search
Back to results

Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

Primary Purpose

Hepatitis B, Viral Hepatitis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tenofovir alafenamide
Entecavir
Sponsored by
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatitis B focused on measuring Hepatitis B, Viral Hepatitis, Tenofovir alafenamide, Entecavir

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients more than 20 years old
  2. Chronic hepatitis B patients
  3. Patients who were indicated for hepatitis B virus antiviral therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Decompensated liver disease (Child-Pugh B &C)
  2. End stage renal disease (eGRF < 15 ml/min/1.73m2)
  3. Prior use of nucleot(s)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B
  4. Prior use of interferon for chronic hepatitis B within six months
  5. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus co-infection
  6. Concurrent other uncontrolled malignancy
  7. Women in pregnancy or lactation
  8. Cannot conform to the study protocol of this study

Sites / Locations

  • Taichung Veterans General HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tenofovir alafenamide group

Entecavir group

Arm Description

Study subjects will receive tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg/tab once daily for 3 years (144 weeks).

Study subjects will receive entecavir 0.5 mg/tab once daily for 3 years (144 weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

HBV viral suppression
proportion of patients with hepatitis B virus(HBV) -DNA suppression
Renal safety: Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate
Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Normalization alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
proportion of patients with ALT normalization
HBsAg loss
proportion of patients with HBsAg loss
HBeAg loss
proportion of patients with HBeAg loss
Bone mineral density
change of bone mineral density

Full Information

First Posted
April 28, 2019
Last Updated
October 7, 2023
Sponsor
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03933384
Brief Title
Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B
Official Title
Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B: An Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2033 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Taichung Veterans General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus entecavir (ETV) in the chronic hepatitis B patients.
Detailed Description
With high antiviral potency and low drug resistance rate, both ETV and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) have been recommended as the first-line antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, risk of renal dysfunction remains an issue in TDF long-term therapy. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel prodrug of tenofovir and is formulated to deliver the active metabolite to target cells more efficiently than TDF at lower doses, thereby reducing systemic exposure to tenofovir. Importantly, TAF had improved renal safety as compared to TDF. TAF has been approved for treating CHB since 2017; however, it is still unknown whether the efficacy and renal safety of TAF is compatible to those of ETV. The investigators aim to conduct an open label, randomized controlled trial comparing TAF with ETV for assessing their efficacy and renal safety in CHB patients. The eligible CHB patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive TAF or ETV. After allocation to TAF group or ETV group, study subjects will receive therapy for 3 years (144 weeks).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatitis B, Viral Hepatitis
Keywords
Hepatitis B, Viral Hepatitis, Tenofovir alafenamide, Entecavir

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The eligible chronic hepatitis B patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily oral doses of tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or entecavir 0.5mg.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
420 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tenofovir alafenamide group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Study subjects will receive tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg/tab once daily for 3 years (144 weeks).
Arm Title
Entecavir group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Study subjects will receive entecavir 0.5 mg/tab once daily for 3 years (144 weeks).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tenofovir alafenamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vemlidy
Intervention Description
Tenofovir alafenamide 25mg/tab once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Entecavir
Other Intervention Name(s)
Baraclude
Intervention Description
Entecavir 0.5mg/tab once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
HBV viral suppression
Description
proportion of patients with hepatitis B virus(HBV) -DNA suppression
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir
Title
Renal safety: Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate
Description
Change of estimated glomerular filtration rate
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Normalization alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Description
proportion of patients with ALT normalization
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir
Title
HBsAg loss
Description
proportion of patients with HBsAg loss
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir
Title
HBeAg loss
Description
proportion of patients with HBeAg loss
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir
Title
Bone mineral density
Description
change of bone mineral density
Time Frame
After 48-week therapy of Tenofovir alafenamide or entecavir

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients more than 20 years old Chronic hepatitis B patients Patients who were indicated for hepatitis B virus antiviral therapy Exclusion Criteria: Decompensated liver disease (Child-Pugh B &C) End stage renal disease (eGRF < 15 ml/min/1.73m2) Prior use of nucleot(s)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B Prior use of interferon for chronic hepatitis B within six months Known history of human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus co-infection Concurrent other uncontrolled malignancy Women in pregnancy or lactation Cannot conform to the study protocol of this study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Teng-Yu Lee, MD, PhD
Phone
886-4-23592525
Ext
3301
Email
tylee@vghtc.gov.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hsin-Ju Tsai, MD
Phone
886-4-23592525
Ext
3301
Email
a9194024@hotmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teng-Yu Lee, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teng-Yu Lee, MD, PhD
Phone
886-4-23592525
Ext
3301
Email
tylee@vghtc.gov.tw

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16879891
Citation
Perz JF, Armstrong GL, Farrington LA, Hutin YJ, Bell BP. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
757978
Citation
Chen DS, Sung JL. Hepatitis B virus infection on Taiwan. N Engl J Med. 1977 Sep 22;297(12):668-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197709222971213. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22668640
Citation
Ni YH, Chang MH, Wu JF, Hsu HY, Chen HL, Chen DS. Minimization of hepatitis B infection by a 25-year universal vaccination program. J Hepatol. 2012 Oct;57(4):730-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25476749
Citation
Chiang CJ, Yang YW, Chen JD, You SL, Yang HI, Lee MH, Lai MS, Chen CJ. Significant reduction in end-stage liver diseases burden through the national viral hepatitis therapy program in Taiwan. Hepatology. 2015 Apr;61(4):1154-62. doi: 10.1002/hep.27630. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29405329
Citation
Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Brown RS Jr, Bzowej NH, Wong JB. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018 Apr;67(4):1560-1599. doi: 10.1002/hep.29800. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28427875
Citation
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017 Aug;67(2):370-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26389937
Citation
Kang L, Pan J, Wu J, Hu J, Sun Q, Tang J. Anti-HBV Drugs: Progress, Unmet Needs, and New Hope. Viruses. 2015 Sep 15;7(9):4960-77. doi: 10.3390/v7092854.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16525138
Citation
Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, Chang TT, Cheinquer H, Goodman Z, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Zink RC, Cross A, Colonno R, Fernandes L; BEHoLD AI463027 Study Group. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051287. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1863.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19052126
Citation
Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, Gane E, de Man RA, Krastev Z, Germanidis G, Lee SS, Flisiak R, Kaita K, Manns M, Kotzev I, Tchernev K, Buggisch P, Weilert F, Kurdas OO, Shiffman ML, Trinh H, Washington MK, Sorbel J, Anderson J, Snow-Lampart A, Mondou E, Quinn J, Rousseau F. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2442-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15565615
Citation
van Bommel F, Wunsche T, Mauss S, Reinke P, Bergk A, Schurmann D, Wiedenmann B, Berg T. Comparison of adefovir and tenofovir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2004 Dec;40(6):1421-5. doi: 10.1002/hep.20464.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29696665
Citation
Tsai HJ, Chuang YW, Lee SW, Wu CY, Yeh HZ, Lee TY. Using the chronic kidney disease guidelines to evaluate the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatitis B patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jun;47(12):1673-1681. doi: 10.1111/apt.14682. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23732715
Citation
Stevens PE, Levin A; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):825-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28404091
Citation
Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, Chuang WL, Chen CY, Kim HJ, Hui AJ, Janssen HL, Chowdhury A, Tsang TY, Mehta R, Gane E, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Gaggar A, Kitrinos KM, Lin L, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Lim YS, Acharya SK, Agarwal K; GS-US-320-0110 Investigators. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):185-195. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30024-3. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Erratum In: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):e2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28404092
Citation
Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, Chan HL, Chuang WL, Stepanova T, Hui AJ, Lim YS, Mehta R, Janssen HL, Acharya SK, Flaherty JF, Massetto B, Cathcart AL, Kim K, Gaggar A, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Pan CQ, Brunetto M, Izumi N, Marcellin P; GS-US-320-0108 Investigators. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):196-206. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30107-8. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Erratum In: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):e2.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs