search
Back to results

Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Sub-tenon Anesthesia

Primary Purpose

Retinal Disease, Diabetic Retinopathy, Maculopathy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Topical lidocaine 2% jelly plus sub-tenon ropivacaine 10% injection
Peribulbar injection
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Retinal Disease focused on measuring vitrectomy, anesthesia, retinal disease, Pain, diabetic retinopathy, maculopathy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have the diagnosis of epiretinal membrane, macular hole, complication of diabetic retinopathy such as vitreous hemorrhage or traction retinal detachment or other vitreomacular diseases that require treatment by pars plana vitrectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pars plana vitrectomy in the studied eye.
  • Previous scleral buckle surgery
  • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
  • Any ocular surgery performed in the studied eye in the previous three months
  • Medical or psychological condition that preclude study adherence

Sites / Locations

  • School of Medicine - Clinical Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group 1- Sub-tenon plus lidocaine jelly

Group 2- peribulbar

Arm Description

Patients are going to be submitted to lidocaine 2% jelly topical anesthesia for 5 minutes then to sub-tenon injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.

Patients are going to be submitted to peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain score
Pain score referred by the patient measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of ruler with 100 cm in length and scale from 0 to 100, where the numbers of this one are visible only in the side of the examiner. It is constructed from a metal ruler with a total length of one meter, supported by two transparent acrylic side supports and a sliding and movable metal weight on the metallic part of the ruler. Before the measurement of pain, the examiner will explain to the patients the functioning of the VAS. Each patient will be encouraged to pass the marker along the scale, with the help of the examiner. It will be made clear to him that point "0" is the point of the scale which represented "no pain", what is considered the better outcome, and point "100" corresponded to the most intense pain he could feel. The patient will be asked about: Intraoperative pain - the intensity of pain throughout the procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Surgical complications
Surgical complications referred by the surgeon during vitrectomy

Full Information

First Posted
April 2, 2019
Last Updated
October 31, 2019
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03902925
Brief Title
Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Sub-tenon Anesthesia
Official Title
Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy Comparing Peribulbar Anesthesia Versus Sub-tenon Injection Plus Topical Jelly Anesthesia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Vitreoretinal surgery has evolved to less invasive procedures, and it is used to treat a wide range of diseases. So anesthesia for vitreoretinal procedures has evolved, promoting adequate analgesia while reducing risks to the patient. In the present study two types of procedures for anesthesia during vitreoretinal surgery are evaluated regarding the pain referred by the patient during the whole procedure: peribulbar anesthesia versus sub-tenon injection plus topical jelly anesthesia. Through the comparative analysis of the pain scale of the two groups it is expected that the two modalities present the same anesthetic efficacy, showing that the methods used may be equivalent.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Retinal Disease, Diabetic Retinopathy, Maculopathy
Keywords
vitrectomy, anesthesia, retinal disease, Pain, diabetic retinopathy, maculopathy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1- Sub-tenon plus lidocaine jelly
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients are going to be submitted to lidocaine 2% jelly topical anesthesia for 5 minutes then to sub-tenon injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.
Arm Title
Group 2- peribulbar
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients are going to be submitted to peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Topical lidocaine 2% jelly plus sub-tenon ropivacaine 10% injection
Intervention Description
Lidocaine 2% jelly applied to conjunctival fornices for 5 minutes then injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% in the sub-tenon space with a blunt cannula through a temporal inferior incision
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Peribulbar injection
Intervention Description
Peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10%
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain score
Description
Pain score referred by the patient measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of ruler with 100 cm in length and scale from 0 to 100, where the numbers of this one are visible only in the side of the examiner. It is constructed from a metal ruler with a total length of one meter, supported by two transparent acrylic side supports and a sliding and movable metal weight on the metallic part of the ruler. Before the measurement of pain, the examiner will explain to the patients the functioning of the VAS. Each patient will be encouraged to pass the marker along the scale, with the help of the examiner. It will be made clear to him that point "0" is the point of the scale which represented "no pain", what is considered the better outcome, and point "100" corresponded to the most intense pain he could feel. The patient will be asked about: Intraoperative pain - the intensity of pain throughout the procedure.
Time Frame
Once 30 minutes after the end of the vitrectomy surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical complications
Description
Surgical complications referred by the surgeon during vitrectomy
Time Frame
Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Duration of surgery
Description
Duration of vitrectomy in minutes
Time Frame
Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery
Title
Anesthetic medications
Description
Other anesthetic medication for controlling pain administered during the study
Time Frame
Once during the vitrectomy surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients that have the diagnosis of epiretinal membrane, macular hole, complication of diabetic retinopathy such as vitreous hemorrhage or traction retinal detachment or other vitreomacular diseases that require treatment by pars plana vitrectomy. Exclusion Criteria: Previous pars plana vitrectomy in the studied eye. Previous scleral buckle surgery Uncontrolled arterial hypertension Any ocular surgery performed in the studied eye in the previous three months Medical or psychological condition that preclude study adherence
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jefferson AS Ribeiro, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Sao Paulo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
School of Medicine - Clinical Hospital
City
Ribeirao Preto
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
14049-900
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We intend to have patient data stored but not individually available for researches at other sites in order to preserve anonymity of the patient.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17183205
Citation
Tang S, Lai P, Lai M, Zou Y, Li J, Li S. Topical anesthesia in transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy for macular-based disorders. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(1):65-8. doi: 10.1159/000096526.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8119430
Citation
Stevens JD, Foss AJ, Hamilton AM. No-needle one-quadrant sub-tenon anaesthesia for panretinal photocoagulation. Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 6):768-71. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.180.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Spaeth G. Ophthalmic Surgery, Principles and Practice. Third Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2003.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Sousa FAEF, Silva JA. Avaliação e mensuração da dor em contextos clínicos e de pesquisa. Rev. Dor, 2004;5(4):408-429.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9349156
Citation
Roman SJ, Chong Sit DA, Boureau CM, Auclin FX, Ullern MM. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;81(8):673-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.8.673.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1015603
Citation
Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976 Nov;31(9):1191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9775241
Citation
Rao GP, Wong D, Groenewald C, McGalliard JN, Jones A, Ridges PJ. Local anaesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery: a case-control study of 200 cases. Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 3a):407-11. doi: 10.1038/eye.1998.96.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17342504
Citation
Theocharis IP, Alexandridou A, Tomic Z. A two-year prospective study comparing lidocaine 2% jelly versus peribulbar anaesthesia for 25G and 23G sutureless vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;245(9):1253-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0556-y. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Sub-tenon Anesthesia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs