search
Back to results

Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Lesions of the Knee With Percutaneous Grafting

Primary Purpose

Bone Marrow Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous introduction of cannula
Magnetic resonance imaging
Bone Grafting
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Marrow Edema

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40 to 85 years
  • Gender: both genders
  • Knee pain for at least 6 months
  • Hypercaption lesion in subchondral region of tibial plateau or femoral condyle in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with fat suppression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatologic diseases diagnosed in treatment
  • Renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis
  • Not ambulatory
  • Knee osteoarthrosis with Kellegren / Lawrence classification greater than 3
  • Alignment in varus or valgus greater than 8 degrees in relation to the mechanical axis
  • Radiographic changes in the femoro-patellar joint associated with symptoms of anterior knee pain

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Surgery

Arm Description

Group evaluated with MRI and submitted to the percutaneous introduction of cannula for bone grafting

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
International Knee Documentation Committee
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Patient-reported survey of patient health
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Patient-reported survey of patient health, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Patient-reported survey of patient health, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Visual analog scale for Pain
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Edema Volume evaluation
MRI evaluation

Full Information

First Posted
February 20, 2017
Last Updated
May 16, 2019
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03941977
Brief Title
Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Lesions of the Knee With Percutaneous Grafting
Official Title
Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Lesions of the Knee With Percutaneous Grafting
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 5, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Objective To evaluate the technique of percutaneous grafting with bone substitute in the knee as to its applicability and technical feasibility. Evaluate the results regarding functional improvement and prevention of the evolution of joint cartilage degeneration. Material and methods Twenty patients from the Knee Group clinic who meet the criteria will be selected. Magnetic resonance imaging will be analyzed on the PACS server. Through the resonance will be performed evaluation of the size of the bone edema in volume and its proportion in relation to the size of the affected condyle or tibial plateau and the cartilage of the femoro-tibial joint. The lesions will then be mapped in the coronal and sagittal plane. Radiographs will be taken in antero-posterior, profile, Rosenberg knee and lower limb views. Evaluation of the patients will be performed by the visual analog pain scale and by the KOOS, IKDC and SF-36v1 indices. Description of Surgical Technique After the mapping the patient will be submitted to the procedure. The procedure consists in the application of a bone substitute based on injectable calcium phosphate in the area of bone edema previously mapped with the aid of radioscopy to guide. After confirming the proper positioning of the guidewire, a trephine is introduced through which the product will be injected. GRAFTYS HBS® (Graftys, Aix en Provence, France) will be used. The procedures will be performed in a surgical center, with conventional antisepsis and asepsis techniques and under spinal anesthesia. The patient will be hospitalized and must be discharged on the first postoperative day. After the procedure the patients will be under partial load as tolerated for two weeks with free range of motion and will start physiotherapy after 2 weeks of the procedure. During hospitalization the patient will receive analgesia with intravenous Dipirone 1g every 6 hours associated with Tramadol 100mg intravenously every 8 hours if severe pain. After discharge the patient will receive analgesia with dipyrone 1g orally every 6 hours associated with Tramadol 100mg orally every 8 hours if severe pain, and Tramadol used by the patient was quantified. Patients will then be re-evaluated at 1, 3, 12, 24 and 48 weeks with the same previous criteria and at 12 months new MRI with the same previous protocol will be performed.
Detailed Description
Initial assessment All the patients included in the study were submitted to the initial evaluation, in which the following exams and scales were performed: Magnetic resonance of the affected knee, according to IOTHCFMUSP standard radiology protocol; Panoramic radiography of lower limbs to measure limb alignment; X-ray in antero-posterior incidence with load and knee profile; Functional ranges of subjective IKDC, KOOS and SF-36v1; Analog visual pain scale. Radiographic evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging The radiographs were evaluated and classified by a specialist radiologist in musculoskeletal, according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification. The radiographs were not identified as to the moment of accomplishment, before or after the procedure. However, in many cases it was possible to identify signs of the procedure in the image, making the evaluator blind. In the MRI images, the location of the bone edema was evaluated in relation to the affected bone (femur or tibia) and affected compartment (medial or lateral). The extent of edema divided into three levels according to the percentage of affected area of the coronal section of the femoral condyle or tibial plateau was also evaluated, with grade 1 being less than 25%, grade 2 between 25% and 50%, and grade 3 greater than 75 %. In the subchondral bone was also recorded the presence of fracture line, cysts and impactions / collapses of the articular surface. In the presence of impaction this was measured in millimeters. Clinical and functional evaluation The patients were evaluated by the functional scales: KOOS and subjective IKDC. Quality of life was also assessed by the SF-36v1 questionnaire. Patient follow-up Patients were followed in outpatient clinics at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks after the surgical procedure. Functional scales were repeated in all consultations. The quality of life scale was repeated at 24 and 48 weeks. Radiographs and MRI were repeated after 48 weeks of surgery. Description of surgical technique Magnetic resonance imaging of the patients was mapped in the surgical center to define the area of the lesion, as well as planning of the injection site at the center of the lesion, trajectory and cannula entry point. The cannula trajectory was defined by prioritizing an appropriate angle of attack for the entry point and larger distances of intraosseous trajectory, in order to avoid extravasation of the bone substitute through the cannula inlet. The procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia, in a surgical center. The patients were placed in dorsal decubitus on a radiolucent table, with a cushion below the ipsilateral hip, for better control of the external rotation of the limb and a cushion also under the ipsilateral knee, aiding in the lateral incidence of fluoroscopy, avoiding the overlap of the knee image contralateral. The material for the procedure was: An 8G metal cannula with distal and lateral exit orifice at the tip Metal cannula of the cannula with introductory tip with cut Metal cannula embolus with blunt tip High Flow Disposable Three-Way Infusion Faucet Five 1mL syringes with thread at the tip One syringe to prepare the Graftys HBS® bone substitute According to preoperative planning, with the help of fluoroscopy in front and profile incidences, the cannula entry point was demarcated, with the placement of the cannula on the skin. Incisions of 5 mm in length were performed with a n11 scalpel blade at the point of entry into the skin. The cannulae were introduced, with fluoroscopy control, towards the center of the previously determined lesion. The progression was done manually or with the aid of hammer, when greater resistance was found. During the introduction of the cannula, oblique incidences of fluoroscopy were performed to avoid perforation of the opposing cortex. The introduction of the cannula was performed very carefully when approaching the opposite cortical, with the possibility of using the blunt tip for cannula, making it difficult to perforation of the cortical. The bone substitute was then prepared by mixing the solid content with the liquid to liquid / pasty state and transferred to 1 ml syringes. Transfer to smaller diameter syringes is important to achieve an injection flow with lower pressure application. The bone substitutes when subjected to higher pressures pass into a separation phase in which the liquid separates from the solid part, making it impossible to deliver the material in the desired area. The 1 ml syringes were connected to the cannulae already positioned at the site determined for filling. The bone substitute was injected, interleaving the passage of a metal plunger through the cannula, between each syringe. Through the fluoroscopy it was possible to visualize the distribution of the product in the bone marrow, ensuring that the application was according to the mapping of the lesion and controlling the presence of possible extravasations. The amount of product injected was defined by the control of filling the area of the lesion by fluoroscopy. In cases of intra-articular extravasation, the injection was interrupted. After the injection was completed, it was waited 5 minutes before removal of the cannula, to reduce the reflux of the material through the inlet. Post-operative care The patients were hospitalized until the day after the procedure. Full load was allowed as tolerated for two weeks, with free range of motion. During hospitalization, patients received analgesia with intravenous dipyrone 1g every 6 hours, associated with intravenous tramadol 100mg every 8 hours if they presented severe pain greater than 7. After discharge, patients received analgesia with dipyrone 1g orally 6 in 6 hours, associated with tramadol 100mg orally every 8 hours, if severe pain, for a week, and the tramadol used by the patient in this period was quantified. Surgical incision stitches were removed at the first outpatient appointment 1 week after surgery. The patients did not undergo physiotherapy or any type of rehabilitation after the procedure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Marrow Edema

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Surgery
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group evaluated with MRI and submitted to the percutaneous introduction of cannula for bone grafting
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous introduction of cannula
Other Intervention Name(s)
Arm: Experimental: Surgery
Intervention Description
An 8 gauge cannula is introduced at the site of the bone marrow lesion. The introduction of the cannula is guided by fluoroscopy.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic resonance imaging
Other Intervention Name(s)
Arm: Experimental: Surgery
Intervention Description
MRI scans will be performed on a 1.5 T (Signa Excite HD, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and a specific knee coil (HD TRKnee 8 Ch High Resolution Knee Array) will be used.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Bone Grafting
Intervention Description
A bone substitute consisting of calcium phosphate will be injected through the cannula, previously inserted, filling the area of the bone marrow lesion. GRAFTYS HBS® (Graftys, Aix en Provence, France) will be used.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life
Time Frame
Pre-operative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
1 week postoperative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
3 weeks postoperative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
6 weeks postoperative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
12 weeks postoperative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
24 weeks postoperative
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Description
Evatualion of Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and knee related Quality of life, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
48 weeks postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame
Pre-operative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
1 week postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
3 weeks postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
6 weeks postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
12 weeks postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
24 weeks postoperative
Title
International Knee Documentation Committee
Description
knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
48 weeks postoperative
Title
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Description
Patient-reported survey of patient health
Time Frame
Pre-operative
Title
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Description
Patient-reported survey of patient health, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
24 weeks postoperative
Title
Short Form 36 Health Survey
Description
Patient-reported survey of patient health, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
48 weeks postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity
Time Frame
Pre-operative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
1 Week postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
3 weeks postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
6 weeks postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
12 weeks postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
24 weeks postoperative
Title
Visual analog scale for Pain
Description
Unidimensional measure of pain intensity, comparative with pre-optative evaluation
Time Frame
48 weeks postoperative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Edema Volume evaluation
Description
MRI evaluation
Time Frame
1 year postoperative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 40 to 85 years Gender: both genders Knee pain for at least 6 months Hypercaption lesion in subchondral region of tibial plateau or femoral condyle in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with fat suppression. Exclusion Criteria: Rheumatologic diseases diagnosed in treatment Renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis Not ambulatory Knee osteoarthrosis with Kellegren / Lawrence classification greater than 3 Alignment in varus or valgus greater than 8 degrees in relation to the mechanical axis Radiographic changes in the femoro-patellar joint associated with symptoms of anterior knee pain
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marco K Demange, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Faculty
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital das Clinicas - University of Sao Paulo
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-010
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Lesions of the Knee With Percutaneous Grafting

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs