search
Back to results

Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY (SAFETY)

Primary Purpose

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Lung Metastases

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Frequency: Every 3 Months
Frequency: Every 6 Months
Imaging Modality: Chest Radiograph (CXR)
Imaging Modality: Chest CT
Sponsored by
McMaster University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Soft Tissue Sarcoma focused on measuring Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Lung Metastases, Overall Survival, Surveillance, Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is 18 years of age or older;
  • The patient has been diagnosed with a primary extremity grade II or III soft-tissue sarcoma (STS);
  • The patient has undergone surgical excision of the tumor with curative intent and with no evidence of gross residual disease based on the pathology report;
  • The patient has completed all planned neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and / or chemotherapy, if applicable;
  • The tumor size is greater than or equal to (≥) five centimeters according to the pathology report or based on the pre-treatment MRI if neoadjuvant radiation and / or chemotherapy are given; and
  • The patient provides informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has metastases at initial presentation based on the radiology report of the initial thoracic imaging†;
  • The patient has recently undergone surgical excision of a local recurrence;
  • The patient has been diagnosed with one of the special sub-types, myxoid / round cell liposarcoma or extra-skeletal Ewing's sarcoma*;
  • The patient has been previously diagnosed with a genetic syndrome with an elevated risk of malignancy, such as Li-Freumeni Syndrome‡;
  • The patient has been previously diagnosed with a co-morbid condition that has a life expectancy of less than (<) one year;
  • The site-specific surveillance protocol for the patient's disease is not compatible with the study protocol (i.e., regular planned whole-body imaging with positron emission tomography [PET] scans);
  • Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with the patient maintaining follow-up (with the specific reasoning requiring approval of the Methods Center);
  • The patient is currently enrolled in a study that does not permit co-enrolment; and
  • The patient has already been enrolled in the SAFETY trial.

    • A second CT scan may be required to confirm that indeterminate nodules are false positives before the patient can be enrolled (provided that the second CT scan shows no evidence of metastatic disease);

      • Myxoid liposarcoma and extra-skeletal Ewing's sarcoma have different metastatic patterns, which necessitate different surveillance protocols;

        • Individuals with Li-Freumeni Syndrome, or other genetic syndromes with an elevated risk of malignancy, appear to be at an elevated risk for radiation-induced cancers, so the use of CT scans should be limited.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California Davis Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Hartford HealthCareRecruiting
  • University of Florida Health Shands HospitalRecruiting
  • Parkview Cancer InstituteRecruiting
  • Holden Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Albany Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Montefiore Medical CenterRecruiting
  • NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital/Perlmutter Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Cleveland ClinicRecruiting
  • Oregon Health and Science University HospitalRecruiting
  • Texas Tech Health Sciences CenterRecruiting
  • Huntsman Cancer InstituteRecruiting
  • Virginia Cancer Specialists
  • Hospital Universitario AustralRecruiting
  • St. Vincent's Hospital MelbourneRecruiting
  • LKH - Universitätsklinikum GrazRecruiting
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreRecruiting
  • Nova Scotia HealthRecruiting
  • Juravinski Hospital and Cancer CentreRecruiting
  • The Ottawa HospitalRecruiting
  • Mount Sinai HospitalRecruiting
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontRecruiting
  • McGill University Health CentreRecruiting
  • Hôtel Dieu du QuebecRecruiting
  • Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico HospitalRecruiting
  • Leiden University Medical CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Surveillance Arm I

Surveillance Arm II

Surveillance Arm III

Surveillance Arm IV

Arm Description

Clinical assessment and chest radiograph (CXR) every six months for two years

Clinical assessment and CXR every three months for two years

Clinical assessment and chest computed tomography (CT) every six months for two years

