search
Back to results

Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy (BOPI-2)

Primary Purpose

IgE Mediated Peanut Allergy, Peanut Hypersensitivity

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Boiled peanut
Defatted roasted peanut flour
Sponsored by
Imperial College London
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for IgE Mediated Peanut Allergy focused on measuring Peanut allergy, Desensitisation, Safety

Eligibility Criteria

7 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 7-18 years (enrolment up to a participant's 19th birthday).
  • Past history consistent with IgE-mediated peanut allergy
  • Allergic to ≤1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at baseline double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, prior to treatment allocation
  • Tolerates at least 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at open food challenge at screening.
  • Written informed consent of parent/legal guardian and patient assent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Required previous admission to an intensive care unit for management of an allergic reaction to peanut.
  • Clinically significant chronic illness (other than asthma, rhinitis or eczema).
  • Undergoing subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy to respiratory allergens, and not yet established on maintenance dosing for at least 3 months.
  • Undergoing oral immunotherapy for food allergy and within the first year of treatment.
  • Subjects receiving anti-IgE therapy, oral immunosuppressants, beta-blocker or ACE inhibitor.
  • Tolerance to ≥1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at initial DBPCFC during screening.
  • Dose-limiting symptoms to 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at screening.
  • Poorly controlled asthma within the previous 3 months (as defined by clinician judgement with reference to the ICON consensus ), or asthma requiring treatment with >5 days oral corticosteroids within the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy
  • Unwilling or unable to fulfil study requirements

Sites / Locations

  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (St. Mary's Hospital)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Boiled peanut Oral Immunotherapy

Conventional Oral immunotherapy

Arm Description

Desensitisation using boiled peanut

Desensitisation using defatted peanut flour

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Desensitisation to >1.4g (roasted) peanut protein at food challenge
The proportion of participants who tolerate 1.44g (or more) roasted peanut protein (equivalent to ≥ 6 roasted peanuts) after 12 months of OIT, as assessed by DBPCFC, in each treatment group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Adverse events
The proportion of participants experiencing adverse events classified as mild non-transient symptoms or more severe during updosing and maintenance in each treatment group.
Other safety outcomes
Rates of adverse events by type / organ involved in each treatment group
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAQLQ
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using the following validated questionnaire: - Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) (reference Muraro et al, 2014)
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAIM
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using the following validated questionnaire: - Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) (see Muraro et al, 2014)
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using standardized instrument (EQ-5D)
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed using the following validated questionnaire: - EQ-5D - a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. (Further details at https://euroqol.org/)
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using standardized instrument (CHU-9D)
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed using the following validated questionnaire: - CHU-9D (The Child Health Utility 9D) - also a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. (Further details at https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/mvh/paediatric)
Change in self-efficacy after each phase of immunotherapy
Change in self-efficacy at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using validated questionnaire.
Immunological outcome: skin prick test
Change in skin prick test wheal (mm) and end-point titration skin prick test between baseline and post immunotherapy
Immunological outcome: Allergen-specific IgE
Change in allergen-specific IgE (kUa/l) between baseline and post immunotherapy

Full Information

First Posted
April 29, 2019
Last Updated
October 18, 2023
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
University College Cork
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03937726
Brief Title
Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy
Acronym
BOPI-2
Official Title
Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy: A Non-inferiority Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
April 29, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
University College Cork

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Peanut allergy is the most common cause of severe allergic reactions to food. Onset is common in childhood, but in contrast to other food allergies such as cow's milk and egg, peanut allergy tends to persist into adulthood. It is associated with a significant impact on quality of life, both for the affected individual and their family. There is no current cure for peanut allergy. Oral peanut immunotherapy (OIT) using defatted, roasted peanut flour has been demonstrated to offer potential in this regard, but is associated with significant and frequent reactions and can cause life-threatening allergic symptoms. The investigators have previously demonstrated that the processing of peanuts through boiling results in a relatively hypoallergenic product due to the loss of key allergenic components from peanut into the water. This has been tested in a recently-completed Phase 2b/3 trial (The BOPI Study, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02149719; HRA reference 15/LO/0287): 47 children/ young people with peanut allergy confirmed at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) were randomised (2:1) to receive either oral immunotherapy (updosing using boiled peanut for ~6 months, followed by maintenance with roasted peanut) or standard treatment (allergen avoidance). Participants underwent repeat DBPCFC at 12 months to assess response, following which peanut OIT was stopped and sustained unresponsiveness assessed after 4 weeks (4SU). 24/32 participants (100% per protocol) achieved the primary outcome of desensitisation to >1.44g peanut protein (approximately 6-8 peanuts, p<0.0001); of those 14 tolerated >4.4g peanut protein. 13/24 participants achieved 4SU. There was no significant change in threshold in the control group (p>0.05). Boiled peanut OIT had a favourable safety profile, with under 2% of doses associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. The BOPI-2 study is a non-inferiority study to demonstrate that boiled peanut is at least as effective as peanut flour in treating children with peanut allergy. The study will compare the rate of adverse events and other safety outcomes between these two interventions, and assess the immunological mechanisms involved, a secondary aim being to develop clinically-useful predictors for identifying individuals likely to undergo successful desensitisation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
IgE Mediated Peanut Allergy, Peanut Hypersensitivity
Keywords
Peanut allergy, Desensitisation, Safety

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Primary outcome will be assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
83 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Boiled peanut Oral Immunotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Desensitisation using boiled peanut
Arm Title
Conventional Oral immunotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Desensitisation using defatted peanut flour
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Boiled peanut
Intervention Description
Desensitisation using boiled peanut for induction and initial updosing
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Defatted roasted peanut flour
Intervention Description
Desensitisation using defatted peanut flour for induction and initial updosing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Desensitisation to >1.4g (roasted) peanut protein at food challenge
Description
The proportion of participants who tolerate 1.44g (or more) roasted peanut protein (equivalent to ≥ 6 roasted peanuts) after 12 months of OIT, as assessed by DBPCFC, in each treatment group.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse events
Description
The proportion of participants experiencing adverse events classified as mild non-transient symptoms or more severe during updosing and maintenance in each treatment group.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Other safety outcomes
Description
Rates of adverse events by type / organ involved in each treatment group
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAQLQ
Description
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using the following validated questionnaire: - Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) (reference Muraro et al, 2014)
Time Frame
6,12 and 13+ months
Title
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using FAIM
Description
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using the following validated questionnaire: - Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) (see Muraro et al, 2014)
Time Frame
6,12 and 13+ months
Title
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using standardized instrument (EQ-5D)
Description
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed using the following validated questionnaire: - EQ-5D - a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. (Further details at https://euroqol.org/)
Time Frame
6,12 and 13+ months
Title
Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQL) from baseline - assessed using standardized instrument (CHU-9D)
Description
Change in HRQL measures at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed using the following validated questionnaire: - CHU-9D (The Child Health Utility 9D) - also a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. (Further details at https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/mvh/paediatric)
Time Frame
6,12 and 13+ months
Title
Change in self-efficacy after each phase of immunotherapy
Description
Change in self-efficacy at 6, 12 and 13 months from baseline, as assessed in study participants and their parent/carer using validated questionnaire.
Time Frame
6,12 and 13+ months
Title
Immunological outcome: skin prick test
Description
Change in skin prick test wheal (mm) and end-point titration skin prick test between baseline and post immunotherapy
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Immunological outcome: Allergen-specific IgE
Description
Change in allergen-specific IgE (kUa/l) between baseline and post immunotherapy
Time Frame
12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Sustained unresponsiveness after 4 weeks cessation of maintenance OIT
Description
Rate of sustained unresponsiveness after 4 weeks cessation of maintenance OIT at 1 year.
Time Frame
After 1 year of OIT
Title
Sustained unresponsiveness after 12+ weeks cessation of maintenance OIT
Description
Rate of sustained unresponsiveness after 12+ weeks cessation of maintenance OIT at 1 year, in those participants who demonstrate sustained unresponsiveness at 4 weeks off maintenance OIT.
Time Frame
After 1 year of OIT

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 7-18 years (enrolment up to a participant's 19th birthday). Past history consistent with IgE-mediated peanut allergy Allergic to ≤1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at baseline double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, prior to treatment allocation Tolerates at least 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at open food challenge at screening. Written informed consent of parent/legal guardian and patient assent. Exclusion Criteria: Required previous admission to an intensive care unit for management of an allergic reaction to peanut. Clinically significant chronic illness (other than asthma, rhinitis or eczema). Undergoing subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy to respiratory allergens, and not yet established on maintenance dosing for at least 3 months. Undergoing oral immunotherapy for food allergy and within the first year of treatment. Subjects receiving anti-IgE therapy, oral immunosuppressants, beta-blocker or ACE inhibitor. Tolerance to ≥1.44 g peanut protein (approx. 6 peanuts) at initial DBPCFC during screening. Dose-limiting symptoms to 1/8 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at screening. Poorly controlled asthma within the previous 3 months (as defined by clinician judgement with reference to the ICON consensus ), or asthma requiring treatment with >5 days oral corticosteroids within the previous 3 months. Pregnancy Unwilling or unable to fulfil study requirements
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul J Turner, FRACP PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Imperial College London
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (St. Mary's Hospital)
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24785644
Citation
Muraro A, Dubois AE, DunnGalvin A, Hourihane JO, de Jong NW, Meyer R, Panesar SS, Roberts G, Salvilla S, Sheikh A, Worth A, Flokstra-de Blok BM; European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines. Food allergy health-related quality of life measures. Allergy. 2014 Jul;69(7):845-53. doi: 10.1111/all.12405. Epub 2014 May 2.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/190335/promising-peanut-trial-offers-hope-children/
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs