Cognitive and Motor Benefits of Standing (KOGIS)

Upright-working has been proven to benefit health by combating the negative effects of physical inactivity. However, long-term commitment to static standing regimens may be limited due to symptoms of musculoskeletal fatigue that may develop during prolonged static standing in the absence of facilitated weight shifting. We propose a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification.

Within-group design to study the effects of standing-and-working accompanied by periodic movement compared to standing-and-working and to sitting-and-working on measures of musculoskeletal fatigue and discomfort, and physiological measures, in healthy normal control subjects, middle-aged to older adults. Measures of musculoskeletal and subjective discomfort and fatigue will be assessed in three sessions, i.e. "seated", "static standing", and "dynamic standing" (see below). During these test sessions subjects will perform small assignments using a computer mimicking light office work, including several tests measuring attention span. The first session will be the seated condition for all participants. Sessions 2 and 3 will be randomized between static or dynamic standing. Prior to any research procedures, written informed consent will be obtained from each subject followed by initial study eligibility screening. Eligibility screening includes clinical screening questions, including, but not limited to, questions regarding significant history of cardiovascular disease, history of lower extremity pain and fractures, back pain, and migraines. Subjects will stand behind a height adjustable table that is positioned about 0.5 meters from a wall. For the "static standing" position subjects will be asked to stand behind the table. No specific restrictions for standing will be imposed on subjects (e.g. "do not move" or "stand quietly"). For the "dynamic standing" condition participants will stand behind the same table but received periodic cues to induce weight-shifting steps. A seated control session condition will also be used to get baseline musculoskeletal subjective ratings for the same time period. Each sitting or standing session will not exceed 4 hour. As many rest breaks will be provided to the subject as needed. The entire test session may take up to approximately 5 hours. The experimental testing protocol will be conducted preferably in the morning over three or more different days. Each day will be dedicated to one testing condition. Subjects will stand on an anti-fatigue mat during the static and dynamic standing sessions. For the standing conditions, rest breaks (e.g. sitting or walking around) will be provided as needed. During the study session caffeine consumption will be prohibited in order to standardize the stimulant effect of caffeine across subjects.

cognition, brain activity, cognitive reserve, work productivity, musculoskeletal discomfort, attention

Participants will receive a general information about the study protocol and received three conditions in a random order.

Four hours of sitting condition will be applied with ad-libitum breaks for toilet use and stretching. During this condition all cognitive, motor and pain scales will be monitored.

Four hours of static standing condition will be applied with ad-libitum breaks for toilet use and stretching. During this condition all cognitive, motor and pain scales will be monitored.

Four hours of static standing condition will be applied with ad-libitum breaks for toilet use and stretching. During this condition all cognitive, motor and pain scales will be monitored.

We propose a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions will be applied: 4 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions will be done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

We propose a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions will be applied: 4 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions will be done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

We propose a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions will be applied: 4 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions will be done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

change in activity levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in musculoskeletal discomfort levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in leg swelling levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in oxygen consumption between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in attentional levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in executive control and cognitive switching levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

change in electrocortical activity levels between all three conditions, which will be measured on average 3 days in-between (maximum length of measurements per subject = 15 days)

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy adults (both gender, age range 18-64 years) who are currently employed. Exclusion Criteria: Inability to stand or walk without an assistive device History of symptoms in stance that preclude safe and comfortable participation, such as dizziness and lightheadedness, orthostasis, severe symptomatic leg or back musculoskeletal pain, or medication side effects History of symptomatic cardiovascular or pulmonary disease History of rheumatic arthritis History of stroke or other neurologic conditions with residual sensorimotor deficits History of chronic pain syndrome requiring narcotic analgesics Neurological disorders Evidence of dementia Diabetics: low or poorly controlled blood glucose Any other history of medical or psychiatric comorbidity precluding safe participation in the project

Levine JA, Schleusner SJ, Jensen MD. Energy expenditure of nonexercise activity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;72(6):1451-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1451.

Levine JA, Kotz CM. NEAT--non-exercise activity thermogenesis--egocentric & geocentric environmental factors vs. biological regulation. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005 Aug;184(4):309-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01467.x.

Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007 Nov;56(11):2655-67. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Dunn S, Kurko J, Bauman AE. A tool for measuring workers' sitting time by domain: the Workforce Sitting Questionnaire. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Dec;45(15):1216-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090214. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

Cook AJ, Degood DE. The cognitive risk profile for pain: development of a self-report inventory for identifying beliefs and attitudes that interfere with pain management. Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):332-45. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000209801.78043.91.

Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993 Feb;52(2):157-168. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B.