Clinical assessment and chest CT every three months for two years

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival
as measured by death from any cause.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient Anxiety
The PROMIS® Cancer-Anxiety instrument assesses self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). The PROMIS® Cancer-Anxiety instrument is a computer adaptive test. A minimum of 4 questions must be answered. One's responses will guide the system's choice of the next question. The test will continue until either the standard error drops below a specified level or the participant has answered the maximum number of 12 questions (whichever comes first). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 4 and the highest is 60. The raw score will then be converted into a standardized T-score for each participant using the applicable conversion table. A higher T-score represents a higher degree of anxiety.
Patient Satisfaction
The PROMIS® Satisfaction with Social Roles & Activities instrument assesses satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities (e.g., 'I am satisfied with my ability to participate in family activities'). This instrument is a computer adaptive test. A minimum of 4 questions must be answered. One's response will guide the system's choice of the next question. The test will continue until either the standard error drops below a specified level or the participant has answered the maximum number of 12 questions (whichever comes first). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 4 and the highest possible raw score is 60. The raw score will then be converted into a standardized T-score for each participant using the applicable conversion table. A higher T-score represents a higher degree of satisfaction.
Patient Quality-of-Life
The validated EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire measures generic health status and consists of 2 sections: the descriptive system and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The descriptive system is comprised of 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 5 and the highest is 25. A lower raw score in the descriptive system represents fewer issues with each of the 5 domains. The VAS records a participant's self-rated health from 0 to 100 on a vertical VAS with endpoints labeled '100 - the best health you can imagine' and '0 - the worst health you can imagine'. The participant is asked to mark an 'X' on the scale and write the corresponding number, which is this section's raw score.
Local Recurrence-Free Survival
As measured by the length of time from the time of randomization that the participant survives with no detection of recurrent disease at the initial tumor site or operative field.
Metastasis-Free Survival
As measured by as the length of time from the time of randomization that the participant survives with no detection of systemic disease recurrence at any anatomic location.
Treatment-Related Complications
Will include both chemotherapy-related complications, such as febrile neutropenia, fungal infections or sepsis, and thoracotomy-related complications, such as pneumothorax or surgical site infections.
Net Healthcare Costs
Will include both the net costs of surveillance and costs incurred from metastasis treatment and metastasis treatment-related complications.

Full Information

First Posted
May 7, 2019
Last Updated
October 4, 2022
Sponsor
McMaster University
Collaborators
Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03944798
Brief Title
Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY
Acronym
SAFETY
Official Title
Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY (SAFETY) International Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2030 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2030 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
McMaster University
Collaborators
Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Following treatment for a primary extremity sarcoma, patients remain at risk for the development of local and systemic disease recurrence. Metastasis (distant recurrence) to the lung is the most frequent single location of disease recurrence in sarcoma patients, occurring in almost half of all patients. Therefore, careful post-operative surveillance is an integral element of patient care. However, the detection of metastases does not necessarily affect long-term survival and may negatively impact quality of life. Surveillance strategies have not been well researched and have been identified as the top research priority in the extremity sarcoma field. Using a 2X2 factorial design to maximize efficiency and reduce overall trial costs, the SAFETY trial will randomize 830 extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients to determine the effect of surveillance strategy on overall patient survival after surgery for a STS of the extremity by comparing the effectiveness of both surveillance frequency (every 3 vs. every 6 months) and imaging modality (CT scans vs. chest radiographs).
Detailed Description
Post-treatment STS surveillance is an integral element of patient care. Although earlier detection of metastatic disease may improve long-term survival, no study has yet provided definitive evidence to support this assumption. A thorough systematic review of the literature has identified only a single limited randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating this clinical question, and surveys of sarcoma surgeons have determined that surgeons typically follow their patients based on the way in which they were trained. The orthopaedic oncology field has identified sarcoma surveillance strategy as the top research priority in the field. In order to fill the evidence gap in sarcoma surveillance, a large international RCT is required. The investigators, therefore, propose the Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY (SAFETY) trial. In preparation for the SAFETY trial, the SAFETY investigators have completed the following preparatory work: A) establishment of a worldwide research collaborative group that spans 6 continents; B) collection of data from international sarcoma patients to determine their perceptions of sarcoma surveillance and their willingness to participate in a study in which randomization will determine their follow-up protocols; and C) the organization of a large Protocol Development Meeting with international and multidisciplinary participation, including sarcoma patient involvement, where critical aspects of the protocol were discussed and finalized. The international, multi-center SAFETY trial will determine the effect of surveillance strategy on overall patient survival after surgery for a STS of the extremity by comparing the effectiveness of both surveillance frequency (every 3 vs. every 6 months) and imaging modality (CT scans vs. chest radiographs). Ultimately, the SAFETY trial will provide the necessary evidence to develop evidence-based surveillance guidelines, and is poised to have a significant impact on the post-operative care and outcomes of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Lung Metastases
Keywords
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Lung Metastases, Overall Survival, Surveillance, Randomized Controlled Trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Model Description
2 x 2 factorial superiority randomized controlled trial
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The local clinical team, site study personnel and participants cannot be blinded to the treatment allocation as the imaging modalities are visually distinguishable and these individuals will be required to arrange the booking of surveillance visits and imaging at their respective clinical site. The Central Adjudication Committee (CAC) will be blinded to surveillance frequency; however, because the imaging modalities are visually distinguishable, the CAC cannot be blinded to imaging modality. The data analysts will, however, remain blinded throughout the trial and all interpretation of study results will be conducted in a blinded manner. Since the primary outcome (overall survival) is objective, a lack of blinding of study personnel and patients, and the incomplete blinding of outcome assessors, introduces minimal threats to validity.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Surveillance Arm I
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Clinical assessment and chest radiograph (CXR) every six months for two years
Arm Title
Surveillance Arm II
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Clinical assessment and CXR every three months for two years
Arm Title
Surveillance Arm III
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Clinical assessment and chest computed tomography (CT) every six months for two years
Arm Title
Surveillance Arm IV
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Clinical assessment and chest CT every three months for two years
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Frequency: Every 3 Months
Intervention Description
every 3 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Frequency: Every 6 Months
Intervention Description
every 6 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Imaging Modality: Chest Radiograph (CXR)
Intervention Description
Chest radiograph (CXR)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Imaging Modality: Chest CT
Intervention Description
Chest computed tomography (CT)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival
Description
as measured by death from any cause.
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Anxiety
Description
The PROMIS® Cancer-Anxiety instrument assesses self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart, dizziness). The PROMIS® Cancer-Anxiety instrument is a computer adaptive test. A minimum of 4 questions must be answered. One's responses will guide the system's choice of the next question. The test will continue until either the standard error drops below a specified level or the participant has answered the maximum number of 12 questions (whichever comes first). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 4 and the highest is 60. The raw score will then be converted into a standardized T-score for each participant using the applicable conversion table. A higher T-score represents a higher degree of anxiety.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Patient Satisfaction
Description
The PROMIS® Satisfaction with Social Roles & Activities instrument assesses satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities (e.g., 'I am satisfied with my ability to participate in family activities'). This instrument is a computer adaptive test. A minimum of 4 questions must be answered. One's response will guide the system's choice of the next question. The test will continue until either the standard error drops below a specified level or the participant has answered the maximum number of 12 questions (whichever comes first). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 4 and the highest possible raw score is 60. The raw score will then be converted into a standardized T-score for each participant using the applicable conversion table. A higher T-score represents a higher degree of satisfaction.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Patient Quality-of-Life
Description
The validated EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire measures generic health status and consists of 2 sections: the descriptive system and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The descriptive system is comprised of 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression). Each question has 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5. To find the raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 5 and the highest is 25. A lower raw score in the descriptive system represents fewer issues with each of the 5 domains. The VAS records a participant's self-rated health from 0 to 100 on a vertical VAS with endpoints labeled '100 - the best health you can imagine' and '0 - the worst health you can imagine'. The participant is asked to mark an 'X' on the scale and write the corresponding number, which is this section's raw score.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Local Recurrence-Free Survival
Description
As measured by the length of time from the time of randomization that the participant survives with no detection of recurrent disease at the initial tumor site or operative field.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Metastasis-Free Survival
Description
As measured by as the length of time from the time of randomization that the participant survives with no detection of systemic disease recurrence at any anatomic location.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Treatment-Related Complications
Description
Will include both chemotherapy-related complications, such as febrile neutropenia, fungal infections or sepsis, and thoracotomy-related complications, such as pneumothorax or surgical site infections.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Net Healthcare Costs
Description
Will include both the net costs of surveillance and costs incurred from metastasis treatment and metastasis treatment-related complications.
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient is 18 years of age or older; The patient has been diagnosed with a primary extremity grade II or III soft-tissue sarcoma (STS); The patient has undergone surgical excision of the tumor with curative intent and with no evidence of gross residual disease based on the pathology report; The patient has completed all planned neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and / or chemotherapy, if applicable; The tumor size is greater than or equal to (≥) five centimeters according to the pathology report or based on the pre-treatment MRI if neoadjuvant radiation and / or chemotherapy are given; and The patient provides informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: The patient has metastases at initial presentation based on the radiology report of the initial thoracic imaging†; The patient has recently undergone surgical excision of a local recurrence; The patient has been diagnosed with one of the special sub-types, myxoid / round cell liposarcoma or extra-skeletal Ewing's sarcoma*; The patient has been previously diagnosed with a genetic syndrome with an elevated risk of malignancy, such as Li-Freumeni Syndrome‡; The patient has been previously diagnosed with a co-morbid condition that has a life expectancy of less than (<) one year; The site-specific surveillance protocol for the patient's disease is not compatible with the study protocol (i.e., regular planned whole-body imaging with positron emission tomography [PET] scans); Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with the patient maintaining follow-up (with the specific reasoning requiring approval of the Methods Center); The patient is currently enrolled in a study that does not permit co-enrolment; and The patient has already been enrolled in the SAFETY trial. A second CT scan may be required to confirm that indeterminate nodules are false positives before the patient can be enrolled (provided that the second CT scan shows no evidence of metastatic disease); Myxoid liposarcoma and extra-skeletal Ewing's sarcoma have different metastatic patterns, which necessitate different surveillance protocols; Individuals with Li-Freumeni Syndrome, or other genetic syndromes with an elevated risk of malignancy, appear to be at an elevated risk for radiation-induced cancers, so the use of CT scans should be limited.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tricia Schneider
Phone
2892446087
Email
schnep@mcmaster.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tess Hudson
Email
hudsontc@mcmaster.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle Ghert, MD, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
McMaster University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California Davis Medical Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steven Thorpe, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Lor Randall, MD
Facility Name
Hartford HealthCare
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06102
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emily Shearier
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adam Lindsay, MD
Facility Name
University of Florida Health Shands Hospital
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
André Spiguel, MD
Facility Name
Parkview Cancer Institute
City
Fort Wayne
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46845
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ashley Romine
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher Johnson, MD, FACS
Facility Name
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin Miller, MD, MS
Facility Name
Albany Medical Center
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew DiCaprio, MD
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Geller, MD
Facility Name
NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital/Perlmutter Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10010
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karim Masrouha, MD
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather Keaney
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nathan Mesko, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lukas Nystrom, MD
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University Hospital
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Hayden, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yee-Cheen Doung, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Gundle, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Hayden, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Texas Tech Health Sciences Center
City
El Paso
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79905
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brianna Godinez
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rajiv Rajani, MD
Facility Name
Huntsman Cancer Institute
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacqueline Hart
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin Jones, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Groundland, MD
Facility Name
Virginia Cancer Specialists
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Platero
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Felasfa Wodajo, MD
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Austral
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mercedes Gunning
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marcos Galli Serra, MD
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
City
Fitzroy
State/Province
Melbourne
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Angela Cochrane
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Choong, MD, FRACS
Facility Name
LKH - Universitätsklinikum Graz
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
8036
Country
Austria
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andreas Leithner, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marko Bergovec, MD
Facility Name
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
City
Porto Alegre
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie Santos
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ricardo Becker, MD
Facility Name
Nova Scotia Health
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H 3A7
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kelly Trask, MSc
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David AJ Wilson, MD, FRCSC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Biddulph, MD, FRCSC
Facility Name
Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8V1C3
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hadia Farrukh
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle Ghert, MD, FRCSC
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yusra Al Mosuli
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joel Werier, MD, FRCSC
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 1X5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony Griffin
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Ferguson, MD,MSc,FRCSC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Tsoi, MD,FRCSC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jay Wunder, MD,PhD,FRCSC
Facility Name
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Georges Bastille, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc Isler, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sophie Mottard, MD
Facility Name
McGill University Health Centre
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3J1
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Turcotte, MD
Facility Name
Hôtel Dieu du Quebec
City
Québec
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1R 2J6
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annie Arteau, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Norbert Dion, MD
Facility Name
Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico Hospital
City
Turin
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simone De Meo, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michele Boffano, MD
Facility Name
Leiden University Medical Center
City
Leiden
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michiel van de Sande, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31537562
Citation
SAFETY Investigators. The Surveillance After Extremity Tumor Surgery (SAFETY) trial: protocol for a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e029054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029054.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://osf.io/bnfsm/
Description
Optimal surveillance strategies following curative surgery for extremity sarcoma: A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials [published in pre-print].
URL
http://osf.io/2wjyk/
Description
Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY (SAFETY): A Protocol for an International Randomized Controlled Trial [published in pre-print].

Learn more about this trial

Surveillance AFter Extremity Tumor surgerY

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs