search
Back to results

Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic Tumors (SCIRSM)

Primary Purpose

Radiotherapy, Spine Metastases, Radiosurgery

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Stereotactic radiotherapy
Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Sponsored by
Peking University Third Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Radiotherapy focused on measuring Stereotactic radiotherapy, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, spinal metastatic tumors

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-80 years old;
  • Spine metastatic tumor patients confirmed by pathology and imaging; Number 3; Surgical treatment is not possible due to iatrogenic or (and) personal factors;
  • Spinal metastasis after previous systemic treatment or progression after previous treatment of spinal metastasis;
  • The anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita parting Ⅰ type - Ⅲ type; Without systemic metastasis or metastasis, the lesion was controlled.
  • ECOG physical condition score: 0-1, Karnofsky score 60, able to withstand puncture;
  • Expected survival 3 months;
  • Main organ function is good, without serious hypertension, diabetes and heart disease.
  • Has signed informed consent;
  • The compliance was good and the family members agreed to follow up for survival.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Of the anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita classification: Ⅳ, Ⅴ Ⅵ, Ⅶ.
  • Participated in other drug clinical trials within four weeks; There was a history of bleeding, and any bleeding event with severe grade of CTCAE5.0 or above occurred within 4 weeks before screening;
  • Screening of patients with known central nervous system metastasis or a history of central nervous system metastasis. For patients with clinical suspected central nervous system metastasis, CT or MRI examination must be performed within 14 days before randomization to exclude central nervous system metastasis.
  • Patients with hypertension who cannot obtain good control by single antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure >140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >90mmHg); Having a history of unstable angina pectoris; Patients newly diagnosed with angina within 3 months before screening or myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening; Arrhythmia (including QTcF: 450ms in male and 470ms in female) requires long-term use of anti-arrhythmia drugs and New York heart association grade II cardiac dysfunction;
  • Long-term unhealed wounds or incomplete fracture healing;
  • Imaging showed that the tumor had invaded important blood vessels or the researchers judged that the patient's tumor had a very high possibility to invade important blood vessels during the treatment and cause fatal bleeding;
  • Coagulation function is unusual, have haemorrhage tendency person (before random 14 days must satisfy: below the circumstance that does not use anticoagulant INR is in normal value range); Patients treated with anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, heparin or their analogues; The use of low-dose warfarin (1mg oral, once daily) or low-dose aspirin (no more than 100mg daily) for preventive purposes is permitted on the premise that the international standardized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) is 1.5;
  • Screening for the occurrence of hyperactive/venous thrombosis events in the first 6 months, such as cerebrovascular accidents (including temporary ischemic attack), deep vein thrombosis (except for venous thrombosis caused by intravenous catheterization in the early stage of chemotherapy, which was determined by the researchers to have recovered) and pulmonary embolism, etc.
  • Thyroid function was abnormal in the past and could not be kept within the normal range even in the case of drug treatment.

    (10) Attending has a history of psychotropic drug abuse, and can't attend or has mental disorder;

  • Always half a year after spinal tumors or other close to the spine tumor lesion lesions radiation;
  • Immunodeficiency disease, or has other acquired, congenital immunodeficiency disease, or has a history of organ transplantation;
  • Judgment according to the researchers, there is serious to endanger the safety of patients or patients completed the research associated with disease.

Sites / Locations

  • Peking University Third HospitalRecruiting
  • The fifth medical center of PLA general hospitalRecruiting
  • Guangxi ruikang hospitalRecruiting
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityRecruiting
  • GEM flower hospital of Liaohe oil field Tang-Du HospitalRecruiting
  • Hiser Medical Center of QingdaoRecruiting
  • Qingdao chengyang people's hospitalRecruiting
  • Second hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityRecruiting
  • Tangdu hospitalRecruiting
  • Mianyang Central HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Stereotactic radiotherapy

Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated

Arm Description

In this study, the metastases were treated with Stereotactic radiotherapy(SBRT).Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10). Stereotactic radiotherapy

In this study, the metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cancer pain score
Numerical grading (NRS) should be used for pain intensity assessment, and facial expression pain scoring should be used for patients with difficulty in expression.
Muscle strength and muscle tension grading
Muscle strength and muscle tension were graded by Numbers
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
Quality of Life Score of Tumor Patients(0-60)
Common methods for evaluating the quality of life of patients:The full score of quality of life is 60, the worst is < 20, the worse is 21-30, the average is 31-40, the better is 41-50, and the good is 51-60.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of pain response
Time from complete or partial pain relief to pain worsening (≥ 3 points on the NRPS
Overall survival
The time from enrollment to death from any cause
Local control rate
The rate at which lesions remained stable during follow-up
Adverse reactions
Adverse reactions during and after treatment
Progression-free survival
Time from treatment to cancer progression or death

Full Information

First Posted
May 21, 2019
Last Updated
July 18, 2019
Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Collaborators
Mianyang Central Hospital, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Qingdao chengyang hospital, Qingdao Hiser Medical Group, Beijing 302 Hospital, Guangxi Ruikang Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03963713
Brief Title
Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic Tumors
Acronym
SCIRSM
Official Title
Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Conventionally-fractionated-image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic Tumors:A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 10, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 31, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Collaborators
Mianyang Central Hospital, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Qingdao chengyang hospital, Qingdao Hiser Medical Group, Beijing 302 Hospital, Guangxi Ruikang Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
Detailed Description
In this study, Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.The metastases were treated with SBRT.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).The metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Radiotherapy, Spine Metastases, Radiosurgery
Keywords
Stereotactic radiotherapy, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, spinal metastatic tumors

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
non-randomized trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Stereotactic radiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In this study, the metastases were treated with Stereotactic radiotherapy(SBRT).Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10). Stereotactic radiotherapy
Arm Title
Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In this study, the metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Stereotactic radiotherapy
Intervention Description
Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Intervention Description
Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cancer pain score
Description
Numerical grading (NRS) should be used for pain intensity assessment, and facial expression pain scoring should be used for patients with difficulty in expression.
Time Frame
1 year after the treatment
Title
Muscle strength and muscle tension grading
Description
Muscle strength and muscle tension were graded by Numbers
Time Frame
1 year after the treatment
Title
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
Description
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
Time Frame
2 years after the treatment
Title
Quality of Life Score of Tumor Patients(0-60)
Description
Common methods for evaluating the quality of life of patients:The full score of quality of life is 60, the worst is < 20, the worse is 21-30, the average is 31-40, the better is 41-50, and the good is 51-60.
Time Frame
2 years after the treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of pain response
Description
Time from complete or partial pain relief to pain worsening (≥ 3 points on the NRPS
Time Frame
1 years after the treatment
Title
Overall survival
Description
The time from enrollment to death from any cause
Time Frame
3 years after the treatment
Title
Local control rate
Description
The rate at which lesions remained stable during follow-up
Time Frame
3 years after the treatment
Title
Adverse reactions
Description
Adverse reactions during and after treatment
Time Frame
6 months after the treatment
Title
Progression-free survival
Description
Time from treatment to cancer progression or death
Time Frame
3 years after the treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18-80 years old; Spine metastatic tumor patients confirmed by pathology and imaging; Number 3; Surgical treatment is not possible due to iatrogenic or (and) personal factors; Spinal metastasis after previous systemic treatment or progression after previous treatment of spinal metastasis; The anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita parting Ⅰ type - Ⅲ type; Without systemic metastasis or metastasis, the lesion was controlled. ECOG physical condition score: 0-1, Karnofsky score 60, able to withstand puncture; Expected survival 3 months; Main organ function is good, without serious hypertension, diabetes and heart disease. Has signed informed consent; The compliance was good and the family members agreed to follow up for survival. Exclusion Criteria: Of the anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita classification: Ⅳ, Ⅴ Ⅵ, Ⅶ. Participated in other drug clinical trials within four weeks; There was a history of bleeding, and any bleeding event with severe grade of CTCAE5.0 or above occurred within 4 weeks before screening; Screening of patients with known central nervous system metastasis or a history of central nervous system metastasis. For patients with clinical suspected central nervous system metastasis, CT or MRI examination must be performed within 14 days before randomization to exclude central nervous system metastasis. Patients with hypertension who cannot obtain good control by single antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure >140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >90mmHg); Having a history of unstable angina pectoris; Patients newly diagnosed with angina within 3 months before screening or myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening; Arrhythmia (including QTcF: 450ms in male and 470ms in female) requires long-term use of anti-arrhythmia drugs and New York heart association grade II cardiac dysfunction; Long-term unhealed wounds or incomplete fracture healing; Imaging showed that the tumor had invaded important blood vessels or the researchers judged that the patient's tumor had a very high possibility to invade important blood vessels during the treatment and cause fatal bleeding; Coagulation function is unusual, have haemorrhage tendency person (before random 14 days must satisfy: below the circumstance that does not use anticoagulant INR is in normal value range); Patients treated with anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, heparin or their analogues; The use of low-dose warfarin (1mg oral, once daily) or low-dose aspirin (no more than 100mg daily) for preventive purposes is permitted on the premise that the international standardized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) is 1.5; Screening for the occurrence of hyperactive/venous thrombosis events in the first 6 months, such as cerebrovascular accidents (including temporary ischemic attack), deep vein thrombosis (except for venous thrombosis caused by intravenous catheterization in the early stage of chemotherapy, which was determined by the researchers to have recovered) and pulmonary embolism, etc. Thyroid function was abnormal in the past and could not be kept within the normal range even in the case of drug treatment. (10) Attending has a history of psychotropic drug abuse, and can't attend or has mental disorder; Always half a year after spinal tumors or other close to the spine tumor lesion lesions radiation; Immunodeficiency disease, or has other acquired, congenital immunodeficiency disease, or has a history of organ transplantation; Judgment according to the researchers, there is serious to endanger the safety of patients or patients completed the research associated with disease.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Junjie Wang, MD
Phone
+860182264910
Email
junjiewang_edu@sina.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Fei Xu, M Med
Phone
+8618511866032
Email
xufeibysy@163.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junjie Wang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fei Xu, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hongqing Zhuang, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaobo Du, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mianyang Central Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jie Li, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Mianyang Central Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiang Song, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lei Zhang, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianguo Zhang, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Qingdao chengyang people's hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peng Liu, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Qingdao Hiser Medical Group
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xuezhang Duan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing 302 Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zuping Lian, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liang Liu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Longhai Shen, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dongjie He, M Med
Organizational Affiliation
Tang-Du Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xuemin Li, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yi Chen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Peking University Third Hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junjie Wang, MD
Phone
+8682264910
Email
junjiewang_edu@sina.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fei Xu, M Med
Phone
+8618511866032
Email
xufeibysy@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Junjie Wang, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fei Xu, M Med
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hongqing Zhuang, M Med
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xuemin Li, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yi Chen, MD
Facility Name
The fifth medical center of PLA general hospital
City
BeiJing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
XueZhang Duan, M Med
Facility Name
Guangxi ruikang hospital
City
NanNing
State/Province
Guangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
530000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ZuPing Lian, M Med
Facility Name
Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
City
GuiYang
State/Province
Guizhou
ZIP/Postal Code
550000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liang Liu, M D
Email
jinshatanwo@163.com
Facility Name
GEM flower hospital of Liaohe oil field Tang-Du Hospital
City
Panjin
State/Province
Liaoning
ZIP/Postal Code
124010
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Longhai Shen, M Med
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Long hai Shen, M Med
Facility Name
Hiser Medical Center of Qingdao
City
Qingdao
State/Province
Shandong
ZIP/Postal Code
266000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peng Liu, M Med
Facility Name
Qingdao chengyang people's hospital
City
Qingdao
State/Province
Shandong
ZIP/Postal Code
266000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
JanGuo Zhang, M Med
Facility Name
Second hospital of Shanxi Medical University
City
TaiYuan
State/Province
Shanxi
ZIP/Postal Code
030000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiang Song, M Med
Email
songxianggeryuan@163.cob
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lei Zhang, M Med
Facility Name
Tangdu hospital
City
Xian
State/Province
Shanxi
ZIP/Postal Code
710000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
DongJie He, M Med
Facility Name
Mianyang Central Hospital
City
Mianyang
State/Province
Sichuan
ZIP/Postal Code
621000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaobo Du, MD
Phone
+8613550822229
Email
duxiaobo2005@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jie Li, M Med
Phone
+8615228324561
Email
lijie.7181@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaobo Du, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jie Li, M Med

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22181327
Citation
Massicotte E, Foote M, Reddy R, Sahgal A. Minimal access spine surgery (MASS) for decompression and stabilization performed as an out-patient procedure for metastatic spinal tumours followed by spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): first report of technique and preliminary outcomes. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;11(1):15-25. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500230.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23816297
Citation
Sahgal A, Whyne CM, Ma L, Larson DA, Fehlings MG. Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):e310-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70101-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15908648
Citation
Rades D, Stalpers LJ, Veninga T, Schulte R, Hoskin PJ, Obralic N, Bajrovic A, Rudat V, Schwarz R, Hulshof MC, Poortmans P, Schild SE. Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3366-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.754.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18426607
Citation
Gong Y, Wang J, Bai S, Jiang X, Xu F. Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis. Radiat Oncol. 2008 Apr 22;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19250762
Citation
Guckenberger M, Goebel J, Wilbert J, Baier K, Richter A, Sweeney RA, Bratengeier K, Flentje M. Clinical outcome of dose-escalated image-guided radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):828-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28041316
Citation
Zhang M, Chen YR, Chang SD, Veeravagu A. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: a single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jan;42(1):E13. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16372.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29224900
Citation
Gandhidasan S, Ball D, Kron T, Bressel M, Shaw M, Chu J, Chander S, Wheeler G, Plumridge N, Chesson B, David S, Siva S. Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastasis: Outcomes from 132 Consecutive Patients. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Mar;30(3):178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15537196
Citation
Ryu S, Rock J, Rosenblum M, Kim JH. Patterns of failure after single-dose radiosurgery for spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101 Suppl 3:402-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17688054
Citation
Chang EL, Shiu AS, Mendel E, Mathews LA, Mahajan A, Allen PK, Weinberg JS, Brown BW, Wang XS, Woo SY, Cleeland C, Maor MH, Rhines LD. Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Aug;7(2):151-60. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/08/151.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17224814
Citation
Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, Welch WC. Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):193-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251863.76595.a2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19092627
Citation
Wowra B, Zausinger S, Drexler C, Kufeld M, Muacevic A, Staehler M, Tonn JC. CyberKnife radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors: characterization of well-suited patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2929-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818c680a.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23167547
Citation
Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Bone Metastases; Lo SS, Lutz ST, Chang EL, Galanopoulos N, Howell DD, Kim EY, Konski AA, Pandit-Taskar ND, Rose PS, Ryu S, Silverman LN, Sloan AE, Van Poznak C. ACR Appropriateness Criteria (R) spinal bone metastases. J Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):9-19. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0376. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic Tumors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs