EEG-based Neurofeedback for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (HALFEED) (HALFEED)
Primary Purpose
Schizophrenia
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Ireland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LORETA
Treatment as usual
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Schizophrenia focused on measuring Hallucinations
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Are ≥ 18 years old
- Have a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
- Have been experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations for at least one year
- Score 2 or more on the frequency item of the auditory hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) at time of initial assessment (representing voices occurring at least once a day)
- Are deemed refractory to antipsychotic treatment (defined as still hearing voices despite 4-6 weeks of treatment with two different antipsychotics)
- Have been on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for the three months prior to study enrolment
- Are right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971)
- Are able to provide written, informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a diagnosed substance abuse disorder
- Prior head injury with loss of consciousness for more than five minutes
- At immediate risk of harm to self or others.
Sites / Locations
- Tallaght University Hospital / St. James' Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
LORETA
Treatment as usual
Arm Description
In the first session, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) will be used in combination with Z-scores to identify participants' resting state EEG differences relative to a database of norms of their demographic. EEG abnormalities which are consistent with the research literature on neural changes associated with AVH will then be targeted for normalization using neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with Z-scores.
Maintenance use of an atypical antipsychotic (e.g., clozapine) with support, when needed, of a community nurse.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Recruitment rate
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
Success of blinding of raters
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
Drop-out rate: Controls
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
The Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) is an 11-item measure of the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. Total scores can range from 0 to 44 with higher scores indicating greater severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. The PSYRATS-AH has been found to have a four-factor structure (Woodward et al., 2014). These are Emotion (range 0-20), Physical (range 0-12), Cognitive (range 0-8) and Loudness (range 0-4). Higher scores on each of these subscales represents more severe auditory verbal hallucinations. We will assess between group differences in both the total and four factor scores of the PSYRATS-AH at end of therapy.
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
The Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS; Hoffman et al., 2003) is a seven-item structured clinical interview, which assesses the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in the past week. Its items assess frequency, reality, loudness, number, length, attentional salience (how demanding of attention the voice is) and distress level. Items are rated on unique scales. Total scores on this measure can range from 0 - 41 . Higher scores represent more severe auditory verbal hallucinations.
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Delusions will be assessed by the Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-D; Haddock et al., 1999). This is a 6-item structured clinical interview. Total scores can range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. It has been found to have two factors (Woodward et al., 2014), namely Distress (distress amount, distress intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation amount, preoccupation duration, conviction, disruption). Total scores on these factors can range from 0-8 and 0-16 respectively, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. Both total PSYRATS-D and factor scores will be employed.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS; Zigmund & Snaith, 1983) is a 16-item self-report measure of both anxiety and depression. Eight items assess depression and eight items assess anxiety. Depression scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Anxiety scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety.
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Quality of life will be assessed by the short-form of the self-report Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ; Endicott et al., 1993). Total scores on 16-item measure can range from 14 to 70, with higher scores representing greater quality of life.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03852706
First Posted
January 25, 2019
Last Updated
March 25, 2022
Sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Collaborators
Actualise
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03852706
Brief Title
EEG-based Neurofeedback for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (HALFEED)
Acronym
HALFEED
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Low-resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Neurofeedback Training for Treatment-resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
A national Covid-19 lockdown prevented completion of the trial
Study Start Date
March 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 25, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 25, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Collaborators
Actualise
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either EEG-based neurofeedback or treatment-as-usual.
Detailed Description
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are experienced by up to 80% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, where they can cause significant occupational and social impairment. Current treatments are incompletely effective. Around 25-30% of AVH are refractory to antipsychotic drugs, and cognitive behavioural therapy only shows a small-medium effect size. Initially promising studies of neurostimulation have shown smaller effect sizes as better controlled trials have been conducted. There is hence the need for innovative new treatments. One potential option is neurofeedback training. The primary objective of study is to perform a randomized, controlled, rater-blinded pilot trial (n=40) of EEG neurofeedback for AVH in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, to assess trial process, which will then inform a future definitive trial. The secondary objective is to calculate a 95% confidence interval that will allow interpretation of statistical difference between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual groups to assess neurofeedback for reducing auditory verbal hallucinations. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a neurofeedback (plus treatment-as-usual) or treatment-as-usual alone condition. Neurofeedback will employ Z-score based LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography). After a baseline assessment, twenty sessions of personalized neurofeedback training will be delivered over a period of approximately four months. This is the first registered trial of EEG neurofeedback for hallucinations. The primary focus of the pilot trial is on feasibility. However, a 95% confidence interval will be determined for the difference on PSYRATS-AH and AHRS scores between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual to help inform a future definitive trial.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Schizophrenia
Keywords
Hallucinations
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
LORETA
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In the first session, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) will be used in combination with Z-scores to identify participants' resting state EEG differences relative to a database of norms of their demographic. EEG abnormalities which are consistent with the research literature on neural changes associated with AVH will then be targeted for normalization using neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with Z-scores.
Arm Title
Treatment as usual
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Maintenance use of an atypical antipsychotic (e.g., clozapine) with support, when needed, of a community nurse.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
LORETA
Intervention Description
Twenty sessions of neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with z-scores.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment as usual
Intervention Description
Treatment-as-usual
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment rate
Description
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
Description
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
Description
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
Description
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Success of blinding of raters
Description
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
Description
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Drop-out rate: Controls
Description
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
Description
The Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) is an 11-item measure of the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. Total scores can range from 0 to 44 with higher scores indicating greater severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. The PSYRATS-AH has been found to have a four-factor structure (Woodward et al., 2014). These are Emotion (range 0-20), Physical (range 0-12), Cognitive (range 0-8) and Loudness (range 0-4). Higher scores on each of these subscales represents more severe auditory verbal hallucinations. We will assess between group differences in both the total and four factor scores of the PSYRATS-AH at end of therapy.
Time Frame
End of intervention (~4 months)
Title
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
Description
The Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS; Hoffman et al., 2003) is a seven-item structured clinical interview, which assesses the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in the past week. Its items assess frequency, reality, loudness, number, length, attentional salience (how demanding of attention the voice is) and distress level. Items are rated on unique scales. Total scores on this measure can range from 0 - 41 . Higher scores represent more severe auditory verbal hallucinations.
Time Frame
End of intervention (~4 months)
Title
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Description
Delusions will be assessed by the Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-D; Haddock et al., 1999). This is a 6-item structured clinical interview. Total scores can range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. It has been found to have two factors (Woodward et al., 2014), namely Distress (distress amount, distress intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation amount, preoccupation duration, conviction, disruption). Total scores on these factors can range from 0-8 and 0-16 respectively, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. Both total PSYRATS-D and factor scores will be employed.
Time Frame
End of intervention (~4 months)
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS; Zigmund & Snaith, 1983) is a 16-item self-report measure of both anxiety and depression. Eight items assess depression and eight items assess anxiety. Depression scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Anxiety scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety.
Time Frame
End of intervention (~4 months)
Title
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
Quality of life will be assessed by the short-form of the self-report Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ; Endicott et al., 1993). Total scores on 16-item measure can range from 14 to 70, with higher scores representing greater quality of life.
Time Frame
End of intervention (~4 months)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Are ≥ 18 years old
Have a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
Have been experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations for at least one year
Score 2 or more on the frequency item of the auditory hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) at time of initial assessment (representing voices occurring at least once a day)
Are deemed refractory to antipsychotic treatment (defined as still hearing voices despite 4-6 weeks of treatment with two different antipsychotics)
Have been on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for the three months prior to study enrolment
Are right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971)
Are able to provide written, informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Having a diagnosed substance abuse disorder
Prior head injury with loss of consciousness for more than five minutes
At immediate risk of harm to self or others.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simon McCarthy-Jones
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tallaght University Hospital / St. James' Hospital
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
EEG-based Neurofeedback for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (HALFEED)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs