search
Back to results

Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA)

Primary Purpose

Aphasia, Stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Escitalopram 10mg
Placebo
Computer-delivered naming treatment
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aphasia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have sustained an acute ischemic left hemisphere stroke.
  • Participants must be fluent speakers of English by self-report.
  • Participants must be capable of giving informed consent or indicating a legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.
  • Participants must be age 18 or older.
  • Participants must be within 5 days of onset of stroke.
  • Participants must be pre-morbidly right-handed by self-report.
  • Participants must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (Aphasia Quotient < 93.8).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous neurological disease affecting the brain including previous symptomatic stroke
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, autism, or other psychiatric or neurological condition that affects naming/language
  • A history of additional risk factors for torsades de pointes (TdP; e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome)
  • Current severe depression, defined as a score of > 15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
  • Uncorrected visual loss or hearing loss by self-report
  • Use of any medication approved by the FDA for treatment of depression at the time of stroke onset
  • Concomitant use of any monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or pimozide, or other drugs that prolong the QT/QTc interval, triptans (and other 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor Agonists), or other contraindications to escitalopram that may be identified.
  • A QTc greater than 450 milliseconds on electrocardiogram or evidence of hyponatremia (Na < 130) at baseline
  • Pregnancy at the time of stroke or planning to become pregnant during the study term.

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins School of MedicineRecruiting
  • Medical University of South CarolinaRecruiting
  • University of South CarolinaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Naming Treatment + Escitalopram

Naming Treatment + Placebo

Arm Description

10 mg escitalopram daily for three months (escalating from 5 mg per day for the first week and tapering to 5 mg per day for the last two weeks)

10 mg placebo daily for three months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Philadelphia Naming Test short-form accuracy score
Number of correctly named items of 30 total items on the computerized picture naming assessment. Scores ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Language production as assessed by lexical features of discourse in "Cookie Theft" picture description
Lexical features, meaning carrying units of language (morphemes), will be counted for each Cookie Theft picture description. There is no maximum number of meaning carrying units, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Language production as assessed by content units included in picture description of "Cookie Theft"
Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. A ratio of included left content units to included right content units then can be calculated and interpreted as a measure of hemispatial attention.
Language production as assessed by rate of syllables per content unit produced in "Cookie Theft" picture description
Syllables included in the picture description are counted. Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. The average rate of syllables per content unit produced can then be calculated and interpreted as a measure of efficiency in producing relevant information in the task.
Depression as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
9 item scale scored 0-3 for each item. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. PHQ-9 >15 or suicidal ideation suggest depression sufficient for exclusion or removal from study.
Language production as assessed by Morphosyntactic Generation (MorGen) Test
60 item assessment of word morphology (e.g., plurals, possessives) and modifiers (e.g., number, size, color). Each item is scored based on produced accurate descriptors of an image relative to a second reference image (e.g., patients see two trees, one larger than the other, and the phrase "little tree" is elicited). Patients are scored for objects correctly named (nouns) out of 60, instances of correct use of plural marker out of 31, instances of correct use of numbers out of 8, instances of correct modifiers denoting size out of 16, instances of correct modifiers denoting color out of 19, instances of correct modifiers denoting possessive markers out of 17, and instances of correctly named possessing individuals (proper names provided on screen) out of 17. These scores can then be interpreted separately or averaged to interpret a broad morphosyntactic accuracy score.
Stroke severity as assessed by NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patient's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items.
Post-stroke level of disability as assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
The mRS is a 6-level scale from "0-No symptoms" to "6-dead" used to evaluate the degree of disability in patients who have suffered a stroke.
Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand strength
Right hand strength assessment by dynamometer
Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand dexterity
Right hand dexterity assessment by 9 peg board test
Change in new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"
Change in new vocabulary items will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Change in incidence of new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"
Change in incidence of each new item will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Change in language production as assessed by speech errors produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"
Change in number of errors will be counted after each retelling is recorded
Change in Language production as assessed by speech pauses produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"
Change in pauses will be counted after each retelling is recorded

Full Information

First Posted
February 14, 2019
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
University of South Carolina, Medical University of South Carolina, University of California, Irvine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03843463
Brief Title
Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia
Acronym
ELISA
Official Title
Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 18, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 18, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 18, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
University of South Carolina, Medical University of South Carolina, University of California, Irvine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In this project, the investigators will investigate the effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), escitalopram, on augmenting language therapy effectiveness, as measured by naming untrained pictures and describing pictures, in individuals with aphasia in the acute and subacute post stroke period (i.e., within three months post stroke).
Detailed Description
In this project, the investigators will investigate the effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), escitalopram, on augmenting language therapy effectiveness, as measured by naming untrained pictures and describing pictures, in individuals with aphasia in the acute and subacute post stroke period (i.e., within three months post stroke). There has been no previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of daily SSRI in the first three months after stroke on improvement of language in people undergoing aphasia treatment. It is plausible that SSRIs, which elevate synaptic serotonin, might enhance recovery by augmenting synaptic plasticity. The investigators propose to conduct a Phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram for augmenting language intervention in subacute stroke. The investigators hypothesize that daily escitalopram for 90 days after stroke results in greater improvement (compared to placebo) in naming untrained pictures, as well as greater increase in content of picture description and greater improvement in morphosyntactic production, when combined with speech and language treatment (SALT). A second aim is to evaluate the mechanisms of language recovery in individuals who receive active medical treatment and those who receive placebo, using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and genetic testing. The investigators hypothesize that greater improvement in language is associated with increased connectivity within the left hemisphere language network on rsfMRI in participants who receive escitalopram than in those who receive placebo, independently of improvement in depression. The investigators also hypothesize that the effects are greatest in individuals with val/val allele of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) - (consistent with previous studies showing a greater response to treatment and greater neuroplasticity in people with the val/val allele than those with one or more met alleles.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aphasia, Stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
88 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Naming Treatment + Escitalopram
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
10 mg escitalopram daily for three months (escalating from 5 mg per day for the first week and tapering to 5 mg per day for the last two weeks)
Arm Title
Naming Treatment + Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
10 mg placebo daily for three months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Escitalopram 10mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lexapro
Intervention Description
Escitalopram tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo (for Escitalopram)
Intervention Description
Sugar pill manufactured to mimic escitalopram 10 mg tablet
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Computer-delivered naming treatment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Computer-delivered naming treatment (CoDeNT)
Intervention Description
15 45-minute sessions of computer-delivered naming treatment beginning two months following stroke
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Philadelphia Naming Test short-form accuracy score
Description
Number of correctly named items of 30 total items on the computerized picture naming assessment. Scores ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Language production as assessed by lexical features of discourse in "Cookie Theft" picture description
Description
Lexical features, meaning carrying units of language (morphemes), will be counted for each Cookie Theft picture description. There is no maximum number of meaning carrying units, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Language production as assessed by content units included in picture description of "Cookie Theft"
Description
Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. A ratio of included left content units to included right content units then can be calculated and interpreted as a measure of hemispatial attention.
Time Frame
Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Language production as assessed by rate of syllables per content unit produced in "Cookie Theft" picture description
Description
Syllables included in the picture description are counted. Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. The average rate of syllables per content unit produced can then be calculated and interpreted as a measure of efficiency in producing relevant information in the task.
Time Frame
Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Depression as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Description
9 item scale scored 0-3 for each item. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. PHQ-9 >15 or suicidal ideation suggest depression sufficient for exclusion or removal from study.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Language production as assessed by Morphosyntactic Generation (MorGen) Test
Description
60 item assessment of word morphology (e.g., plurals, possessives) and modifiers (e.g., number, size, color). Each item is scored based on produced accurate descriptors of an image relative to a second reference image (e.g., patients see two trees, one larger than the other, and the phrase "little tree" is elicited). Patients are scored for objects correctly named (nouns) out of 60, instances of correct use of plural marker out of 31, instances of correct use of numbers out of 8, instances of correct modifiers denoting size out of 16, instances of correct modifiers denoting color out of 19, instances of correct modifiers denoting possessive markers out of 17, and instances of correctly named possessing individuals (proper names provided on screen) out of 17. These scores can then be interpreted separately or averaged to interpret a broad morphosyntactic accuracy score.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Stroke severity as assessed by NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Description
The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patient's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items.
Time Frame
Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment, 20 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Post-stroke level of disability as assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Description
The mRS is a 6-level scale from "0-No symptoms" to "6-dead" used to evaluate the degree of disability in patients who have suffered a stroke.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand strength
Description
Right hand strength assessment by dynamometer
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand dexterity
Description
Right hand dexterity assessment by 9 peg board test
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Change in new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"
Description
Change in new vocabulary items will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Change in incidence of new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"
Description
Change in incidence of each new item will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Change in language production as assessed by speech errors produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"
Description
Change in number of errors will be counted after each retelling is recorded
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment
Title
Change in Language production as assessed by speech pauses produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"
Description
Change in pauses will be counted after each retelling is recorded
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must have sustained an acute ischemic left hemisphere stroke. Participants must be fluent speakers of English by self-report. Participants must be capable of giving informed consent or indicating a legally authorized representative to provide informed consent. Participants must be age 18 or older. Participants must be within 5 days of onset of stroke. Participants must be pre-morbidly right-handed by self-report. Participants must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (Aphasia Quotient < 93.8). Exclusion Criteria: Previous neurological disease affecting the brain including previous symptomatic stroke Diagnosis of schizophrenia, autism, or other psychiatric or neurological condition that affects naming/language A history of additional risk factors for torsades de pointes (TdP; e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome) Current severe depression, defined as a score of > 15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Uncorrected visual loss or hearing loss by self-report Use of any medication approved by the FDA for treatment of depression at the time of stroke onset Concomitant use of any monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or pimozide, or other drugs that prolong the QT/QTc interval, triptans (and other 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor Agonists), or other contraindications to escitalopram that may be identified. A QTc greater than 450 milliseconds on electrocardiogram or evidence of hyponatremia (Na < 130) at baseline Pregnancy at the time of stroke or planning to become pregnant during the study term.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Argye Hillis-Trupe, MD
Phone
(410) 614-2381
Email
argye@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Melissa D Stockbridge, PhD
Email
md.stockbridge@jhmi.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Argye Hillis-Trupe, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Argye E Hillis, MD
Phone
410-812-6716
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Catherine Kelly, MA
Phone
410-502-6045
Email
chead2@jhu.edu
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leo Bonilha
Phone
843-792-5044
Email
bonilha@musc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kelly Krajeck
Phone
(843) 792-0189
Email
krajeck@musc.edu
Facility Name
University of South Carolina
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29208
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Souvik Sen
Phone
803-545-6073
Email
Souvik.Sen@uscmed.sc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leigh Ann Spell
Phone
(803) 777-2693
Email
spelll@mailbox.sc.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12649521
Citation
Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):987-93. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0. Epub 2003 Mar 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27245310
Citation
Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21216670
Citation
Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, Berard E, Lamy C, Bejot Y, Deltour S, Jaillard A, Niclot P, Guillon B, Moulin T, Marque P, Pariente J, Arnaud C, Loubinoux I. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Feb;10(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8. Epub 2011 Jan 7. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2011 Mar;10(3):205.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30528472
Citation
FOCUS Trial Collaboration. Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jan 19;393(10168):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32823-X. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24690945
Citation
Doron R, Lotan D, Versano Z, Benatav L, Franko M, Armoza S, Kately N, Rehavi M. Escitalopram or novel herbal mixture treatments during or following exposure to stress reduce anxiety-like behavior through corticosterone and BDNF modifications. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e91455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091455. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9316679
Citation
Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W, Schildermans F, Deberdt W. Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994 Aug;17(4):320-31. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199408000-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30150003
Citation
Fridriksson J, Elm J, Stark BC, Basilakos A, Rorden C, Sen S, George MS, Gottfried M, Bonilha L. BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1276-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29276014
Citation
Gu SC, Wang CD. Early Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Recovery after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1178-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25911132
Citation
Hayasaka Y, Purgato M, Magni LR, Ogawa Y, Takeshima N, Cipriani A, Barbui C, Leucht S, Furukawa TA. Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 15;180:179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20538691
Citation
Hillis AE. The 'standard' for poststroke aphasia recovery. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1316-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585364. Epub 2010 Jun 10. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29451321
Citation
Hillis AE, Beh YY, Sebastian R, Breining B, Tippett DC, Wright A, Saxena S, Rorden C, Bonilha L, Basilakos A, Yourganov G, Fridriksson J. Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2018 Mar;83(3):612-622. doi: 10.1002/ana.25184. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25844378
Citation
Hillis AE, Tippett DC. Stroke Recovery: Surprising Influences and Residual Consequences. Adv Med. 2014;2014:378263. doi: 10.1155/2014/378263.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9084344
Citation
Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K, Van Vleymen B, Deberdt W. Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90028-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20124118
Citation
Jorge RE, Acion L, Moser D, Adams HP Jr, Robinson RG. Escitalopram and enhancement of cognitive recovery following stroke. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;67(2):187-96. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.185.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30355209
Citation
Kraglund KL, Mortensen JK, Damsbo AG, Modrau B, Simonsen SA, Iversen HK, Madsen M, Grove EL, Johnsen SP, Andersen G. Neuroregeneration and Vascular Protection by Citalopram in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TALOS). Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2568-2576. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020067.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22294409
Citation
Kurland J, Pulvermuller F, Silva N, Burke K, Andrianopoulos M. Constrained versus unconstrained intensive language therapy in two individuals with chronic, moderate-to-severe aphasia and apraxia of speech: behavioral and fMRI outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S65-87. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0113). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23422053
Citation
Lam RW. Antidepressants and QTc prolongation. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013 Mar;38(2):E5-6. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120256. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20538700
Citation
Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1485-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577338. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26807842
Citation
Marangolo P, Fiori V, Sabatini U, De Pasquale G, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Gili T. Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Language Treatment Enhances Functional Connectivity in the Left Hemisphere: Preliminary Data from Aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):724-38. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00927. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23152272
Citation
Mead GE, Hsieh CF, Lee R, Kutlubaev MA, Claxton A, Hankey GJ, Hackett ML. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub2.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Pan XL, Chen HF, Cheng X, Hu CC, Wang JW, Fu YM, Kong HM, Shao HJ. Effects of Paroxetine on Motor and Cognitive Function Recovery in Patients with Non-Depressed Ischemic Stroke: An Open Randomized Controlled Study. Brain Impairment. 2018 May:1-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29320072
Citation
Saeterdal I, Pike E, Ringerike T, Gjertsen MK. Efficacy and Safety for the Newer Antidepressants in Adults [Internet]. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2007 Jun. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 17-2007. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK464856/
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24424469
Citation
Sanchez C, Reines EH, Montgomery SA. A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):185-96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28127284
Citation
Sebastian R, Saxena S, Tsapkini K, Faria AV, Long C, Wright A, Davis C, Tippett DC, Mourdoukoutas AP, Bikson M, Celnik P, Hillis AE. Cerebellar tDCS: A Novel Approach to Augment Language Treatment Post-stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 12;10:695. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00695. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24523553
Citation
Wang C, Zhang Y, Liu B, Long H, Yu C, Jiang T. Dosage effects of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on cortical surface area and functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 12;34(7):2645-51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3501-13.2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11546902
Citation
Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R, Ford J, Dronkers N, Salmeron E, Lai J, Unwin DH. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2093-8. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095720.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34941929
Citation
Stockbridge MD, Fridriksson J, Sen S, Bonilha L, Hillis AE. Protocol for Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA): A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261474. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs