Offloading Device for Post Surgical Foot Procedures
Primary Purpose
Plantar Fascitis, Fat Pad Syndrome
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PopSole™ offloading device
padded insole
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Plantar Fascitis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
- Subjects scheduled to undergo a standard of care treatment with fat grafting for foot pain due to forefoot or heel fat pad atrophy or chronic plantar fasciitis as defined by heel pain for greater than 6 months and failed non-surgical therapy
- Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including ultrasounds
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concurrent injury to the lower extremity that would effect gait
- Open foot ulcerations, fractures, or diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the feet
- Surgical foot intervention in the last 6 months
- Diagnosis of pregnancy or the intent of the participant to become pregnant during participation in this study
- Any issue that per the physician's determination would render the patient not appropriate to continue participation in the study (compliance, change in physical status, etc.)
Sites / Locations
- UPMC Magee Women's Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
Intervention
Standard of care
Arm Description
Pedal fat grafting followed by PopSole™ offloading device
Pedal fat grafting followed by standard post-operative care with padding of the insoles
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ultrasonography
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Ultrasonography
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Ultrasonography
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Ultrasonography
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Offload Device Survey
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Offload Device Survey
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Offload Device Survey
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Offload Device Survey
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03873207
First Posted
March 8, 2019
Last Updated
January 24, 2023
Sponsor
Jeffrey A. Gusenoff, MD
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03873207
Brief Title
Offloading Device for Post Surgical Foot Procedures
Official Title
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing PopSole™ Offloading Device to Standard of Care Methods for the Reduction of Pain and Expedited Recovery in Patients Post Fat Graft Procedure
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
This study (NCT03873207) was closed with the University of Pittsburgh's HRPO office (STUDY19080348) in January 2021, prior to enrolling any subjects.
Study Start Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jeffrey A. Gusenoff, MD
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Study goals are to determine if a novel post-surgical foot offloading device can reduce post-operative pain and expedite the return to daily activity following fat grafting. Investigators will perform a prospective, randomized study utilizing PopSole™, a novel fully customizable post-operative shoe insert, to aid in the recovery of patients post-surgical fat graft injections for pain and limited activity due to foot disorders (ie. fat pad atrophy of the forefoot, heel, or for chronic plantar fasciitis).
Standard of care fat grafting is often used in plastic surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive reasons. Foot fat grafting, though not considered part of this research trial, is routinely offered in the UPMC Aesthetic Plastic Surgery center as a cosmetic surgery option; however, treatment modality options following the completion of a foot fat grafting procedure to protect the fat grafts and reduce weight bearing on the fresh fat grafts are limited. Current standard of care options including crutches, scooters, bulky post-operative shoes (ie. Darco shoes [Darco Intl. Huntington WV.]), and the addition of padding to insoles or orthotics that attempt to offload the treated area. Most of these devices are flat and provide poor anatomical support, leading to compensatory gait issues which can lead to further problems and pain in the knees, hips, and back. The most common complication with post-operative foot gear is non-compliance: patients do not wear it.
The investigators have devised a novel foot offloading device (PopSole™) which will allow for customization of the area where the fat has been injected into the foot, as well as allow for customizable arch support and elevation of the metatarsals. By randomizing patients to recovery with standard methods versus this new device, the investigators are hopeful for earlier patient ambulation and return to work with decreased pain.
Detailed Description
Subjects will complete the following screening research procedures:
Baseline reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires and surveys that will take approximately 25 minutes to complete:
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire to assess subject ADL and function ability
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO) to assess subject pain, activity and function
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS) to assess subject pain and function
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index to assess subject foot pain/discomfort
Pittsburgh Foot Survey to assess subject pain, activity, life satisfaction/quality of life
Offload Device Survey to assess the ease and comfort of the offload device
Foot ultrasounds will be performed to assess and measure baseline thickness of the plantar fascia, forefoot, or heel.
2D Photographs of both feet will be performed for a visual baseline assessment skin and soft tissue thickness.
If the clinical fat graft procedure occurs on a day different from the screening visit, the following research activities will be completed at Visit 2 if the subject continues to remain interested and eligible for study participation:
Collection of subject's vital signs (Temp, HR, Resp., BP), medication profile, allergies, weight, BMI calculation and adverse event collection and reporting.
Medical and surgical history collection review - the Investigator will confirm that the subject's medical status has not changed since last seen and the subject continues to satisfy eligibility criteria for study intervention.
Performance of a limited physical and foot exam by PI and /or Co-investigator MD
Women of childbearing potential will receive a urine pregnancy dip test with results documented to study chart.
Diary cards with instruction to start entry on the diary card 24 hours after the fat grafting surgery to continue through Post-operative Visit 4 (Month 1) and be placed to study chart. The subject will be instructed to document self-assessment of the following events pertaining to the surgical site: Pain, Bruising, Redness of the skin, Itching, Swelling, Bleeding, Other (any concerns/issues not listed). The subject will be instructed to identify on the diary card the location, date and day of each documented event. Unresolved events at Visit 4 will be carried over for documentation to the adverse event log.
2D Photographs of both feet
Offload Device Distribution to remain in use at all times during ambulation and activity instruction to stay off of feet as much as possible for 3 days, then limit ambulation to 10 minutes per hour for 4 weeks and no sports, kicking, running or exercise for 4 weeks. Devices will be provided for both feet to maintain symmetry and gait stability between the two feet.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Plantar Fascitis, Fat Pad Syndrome
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
prospective, randomized two cohort (device or SOC) pilot study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pedal fat grafting followed by PopSole™ offloading device
Arm Title
Standard of care
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Pedal fat grafting followed by standard post-operative care with padding of the insoles
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PopSole™ offloading device
Intervention Description
Offload Device Distribution to remain in use at all times during ambulation and activity instruction to stay off of feet as much as possible for 3 days, then limit ambulation to 10 minutes per hour for 4 weeks and no sports, kicking, running or exercise for 4 weeks. Devices will be provided for both feet to maintain symmetry and gait stability between the two feet.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
padded insole
Intervention Description
the control arm will be provided with standard padded insole to wear inside footwear
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ultrasonography
Description
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Ultrasonography
Description
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Ultrasonography
Description
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
Ultrasonography
Description
Tissue thickness (skin, soft tissue, and plantar fascia thickness) as assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Title
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Description
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
at screening
Title
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Description
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Description
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire (AOFAS).
Description
This survey assesses gait (no abnormality to severe abnormality), ankle motion restriction (no restriction to severe restriction), difficulty with waling on uneven surfaces (no difficulty to severe difficulty) and alignment (good to poor). There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Title
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Description
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Description
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Description
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
Pittsburgh Foot Survey
Description
Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from "Very severe" to "Had no pain". Scale for pain interference ranges from " Very much" to "not at all". Scale of functionality ranges from "unable to do" to "without any difficulty" in regards to a range of specified activities. There is no overall summation of results
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Title
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Description
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Description
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Description
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Description
Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from "On most/every day(s)" which is scored as 2 to "none of the time" which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure).
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Title
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Description
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Description
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Description
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire (MAYO)
Description
Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (<70)
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Title
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Description
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Description
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Description
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Time Frame
2 months post-op
Title
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire
Description
Mobility and functionality questionnaire. Scale ranges from "Unable to do" to "no difficulty at all" in response to questions on mobility. There is no overall summation of results.
Time Frame
6 months post-op
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Offload Device Survey
Description
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Time Frame
at screening
Title
Offload Device Survey
Description
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Time Frame
2 weeks post-op
Title
Offload Device Survey
Description
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Time Frame
1 month post-op
Title
Offload Device Survey
Description
Device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (0-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), ease of use (0-10 with 10 being most easy to use) and how many hours per night a patient needed to wear a night splint (0-8).
Time Frame
2 months post-op
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
Subjects scheduled to undergo a standard of care treatment with fat grafting for foot pain due to forefoot or heel fat pad atrophy or chronic plantar fasciitis as defined by heel pain for greater than 6 months and failed non-surgical therapy
Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including ultrasounds
Exclusion Criteria:
Concurrent injury to the lower extremity that would effect gait
Open foot ulcerations, fractures, or diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the feet
Surgical foot intervention in the last 6 months
Diagnosis of pregnancy or the intent of the participant to become pregnant during participation in this study
Any issue that per the physician's determination would render the patient not appropriate to continue participation in the study (compliance, change in physical status, etc.)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey A Gusenoff, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UPMC Magee Women's Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Offloading Device for Post Surgical Foot Procedures
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs