Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Tympanoplasty
Primary Purpose
Tympanic Membrane Perforation
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biodesign Otologic graft
Autologous temporalis fascia
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Tympanic Membrane Perforation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing primary tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a known biologic sensitivity or a cultural objection to use of porcine materials.
Sites / Locations
- Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi Campus
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Biodesign graft tympanic membrane repair
Autograft tympanic membrane repair
Arm Description
Patient's perforated tympanic membrane will be repaired with an acellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa, Biodesign Otologic graft
Patient's perforated tympanic membrane will be repaired with autologous temporalis fascia.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Secondary Outcome Measures
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Test the Air Bone Gap starting at 1000 Hz then 2000, 4000, 8000, 250 and 500 for air-conduction thresholds. Then test non-masked bone-conduction thresholds at the same frequencies.
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Test Word Recognition for 50-2 syllables words
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Determine the air bond gap by measuring the difference between the air conduction and gone conduction testing. The air bone gap is the difference between the 2 readings and must be present at 3 consecutive frequencies.
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
The word recognition testing evaluates the patient's ability to repeat phonetically balanced words appropriate for his/her hearing level.
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Determine the air bond gap by measuring the difference between the air conduction and gone conduction testing. The air bone gap is the difference between the 2 readings and must be present at 3 consecutive frequencies.
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
The word recognition testing evaluates the patient's ability to repeat phonetically balanced words appropriate for his/her hearing level.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03904316
First Posted
March 18, 2019
Last Updated
August 10, 2022
Sponsor
Ascension South East Michigan
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03904316
Brief Title
Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Tympanoplasty
Official Title
Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Tympanoplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
The trial was stopped as the benefit was challenging to determine in preliminary usage.
Study Start Date
October 3, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ascension South East Michigan
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate tympanoplasty outcomes using Biodesign SIS graft compared to autologous temporalis fascia, the most commonly used graft for repair of tympanic membrane.
Detailed Description
Patients 18 years or older will undergo primary tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy. The patients will be randomized into groups receiving Biodesign versus autograft temporalis fascia for repair.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tympanic Membrane Perforation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Biodesign graft tympanic membrane repair
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient's perforated tympanic membrane will be repaired with an acellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa, Biodesign Otologic graft
Arm Title
Autograft tympanic membrane repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patient's perforated tympanic membrane will be repaired with autologous temporalis fascia.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Biodesign Otologic graft
Intervention Description
Acellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Autologous temporalis fascia
Intervention Description
An autologous graft for tympanic membrane repair
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Description
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Time Frame
1 month postoperatively by the surgeon
Title
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Description
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Time Frame
2 months postoperatively by the surgeon
Title
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Description
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Time Frame
3 months postoperatively by the surgeon
Title
Assessment of graft take after tympanoplasty
Description
Microscopically evaluate tympanic membrane for perforation closure
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively by the surgeon
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters preoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Test the Air Bone Gap starting at 1000 Hz then 2000, 4000, 8000, 250 and 500 for air-conduction thresholds. Then test non-masked bone-conduction thresholds at the same frequencies.
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters preoperatively.
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Test Word Recognition for 50-2 syllables words
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters preoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 3 months postoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Determine the air bond gap by measuring the difference between the air conduction and gone conduction testing. The air bone gap is the difference between the 2 readings and must be present at 3 consecutive frequencies.
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 3 months postoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
The word recognition testing evaluates the patient's ability to repeat phonetically balanced words appropriate for his/her hearing level.
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 3 months postoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Test the pure tone conduction (average of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz).
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 6 months postoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
Determine the air bond gap by measuring the difference between the air conduction and gone conduction testing. The air bone gap is the difference between the 2 readings and must be present at 3 consecutive frequencies.
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 6 months postoperatively
Title
Measurement of Hearing Parameters
Description
The word recognition testing evaluates the patient's ability to repeat phonetically balanced words appropriate for his/her hearing level.
Time Frame
Measure hearing parameters 6 months postoperatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing primary tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with a known biologic sensitivity or a cultural objection to use of porcine materials.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Seilesh Babu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Michigan Ear Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi Campus
City
Novi
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48374
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14623693
Citation
Ambro BT, Zimmerman J, Rosenthal M, Pribitkin EA. Nasal septal perforation repair with porcine small intestinal submucosa. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;5(6):528-9. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.5.6.528.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17710604
Citation
Ansaloni L, Cambrini P, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, Hodde JP, Metzger DW, D'Alessandro L, Pinna AD. Immune response to small intestinal submucosa (surgisis) implant in humans: preliminary observations. J Invest Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):237-41. doi: 10.1080/08941930701481296.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17564175
Citation
Bejjani GK, Zabramski J; Durasis Study Group. Safety and efficacy of the porcine small intestinal submucosa dural substitute: results of a prospective multicenter study and literature review. J Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;106(6):1028-33. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1028.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23956139
Citation
Illing E, Chaaban MR, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Porcine small intestine submucosal graft for endoscopic skull base reconstruction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Nov;3(11):928-32. doi: 10.1002/alr.21206. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14073760
Citation
JANSEN C. CARTILAGE--TYMPANOPLASTY. Laryngoscope. 1963 Oct;73:1288-301. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196310000-00006. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11306396
Citation
Knoll LD. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosal graft in the surgical management of Peyronie's disease. Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):753-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01079-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23777420
Citation
Lin HK, Godiwalla SY, Palmer B, Frimberger D, Yang Q, Madihally SV, Fung KM, Kropp BP. Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014 Feb;20(1):73-83. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0126. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29290312
Citation
Min J, Kim SH. Comparison of transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty with sterile acellular dermal allograft to conventional endaural microscopic tympanoplasty with tragal perichondrium. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar-Apr;39(2):167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17287942
Citation
Murphy F, Corbally MT. The novel use of small intestinal submucosal matrix for chest wall reconstruction following Ewing's tumour resection. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Apr;23(4):353-6. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-1882-1. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20723784
Citation
Ort SA, Ehrlich HP, Isaacson JE. Acellular porcine intestinal submucosa as fascial graft in an animal model: applications for revision tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Sep;143(3):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.04.268.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14146678
Citation
ORTEGREN U. MYRINGOPLASTY. A 4-YEAR SERIES REVIEWED 2 YEARS AFTER OPERATION. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1964;188:SUPPL 188:234+. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24214917
Citation
Phillips J, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Porcine small intestine submucosal grafts for post-tumor resection orbital reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):E219-23. doi: 10.1002/lary.24515. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23032665
Citation
Van Rompaey V, Farr MR, Hamans E, Mudry A, Van de Heyning PH. Allograft tympanoplasty: a historical perspective. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):180-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31826bf16d.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14624898
Citation
Rutner AB, Levine SR, Schmaelzle JF. Processed porcine small intestine submucosa as a graft material for pubovaginal slings: durability and results. Urology. 2003 Nov;62(5):805-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00664-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18209120
Citation
Seymour PE, Leventhal DD, Pribitkin EA. Lip augmentation with porcine small intestinal submucosa. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;10(1):30-3. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2007.17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
13854782
Citation
SHEA JJ Jr. Vein graft closure of eardrum perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 1960 Jun;74:358-62. doi: 10.1017/s002221510005670x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16015147
Citation
Spiegel JH, Kessler JL. Tympanic membrane perforation repair with acellular porcine submucosa. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Jul;26(4):563-6. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169636.63440.4e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5324120
Citation
Storrs L. Myringoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1966 Feb;76(2):185-95. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196602000-00001. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27273405
Citation
Tan HE, Santa Maria PL, Eikelboom RH, Anandacoomaraswamy KS, Atlas MD. Type I Tympanoplasty Meta-Analysis: A Single Variable Analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):838-46. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001099.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Tympanoplasty
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs