used any topical medicated treatment for AD (except for emollients) two weeks prior to start of treatment/Baseline (Day 0) including but not limited to, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, tars, bleach, antimicrobials and bleach baths.
  5. Patients who used emollients containing urea, ceramides or hyaluronic acid less than 12 weeks prior to Baseline (Day 0).
  6. Patients who have had excessive sun exposure, have used tanning booths or other ultraviolet (UV) light sources four weeks prior to Baseline (Day 0) and/or were planning a trip to a sunny climate or to use tanning booths or other UV sources between screening and follow-up visits.
  7. Patients who had a history of hypersensitivity to any substance in DS107 or placebo capsules.
  8. Patients who had a history of hypersensitivity to soy beans or soy lecithin.
  9. Patients who had a white cell count or differential white cell count outside of the normal reference range at screening.
  10. Patients who had any clinically significant controlled or uncontrolled medical condition or laboratory abnormality that would, in the opinion of the investigator, put the patient at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results.
  11. Patients who had a clinically significant impairment of renal or hepatic function.
  12. Patients with significant uncontrolled cardiovascular, neurologic, malignant, psychiatric, respiratory or hypertensive disease, as well as uncontrolled diabetes and fluoride arthritis or any other illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to interfere with completion of the study.
  13. Patients with active infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis B, hepatitis C or advanced disease secondary to infection with human immunodeficiency virus).
  14. Patients with a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse in the opinion of the investigator in the last year prior to Baseline (Day 0).
  15. Patients who had participated in any other clinical study with an investigational drug within 3 months before the first day of administration of study treatment.
  16. Patients who have had treatment with biologics as follows:

    Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months before the screening visit, or until lymphocyte count returned to normal, whichever was longer. b. Other biologics influencing cell proliferation: within 6 months before the screening visit. c. Dupilumab or other monoclonal antibodies within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever was longer.

  17. Patients who were pregnant, planning pregnancy, breastfeeding and/or were unwilling to use adequate contraception (as specified in Inclusion Criterion 10) during the trial.
  18. Patients, in the opinion of the investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.

Sites / Locations

  • DS Investigational Site 524
  • DS Investigational Site 528
  • DS Investigational Site 502
  • DS Investigational Site 504
  • DS Investigational Site 505
  • DS Investigational Site 516
  • DS Investigational Site 501
  • DS Investigational Site 517
  • DS Investigational Site 527
  • DS Investigational Site 510
  • DS Investigational Site 512
  • DS Investigational Site 514
  • DS Investigational Site 513
  • DS Investigational Site 519
  • DS Investigational Site 511
  • DS Investigational Site 526
  • DS Investigational Site 521
  • DS Investigational Site 525
  • DS Investigational Site 509
  • DS Investigational Site 506
  • DS Investigational Site 508
  • DS Investigational Site 507
  • DS Investigative Site 529
  • DS Investigative Site 530
  • DS Investigational Site 523
  • DS Investigational Site 518
  • DS Investigational Site 101
  • DS Investigational Site 203
  • DS Investigational Site 202
  • DS Investigational Site 208
  • DS Investigational Site 204
  • DS Investigational Site 206
  • DS Investigational Site 201
  • DS Investigational Site 207
  • DS Investigational Site 211
  • DS Investigational Site 205
  • DS Investigational Site 210
  • DS Investigational Site 214
  • DS Investigational Site 212
  • DS Investigational Site 304
  • DS Investigational Site 301
  • DS Investigational Site 302
  • DS Investigational Site 303
  • DS Investigational Site 305
  • DS Investigational Site 406
  • DS Investigational Site 403
  • DS Investigational Site 405
  • DS Investigational Site 407
  • DS Investigational Site 401
  • DS Investigational Site 402

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

2g Oral DS107

Placebo

Arm Description

2g DS107 (4 DS107 capsules) administered once-daily for 16 weeks

Placebo (4 placebo capsules) orally administered once-daily for 16 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Patients Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis Score of 0 or 1 and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in vIGA-ADTM in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline at Week 16.
Proportion of patients achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a decrease of at least 2 points in vIGA-ADTM in treated population compared to placebo population from Baseline at Week 16 using GLMM.The vIGA-ADTM scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment.
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 16.
Proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 (≥75% improvement from Baseline) in treated population compared to placebo population at Week 16 using GLMM.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Patients Achieving a vIGA-ADTM Score of 0 or 1 and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in vIGA-ADTM in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20.
Proportion of patients achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a decrease of at least 2 points in vIGA-ADTM in treated population compared to placebo population from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20 and the change in proportion of patients from Week 16 to Week 18 and 20. The vIGA-ADTM scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment.
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20 EASI quantifies the severity of a patient's AD based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0-72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body.
Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) Score in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
The Validated Global Investigator Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A decrease in Validated Global Investigator Assessment scale indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Change From Baseline in EASI in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Change from Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) in treated population compared to placebo population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. EASI quantifies the severity of a patient's atopic dermatitis (AD) based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 (no lesion severity) to 72 (severe lesions) that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The severity of each sign is assessed using a 4-point scale (half points are permitted): 0 = none 1 = mild 2 = moderate 3 = severe A decrease in EASI indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Change From Baseline in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Change from Baseline in worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in treated population compared to placebo population to Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 18. Severity of pruritus related to atopic dermatitis (AD) was self-assessed by patients daily using the NRS. Patients were asked to estimate the intensity of pruritus at its worst over the previous 24 hours. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that was used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients will score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst itch imaginable. Patients will complete the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit. A decrease in worst itch NRS indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 3 Points in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 3 Points in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that will be used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 (no itch) and 10 (worst itch imaginable). Patients will complete the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit.
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 4 Points in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20,
Proportion of patients achieving a decrease of at least 4 points in worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in treated population compared to placebo population from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. Severity of pruritus related to atopic dermatitis (AD) was self-assessed by patients daily using the NRS. Patients were asked to estimate the intensity of pruritus at its worst over the previous 24 hours. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that is used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients will score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst itch imaginable. Patients completed the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit. A decrease in worst itch NRS indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0-72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The severity of each sign is assessed using a 4-point scale (half points are permitted): 0 = none 1 = mild 2 = moderate 3 = severe A decrease in EASI indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Change From Baseline in the Body Surface Area Affected by AD in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Change from Baseline in the Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD in treated population compared to placebo population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) grading system was developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis and has been a standard tool to assess atopic dermatitis (AD) severity in clinical studies. Six items (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriation, lichenification, and dryness) will be selected to evaluate the AD severity. The intensity of each item is graded using a 4-point scale: 0 = No symptoms 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe The overall body surface area (BSA) affected by AD is evaluated (from 0 to 100%) and included in the SCORAD scores. Loss of sleep and pruritus will be evaluated by patients on a visual analog scale (0-10).
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Safety Analysis Set.

Full Information

First Posted
January 23, 2019
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Sponsor
DS Biopharma
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03817190
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered DS107 in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered DS107 in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Based on Interim Analysis results
Study Start Date
September 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 3, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 3, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
DS Biopharma

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered DS107 (2g) versus placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD). Oral DS107/Placebo capsules will be administered for 16 weeks. The study will enrol approximately 220 subjects.
Detailed Description
This study involves a comparison of 2g DS107 with placebo, administered orally once daily for a total of 16 weeks. Patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint will be the vIGA (Validated Investigator's Global Assessment) and EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index). Other endpoints include vIGA, EASI, SCORAD, BSA (Body Surface Area) and NRS (Numeric Rating Scale).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atopic Dermatitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
219 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
2g Oral DS107
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
2g DS107 (4 DS107 capsules) administered once-daily for 16 weeks
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo (4 placebo capsules) orally administered once-daily for 16 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
DS107
Other Intervention Name(s)
DS107 500mg DGLA Capsules/DS107 500mg Placebo Capsules
Intervention Description
DS107 Capsule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo capsule
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis Score of 0 or 1 and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in vIGA-ADTM in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline at Week 16.
Description
Proportion of patients achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a decrease of at least 2 points in vIGA-ADTM in treated population compared to placebo population from Baseline at Week 16 using GLMM.The vIGA-ADTM scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment.
Time Frame
16 Weeks
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 16.
Description
Proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 (≥75% improvement from Baseline) in treated population compared to placebo population at Week 16 using GLMM.
Time Frame
16 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving a vIGA-ADTM Score of 0 or 1 and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in vIGA-ADTM in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20.
Description
Proportion of patients achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a decrease of at least 2 points in vIGA-ADTM in treated population compared to placebo population from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20 and the change in proportion of patients from Week 16 to Week 18 and 20. The vIGA-ADTM scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 20.
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20
Description
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 20 EASI quantifies the severity of a patient's AD based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0-72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 20.
Title
Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) Score in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Description
The Validated Global Investigator Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) scale awards a score of 0-4 based on a 5-point severity scale from clear to severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A decrease in Validated Global Investigator Assessment scale indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Time Frame
20 Weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in EASI in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Description
Change from Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) in treated population compared to placebo population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. EASI quantifies the severity of a patient's atopic dermatitis (AD) based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 (no lesion severity) to 72 (severe lesions) that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The severity of each sign is assessed using a 4-point scale (half points are permitted): 0 = none 1 = mild 2 = moderate 3 = severe A decrease in EASI indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Time Frame
Week 20
Title
Change From Baseline in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Description
Change from Baseline in worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in treated population compared to placebo population to Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 18. Severity of pruritus related to atopic dermatitis (AD) was self-assessed by patients daily using the NRS. Patients were asked to estimate the intensity of pruritus at its worst over the previous 24 hours. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that was used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients will score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst itch imaginable. Patients will complete the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit. A decrease in worst itch NRS indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Time Frame
Week 18
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 3 Points in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Description
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 3 Points in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that will be used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 (no itch) and 10 (worst itch imaginable). Patients will complete the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit.
Time Frame
Week 20
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Decrease of at Least 4 Points in Worst Itch NRS in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population From Baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20,
Description
Proportion of patients achieving a decrease of at least 4 points in worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in treated population compared to placebo population from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. Severity of pruritus related to atopic dermatitis (AD) was self-assessed by patients daily using the NRS. Patients were asked to estimate the intensity of pruritus at its worst over the previous 24 hours. The Pruritus NRS is a single-question assessment tool that is used to assess the patient's worst itch as a result of AD in the previous 24 hours. Patients will score their pruritus due to AD on a scale of 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst itch imaginable. Patients completed the rating scale daily starting at screening through to the last study visit. A decrease in worst itch NRS indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Time Frame
Week 20
Title
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20.
Description
Proportion of Patients Achieving EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index From Baseline) in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 20. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0-72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The severity of each sign is assessed using a 4-point scale (half points are permitted): 0 = none 1 = mild 2 = moderate 3 = severe A decrease in EASI indicates a positive outcome for the participant.
Time Frame
Week 20
Title
Change From Baseline in the Body Surface Area Affected by AD in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Description
Change from Baseline in the Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD in treated population compared to placebo population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Time Frame
Week 18
Title
Change From Baseline in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score in Treated Population Compared to Placebo Population to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 18.
Description
The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) grading system was developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis and has been a standard tool to assess atopic dermatitis (AD) severity in clinical studies. Six items (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriation, lichenification, and dryness) will be selected to evaluate the AD severity. The intensity of each item is graded using a 4-point scale: 0 = No symptoms 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe The overall body surface area (BSA) affected by AD is evaluated (from 0 to 100%) and included in the SCORAD scores. Loss of sleep and pruritus will be evaluated by patients on a visual analog scale (0-10).
Time Frame
18 Weeks
Title
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Description
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Safety Analysis Set.
Time Frame
20 Weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD according to the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria that had been present for at least 6 months before the screening visit. Patients with moderate to severe AD at baseline as defined by a Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-ADTM) score of 3 Or 4 at baseline. Patients with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≥16 at screening and baseline. Patients with AD covering a minimum 10% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at baseline. Patients with a worst itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score in a day of ≥4 (on 11-point NRS) at the screening and baseline visits. Patients whose pre-study clinical laboratory findings did not interfere with their participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator. Patients who were able and willing to stop all current treatments for AD throughout the study (except for allowed emollients). Patients who were on a stable dose of a bland emollient for at least 7 days prior to baseline. Male or female patients aged 18 years and older on the day of signing the informed consent form (ICF). Female patients and male patients with female partners of child bearing potential had to use highly effective birth control methods or have a sterilised partner for the duration of the study. Recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments were otherwise medically inadvisable (e.g. because of important side effects or safety risks). Patients who were able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and understand and sign the written informed consent prior to initiation of any study specific activities or procedures. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with other skin conditions that might interfere with AD diagnosis and/or evaluation (such as psoriasis or current active viral, bacterial and fungal topical skin infections) as assessed by the investigator. Patients who had used systemic treatments that could affect AD less than 4 weeks prior to Baseline Visit (Day 0), e.g. retinoids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea), azathioprine and oral/injectable corticosteroids. Intranasal corticosteroids and inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions were allowed. Patients with previous exposure to DS107. Patients who had used any topical medicated treatment for AD (except for emollients) two weeks prior to start of treatment/Baseline (Day 0) including but not limited to, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, tars, bleach, antimicrobials and bleach baths. Patients who used emollients containing urea, ceramides or hyaluronic acid less than 12 weeks prior to Baseline (Day 0). Patients who have had excessive sun exposure, have used tanning booths or other ultraviolet (UV) light sources four weeks prior to Baseline (Day 0) and/or were planning a trip to a sunny climate or to use tanning booths or other UV sources between screening and follow-up visits. Patients who had a history of hypersensitivity to any substance in DS107 or placebo capsules. Patients who had a history of hypersensitivity to soy beans or soy lecithin. Patients who had a white cell count or differential white cell count outside of the normal reference range at screening. Patients who had any clinically significant controlled or uncontrolled medical condition or laboratory abnormality that would, in the opinion of the investigator, put the patient at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results. Patients who had a clinically significant impairment of renal or hepatic function. Patients with significant uncontrolled cardiovascular, neurologic, malignant, psychiatric, respiratory or hypertensive disease, as well as uncontrolled diabetes and fluoride arthritis or any other illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to interfere with completion of the study. Patients with active infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis B, hepatitis C or advanced disease secondary to infection with human immunodeficiency virus). Patients with a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse in the opinion of the investigator in the last year prior to Baseline (Day 0). Patients who had participated in any other clinical study with an investigational drug within 3 months before the first day of administration of study treatment. Patients who have had treatment with biologics as follows: Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months before the screening visit, or until lymphocyte count returned to normal, whichever was longer. b. Other biologics influencing cell proliferation: within 6 months before the screening visit. c. Dupilumab or other monoclonal antibodies within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever was longer. Patients who were pregnant, planning pregnancy, breastfeeding and/or were unwilling to use adequate contraception (as specified in Inclusion Criterion 10) during the trial. Patients, in the opinion of the investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Markus Weissbach, MD
Organizational Affiliation
DS Biopharma
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 524
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 528
City
Huntington Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92647
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 502
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90045
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 504
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 505
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 516
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92705
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 501
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 517
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20037
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 527
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33122
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 510
City
Sunrise
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33351
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 512
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31904
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 514
City
Skokie
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60077
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 513
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40241
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 519
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48084
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 511
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 526
City
Grants Pass
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97527
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 521
City
Medford
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97504
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 525
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19046
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 509
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76011
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 506
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78745
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 508
City
Cypress
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77433
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 507
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78213
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigative Site 529
City
Orem
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84058
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigative Site 530
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84117
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 523
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23224
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 518
City
Kenosha
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53144
Country
United States
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 101
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 203
City
Augsburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 202
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 208
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 204
City
Dresden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 206
City
Essen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 201
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 207
City
Gera
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 211
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 205
City
Luebeck
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 210
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 214
City
Münster
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 212
City
Rostock
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 304
City
Jūrmala
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 301
City
Riga
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 302
City
Riga
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 303
City
Riga
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 305
City
Riga
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 406
City
Gdańsk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 403
City
Poznań
Country
Poland
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 405
City
Warsaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 407
City
Warsaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 401
City
Wrocław
Country
Poland
Facility Name
DS Investigational Site 402
City
Łódź
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered DS107 in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs