search
Back to results

Optimized Medico-pharmaceutical Collaboration in the Drug Management of Patients With Heart Failure (COMPIC)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reinforced multidisciplinary follow-up
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Montpellier
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart failure, pharmacist, multidisciplinary team, readmission

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged more than 18 years
  • Adult patient admitted in cardiology department (full hospitalisation or intensive care) for heart failure no matter the type and the stage of the disease
  • Person affiliated or beneficiary of a social security system
  • Collection of a free, informed, express and written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non autonomous drug management patients and not disposing
  • a present caregiver during hospitalisation
  • Patients living in an institution
  • Person participating in another clinical trial with an exclusion period still ongoing
  • Person whose physical and/or psychological health is severely altered, and which, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the participation's to the study
  • Person deprived of his rights, person under tutorship or guardianship
  • Refusal to sign the consent

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital of Montpellier Cardiology departments oh the Montpellier, Nîmes and Toulouse University HospitalsRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Reinforced multidisciplinary follow-up

Standard care

Arm Description

Entrance medication reconciliation performed by a pharmacist Patient compliance evaluation Patient quality of life evaluation Pharmaceutical analysis with focus on medication optimization with a specific check-list (according to ESC 2016 recommendations) Hospitalisation discharge medication reconciliation Patient pharmaceutic interview at the hospitalisation discharge Transmission of informations to the general practitioner and the pharmacist's patient Multidisciplinary consult at 1 month after hospitalisation discharge

Drug review by a paramedic or a pharmacist Pharmaceutical analysis Therapeutic optimisation based on the usual practices care of the cardiologic department Writing of the prescription given on leaving hospital based on the usual care of the department Treatments explanations and support to the patient on the usual care Transmission of the hospitalisation report to the patient general practitioner as the usual practice Medical consult in usual time frames (an average of 1 month after hospitalisation discharge) at the patient location of choice

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rehospitalisation for heart failure
At least one rehospitalisation with heart failure related cause

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prescriptions conformity rates compared to heart failure recommendations edited by the European Society of Cardiology in 2016
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Prescriptions conformity rates compared to heart failure recommendations edited by the European Society of Cardiology in 2016
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Compliance level
Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Compliance level
Evaluated by the "Girerd medication adherence questionnaire" Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Compliance level
Evaluated by the "Girerd medication adherence questionnaire" Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Treatment persistence rates
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Death rate
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time before death
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time of occurrence of a potential rehospitalisation related to the disease
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Quality of life score
Evaluated by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire contains 21 questions. Each of the 21 questions ask the patients to indicate how much a possible effect of heart failure have affected their ability to live as wanted during the past month using a scale from 0 (not present or no effect), 1 (very little), 2, 3, 4, or 5 (very much).The measurement of heart failure severity is assessed by summing the responses that ranges from 0 to 105.
Satisfaction of the patient
Evaluated by Likert scale This questionnaire indicates the degree of patient satisfaction using 9 questions which explore the improvement of patient behavior concerning disease and treatment. The measurement of satisfaction is assessed by summing the responses that range from 9 (unsatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied)
Satisfaction of health professionals
Evaluated by Likert scale (only for interventional arm) This questionnaire indicates the degree of health professional satisfaction using 6 questions which explore the improvement of transition between hospital to community and comprehension of therapeutic optimization. The measurement of satisfaction is assessed by summing the responses that range from 6 (unsatisfied) to 24 (very satisfied)
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

Full Information

First Posted
March 27, 2019
Last Updated
December 31, 2021
Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03902028
Brief Title
Optimized Medico-pharmaceutical Collaboration in the Drug Management of Patients With Heart Failure
Acronym
COMPIC
Official Title
Interest of an Optimized Medico-pharmaceutical Collaboration in the Drug Management of Patients With Heart Failure: Controlled, Randomized, Multicentric Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 2, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a controlled, randomized, open-label, multicentric study evaluating the value of coordinated medico-pharmaceutical management compared to standard management in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of these optimized activities on the re-hospitalization of the patient with cardiac insufficiency for a disease-related event within three months of the initial hospitalization.
Detailed Description
Heart failure (FH) is a public health problem with an estimated prevalence of about 1.5% in developed countries. In 2013, the number of patients hospitalized in France for heart failure amounted to 165 231 and 20% of them were re-hospitalized at least once for the same reason during this year. Several factors contribute to the occurrence of cardiac decompensation (DC) : some modifiable (age, severity of IC, etiology ...) and others modifiable, such as therapeutics. Various elements could reduce the frequency of re-hospitalizations and the mortality due to this disease : a better knowledge of treatments by patients and consequently a better therapeutic compliance a better knowledge of the factors and signs of DC (low-sodium diet, weighing...) a better implementation of prescribing recommendations : less than 50% of patients have optimal treatment compared to ESC recommendations a better communication at the transition points of the patient pathway. The creation of a binomial cardiologist-clinical pharmacist during hospitalization and the maintenance of this optimized multidisciplinary follow-up within 3 months post-hospitalization is a proposal to intervene on these factors. Indeed, the clinical pharmacist (present in the care unit) works in collaboration with the medical and paramedical teams and can improve the care of patients. In the experimental group, a specific multidisciplinary consultation is planned for one month after the end of the hospitalization. A 3-month follow-up visit will be carried out by phone call to meet the criteria for readmission, mortality, quality of life, adherence and persistence of treatments.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart failure, pharmacist, multidisciplinary team, readmission

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
248 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Reinforced multidisciplinary follow-up
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Entrance medication reconciliation performed by a pharmacist Patient compliance evaluation Patient quality of life evaluation Pharmaceutical analysis with focus on medication optimization with a specific check-list (according to ESC 2016 recommendations) Hospitalisation discharge medication reconciliation Patient pharmaceutic interview at the hospitalisation discharge Transmission of informations to the general practitioner and the pharmacist's patient Multidisciplinary consult at 1 month after hospitalisation discharge
Arm Title
Standard care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Drug review by a paramedic or a pharmacist Pharmaceutical analysis Therapeutic optimisation based on the usual practices care of the cardiologic department Writing of the prescription given on leaving hospital based on the usual care of the department Treatments explanations and support to the patient on the usual care Transmission of the hospitalisation report to the patient general practitioner as the usual practice Medical consult in usual time frames (an average of 1 month after hospitalisation discharge) at the patient location of choice
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Reinforced multidisciplinary follow-up
Intervention Description
Reinforced multidisciplinary follow-up
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rehospitalisation for heart failure
Description
At least one rehospitalisation with heart failure related cause
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prescriptions conformity rates compared to heart failure recommendations edited by the European Society of Cardiology in 2016
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
At hospitalisation discharge (Day 0)
Title
Prescriptions conformity rates compared to heart failure recommendations edited by the European Society of Cardiology in 2016
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Compliance level
Description
Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Time Frame
At hospitalisation discharge (Day 0)
Title
Compliance level
Description
Evaluated by the "Girerd medication adherence questionnaire" Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Time Frame
At 1 month after hospitalisation discharge for the experimental group only
Title
Compliance level
Description
Evaluated by the "Girerd medication adherence questionnaire" Evaluated by the " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " The " Girerd medication adherence questionnaire " contains 6 questions which answers are " yes " or " no ". The number of " yes " responses permits to evaluate the level of the patient medication adherence as following : 0 yes : good compliance 1 or 2 yes : minor non compliance 3 or more yes : non compliance
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Treatment persistence rates
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Death rate
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Time before death
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Time of occurrence of a potential rehospitalisation related to the disease
Description
Evaluated by a pharmacist
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Quality of life score
Description
Evaluated by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire contains 21 questions. Each of the 21 questions ask the patients to indicate how much a possible effect of heart failure have affected their ability to live as wanted during the past month using a scale from 0 (not present or no effect), 1 (very little), 2, 3, 4, or 5 (very much).The measurement of heart failure severity is assessed by summing the responses that ranges from 0 to 105.
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Satisfaction of the patient
Description
Evaluated by Likert scale This questionnaire indicates the degree of patient satisfaction using 9 questions which explore the improvement of patient behavior concerning disease and treatment. The measurement of satisfaction is assessed by summing the responses that range from 9 (unsatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied)
Time Frame
Call at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Satisfaction of health professionals
Description
Evaluated by Likert scale (only for interventional arm) This questionnaire indicates the degree of health professional satisfaction using 6 questions which explore the improvement of transition between hospital to community and comprehension of therapeutic optimization. The measurement of satisfaction is assessed by summing the responses that range from 6 (unsatisfied) to 24 (very satisfied)
Time Frame
online questionnaire at 3 months after hospitalisation discharge
Title
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame
3 months after hospitalisation discharge

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient aged more than 18 years Adult patient admitted in cardiology department (full hospitalisation or intensive care) for heart failure no matter the type and the stage of the disease Person affiliated or beneficiary of a social security system Collection of a free, informed, express and written consent Exclusion Criteria: Non autonomous drug management patients and not disposing a present caregiver during hospitalisation Patients living in an institution Person participating in another clinical trial with an exclusion period still ongoing Person whose physical and/or psychological health is severely altered, and which, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the participation's to the study Person deprived of his rights, person under tutorship or guardianship Refusal to sign the consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Audrey CASTET-NICOLAS, MCU-PH, Pharm D, PhD
Phone
(0)467338564
Ext
+33
Email
audrey-castet@chu-montpellier.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Nicolas CHAPET, Pharm D, PhD
Phone
(0)467338562
Email
n-chapet@chu-montpellier.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital of Montpellier Cardiology departments oh the Montpellier, Nîmes and Toulouse University Hospitals
City
Montpellier
State/Province
Occitanie
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audrey CASTET-NICOLAS, MCU-PH, Pharm D, PhD
Phone
(0)467338564
Email
audrey-castet@chu-montpellier.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas CHAPET, Pharm D
Phone
(0)467338562
Email
n-chapet@chu-montpellier.fr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26259774
Citation
Jackevicius CA, de Leon NK, Lu L, Chang DS, Warner AL, Mody FV. Impact of a Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Post-hospitalization Program on Heart Failure Readmission Rates. Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Nov;49(11):1189-96. doi: 10.1177/1060028015599637. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27206819
Citation
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 30;:
Results Reference
result
Citation
Available at: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/37/27/2129/1748921/2016-ESC-Guidelines-for-the-diagnosis-and. (Accessed: 12th September 2017).
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28409010
Citation
Masters J, Morton G, Anton I, Szymanski J, Greenwood E, Grogono J, Flett AS, Cleland JG, Cowburn PJ. Specialist intervention is associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient heart failure team. Open Heart. 2017 Mar 8;4(1):e000547. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000547. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28233442
Citation
Van Spall HGC, Rahman T, Mytton O, Ramasundarahettige C, Ibrahim Q, Kabali C, Coppens M, Brian Haynes R, Connolly S. Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1427-1443. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.765. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17298190
Citation
Lopez Cabezas C, Falces Salvador C, Cubi Quadrada D, Arnau Bartes A, Ylla Bore M, Muro Perea N, Homs Peipoch E. Randomized clinical trial of a postdischarge pharmaceutical care program vs regular follow-up in patients with heart failure. Farm Hosp. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):328-42. doi: 10.1016/s1130-6343(06)74004-1. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28233258
Citation
Parajuli DR, Franzon J, McKinnon RA, Shakib S, Clark RA. Role of the Pharmacist for Improving Self-care and Outcomes in Heart Failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Apr;14(2):78-86. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0323-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28462286
Citation
Wan TTH, Terry A, Cobb E, McKee B, Tregerman R, Barbaro SDS. Strategies to Modify the Risk of Heart Failure Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 18;4:2333392817701050. doi: 10.1177/2333392817701050. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24259613
Citation
Buckley MS, Harinstein LM, Clark KB, Smithburger PL, Eckhardt DJ, Alexander E, Devabhakthuni S, Westley CA, David B, Kane-Gill SL. Impact of a clinical pharmacy admission medication reconciliation program on medication errors in "high-risk" patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Dec;47(12):1599-610. doi: 10.1177/1060028013507428. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24375606
Citation
Warden BA, Freels JP, Furuno JP, Mackay J. Pharmacy-managed program for providing education and discharge instructions for patients with heart failure. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Jan 15;71(2):134-9. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130103.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Optimized Medico-pharmaceutical Collaboration in the Drug Management of Patients With Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs