Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients (ESCAPE-PD)
Primary Purpose
End Stage Renal Disease, Peritoneal Dialysis
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Thailand
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spironolactone
Losartan
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for End Stage Renal Disease focused on measuring Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritoneal Membrane, Spironolactone, Losartan, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years or older (both male and female patients)
- Incidence or prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients undergoing CAPD
- Had standard dialysis prescription for at least 30 days before screening
- History of hypertension
- Stable clinical condition without any inflammation at least 4 weeks prior to enrolment
- Had an ability to understand and willingness to sign an informed consent statement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Serum potassium concentration of ≥ 5.5 milliequivalent /liter
- History of severe or active cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
- History of renal artery stenosis
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Contraindication to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
- Pregnancy
- Recent PD-related peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection (within 2 months of screening)
- Had planned to have kidney transplantation or transfer to other PD centers with 6 months
- Prognosis for survival less than 12 months
- Any conditions (both mental or physical) that would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol
- Any disease of the abdominal wall, such as injury or surgery, burns, hernia, dermatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or diverticulitis) that in the opinion of the Investigator would preclude the patient from being able to have PD
- Any intra-abdominal tumors or intestinal obstruction
- Current or recent (within 30 days) exposure to others investigational medicinal products
Sites / Locations
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Combination of spironolactone and losartan
Losartan Alone
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Peritoneal dialysate effluent CA-125
Using a commercial microparticle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PET indices
PET indices including dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio [D/P Cr], 4-hour ultrafiltration (UF) volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test [D/D0]) measured using a modified PET method (performed using 2,000 mL of 2.5% glucose solution).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Changes in dialysate adequacy by Weekly kt/V
Changes in dialysate adequacy by weekly creatinine clearance
Changes in serum albumin concentration
Changes in serum potassium concentration
Changes in waist circumference
Changes in body mass index (BMI)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Changes in Nutritional status
Using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)
Changes in Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS)
Changes in participant quality of life score
Using Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36 Version 1.3)
Changes in health utility
Using EuroQOL-5 dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Changes in disease-specific Thai quality of life score
Using the 9-Thai Health status AssessmentInstrument (9-THAI) questionnaire
Changes in participant well-being score
Using the World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) well-being index
Number of participants with disability
Using the Barthel activities daily life index
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03953950
Brief Title
Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Acronym
ESCAPE-PD
Official Title
Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: An Open-Label Randomized-Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chiang Mai University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The ESCAPE-PD (Effects of add-on SpironolaCtone to losartan versus Alone on Peritoneal mEmbrane among continuous ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis patients) study is a randomized, open-label, single center, active-controlled clinical trial. Adults end-stage kidney disease patients 18 years or older undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) will be enrolled. A total 84 CAPD will be randomly assigned to either the combination of spironolactone and losartan (experimental arm) or losartan alone (control arm). The primary outcomes are the difference in peritoneal dialysate effluent cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) indices (dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio, 4-hour ultrafiltration volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test). Secondary outcome measures include laboratory and mechanistic outcome measures, nutrition outcomes, health-related quality of life, physical function, clinical events, and safety profiles. Results will be disseminated to suggest a strategy to prevent the peritoneal membrane function among CAPD patients through peer-reviewed publications along with scientific meetings.
Detailed Description
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of the methods of renal replacement therapy (RRT) that can easily perform at home. The declared "PD first" policy from the National Health Security Office causes rapidly expansion of this group of patients. In the year 2013, the current study in Thailand showed that the patients enrolled for peritoneal dialysis accumulated for more than 15,000 people. It works continuously similar to the actual function of the kidneys in normal people. In addition, PD also helps to slow the decline of remaining kidney function (residual renal function), which is very important and affect in decreasing mortality rate in this group of patients. However, PD has several limitations such as complications from the infection and high failure rate associated with a dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane during long-term treatment. Approximately 4-12 percent of patients will have ultrafiltration failure and volume overload in the first couple of years of treatment and soar to 30-50 percent in patients treated for more than six years.
The causes of peritoneal membrane deterioration are exposure to incompatible dialysis solution with hyperosmolar glucose content, acidic pH, reactions to PD catheter material, uremia and peritonitis. The alterations of structural and functional of the peritoneal membrane after exposed to these several insults are epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and increase in peritoneal solute transport, which consequently leading to peritoneal dialysis failure. It has been already demonstrated that the local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a key role in this regulation by promoting the activation of neoangiogenesis and fibrotic pathways.
According to the pathophysiologic changes of the peritoneal membrane, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are adapted to be use in respect of membrane preserving agents. Many studies, both in human and animal models, demonstrate the protective effect against peritoneal membrane deterioration by inhibiting the formation of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and decreasing progression rate of small to high transport membrane type. In fact, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) seem to have higher efficacy than ACEIs/ARBs in some experimental models. The possible mechanism is the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists that not only inhibit the formation of TGF- β1 and VEGF, but also suppress intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the substrates responsible for aldosterone induces alterations in cell phenotype. A prospective cohort study of 23 CAPD patients was conducted and evaluated the effect of spironolactone on peritoneal membrane. The result showed the possible benefit of spironolactone in slowing the decline of peritoneal function, suppressing the elevation of profibrotic markers, and increasing mesothelial cell mass.
As a result of the clinical practice, most of CAPD patients tend to receive ACEIs/ARBs as prescribe by the clinicians, in order to control blood pressure, raise serum potassium level, and others compelling indications. Thus, the concept of add-on MRAs to ACEIs/ARBs, desiring the synergistic effects of these 2 drugs group, for membrane preservation is challenge. Notwithstanding the fact that current evidence about the combination effects of ACEIs/ARBs with MRAs is limited in term of quality of the study, sample size, inadequate follow-up period, and poor sensitive parameter in assessing the structural and functional changes of the peritoneal membrane. Thereby, this study aims to evaluate the effect of add-on spironolactone to losartan versus losartan alone on membrane preservation in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Renal Disease, Peritoneal Dialysis
Keywords
Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritoneal Membrane, Spironolactone, Losartan, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
84 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Combination of spironolactone and losartan
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Losartan Alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Spironolactone
Intervention Description
Spironolactone Starting dose: 25 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Losartan
Intervention Description
Losartan Starting dose: 50 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Peritoneal dialysate effluent CA-125
Description
Using a commercial microparticle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Time Frame
6 months
Title
PET indices
Description
PET indices including dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio [D/P Cr], 4-hour ultrafiltration (UF) volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test [D/D0]) measured using a modified PET method (performed using 2,000 mL of 2.5% glucose solution).
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in dialysate adequacy by Weekly kt/V
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in dialysate adequacy by weekly creatinine clearance
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in serum albumin concentration
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in serum potassium concentration
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in waist circumference
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in body mass index (BMI)
Description
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in Nutritional status
Description
Using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in participant quality of life score
Description
Using Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36 Version 1.3)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in health utility
Description
Using EuroQOL-5 dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in disease-specific Thai quality of life score
Description
Using the 9-Thai Health status AssessmentInstrument (9-THAI) questionnaire
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in participant well-being score
Description
Using the World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) well-being index
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with disability
Description
Using the Barthel activities daily life index
Time Frame
6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Incidence of PD technique failure
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Incidence of PD-related infections
Description
Peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with investigational medicinal products-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Description
Safety of investigational medicinal products related to potential harm (e.g. death, hospitalization, and emergency visit)
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years or older (both male and female patients)
Incidence or prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients undergoing CAPD
Had standard dialysis prescription for at least 30 days before screening
History of hypertension
Stable clinical condition without any inflammation at least 4 weeks prior to enrolment
Had an ability to understand and willingness to sign an informed consent statement
Exclusion Criteria:
Serum potassium concentration of ≥ 5.5 milliequivalent /liter
History of severe or active cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
History of renal artery stenosis
Uncontrolled hypertension
Contraindication to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
Pregnancy
Recent PD-related peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection (within 2 months of screening)
Had planned to have kidney transplantation or transfer to other PD centers with 6 months
Prognosis for survival less than 12 months
Any conditions (both mental or physical) that would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol
Any disease of the abdominal wall, such as injury or surgery, burns, hernia, dermatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or diverticulitis) that in the opinion of the Investigator would preclude the patient from being able to have PD
Any intra-abdominal tumors or intestinal obstruction
Current or recent (within 30 days) exposure to others investigational medicinal products
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University
City
Chiang Mai
ZIP/Postal Code
50200
Country
Thailand
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33586138
Citation
Hasegawa T, Nishiwaki H, Ota E, Levack WM, Noma H. Aldosterone antagonists for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 15;2(2):CD013109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013109.pub2.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs