Novel Triple-dose Tuberculosis Retreatment Regimens: How to Overcome Resistance Without Creating More (TriDoRe)
Primary Purpose
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Bangladesh
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
6EH³RZ
6EHR³Z
6EHRZLfx
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All newly registered patients with smear-positive recurrent pulmonary TB
- Adults as well as children (no age limit)
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients transferred to a health facility not supported by Damien Foundation will be excluded. This includes patients diagnosed with HIV/TB-coinfection.
Sites / Locations
- Damien Foundation
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
High-Dose Isoniazid
High-Dose Rifampicin
World Health Organisation (WHO) regimen
Arm Description
New high-dose isoniazid retreatment regimen (6EH³RZ) - H 15mg/kg
New high-dose rifampicin retreatment regimen (6EHR³Z) - R 30mg/kg
WHO levofloxacin-strengthened regimen (6EHRZLfx)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Bacteriological effectiveness (proportion of relapse-free cure excluding deaths and lost-to-follow-up)
To study if the bacteriological effectiveness of two high-dose regimens is non-inferior to the WHO recommended levofloxacin-strengthened regimen in patients with rifampicin-susceptible recurrent TB. Relapse-free cure is based on sputum smear and culture-result.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Frequency of resistance to the different drug components at screening.
Determine the initial resistance profile to the different drug components (Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Levofloxacin) for the entire cohort of patients with recurrent TB
Identify predictors of bacteriological effectiveness
Identify predictors (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …) of bacteriological effectiveness
Programmatic effectiveness (i.e proportion of participants with relapse-free cure)
Compare the programmatic effectiveness of the 3 different regimens. Relapse-free cure is based on sputum smear and culture-result.
Number of SAEs and study-specific adverse events of the different retreatment regimens
Compare the safety (SAEs and study-specific adverse events ) of the different retreatment regimens.
Negative predictive value of two-week FDA
Evaluate a novel application of fluorescein diacetate vital staining fluorescence microscopy (FDA) at 0 and 2 weeks of treatment, to estimate its utility as screening test for initial resistance to rifampicin, and identify predictors for FDA reduction at 2 weeks. The negative predictive value of two-week FDA showing no lack of 10-fold reduction of viable bacilli at two weeks.
Proportion of participants relapse-free cure
To estimate the proportion of relapse-free cure among patients with FDA conversion to zero at 2 weeks, by regimen.The proportion (95% confidence interval) relapse-free cure among those who converted on the two-week FDA, by regimen.
Difference (95% confidence interval) in bacteriological effectiveness (susceptible to both rifampicin and isoniazid vs heteroresistance to rifampicin and/or isoniazid).(heteroresistance), by regimen studied in the trial
Estimate the clinical relevance of different proportions of mutant subpopulations (heteroresistance), by regimen studied in the trial.
Proportion of participants with acquired resistance
proportion of participants with acquired resistance, by treatment regimen
Identify predictors of programmatic effectiveness (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …)
Identify predictors (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03862248
First Posted
February 4, 2019
Last Updated
January 16, 2020
Sponsor
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Collaborators
Damien Foundation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03862248
Brief Title
Novel Triple-dose Tuberculosis Retreatment Regimens: How to Overcome Resistance Without Creating More
Acronym
TriDoRe
Official Title
Novel Triple-dose Tuberculosis Retreatment Regimens: How to Overcome Resistance Without Creating More
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Feasibility of the clinical trial could not be confirmed at the different sites.
Study Start Date
September 30, 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Collaborators
Damien Foundation
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Drug-resistance is a major challenge for tuberculosis (TB) care programs. The new WHO guideline recommends adding levofloxacin in previously treated patients with isoniazid-resistant rifampicin-susceptible TB. The investigators believe that such a retreatment regimen may result in acquired resistance to fluoroquinolone, the core drug of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) regimen, and thus threaten the effectiveness of the fluoroquinolone-based MDR-TB treatment regimen. Therefore the investigators propose to study if regimens strengthened by using high-dose first-line drugs, either a triple dose of isoniazid or a triple dose of rifampicin, are non-inferior to the WHO recommended levofloxacin-strengthened regimen. If one of both high-dose regimens would be non-inferior, it could replace the levofloxacin-strengthened regimen.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
High-Dose Isoniazid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
New high-dose isoniazid retreatment regimen (6EH³RZ) - H 15mg/kg
Arm Title
High-Dose Rifampicin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
New high-dose rifampicin retreatment regimen (6EHR³Z) - R 30mg/kg
Arm Title
World Health Organisation (WHO) regimen
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
WHO levofloxacin-strengthened regimen (6EHRZLfx)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
6EH³RZ
Intervention Description
New high-dose isoniazid retreatment regimen (6EH³RZ) - H 15mg/kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
6EHR³Z
Intervention Description
New high-dose rifampicin retreatment regimen (6EHR³Z) - R 30mg/kg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
6EHRZLfx
Intervention Description
WHO levofloxacin-strengthened regimen (6EHRZLfx)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bacteriological effectiveness (proportion of relapse-free cure excluding deaths and lost-to-follow-up)
Description
To study if the bacteriological effectiveness of two high-dose regimens is non-inferior to the WHO recommended levofloxacin-strengthened regimen in patients with rifampicin-susceptible recurrent TB. Relapse-free cure is based on sputum smear and culture-result.
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of resistance to the different drug components at screening.
Description
Determine the initial resistance profile to the different drug components (Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Levofloxacin) for the entire cohort of patients with recurrent TB
Time Frame
At screening (day 0)
Title
Identify predictors of bacteriological effectiveness
Description
Identify predictors (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …) of bacteriological effectiveness
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Title
Programmatic effectiveness (i.e proportion of participants with relapse-free cure)
Description
Compare the programmatic effectiveness of the 3 different regimens. Relapse-free cure is based on sputum smear and culture-result.
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Title
Number of SAEs and study-specific adverse events of the different retreatment regimens
Description
Compare the safety (SAEs and study-specific adverse events ) of the different retreatment regimens.
Time Frame
up to month 6
Title
Negative predictive value of two-week FDA
Description
Evaluate a novel application of fluorescein diacetate vital staining fluorescence microscopy (FDA) at 0 and 2 weeks of treatment, to estimate its utility as screening test for initial resistance to rifampicin, and identify predictors for FDA reduction at 2 weeks. The negative predictive value of two-week FDA showing no lack of 10-fold reduction of viable bacilli at two weeks.
Time Frame
2 weeks after start of treatment
Title
Proportion of participants relapse-free cure
Description
To estimate the proportion of relapse-free cure among patients with FDA conversion to zero at 2 weeks, by regimen.The proportion (95% confidence interval) relapse-free cure among those who converted on the two-week FDA, by regimen.
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Title
Difference (95% confidence interval) in bacteriological effectiveness (susceptible to both rifampicin and isoniazid vs heteroresistance to rifampicin and/or isoniazid).(heteroresistance), by regimen studied in the trial
Description
Estimate the clinical relevance of different proportions of mutant subpopulations (heteroresistance), by regimen studied in the trial.
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Title
Proportion of participants with acquired resistance
Description
proportion of participants with acquired resistance, by treatment regimen
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
Title
Identify predictors of programmatic effectiveness (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …)
Description
Identify predictors (including treatment regimen, resistance profile, presence of cavities, the grading of the smear, …).
Time Frame
18 months (6-month treatment + 12-month follow-up period)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
participant eligibility is based on self-representation of gender identity
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All newly registered patients with smear-positive recurrent pulmonary TB
Adults as well as children (no age limit)
Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients transferred to a health facility not supported by Damien Foundation will be excluded. This includes patients diagnosed with HIV/TB-coinfection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Decroo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Insitute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Damien Foundation
City
Dhaka
Country
Bangladesh
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Novel Triple-dose Tuberculosis Retreatment Regimens: How to Overcome Resistance Without Creating More
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs