search
Back to results

The Role of HNHF to Improve Clinical Outcomes Following Severe AECOPD

Primary Purpose

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Humidified nasal high-flow device
Sponsored by
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease focused on measuring Neural respiratory drive, Physiology, Respiratory muscles, COPD exacerbation, Ventilation, Nasal high-flow, High-flow nasal cannula

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of AECOPD
  • Aged 40-80 years
  • ≥10 pack year smoking history
  • Body mass index ≤ 35kg/m2
  • Cognitively and linguistically able to follow English instructions, provide informed consent and complete the study protocol
  • To be discharged home following the hospitalisation in a home environment deemed safe by the investigator to perform home assessments
  • Patient lives in the catchment area served by the Integrated Respiratory Team at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chest radiograph excludes pneumothorax
  • Requirement for acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) during index hospitalisation or established on home positive airway pressure (PAP)
  • Significant chronic respiratory failure (PaCO2 >7.0)
  • Clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea requiring treatment
  • Allergies to latex, metals or local anaesthetic
  • Broken or inflamed skin at the second intercostal space parasternal chest wall areas
  • Psychological or social factors that would impair compliance with the study protocol
  • Any major non-COPD chronic co-morbidity that may contribute significantly to risk of readmission, including (but not limited to) severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <30%), malignancy (active treatment or palliation), end stage renal failure and significant neuromuscular disease
  • Planned travel away from home in the 30-day post-discharge period

Sites / Locations

  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention

Control

Arm Description

HNHF device (intervention) + usual care

Usual care alone

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to 30-day hospital readmission following index hospitalisation with AECOPD
30-day readmission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recruitment rate of eligible patients
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by proportion of patients who fulfil eligibility criteria who consent to participate.
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (symptom diary)
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by completion of symptom diaries. Progression criterion = participant diaries completed by >70% of participants. Assessed at 30-days following hospital discharge.
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (physical activity monitor)
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by usage of physical activity monitors. Progression criterion = usage >70% of participants. Measured from physical activity monitor computer downloads at 30-days following hospital discharge.
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (spirometry)
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by completion of spirometry. Progression criterion = spirometry measured at every study assessment for >70% of participants.
Participants' HNHF device usage
Feasibility outcome measure: usage hours accessed from the device at completion of participants' study participation for those participants allocated to the intervention arm.
Acceptability of HNHF at home: semi-structured interviews
Qualitative evaluation: Use of semi-structured interviews after 30 days post-discharge following index hospitalisation to explore barriers and facilitators to device usage in intervention arm participants.
Non-readmission AECOPD
Clinical outcome measure: the number of acute exacerbations of COPD that do not require hospitalisation will be recorded using symptom diaries.
Breathlessness
Clinical outcome measure: breathlessness severity will be assessed using the modified Borg scale (minimum score = 0, indicating no breathlessness, maximum score = 10 indicating maximal intensity of breathlessness).
Breathlessness
Clinical outcome measure: breathlessness severity will be assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile.
Physical activity
Clinical outcome measure: daily physical activity (measured in counts per minute) will be quantified using a wrist-worn physical activity monitor which uses a triaxial accelerometer.
Health-related quality of life: COPD Assessment Test
Clinical outcome measure: assessed using the COPD Assessment Test.
Health-related quality of life: Clinical COPD Questionnaire
Clinical outcome measure: assessed using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Scored from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicative of worse disease-specific health-related quality of life.
Inspiratory capacity
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a pneumotachograph.
Breathlessness
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using the modified Borg scale. This zero to ten scale measures breathlessness intensity, with higher scores representing more intense breathlessness. The score will be measured before exercise, at 2 minute intervals during exercise, at exercise cessation and during exercise recovery.
Neural respiratory drive
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a parasternal and diaphragm electromyography using surface and nasogastric electrodes, respectively.
Pulmonary pressures and flow
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a pressure transducer connected to a nasogastric catheter and a pneumotachograph.
Time to recover from maximal breathlessness
Proof of concept study outcome: time from maximal breathlessness at peak exercise to pre-exercise modified Borg scale.

Full Information

First Posted
March 21, 2019
Last Updated
April 9, 2021
Sponsor
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03899558
Brief Title
The Role of HNHF to Improve Clinical Outcomes Following Severe AECOPD
Official Title
The Role of Humidified Nasal High-flow to Reduce 30-day Hospital Re-admissions Following Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 17, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 24, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 24, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common lung disease, affecting 1.2 million people in the United Kingdom (UK). COPD patients suffer with episodes of worsening breathing symptoms called acute exacerbations (AECOPD). Exacerbations occur more often as the disease progresses and are a leading cause of emergency hospitalisation. Patients recovering from exacerbations are at high risk of deteriorating, with one quarter readmitted to hospital within thirty days. COPD thus imposes immense burdens on the National Health Service and patients. This research will investigate the effects of using humidified nasal high-flow (HNHF) during recovery from severe COPD exacerbations. HNHF delivers warmed, humidified air under flows of up to 60 litres per minute through a nasal interface. This has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, including exacerbation frequency, hospitalisations, breathlessness and quality of life amongst COPD patients with respiratory failure. It is thought to achieve this by improving secretion clearance and providing positive airways pressure which supports the breathing system. Patients admitted to St Thomas' Hospital, London with COPD exacerbations will be recruited. Prior to discharge, participants will be randomised to receive either usual care alone or usual care plus a HNHF device, which they will be trained to use for a regular period daily. Usual care includes inhalers, steroids and may include antibiotics. Participants will be followed up for 30-days after hospital discharge using weekly assessments, daily symptom diaries and wrist-worn watch-like devices that detect physical activity. This will enable evaluation of the clinical effects of HNHF on re-exacerbations, readmissions, breathlessness, physical activity and quality of life. Device usage will also be quantified. Participants who receive devices will be interviewed to explore their experiences. After the 30-day home follow-up period, a sub-group of participants will undergo detailed breathing tests during and after exercise to explore the effects of HNHF on the respiratory system.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Keywords
Neural respiratory drive, Physiology, Respiratory muscles, COPD exacerbation, Ventilation, Nasal high-flow, High-flow nasal cannula

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
HNHF device (intervention) + usual care
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual care alone
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Humidified nasal high-flow device
Intervention Description
Humidified nasal high-flow device which delivers warmed, humidified air at flow rates of up to 60 litres per minute via a nasal cannula interface. Intended delivery at 30 L/min at 37 degrees Celsius, if tolerated.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to 30-day hospital readmission following index hospitalisation with AECOPD
Description
30-day readmission
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment rate of eligible patients
Description
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by proportion of patients who fulfil eligibility criteria who consent to participate.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (symptom diary)
Description
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by completion of symptom diaries. Progression criterion = participant diaries completed by >70% of participants. Assessed at 30-days following hospital discharge.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (physical activity monitor)
Description
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by usage of physical activity monitors. Progression criterion = usage >70% of participants. Measured from physical activity monitor computer downloads at 30-days following hospital discharge.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Adherence with completion of clinical outcome measures (spirometry)
Description
Feasibility outcome measure: assessed by completion of spirometry. Progression criterion = spirometry measured at every study assessment for >70% of participants.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Participants' HNHF device usage
Description
Feasibility outcome measure: usage hours accessed from the device at completion of participants' study participation for those participants allocated to the intervention arm.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Acceptability of HNHF at home: semi-structured interviews
Description
Qualitative evaluation: Use of semi-structured interviews after 30 days post-discharge following index hospitalisation to explore barriers and facilitators to device usage in intervention arm participants.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Non-readmission AECOPD
Description
Clinical outcome measure: the number of acute exacerbations of COPD that do not require hospitalisation will be recorded using symptom diaries.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Breathlessness
Description
Clinical outcome measure: breathlessness severity will be assessed using the modified Borg scale (minimum score = 0, indicating no breathlessness, maximum score = 10 indicating maximal intensity of breathlessness).
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Breathlessness
Description
Clinical outcome measure: breathlessness severity will be assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Physical activity
Description
Clinical outcome measure: daily physical activity (measured in counts per minute) will be quantified using a wrist-worn physical activity monitor which uses a triaxial accelerometer.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Health-related quality of life: COPD Assessment Test
Description
Clinical outcome measure: assessed using the COPD Assessment Test.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Health-related quality of life: Clinical COPD Questionnaire
Description
Clinical outcome measure: assessed using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Scored from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicative of worse disease-specific health-related quality of life.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Inspiratory capacity
Description
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a pneumotachograph.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Breathlessness
Description
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using the modified Borg scale. This zero to ten scale measures breathlessness intensity, with higher scores representing more intense breathlessness. The score will be measured before exercise, at 2 minute intervals during exercise, at exercise cessation and during exercise recovery.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Neural respiratory drive
Description
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a parasternal and diaphragm electromyography using surface and nasogastric electrodes, respectively.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Pulmonary pressures and flow
Description
Proof of concept study outcome: measured during the physiological sub-study involving incremental exercise using a pressure transducer connected to a nasogastric catheter and a pneumotachograph.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge
Title
Time to recover from maximal breathlessness
Description
Proof of concept study outcome: time from maximal breathlessness at peak exercise to pre-exercise modified Borg scale.
Time Frame
30 days following hospital discharge

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Emergency hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of AECOPD Aged 40-80 years ≥10 pack year smoking history Body mass index ≤ 35kg/m2 Cognitively and linguistically able to follow English instructions, provide informed consent and complete the study protocol To be discharged home following the hospitalisation in a home environment deemed safe by the investigator to perform home assessments Patient lives in the catchment area served by the Integrated Respiratory Team at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Exclusion Criteria: Chest radiograph excludes pneumothorax Requirement for acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) during index hospitalisation or established on home positive airway pressure (PAP) Significant chronic respiratory failure (PaCO2 >7.0) Clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea requiring treatment Allergies to latex, metals or local anaesthetic Broken or inflamed skin at the second intercostal space parasternal chest wall areas Psychological or social factors that would impair compliance with the study protocol Any major non-COPD chronic co-morbidity that may contribute significantly to risk of readmission, including (but not limited to) severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <30%), malignancy (active treatment or palliation), end stage renal failure and significant neuromuscular disease Planned travel away from home in the 30-day post-discharge period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicholas Hart, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 7EH
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26194996
Citation
Suh ES, Mandal S, Harding R, Ramsay M, Kamalanathan M, Henderson K, O'Kane K, Douiri A, Hopkinson NS, Polkey MI, Rafferty G, Murphy PB, Moxham J, Hart N. Neural respiratory drive predicts clinical deterioration and safe discharge in exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2015 Dec;70(12):1123-30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207188. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21597112
Citation
Murphy PB, Kumar A, Reilly C, Jolley C, Walterspacher S, Fedele F, Hopkinson NS, Man WD, Polkey MI, Moxham J, Hart N. Neural respiratory drive as a physiological biomarker to monitor change during acute exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2011 Jul;66(7):602-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.151332. Epub 2011 May 19.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Role of HNHF to Improve Clinical Outcomes Following Severe AECOPD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs