Impacts of Oral Irrigation in Patients With Periimplant Mucositis
Peri-implant Mucositis
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Peri-implant Mucositis focused on measuring periimplant mucositis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- subject with no systemic diseases that affect oral tissues and the nature of plaque,
- with no professional cleaning for at least six months prior to baseline examination,
- with one or more implants (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) functioning at least 24 months before the start of the study
- having implants with BOP in at least two of the six regions
- The people who agreed to refrain from the use of any nonstudy dental device or oral care product for the study duration were included in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
- subjects not cooperative,
- having disease associated with bacteremia,
- taking medication influencing gingival health (eg. dilantin, calcium channel blockers, cyclosporine, anticoagulants),
- using long-term antibiotic and anti-inflammatory agents,
- smokers and
- women who were pregnant and in lactation period
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Experimental
Experimental
Active Comparator
Oral irrigator group
Interdental brush group
Control group
Fifteen patients using toothbrush and oral irrigator(oxytet oral irrigatör).All patients were told to use Modified Bass method of tooth brushing technique. PI, GI, PPD and CAL values were measured with William's probe (Hu-Fried, Chicago, IL, A.B.D) around the teeth and with plastic probe around the implants. All clinical parameters were evaluated on each of the six regions of the implant (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual, disto-lingual).PICF was collected one day after the clinical examination from buccal aspects of the mesial and distal surfaces at the interproximal sites.Following the initial clinical records, all patients were performed full mouth instrumentation and described oral hygiene procedure according to their groups.
Fifteen patients using toothbrush and interdental brush.All patients were told to use Modified Bass method of tooth brushing technique. PI, GI, PPD and CAL values were measured with William's probe (Hu-Fried, Chicago, IL, A.B.D) around the teeth and with plastic probe around the implants. All clinical parameters were evaluated on each of the six regions of the implant (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual, disto-lingual). PICF was collected one day after the clinical examination from buccal aspects of the mesial and distal surfaces at the interproximal sites. Following the initial clinical records, all patients were performed full mouth instrumentation and described oral hygiene procedure according to their groups.
Fifteen patients using only toothbrush.All patients were told to use Modified Bass method of tooth brushing technique. PI, GI, PPD and CAL values were measured with William's probe (Hu-Fried, Chicago, IL, A.B.D) around the teeth and with plastic probe around the implants. All clinical parameters were evaluated on each of the six regions of the implant (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual, disto-lingual). PICF was collected one day after the clinical examination from buccal aspects of the mesial and distal surfaces at the interproximal sites. Following the initial clinical records, all patients were performed full mouth instrumentation and described oral hygiene procedure according to their groups.