Clinical Efficacy of Luna EMG Robot Therapy for Patients After Stroke
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Luna EMG
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Luna EMG, drop foot, chronic stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients over 6 months after stroke,
- tibialis anterior strength (Lovett scale) not less than 1 and not greater than 3,
- Ashworth scale in tibialis anterior 0,1, 2
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients less than 6 months after stroke,
- tibialis anterior strength (Lovett scale) 0, 4, 5,
- Ashworth scale in tibialis anterior higher than 2,
- damage to the central nervous system which is another incident,
- serious cognitive deficit,
- stiffness of the ankle.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Study Group
Control group
Arm Description
A four-week rehabilitation program (Monday to Friday) involving the hour of individual ankle therapy and one hour therapy on the Luna EMG device.
A four-week rehabilitation program (Monday to Friday) involving two hours of individual ankle therapy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
EMG using the Luna EMG
EMG will be performed using the Luna EMG device also allowing the treatment and diagnosis. With Luna EMG we can supply objective, data driven diagnosis. Innervation diagnosis and motor unit recruitment through surface electromyography. We'd like to assess bioelectrical activity at the tibialis anterior muscle during relaxing for two minutes (mean, minimum and maximum electrical activity in muscle - in microvolts).
EMG using the Luna EMG
EMG will be performed using the Luna EMG device also allowing the treatment and diagnosis. With Luna EMG we can supply objective, data driven diagnosis. Innervation diagnosis and motor unit recruitment through surface electromyography. We'd like to assess bioelectrical activity at the tibialis anterior muscle activation patterns during three times dorsiflexion (mean, minimum and maximum electrical activity in muscle - in microvolts).
Lovett scale
The muscle strength in Lovett scale is graded on a scale of 0-5:
Grade 5: Muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Grade 4: Muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance.
Grade 3:Muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed.
Grade 2: Muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. Grade 1: Only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle.
Grade 0: No movement is observed. Higher values represent a better outcome. We'd like to asses foot dorsiflexor muscle strength.
Ashworth scale
Measurement of resistance during passive plantarflexion and dorsiflexion.
Scorse range from 0 to 4, with 5 choices:
Grade 0: No increase in muscle tone. Grade 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal.
resistance when the affected part is moved in flexion or extension. Grade 2: More marked increase in muscle tone, but affected part(s) easily moved.
Grade 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult. Grade 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Tinetti test - gait and balance
The Tinetti Balance and Gait test is a standardized evaluation of mobility and stability. Balance and gait are assessed and scored individually in a 16-item test. A three-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-2. "0" indicates the highest level of impairment and "2" the individuals independence. Gait is scored 0-12 and balance is scored 0-16. Total Test Score is maximum 28.
Interpretation:
25-28 low fall risk 19-24 medium fall risk < 19 high fall risk Higher score represent a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03888118
Brief Title
Clinical Efficacy of Luna EMG Robot Therapy for Patients After Stroke
Official Title
Clinical Efficacy of Luna EMG Robot Therapy for Patients After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 1, 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
August 30, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rehamed Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A lot of studies prove that rehabilitation with the use of modern devices accelerates the recovery of function in patients after stroke. Repeated correct movement patterns affect the central nervous system and stimulating its plasticity. Despite the fact that so many studies confirm the validity of therapy using robots, it is still difficult to assess to what extent its use improves the effectiveness of traditional therapy. In these studies, we want to objectively assess the effectiveness of the Luna device using EMG biofeedback.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
Luna EMG, drop foot, chronic stroke
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Study Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A four-week rehabilitation program (Monday to Friday) involving the hour of individual ankle therapy and one hour therapy on the Luna EMG device.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
A four-week rehabilitation program (Monday to Friday) involving two hours of individual ankle therapy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Luna EMG
Intervention Description
The duration of the overall therapeutic intervention in both groups will be the same.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EMG using the Luna EMG
Description
EMG will be performed using the Luna EMG device also allowing the treatment and diagnosis. With Luna EMG we can supply objective, data driven diagnosis. Innervation diagnosis and motor unit recruitment through surface electromyography. We'd like to assess bioelectrical activity at the tibialis anterior muscle during relaxing for two minutes (mean, minimum and maximum electrical activity in muscle - in microvolts).
Time Frame
3 minutes
Title
EMG using the Luna EMG
Description
EMG will be performed using the Luna EMG device also allowing the treatment and diagnosis. With Luna EMG we can supply objective, data driven diagnosis. Innervation diagnosis and motor unit recruitment through surface electromyography. We'd like to assess bioelectrical activity at the tibialis anterior muscle activation patterns during three times dorsiflexion (mean, minimum and maximum electrical activity in muscle - in microvolts).
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Lovett scale
Description
The muscle strength in Lovett scale is graded on a scale of 0-5:
Grade 5: Muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Grade 4: Muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance.
Grade 3:Muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed.
Grade 2: Muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. Grade 1: Only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle.
Grade 0: No movement is observed. Higher values represent a better outcome. We'd like to asses foot dorsiflexor muscle strength.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Ashworth scale
Description
Measurement of resistance during passive plantarflexion and dorsiflexion.
Scorse range from 0 to 4, with 5 choices:
Grade 0: No increase in muscle tone. Grade 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal.
resistance when the affected part is moved in flexion or extension. Grade 2: More marked increase in muscle tone, but affected part(s) easily moved.
Grade 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult. Grade 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Tinetti test - gait and balance
Description
The Tinetti Balance and Gait test is a standardized evaluation of mobility and stability. Balance and gait are assessed and scored individually in a 16-item test. A three-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-2. "0" indicates the highest level of impairment and "2" the individuals independence. Gait is scored 0-12 and balance is scored 0-16. Total Test Score is maximum 28.
Interpretation:
25-28 low fall risk 19-24 medium fall risk < 19 high fall risk Higher score represent a better outcome.
Time Frame
10 minutes
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patients over 6 months after stroke,
tibialis anterior strength (Lovett scale) not less than 1 and not greater than 3,
Ashworth scale in tibialis anterior 0,1, 2
Exclusion Criteria:
patients less than 6 months after stroke,
tibialis anterior strength (Lovett scale) 0, 4, 5,
Ashworth scale in tibialis anterior higher than 2,
damage to the central nervous system which is another incident,
serious cognitive deficit,
stiffness of the ankle.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Efficacy of Luna EMG Robot Therapy for Patients After Stroke
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs