search
Back to results

The United States Healthy Living Study

Primary Purpose

Colo-rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
message delivered via virtual technology
Sponsored by
University of Florida
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Colo-rectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 73 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • reside within the United States but outside of Florida
  • speak English
  • are of either black or white racial background.
  • are out-of-guidelines for colorectal cancer screening (>10 years for colonoscopy, >3 years for Cologuard, > 1 year for fecal immunochemical test)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • does not meet the above criteria

Sites / Locations

  • University of Florida

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Concordant virtual human

Dis-concordant virtual human

Concordant text

Dis-concordant text

Arm Description

Participant is exposed to a demographically concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered by virtual human technology.

Participant is exposed to a demographically dis-concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered by virtual human technology.

Participant is exposed to a demographically concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered in a text-based format.

Participant is exposed to a demographically dis-concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered in a text-based format.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Perceived susceptibility
Perceived susceptibility (Birmingham et al., 2015) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I am at risk for getting colon cancer in my lifetime. It is possible that I will get colon cancer in my lifetime. I am susceptible to getting colon cancer in my lifetime. It is likely that I will get colon cancer in my lifetime.
Perceived severity
Perceived severity (Boonyasiriwat et al., 2013; Hsien Cheah, 2006; Lipkus & Klein, 2006) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 5. I believe that colon cancer is harmful. 6. I believe that colon cancer is a significant disease. 7. I believe that colon cancer has serious negative consequences. 8. I believe that colon cancer is serious. 9. I believe that colon cancer is dangerous. 10. I believe that colon cancer is life-threatening.
Perceived benefits
Perceived benefits (Christy et al., 2013; Purnell, Katz, Andersen, & Bennett, 2010; Rawl et al., 2001; Vernon, Myers, & Tilley, 1997) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 13. The FIT will decrease your chances of dying from colon cancer. 14. The FIT will help you not worry as much about colon cancer. 15. I believe that if I had a normal screening test result, I wouldn't have to worry about developing colon cancer. 16. I believe that when colon cancer is found early, it can be cured.
Perceived barriers
Perceived barriers (Champion & Skinner, 2003; Gwede et al., 2011; James, Campbell, & Hudson, 2002) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 17. My doctor would never recommend the FIT. 18. The FIT would be too expensive. 19. The FIT would be too embarrassing. 20. Preparation for the FIT is too hard. 21. The FIT takes too much time. 22. The FIT is difficult because it is too hard to understand all the instructions.
Attitudes towards Fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Attitudes towards FIT/colonoscopy (Rydell, Sherman, Boucher, & Macy, 2012) Please indicate your feelings about FIT. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. FIT is… 23. Awful-Nice 24. Unpleasant-Pleasant 25. Fun-Not Fun
Attitudes towards colonoscopy
Attitudes towards FIT/colonoscopy (Rydell, Sherman, Boucher, & Macy, 2012) Please indicate your feelings about colonoscopy. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. Colonoscopy is… 26. Awful-Nice 27. Unpleasant-Pleasant 28. Fun-Not Fun
Self-efficacy
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I am confident that I can use the FIT. Arranging my schedule to use the FIT is an easy thing to do. FIT screening would be easy for me to do. It would be easy for me to take a stool sample. It would be easy for me to mail my kit back. It would be easy for me to use all the tools in the kit. I know how to collect a stool sample. I am confident that I can get a colonoscopy. Arranging my schedule to get a colonoscopy is an easy thing to do. Finding time to get a colonoscopy would be difficult for me to do. Screening for colon cancer with a colonoscopy would be easy for me to do. It would be easy for me to get a colonoscopy.
Response efficacy
Response efficacy (Boer & Seydel, 1996; Duncan et al., 2014; Hwang et al., 2012, 2013; Vernon et al., 1997) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 7. FIT screening leads to early detection if something is wrong. 8. FIT screening leads to the detection of small abnormalities. 9. FIT screening will help me find cancer early. (What has Nick gotten from something like this?) 10. FIT screening will decrease my chances of dying from colon cancer
Comparative risk feedback
Comparative risk feedback (Dillard, Ferrer, Ubel, & Fagerlin, 2012; Weinstein et al., 2004) 11. Compared to the average person-your age, gender, and race-how would you rate your chances of developing colon cancer in your life? (Very much higher, much higher, higher, average, lower, much lower, very much lower)
Cancer Information Overload
Cancer Information Overload (Jensen, Carcioppolo, et al., 2014) Below are some statements about the information you read and hear about cancer. For each statement, please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 12. There are so many different recommendations about preventing cancer, it's hard to know which ones to follow. 13. There is not enough time to do all of the things recommended to prevent cancer. 14. It has gotten to the point where I don't even care to hear new information about cancer. 15. I feel overwhelmed by the amount of cancer information I am supposed to know.
Cancer fatalism
Cancer fatalism (Powe, 1995; Shen, Condit, & Wright, 2009) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 11. I will die if I get colon cancer. 12. If I am diagnosed with colon cancer, I have little chance of surviving the disease.
Perceived Message Relevance Scale
Perceived Message Relevance Scale (Jensen, King, et al., 2014; Jensen, King, Carcioppolo, & Davis, 2012) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 16. The message seemed to be written personally for me. 17. The message was very relevant to my situation. 18. The message was applicable to me. 19. The message was very customized to me. 20. This message was manipulative. 21. This message was misleading.
Argument strength
Argument strength (Zhao, Strasser, Cappella, Lerman, & Fishbein, 2011) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree) about colon cancer screening. 22. The visit is a reason for screening with FIT that is believable. 23. The visit is a reason for screening with FIT that is convincing. 24. The visit is gives me a reason for screening with FIT that is important to me. 25. The visit helped me feel confident about how best to screen with FIT. 26. The visit would help my friends screen with FIT. 27. The visit put thoughts in my mind about wanting to screen with FIT. 28. The statement put thoughts in my mind about not wanting to avoid screening. 29. Overall, how much do you agree or disagree with the visit? 30. Is the reason the visit gave for screening with FIT a strong reason or weak reason?
Source credibility
Source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) Please indicate your feelings about Alex. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. 37. Intelligent-Unintelligent 38. Trained-Untrained 39. Cares about me-Doesn't care about me 40. Honest-Dishonest 41. Has my interests at heart-Doesn't have my interests at heart 42. Trustworthy-Untrustworthy 43. Expert-Inexpert 44. Not self-centered-Self-centered 45. Concerned with me-Not concerned with me 46. Honorable-Dishonorable 47. Informed-Uninformed 48. Moral-Immoral 49. Competent-Incompetent 50. Ethical-Unethical 51. Sensitive-Insensitive 52. Bright-Stupid 53. Genuine-Phony 54. Understanding-Not understanding
Trust in Physician Scale
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I doubt that my doctor really cares about me as a person. My doctor usually puts my needs first. I trust my doctor so much I always try to follow his/her advice. If my doctor tells me something is so, then it must be true. I sometimes distrust my doctor's opinion. I trust my doctor's judgments about my medical care. I feel my doctor does not do everything he/she should about my medical care. I trust my doctor to put my medical needs above all other considerations when treating my medical problems. My doctor is well qualified to manage (diagnose and treat or make an appropriate referral) medical problems like mine. I trust my doctor to tell me if a mistake was made about my treatment. I sometimes worry that my doctor may not keep the information we discuss totally private.
Patient-provider communication scale
Patient-provider communication scale (Katz et al., 2004) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 66. I receive enough understandable information from my doctor/healthcare provider to make good decisions about my health. 67. I feel rushed during visits. 68. My doctor/healthcare provider involves me in decisions about my health care treatment. 69. I feel uncomfortable asking my doctor for tests or information if he/she doesn't mention it. 70. My doctor/healthcare provider understands my health needs.
Patient general health (SF-36)
Patient general health (SF-36) (Fan, Burman, McDonell, & Fihn, 2005; Jenkinson, Coulter, & Wright, 1993; RAND Corporation, n.d.) 71. In general, would you say your health is: Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor 72. How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks? None Very mild Mild Moderate Severe Very severe 73. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work outside the home and housework)? Not at all A little bit Moderately Quite a bit Extremely
eHeals Health Literacy
eHeals Health Literacy (Norman & Skinner, 2006) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 74. I know how to find helpful health resources on the Internet. 75. I know how to use the Internet to answer my health questions. 76. I know what health resources are available on the Internet. 77. I know where to find helpful health resources on the Internet. 78. I know how to use the health information I find on the Internet to help me. 79. I have the skills I need to evaluate the health resources I find on the Internet. 80. I can tell high quality from low quality health resources on the Internet. 81. I feel confident in using information from the Internet to make health decisions.
Transportation
Transportation (Green & Brock, 2000) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 82. During the appointment, I could easily picture myself in the exam room. 83. While I was reading the narrative, activity going on in the room around me was not on my mind. 84. I could picture myself in the scene of the events described in the narrative. 85. I was mentally involved in the conversation while reading it. 86. After finishing the appointment, I found it easy to put it out of my mind. 87. I wanted to learn how the narrative ended. 88. The appointment affected me emotionally. 89. I found myself thinking of ways the narrative could have turned out differently. 90. I found my mind wandering while reading the narrative. 91. The events in the narrative are relevant to my everyday life. 92. The events in the narrative have changed my life.
Usability of App
In the last 12 months, how often have you used a secure website or application ("app") to track your health information online? Daily Weekly Monthly A few times a year I don't use websites or applications for this. What device(s) do you use to access your personal health information online? (Please circle all that apply) Phone Tablet Laptop/desktop Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). -Various statements about PHI, electronic storage, and access- Please rate how similar you are to Alex on the following dimensions: Gender Race Age Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). -Various questions about the virtual assistant's usefulness-
Homophily
Homophily (Lin & Guan, 2003; McCroskey, Richmond, & Daly, 1975; Z. Wang, Walther, Pingree, & Hawkins, 2008) Alex, my healthcare assistant… 129. Thinks like me-doesn't think like me 130. Behaves like me-doesn't behave like me 131. Is similar to me-is different from me 132. Is like me-is unlike me 133. Has a background similar from mine-has a background different to mine 134. Has morals like mine-has morals unlike mine 135. Looks similar to me-looks different from me 136. Has the same body size as I do-is a different body size than I am
Interpersonal Distance
Interpersonal Distance (Bailenson, Blascovich, Beall, & Loomis, 2003) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 137. I perceive that I am in the presence of Alex in the room with me. 138. I feel that Alex is aware of my presence. 139. The thought that Alex is not a real person crosses my mind often. 140. I perceive Alex as being only a computerized image, not as a real person.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Sponsor
University of Florida
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03867409
Brief Title
The United States Healthy Living Study
Official Title
The United States Healthy Living Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 5, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 14, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 14, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Florida
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to pilot test the efficacy of a patient-centered, tailored message intervention delivered via virtual human technology for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within guidelines. Although participation is not limited to these groups, the study team is particularly interested in the feasibility of the intervention for reaching racial/ethnic minority and rural patients.
Detailed Description
The primary goal of the study is to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality by increasing CRC screening rates among the at-risk patient community and to reduce racial and geographic (rural vs. urban) disparities in CRC screening and mortality rates. To accomplish this long-term goal, this study aims to develop and test precision messaging tailored to target audiences through development and evaluation of culturally sensitive, interactive messages about CRC screening delivered using VHT. The study will investigate whether interactive, tailored messages contribute to an overall enhancement of knowledge of CRC and screening options by eliciting positive attitudes and behaviors toward FIT screening. To date, there is no other study that has looked to partner specific message strategies and colorectal cancer screening with an emphasis on racial concordance and modality. As such, the researchers hope to shed new light on how, as health communicators, to more successfully engage target audiences to change attitudes and/or behaviors towards getting screened for colorectal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colo-rectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The study design will be a fractional factorial design for delivering a CRC intervention. Patients will either see a racially concordant virtual human message, a racially discordant virtual human message, a racially concordant text-based message, a racially discordant text-based message, or an attention control message.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2218 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Concordant virtual human
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participant is exposed to a demographically concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered by virtual human technology.
Arm Title
Dis-concordant virtual human
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participant is exposed to a demographically dis-concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered by virtual human technology.
Arm Title
Concordant text
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participant is exposed to a demographically concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered in a text-based format.
Arm Title
Dis-concordant text
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participant is exposed to a demographically dis-concordant (i.e. gender and race matched with patient) colon cancer screening message delivered in a text-based format.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
message delivered via virtual technology
Intervention Description
The intervention is precision messaging tailored to target audiences through development and evaluation of culturally sensitive, interactive messages about CRC screening delivered using VHT. The study will investigate whether interactive, tailored messages contribute to an overall enhancement of knowledge of CRC and screening options by eliciting positive attitudes and behaviors toward FIT screening.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perceived susceptibility
Description
Perceived susceptibility (Birmingham et al., 2015) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I am at risk for getting colon cancer in my lifetime. It is possible that I will get colon cancer in my lifetime. I am susceptible to getting colon cancer in my lifetime. It is likely that I will get colon cancer in my lifetime.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Perceived severity
Description
Perceived severity (Boonyasiriwat et al., 2013; Hsien Cheah, 2006; Lipkus & Klein, 2006) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 5. I believe that colon cancer is harmful. 6. I believe that colon cancer is a significant disease. 7. I believe that colon cancer has serious negative consequences. 8. I believe that colon cancer is serious. 9. I believe that colon cancer is dangerous. 10. I believe that colon cancer is life-threatening.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Perceived benefits
Description
Perceived benefits (Christy et al., 2013; Purnell, Katz, Andersen, & Bennett, 2010; Rawl et al., 2001; Vernon, Myers, & Tilley, 1997) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 13. The FIT will decrease your chances of dying from colon cancer. 14. The FIT will help you not worry as much about colon cancer. 15. I believe that if I had a normal screening test result, I wouldn't have to worry about developing colon cancer. 16. I believe that when colon cancer is found early, it can be cured.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Perceived barriers
Description
Perceived barriers (Champion & Skinner, 2003; Gwede et al., 2011; James, Campbell, & Hudson, 2002) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 17. My doctor would never recommend the FIT. 18. The FIT would be too expensive. 19. The FIT would be too embarrassing. 20. Preparation for the FIT is too hard. 21. The FIT takes too much time. 22. The FIT is difficult because it is too hard to understand all the instructions.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Attitudes towards Fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Description
Attitudes towards FIT/colonoscopy (Rydell, Sherman, Boucher, & Macy, 2012) Please indicate your feelings about FIT. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. FIT is… 23. Awful-Nice 24. Unpleasant-Pleasant 25. Fun-Not Fun
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Attitudes towards colonoscopy
Description
Attitudes towards FIT/colonoscopy (Rydell, Sherman, Boucher, & Macy, 2012) Please indicate your feelings about colonoscopy. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. Colonoscopy is… 26. Awful-Nice 27. Unpleasant-Pleasant 28. Fun-Not Fun
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Self-efficacy
Description
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I am confident that I can use the FIT. Arranging my schedule to use the FIT is an easy thing to do. FIT screening would be easy for me to do. It would be easy for me to take a stool sample. It would be easy for me to mail my kit back. It would be easy for me to use all the tools in the kit. I know how to collect a stool sample. I am confident that I can get a colonoscopy. Arranging my schedule to get a colonoscopy is an easy thing to do. Finding time to get a colonoscopy would be difficult for me to do. Screening for colon cancer with a colonoscopy would be easy for me to do. It would be easy for me to get a colonoscopy.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Response efficacy
Description
Response efficacy (Boer & Seydel, 1996; Duncan et al., 2014; Hwang et al., 2012, 2013; Vernon et al., 1997) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 7. FIT screening leads to early detection if something is wrong. 8. FIT screening leads to the detection of small abnormalities. 9. FIT screening will help me find cancer early. (What has Nick gotten from something like this?) 10. FIT screening will decrease my chances of dying from colon cancer
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Comparative risk feedback
Description
Comparative risk feedback (Dillard, Ferrer, Ubel, & Fagerlin, 2012; Weinstein et al., 2004) 11. Compared to the average person-your age, gender, and race-how would you rate your chances of developing colon cancer in your life? (Very much higher, much higher, higher, average, lower, much lower, very much lower)
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Cancer Information Overload
Description
Cancer Information Overload (Jensen, Carcioppolo, et al., 2014) Below are some statements about the information you read and hear about cancer. For each statement, please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 12. There are so many different recommendations about preventing cancer, it's hard to know which ones to follow. 13. There is not enough time to do all of the things recommended to prevent cancer. 14. It has gotten to the point where I don't even care to hear new information about cancer. 15. I feel overwhelmed by the amount of cancer information I am supposed to know.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Cancer fatalism
Description
Cancer fatalism (Powe, 1995; Shen, Condit, & Wright, 2009) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 11. I will die if I get colon cancer. 12. If I am diagnosed with colon cancer, I have little chance of surviving the disease.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Perceived Message Relevance Scale
Description
Perceived Message Relevance Scale (Jensen, King, et al., 2014; Jensen, King, Carcioppolo, & Davis, 2012) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 16. The message seemed to be written personally for me. 17. The message was very relevant to my situation. 18. The message was applicable to me. 19. The message was very customized to me. 20. This message was manipulative. 21. This message was misleading.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Argument strength
Description
Argument strength (Zhao, Strasser, Cappella, Lerman, & Fishbein, 2011) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree) about colon cancer screening. 22. The visit is a reason for screening with FIT that is believable. 23. The visit is a reason for screening with FIT that is convincing. 24. The visit is gives me a reason for screening with FIT that is important to me. 25. The visit helped me feel confident about how best to screen with FIT. 26. The visit would help my friends screen with FIT. 27. The visit put thoughts in my mind about wanting to screen with FIT. 28. The statement put thoughts in my mind about not wanting to avoid screening. 29. Overall, how much do you agree or disagree with the visit? 30. Is the reason the visit gave for screening with FIT a strong reason or weak reason?
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Source credibility
Description
Source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) Please indicate your feelings about Alex. Numbers 1 and 5 indicate a very strong feeling. Numbers 2 and 4 indicate a weak feeling. Number 3 indicates you are undecided. 37. Intelligent-Unintelligent 38. Trained-Untrained 39. Cares about me-Doesn't care about me 40. Honest-Dishonest 41. Has my interests at heart-Doesn't have my interests at heart 42. Trustworthy-Untrustworthy 43. Expert-Inexpert 44. Not self-centered-Self-centered 45. Concerned with me-Not concerned with me 46. Honorable-Dishonorable 47. Informed-Uninformed 48. Moral-Immoral 49. Competent-Incompetent 50. Ethical-Unethical 51. Sensitive-Insensitive 52. Bright-Stupid 53. Genuine-Phony 54. Understanding-Not understanding
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Trust in Physician Scale
Description
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). I doubt that my doctor really cares about me as a person. My doctor usually puts my needs first. I trust my doctor so much I always try to follow his/her advice. If my doctor tells me something is so, then it must be true. I sometimes distrust my doctor's opinion. I trust my doctor's judgments about my medical care. I feel my doctor does not do everything he/she should about my medical care. I trust my doctor to put my medical needs above all other considerations when treating my medical problems. My doctor is well qualified to manage (diagnose and treat or make an appropriate referral) medical problems like mine. I trust my doctor to tell me if a mistake was made about my treatment. I sometimes worry that my doctor may not keep the information we discuss totally private.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Patient-provider communication scale
Description
Patient-provider communication scale (Katz et al., 2004) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 66. I receive enough understandable information from my doctor/healthcare provider to make good decisions about my health. 67. I feel rushed during visits. 68. My doctor/healthcare provider involves me in decisions about my health care treatment. 69. I feel uncomfortable asking my doctor for tests or information if he/she doesn't mention it. 70. My doctor/healthcare provider understands my health needs.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Patient general health (SF-36)
Description
Patient general health (SF-36) (Fan, Burman, McDonell, & Fihn, 2005; Jenkinson, Coulter, & Wright, 1993; RAND Corporation, n.d.) 71. In general, would you say your health is: Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor 72. How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks? None Very mild Mild Moderate Severe Very severe 73. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work outside the home and housework)? Not at all A little bit Moderately Quite a bit Extremely
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
eHeals Health Literacy
Description
eHeals Health Literacy (Norman & Skinner, 2006) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 74. I know how to find helpful health resources on the Internet. 75. I know how to use the Internet to answer my health questions. 76. I know what health resources are available on the Internet. 77. I know where to find helpful health resources on the Internet. 78. I know how to use the health information I find on the Internet to help me. 79. I have the skills I need to evaluate the health resources I find on the Internet. 80. I can tell high quality from low quality health resources on the Internet. 81. I feel confident in using information from the Internet to make health decisions.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Transportation
Description
Transportation (Green & Brock, 2000) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 82. During the appointment, I could easily picture myself in the exam room. 83. While I was reading the narrative, activity going on in the room around me was not on my mind. 84. I could picture myself in the scene of the events described in the narrative. 85. I was mentally involved in the conversation while reading it. 86. After finishing the appointment, I found it easy to put it out of my mind. 87. I wanted to learn how the narrative ended. 88. The appointment affected me emotionally. 89. I found myself thinking of ways the narrative could have turned out differently. 90. I found my mind wandering while reading the narrative. 91. The events in the narrative are relevant to my everyday life. 92. The events in the narrative have changed my life.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Usability of App
Description
In the last 12 months, how often have you used a secure website or application ("app") to track your health information online? Daily Weekly Monthly A few times a year I don't use websites or applications for this. What device(s) do you use to access your personal health information online? (Please circle all that apply) Phone Tablet Laptop/desktop Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). -Various statements about PHI, electronic storage, and access- Please rate how similar you are to Alex on the following dimensions: Gender Race Age Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). -Various questions about the virtual assistant's usefulness-
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Homophily
Description
Homophily (Lin & Guan, 2003; McCroskey, Richmond, & Daly, 1975; Z. Wang, Walther, Pingree, & Hawkins, 2008) Alex, my healthcare assistant… 129. Thinks like me-doesn't think like me 130. Behaves like me-doesn't behave like me 131. Is similar to me-is different from me 132. Is like me-is unlike me 133. Has a background similar from mine-has a background different to mine 134. Has morals like mine-has morals unlike mine 135. Looks similar to me-looks different from me 136. Has the same body size as I do-is a different body size than I am
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Interpersonal Distance
Description
Interpersonal Distance (Bailenson, Blascovich, Beall, & Loomis, 2003) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements (5=strongly agree; 1=strongly disagree). 137. I perceive that I am in the presence of Alex in the room with me. 138. I feel that Alex is aware of my presence. 139. The thought that Alex is not a real person crosses my mind often. 140. I perceive Alex as being only a computerized image, not as a real person.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
73 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: reside within the United States but outside of Florida speak English are of either black or white racial background. are out-of-guidelines for colorectal cancer screening (>10 years for colonoscopy, >3 years for Cologuard, > 1 year for fecal immunochemical test) Exclusion Criteria: does not meet the above criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janice Krieger, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Florida
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32611
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The United States Healthy Living Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs