search
Back to results

Building a Bridge (BAB) Between Clinical and Community Care (BAB)

Primary Purpose

Caregiver Burden

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Options Counselor Health Educator (OC-HE) Intervention
Sponsored by
Sato Ashida
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Caregiver Burden focused on measuring Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, Caregiver, Bridging community, Bridging medical settings

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 110 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age
  • Speaks English
  • Lives in Iowa
  • Caregiver of someone diagnosed with dementia within the past 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

- Does not meet inclusion criteria

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention Group

Control

Arm Description

These individuals will receive the Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention

These individuals will receive the typical standard of care treatment from clinics

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Modified Zarit Burden Interview
Caregiver burden 12 item self report questionnaire; Minimum score 0, maximum score 36 with low scores showing less burden

Secondary Outcome Measures

Knowledge of Formal Services
Established measure of the extent to which caregiver knows about formal services available in their communities. Participants answer the extent to which (on a five-point Likert scale from "not at all true of me" to "completely true of me") they are informed about federal programs, that they know what to do to get help, that they know how to get the person they care for into a nursing home, that they are aware of how to pay for a nursing home, that they can get information about different options for getting care, that they know which home health care agencies are active in their area, that they know which nursing facilities are available in their area, and how to get assistance due to COVID (added later). The scale ranges from "Not True at all of me" to "Completely true of me", where these answers and those in between score 1-5. The scale is scored by adding up these scores of the 8 questions. Thus, the range is 8-40, with a 40 being the highest knowledge of formal services.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression
Ten item measure assessing the extent to which the individual is experiencing depressive symptoms. Questions ask about how often feelings or events happen in a week on a scale from None of the time, where less than one day receives 0 points, to Most of the time, where 5 to 7 days receives 3 points. The lowest score is a 0, indicating no depression. The highest score is 30, indicating high depression.
Emergency Care Use
Self-reported measure of the number of times participants have visited a doctor or other health care provider unexpectedly in the past 6 months. The lowest score could be 0, indicating no emergency care use and the highest score for each could be 180 days, indicating that the participant visited a doctor or health care provider every day for the past six months
Social Network-Uplift
Count of network members engaging in supportive interactions (Uplift) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 8 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in uplifting interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.
Social Network-Malfeasant
Count of network members engaging in negative caregiving social interactions (Malfeasant) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 7 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in malfeasant interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.

Full Information

First Posted
April 16, 2019
Last Updated
November 17, 2022
Sponsor
Sato Ashida
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), University of Kansas School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Boston College, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03932812
Brief Title
Building a Bridge (BAB) Between Clinical and Community Care
Acronym
BAB
Official Title
Building a Bridge (Between Clinical and Community Care): Post-diagnosis Support for Persons With Dementia and Their Families
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sato Ashida
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), University of Kansas School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Boston College, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Dementia diagnosis triggers a transitional phase for the individuals and their families, often causing emotional distress and family conflicts due to the ambiguity of the illness and future trajectories. Families often report a lack of information and guidance during the period immediately following diagnosis, suggesting a missed opportunity for prevention of family distress at the outset of the caregiver and patient career. With large and increasing numbers of individuals newly diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) each year, there is an urgent need to develop effective intervention models to support role transitions and minimize distress related to ADRD diagnosis. The long-term goal of this research is to minimize negative consequences of ADRD by enhancing the support systems of the affected families as they start their new and challenging phase of life as patients and family caregivers. The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of this new Options Counselor-Health Education (OC-HE) intervention on bridging the medical and community-settings through potential mechanisms of influence, enhancement of social networks and support. Implementation strategies will be developed in collaboration with partnering clinics and local Area Agencies on Aging. Participants will be recruited from three clinics at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) that provide dementia diagnostic services and randomized into an intervention or control arm; and complete baseline and three- and six-month follow-up interviews. This study is innovative in its consideration of contributing factors at multiple levels of the ecological model (i.e., individual, social network, and organizational) and its collaborative approach, involving medical clinics, an Area Agency on Aging (AAA), and Alzheimer's Association (AA) to develop and evaluate a new care model that bridges between the medical and community settings.
Detailed Description
Once the participant has consented, the research assistant will set up a time to complete a baseline interview, either in-person or via telephone. The baseline interview will take 40-50 minutes to complete. After the baseline survey has been completed, the participant will be randomized using simple randomization based on a computer-generated random numbers to assign the family into the intervention or standard care (control group). If the participant is randomized into the intervention group, the options counselor will be given the participant's contact information and will establish contact with the participant to make an in-home or telephone (if preferred) visit within two weeks of the participant's consent. The participant and patient can jointly participate in the initial meeting. The options counselor may make additional calls to the participant if more information is needed in the absence of the patient as requested by the participant. During the initial visit/call, the options counselor will use the modified Options Counseling (OC) assessment tool and caregiver intake form (attached) to assess patient and family needs and to develop family actions plans (see attached family action plan form) using LifeLong Links to identify services available in their local areas, and to connect them to providers. The options counselor will also provide dementia education on the topics that the family desires to discuss. Modules to discuss with the participant include About Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia, Social Relationships and Daily Life, Anticipating Changes and Challenges, Interacting with Providers, and Addressing Future Needs. This initial visit should take between 1 and 2 hours. The options counselor will conduct 5 additional follow-up intervention calls, which will last between 30 minutes to 1 hour. These calls will happen each month, in the 5 months following the initial visit/call. The follow up intervention calls will be used to adjust action plans and implement additional training modules selected by the participant. The attached intervention log will be filled out by the options counselor after each session (6 sessions per participant) to track what was covered. The research team will use the intervention logs as fidelity checks. The sessions will also be recorded so that the research team can check for fidelity to intervention protocol. The options counselor, Maria Donohoe, is a research team member on this IRB. Both intervention and standard care participants will complete 3 month and 6 month interviews, conducted by the research team members. The standard care group will have 3 and 6 month interviews prior to their receiving a call from an options counselor. The call and work that the standard care group does with an options counselor is not the intervention because the intervention protocol for this research will not be used. This phone call is made for the standard care group to receive support after the study data is collected if desired. Each follow up interview will take between 30 and 40 minutes to complete. All three interviews will be recorded so that research team members can review the data for accuracy. Participants will be asked by the research assistant for permission to record and will be invited to let the researcher know if they would not like to be recorded or if they would like to turn off the recorder at any time. Participants will still be able to participate in the study if they do not elect to be recorded. The responses questions will be recorded on paper and then entered into an online survey database on Qualtrics. Those in the intervention group wishing to continue and those in the standard care group wishing to receive Options Counseling after completing the 6 month interview will receive a call from a local options counselor in their area. Options Counseling services are provided using the Older American's Act funding by the local Area Agencies on Aging, thus, there will be no cost for older individuals and their family. . For each interview, the research assistant will make up to three calls to schedule a time, leaving a voicemail (if available) and a phone number to call if the participant would like to continue their participation. On the final call, the research assistant will let the participant know that this is the last call and if the participant would like to continue with the study, they are welcome to call back. Those who miss the 3-month follow-up interview will be contacted again for the 6-month follow up interview, and the same protocol will be used to establish contact. At the end of the study (after the 6 month follow up interview), all study participants, regardless of study arm, will be given the option to receive a call from an options counselor who will offer options counseling services in their own community.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Caregiver Burden
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, Caregiver, Bridging community, Bridging medical settings

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
82 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
These individuals will receive the Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
These individuals will receive the typical standard of care treatment from clinics
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Options Counselor Health Educator (OC-HE) Intervention
Intervention Description
The OC-HE will meet in person with the participant one time and five times via telephone to provide options counseling based on modules developed by the research team
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Modified Zarit Burden Interview
Description
Caregiver burden 12 item self report questionnaire; Minimum score 0, maximum score 36 with low scores showing less burden
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Knowledge of Formal Services
Description
Established measure of the extent to which caregiver knows about formal services available in their communities. Participants answer the extent to which (on a five-point Likert scale from "not at all true of me" to "completely true of me") they are informed about federal programs, that they know what to do to get help, that they know how to get the person they care for into a nursing home, that they are aware of how to pay for a nursing home, that they can get information about different options for getting care, that they know which home health care agencies are active in their area, that they know which nursing facilities are available in their area, and how to get assistance due to COVID (added later). The scale ranges from "Not True at all of me" to "Completely true of me", where these answers and those in between score 1-5. The scale is scored by adding up these scores of the 8 questions. Thus, the range is 8-40, with a 40 being the highest knowledge of formal services.
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Title
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression
Description
Ten item measure assessing the extent to which the individual is experiencing depressive symptoms. Questions ask about how often feelings or events happen in a week on a scale from None of the time, where less than one day receives 0 points, to Most of the time, where 5 to 7 days receives 3 points. The lowest score is a 0, indicating no depression. The highest score is 30, indicating high depression.
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Title
Emergency Care Use
Description
Self-reported measure of the number of times participants have visited a doctor or other health care provider unexpectedly in the past 6 months. The lowest score could be 0, indicating no emergency care use and the highest score for each could be 180 days, indicating that the participant visited a doctor or health care provider every day for the past six months
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Title
Social Network-Uplift
Description
Count of network members engaging in supportive interactions (Uplift) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 8 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in uplifting interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Title
Social Network-Malfeasant
Description
Count of network members engaging in negative caregiving social interactions (Malfeasant) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 7 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in malfeasant interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Description
5-item self-reported measure assessing caregivers' confidence to use community-based services. The scale ranges on level of certainty from "not at all certain" to "very certain." The responses are scored on a scale of 0-10. These scores are summed up for a final score of 0-50, with a 50 being the highest knowledge of formal services. Questions include how certain the caregiver can get answers to all questions about services in the community, find organizations or agencies that provide services in need, arrange for services themselves, get answers to all questions about the individual's care, and get answers to changes in services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Time Frame
Change over time from baseline to 6-month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
110 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years of age Speaks English Lives in Iowa Caregiver of someone diagnosed with dementia within the past 6 months Exclusion Criteria: - Does not meet inclusion criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sato Ashida, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Williams, RN, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Kansas School of Nursing
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Building a Bridge (BAB) Between Clinical and Community Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs