search
Back to results

Intramedullary Bone Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures

Primary Purpose

Tibial Fractures, Nonunion of Fracture, Delayed Union of Fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intramedullary Bone Graft
Sponsored by
University of Louisville
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Tibial Fractures focused on measuring Tibial diaphyseal fracture, Nonunion, Delayed union

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age 18 or older
  • Patient with a Gustillo I, II, or IIIa open tibia shaft fracture to be treated primarily with an intramedullary nail
  • Primary closure of the open fracture wound during the initial operation
  • Consent to participate in the study.
  • Are able and willing to return to the hospital or clinic for follow-up for a period of 6-9 months or until radiographic union.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18.
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with segmental tibia fractures or those with loss of bone
  • Patients with skin defects over the tibia that cannot be closed primarily
  • Patients with a pathologic fracture of the tibia
  • Patient has quadriplegia or paraplegia

Sites / Locations

  • University of Louisville HospitalRecruiting
  • University of Louisville HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Intervention

Arm Description

Patients in this group will undergo standard treatment for their open tibia shaft fracture (irrigation and debridement of their open fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing)

Patients in this group will receive a bone graft in addition to the undergoing standard treatment for their open tibia shaft fracture (irrigation and debridement of their open fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Radiographic Union at 6 months
Percentage of patients with the presence of cortical bridging on at least 3 of the 4 fracture cortices at 6 months
Radiographic Union at 4 months
Percentage of patients with the presence of cortical bridging on at least 3 of the 4 fracture cortices at 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 6 months
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 4 months
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 2 months
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.

Full Information

First Posted
March 25, 2019
Last Updated
December 13, 2021
Sponsor
University of Louisville
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03891888
Brief Title
Intramedullary Bone Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures
Official Title
Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: Can Packing the Exposed Cortex With Intramedullary Reamings Increase Union Rates
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 26, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Louisville

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will examine if there is a difference between the time to full union between the control group and the study group. Each group will be composed of patients who have an open fracture in the mid tibia. Both groups will undergo primary fixation via reamed intramedulary nailing (IMN), a common treatment for tibia shaft fractures in adults. The study group will have a bone graft applied to the open cortex of the fracture. The bone graft will be composed of the intramedullary reamings, which are a byproduct produced when the intramedullary canal is reamed in preparation for insertion of the IMN.
Detailed Description
Open fractures of the tibial diaphysis are known to have high rates of nonunion or delayed union, with widely varying nonunion rates reported to be between 15% and 60% even in lower Gustilo Anderson grade (types I, II, and IIIA) open fractures. Nonunions are costly as they require more healthcare services and result in increased patient pain and disability. A previous study has demonstrated that the use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) at the time of definitive tibial shaft fracture fixation significantly reduced the risk of delayed union. However, BMP is costly and is rarely used for this purpose. Intramedullary bone graft (IMBG) collected by the reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) technique has been shown to be effective for producing bone graft to stimulate healing and treat larger defects in long bones as well as in the treatment of nonunions. However, the RIA apparatus also introduces and extra expense to the operation and produces more bone graft than would be needed for packing of the open cortex in non-segmental fractures without bone loss. The investigator's study aims to determine if packing the exposed fracture cortex with a small volume of IMBG collected from the tip of a standard reamer during intramedullary nailing can effectively reduce rate of delayed union and nonunion in open tibia shaft fractures. This will be a prospective interventional study with two randomized, parallel groups. Patients with an open diaphyseal tibial fracture will be considered for study inclusion. Patients who consent to participate in the study will be randomized to one of two groups. The first will be the control group. This group will receive the standard of care for their injury, which consists of irrigation and debridement of the open fracture, reamed intramedullary nailing and primary wound closure. The second group, the intervention group, will also undergo irrigation and debridement of the open fracture with reamed intramedullary nailing, but will also receive a bone graft on the exposed cortex of the tibial fracture before primarily closing the wound. The bone graft will be made up of the product of the intramedullary reaming prior to the insertion of the intramedullary nail. This bone graft will be collected by wiping the reamings from the reamer tip into a sterile, pre-weighed container after each pass of the reamer through the medullary canal. Prior to introducing the graft into the exposed cortex, the graft will be weighed so that a record may be kept of the amount of graft collected and subsequently used in the procedure. Each group will then receive identical follow-up care with clinic visits at 2, 8, 16, and 24 weeks post operatively, and will receive X-rays at the 8, 16, and 24 week visits. Each radiograph will be evaluated and assigned a Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score by an independent evaluator. Additionally, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire will be administered at enrollment, 8, 16, and 24 week visit to objectively measure patient progress in functional outcomes. The primary outcome measurement will be the rate of union of the fracture in both groups at 3 and 6 month follow up. Radiographic union of the fracture will be defined as the presence of cortical bridging on at least 3 of the 4 cortices or RUST score >10. Delayed union will be defined as failure to achieve cortical bridging on 3 of 4 cortices or a RUST score >10 by 6 months. Nonunion will be defined as a fracture that in the opinion of the treating surgeon has no possibility of healing without further intervention.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tibial Fractures, Nonunion of Fracture, Delayed Union of Fracture
Keywords
Tibial diaphyseal fracture, Nonunion, Delayed union

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomized to either a treatment or control group.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Patient will not know if they are randomized to the control or intervention group
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
130 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients in this group will undergo standard treatment for their open tibia shaft fracture (irrigation and debridement of their open fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing)
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients in this group will receive a bone graft in addition to the undergoing standard treatment for their open tibia shaft fracture (irrigation and debridement of their open fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Intramedullary Bone Graft
Intervention Description
Patients in this group will undergo standard treatment for their open tibia shaft fracture (irrigation and debridement of their open fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing), but will also have the reamings from the medullary canal preparation collected and packed into the exposed fracture cortex
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic Union at 6 months
Description
Percentage of patients with the presence of cortical bridging on at least 3 of the 4 fracture cortices at 6 months
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Radiographic Union at 4 months
Description
Percentage of patients with the presence of cortical bridging on at least 3 of the 4 fracture cortices at 4 months
Time Frame
4 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 6 months
Description
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 4 months
Description
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.
Time Frame
4 months
Title
Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score at 2 months
Description
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale Score is a patient reported outcome measure that can be used clinically to measure initial function, ongoing progress, and outcomes in patients with impairment of the lower extremities due to musculoskeletal conditions or disorders. The test assesses activities of daily living, balance, coordination, functional mobility, occupational performance, quality of life, range of motion, and strength, and is scored out of 80 points. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 80, with a higher score associated with better outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference for this scale is 9 points.
Time Frame
2 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Return to work status at 6 months post injury
Description
Percentage of patients who had returned to work at 6 months post injury
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Return to work status at 4 months post injury
Description
Percentage of patients who had returned to work at 4 months post injury
Time Frame
4 months
Title
Return to work status at 2 months post injury
Description
Percentage of patients who had returned to work at 2 months post injury
Time Frame
2 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient age 18 or older Patient with a Gustillo I, II, or IIIa open tibia shaft fracture to be treated primarily with an intramedullary nail Primary closure of the open fracture wound during the initial operation Consent to participate in the study. Are able and willing to return to the hospital or clinic for follow-up for a period of 6-9 months or until radiographic union. Exclusion Criteria: Patients under the age of 18. Patients who are pregnant Patients with segmental tibia fractures or those with loss of bone Patients with skin defects over the tibia that cannot be closed primarily Patients with a pathologic fracture of the tibia Patient has quadriplegia or paraplegia
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rodolfo Zamora, MD
Phone
502-629-5460
Email
razamo02@louisville.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Salwa M Rashid, MD, MPH
Phone
5028526964
Email
sfrash01@louisville.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rodolfo Zamora, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Louisville
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Louisville Hospital
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rodolfo Zamora, MD
Phone
502-629-5460
Email
razamo02@louisville.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salwa M Rashid, MD,MPH
Phone
5028526964
Email
sfrash01@louisville.edu
Facility Name
University of Louisville Hospital
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rodolfo Zamora, MD
Phone
502-629-5460
Email
razamo02@louisville.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauren M Nelson, MD
Phone
831-535-3397
Email
lmgerm01@louisville.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27125823
Citation
O'Halloran K, Coale M, Costales T, Zerhusen T Jr, Castillo RC, Nascone JW, O'Toole RV. Will My Tibial Fracture Heal? Predicting Nonunion at the Time of Definitive Fixation Based on Commonly Available Variables. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1385-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4821-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7714657
Citation
Riemer BL, DiChristina DG, Cooper A, Sagiv S, Butterfield SL, Burke CJ 3rd, Lucke JF, Schlosser JD. Nonreamed nailing of tibial diaphyseal fractures in blunt polytrauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Feb;9(1):66-75. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199502000-00011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7869165
Citation
Sanders R, Jersinovich I, Anglen J, DiPasquale T, Herscovici D Jr. The treatment of open tibial shaft fractures using an interlocked intramedullary nail without reaming. J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Dec;8(6):504-10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3597491
Citation
Caudle RJ, Stern PJ. Severe open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jul;69(6):801-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23351958
Citation
Antonova E, Le TK, Burge R, Mershon J. Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 26;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-42.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12473698
Citation
Govender S, Csimma C, Genant HK, Valentin-Opran A, Amit Y, Arbel R, Aro H, Atar D, Bishay M, Borner MG, Chiron P, Choong P, Cinats J, Courtenay B, Feibel R, Geulette B, Gravel C, Haas N, Raschke M, Hammacher E, van der Velde D, Hardy P, Holt M, Josten C, Ketterl RL, Lindeque B, Lob G, Mathevon H, McCoy G, Marsh D, Miller R, Munting E, Oevre S, Nordsletten L, Patel A, Pohl A, Rennie W, Reynders P, Rommens PM, Rondia J, Rossouw WC, Daneel PJ, Ruff S, Ruter A, Santavirta S, Schildhauer TA, Gekle C, Schnettler R, Segal D, Seiler H, Snowdowne RB, Stapert J, Taglang G, Verdonk R, Vogels L, Weckbach A, Wentzensen A, Wisniewski T; BMP-2 Evaluation in Surgery for Tibial Trauma (BESTT) Study Group. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Dec;84(12):2123-34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200212000-00001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24625833
Citation
Dawson J, Kiner D, Gardner W 2nd, Swafford R, Nowotarski PJ. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator as a device for harvesting bone graft compared with iliac crest bone graft: union rates and complications. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Oct;28(10):584-90. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000086.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Intramedullary Bone Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs