search
Back to results

Bone Healing Accelerant Versus Standard of Care for Open Tibia Fractures

Primary Purpose

Tibial Fractures

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BHA
Sponsored by
Carmell Therapeutics Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tibial Fractures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Patient is between the ages of 18-75 inclusive at time of randomization.
  2. Patient has an acute open Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA or IIIB fracture of the tibia shaft, with or without a fibula fracture, secondary to trauma.
  3. Patient received antibiotic treatment within 2 hours of presentation at initial medical facility.
  4. Patient underwent their first operative debridement within 24 hours of presentation at initial medical facility.
  5. Patient is scheduled to have DWC within 14 days of initial injury.
  6. The tibia fracture requires open fracture reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary (IM) nailing;

    • IM nailing has been cross-locked for stability with a 4-5mm interlock, with a minimum of 1 static screw above the fracture site and 1 static screw below the fracture site, and
    • All IM nails have a diameter between 8.5-12mm with 1.0-1.5mm over-reaming of the canal.

    The temporary use of external fixation prior to IM rodding and DWC is allowed.

  7. Upon stabilization of the tibia fracture, the patient has a cortical deficit of less than or equal to 1.0cm involving no more than 50% of the tibia circumference. The cortical deficit of the residual 50% circumference must be less than 1.0cm. Gap assessments to be made with calibrated radiographs or visual inspection. In addition, patients are not likely to require a secondary procedure(s) to promote bone healing.
  8. BHA is able to be applied through existing soft tissue defects created by the injury or those created during surgical treatment. No new incisions should be required specifically for application of BHA.
  9. Patient is willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all pre-operative, post-operative and rehabilitation requirements.
  10. Patient is able to give voluntary IC to participate and has signed an IC form specific to this study prior to study treatment and DWC.
  11. Patients of childbearing potential must use adequate methods of contraception during the duration of follow-up (12-months). Adequate methods include abstinence, female and male sterilization, hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, injectables, and double barrier methods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are currently participating in another investigational trial or having participated in a clinical investigation within the last 90 days or intend to during the course of the study.
  2. Patients who are currently prisoners.
  3. Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
  4. Patients who are skeletally immature (<18 years of age or radiographic evidence of open tibial physes).
  5. Patients with Type I, II, or IIIC open tibia fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification.
  6. Current injury is a pathological fracture.
  7. Patients with additional injuries that could impact their ability to complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following:

    1. Head injury with impaired cognitive function,
    2. Spinal injury with resultant neurologic weakness or paralysis,
    3. Multi-trauma requiring prolonged hospitalization or recovery that, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such injuries will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol,
    4. Concomitant ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity injury/fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.
    5. Sustained severe burns (>10% total body surface area [TBSA] or >5% TBSA with full thickness or circumferential injury)
    6. Compartment syndrome of the leg diagnosed preoperatively
  8. Patients with pre-existing conditions, mental/psychosocial disorders, or who are taking medication that may delay or impair the fracture healing process or that could impact their ability to return for follow-up visits and/or complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following:

    1. Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine of 3.5 mg/dL or higher or being treated with renal dialysis,
    2. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with A1C of greater than or equal to 10%,
    3. Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal or diagnosed hepatitis C or hepatitis B,
    4. Neurological or neuromuscular disorders affecting ambulatory capability or cognition, such as Parkinson's disease, myasthenia gravis, or stroke with relevant residual neurological deficit,
    5. Current medications that could interfere with fracture healing such as systemic corticosteroids,
    6. Morbid Obesity with BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2,
    7. A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, hyperthyroidism, parathyroid hormone disorder, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, or Cushing's disease),
    8. History of osteomyelitis of index lower extremity or evidence of active soft tissue or bone infection at this site of injury at the time of DWC,
    9. Patients with immune deficiency or history of auto-immune disease.
  9. Patients with an active malignancy or a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of malignancy for at least 5 years.
  10. Patients with any medical condition or life circumstances that in the surgeon's opinion could impact their ability to return for follow-up visits and/or complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following:

    1. Patient lives too far away making the return for study visits to the surgeon's facility unlikely,
    2. The patient has known alcohol or drug abuse within 3 months of screening to a degree that makes it unlikely the patient will follow study requirements.
  11. Patients who are known to have anaphylactic or severe systemic reaction to human blood products, genipin, β-TCP, glycerin or to other components of the investigative product formulation.
  12. Female patients of child-bearing potential who meet any of the following criteria:

    • Patient is currently pregnant (prior diagnosis or a positive pregnancy test at baseline), or planning to become pregnant any time during the course of the study
    • Currently breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed at any time during the course of the study
  13. Upon stabilization of the tibia fracture, the patient has a bone gap greater than 1.0cm apparent by calibrated radiographs or by visual inspection and/or the patient is highly likely to require secondary intervention procedure(s), surgical or nonsurgical (e.g., bone stimulation or ultrasound treatment) for the index fracture.
  14. Patients who have mal-alignment post-IM nailing of >10° in the coronal plane or >15° in the sagittal plane.
  15. Patients who received only plates and screws for tibia fracture stabilization.
  16. At the time of the DWC surgery, patients who have a planned secondary intervention procedure, surgical or nonsurgical (e.g., bone stimulation or ultrasound treatment) for the index fracture.
  17. Patients being treated with any form of local antibiotics at the time of DWC.

Sites / Locations

  • Carmell Therapeutics

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

BHA

Control

Arm Description

Subjects treated with BHA + standard of care

Subjects treated as per standard of care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite healing measure
Proportion of subjects in each arm meeting the healing success criteria. A binary (Yes/No) outcome for overall healing will be derived from the following three outcomes: Radiographic healing as measured by a score of at least 13 on the modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia fractures (mRUST, range bad to good 1-16), ambulation as measured by a score of at least 2 on the Function IndeX for Trauma scale (range bad to good 0-3), and no secondary intervention to promote bone healing. All three components must be met for a "yes" on composite healing.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Radiographic healing
Population mean Modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia Fractures (mRUST) scores (range bad to good is 4-16)
Secondary intervention (surgical or nonsurgical)
Proportion of subjects not having secondary intervention conducted specifically to promote bone healing needed
Surgical site infection
Proportion of subjects having surgical site infection through 12 months as determined by CDC guidelines

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2019
Last Updated
January 21, 2020
Sponsor
Carmell Therapeutics Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03826784
Brief Title
Bone Healing Accelerant Versus Standard of Care for Open Tibia Fractures
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bone Healing Accelerant Versus Standard of Care in Subjects With Open Tibia Fractures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Combined into an international study (CAR-BHA-I21)
Study Start Date
November 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
January 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Carmell Therapeutics Corporation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical study is being conducted to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Bone Healing Accelerant (BHA) product when applied to tibia (leg bone) fractures with an external wound or skin break (also called open tibia fractures). It is hypothesized that by 6 months, the number of subjects with successful bone healing will be greater in the BHA-treated group compared to subjects treated with standard of care alone. Open tibia fractures were chosen for this study because healing rates are typically longer than for other bone fractures due to the limited vascular supply, limited soft tissue coverage, and higher risk of infection.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tibial Fractures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BHA
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects treated with BHA + standard of care
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Subjects treated as per standard of care
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
BHA
Intervention Description
BHA active ingredients include a blood-derived component and beta-tricalcium phosphate. It is applied directly to the bone fracture and nearby viable bone at the time of wound closure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite healing measure
Description
Proportion of subjects in each arm meeting the healing success criteria. A binary (Yes/No) outcome for overall healing will be derived from the following three outcomes: Radiographic healing as measured by a score of at least 13 on the modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia fractures (mRUST, range bad to good 1-16), ambulation as measured by a score of at least 2 on the Function IndeX for Trauma scale (range bad to good 0-3), and no secondary intervention to promote bone healing. All three components must be met for a "yes" on composite healing.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic healing
Description
Population mean Modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia Fractures (mRUST) scores (range bad to good is 4-16)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Secondary intervention (surgical or nonsurgical)
Description
Proportion of subjects not having secondary intervention conducted specifically to promote bone healing needed
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Surgical site infection
Description
Proportion of subjects having surgical site infection through 12 months as determined by CDC guidelines
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, subjects must meet all of the following criteria: Patient is between the ages of 18-75 inclusive at time of randomization. Patient has an acute open Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA or IIIB fracture of the tibia shaft, with or without a fibula fracture, secondary to trauma. Patient received antibiotic treatment within 2 hours of presentation at initial medical facility. Patient underwent their first operative debridement within 24 hours of presentation at initial medical facility. Patient is scheduled to have DWC within 14 days of initial injury. The tibia fracture requires open fracture reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary (IM) nailing; IM nailing has been cross-locked for stability with a 4-5mm interlock, with a minimum of 1 static screw above the fracture site and 1 static screw below the fracture site, and All IM nails have a diameter between 8.5-12mm with 1.0-1.5mm over-reaming of the canal. The temporary use of external fixation prior to IM rodding and DWC is allowed. Upon stabilization of the tibia fracture, the patient has a cortical deficit of less than or equal to 1.0cm involving no more than 50% of the tibia circumference. The cortical deficit of the residual 50% circumference must be less than 1.0cm. Gap assessments to be made with calibrated radiographs or visual inspection. In addition, patients are not likely to require a secondary procedure(s) to promote bone healing. BHA is able to be applied through existing soft tissue defects created by the injury or those created during surgical treatment. No new incisions should be required specifically for application of BHA. Patient is willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all pre-operative, post-operative and rehabilitation requirements. Patient is able to give voluntary IC to participate and has signed an IC form specific to this study prior to study treatment and DWC. Patients of childbearing potential must use adequate methods of contraception during the duration of follow-up (12-months). Adequate methods include abstinence, female and male sterilization, hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, injectables, and double barrier methods. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are currently participating in another investigational trial or having participated in a clinical investigation within the last 90 days or intend to during the course of the study. Patients who are currently prisoners. Patients who are unable to give informed consent. Patients who are skeletally immature (<18 years of age or radiographic evidence of open tibial physes). Patients with Type I, II, or IIIC open tibia fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Current injury is a pathological fracture. Patients with additional injuries that could impact their ability to complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following: Head injury with impaired cognitive function, Spinal injury with resultant neurologic weakness or paralysis, Multi-trauma requiring prolonged hospitalization or recovery that, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such injuries will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol, Concomitant ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity injury/fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol. Sustained severe burns (>10% total body surface area [TBSA] or >5% TBSA with full thickness or circumferential injury) Compartment syndrome of the leg diagnosed preoperatively Patients with pre-existing conditions, mental/psychosocial disorders, or who are taking medication that may delay or impair the fracture healing process or that could impact their ability to return for follow-up visits and/or complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following: Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine of 3.5 mg/dL or higher or being treated with renal dialysis, Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with A1C of greater than or equal to 10%, Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal or diagnosed hepatitis C or hepatitis B, Neurological or neuromuscular disorders affecting ambulatory capability or cognition, such as Parkinson's disease, myasthenia gravis, or stroke with relevant residual neurological deficit, Current medications that could interfere with fracture healing such as systemic corticosteroids, Morbid Obesity with BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2, A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, hyperthyroidism, parathyroid hormone disorder, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, or Cushing's disease), History of osteomyelitis of index lower extremity or evidence of active soft tissue or bone infection at this site of injury at the time of DWC, Patients with immune deficiency or history of auto-immune disease. Patients with an active malignancy or a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of malignancy for at least 5 years. Patients with any medical condition or life circumstances that in the surgeon's opinion could impact their ability to return for follow-up visits and/or complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following: Patient lives too far away making the return for study visits to the surgeon's facility unlikely, The patient has known alcohol or drug abuse within 3 months of screening to a degree that makes it unlikely the patient will follow study requirements. Patients who are known to have anaphylactic or severe systemic reaction to human blood products, genipin, β-TCP, glycerin or to other components of the investigative product formulation. Female patients of child-bearing potential who meet any of the following criteria: Patient is currently pregnant (prior diagnosis or a positive pregnancy test at baseline), or planning to become pregnant any time during the course of the study Currently breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed at any time during the course of the study Upon stabilization of the tibia fracture, the patient has a bone gap greater than 1.0cm apparent by calibrated radiographs or by visual inspection and/or the patient is highly likely to require secondary intervention procedure(s), surgical or nonsurgical (e.g., bone stimulation or ultrasound treatment) for the index fracture. Patients who have mal-alignment post-IM nailing of >10° in the coronal plane or >15° in the sagittal plane. Patients who received only plates and screws for tibia fracture stabilization. At the time of the DWC surgery, patients who have a planned secondary intervention procedure, surgical or nonsurgical (e.g., bone stimulation or ultrasound treatment) for the index fracture. Patients being treated with any form of local antibiotics at the time of DWC.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janet M Vargo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Carmell Therapeutics
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Carmell Therapeutics
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15203
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Bone Healing Accelerant Versus Standard of Care for Open Tibia Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs