search
Back to results

A Study on Whether Patients Prefer the Spiriva® Respimat® or the Spiriva® Handihaler® for Treating Their Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Primary Purpose

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tiotropium Respimat® (T1)
Tiotropium Handihaler® (T2)
Sponsored by
Boehringer Ingelheim
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of COPD and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1 (Screening).

    • Relatively stable, moderate to very severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% of predicted normal and FEV1/FVC <70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol.
    • Male = exp [-10.61669 + 2.27078 × ln (- in cm) + 0.06622 × ln (age in year) + Mspline] Female = exp [-9.69716 + 2.09385 × ln (- in cm) + 0.02006 × ln (age in year) + Mspline]
    • Historical data from spirometry measurements within the past 6 either at the site or at the other hospital may be used. If the measurements are not performed at the trial site a referral letter and signed copies of the measurement printouts must be provided to the trial site for source data verification. In case several qualifying spirometry measurements are available, the most recent one should be referred to as long as it was not performed during an exacerbation. Patients may not be randomised to the study without the availability of spirometry data at the actual study site.
  • Male or female, age: ≥40 years of age
  • Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded).
  • Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonization (ICH) ICH-GCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial
  • Patients must be able to inhale medication from the Tiotropium Respimat® and Tiotropium HandiHaler®
  • Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures, and must be able to maintain records (patient diary) during the study period as required by the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had visual, cognitive, or motor impairment that, as judged by the investigator, did not allow the patient to independently read and complete the PASAPQ questionnaire
  • Patients have had used both Respimat® and HandiHaler® (including generic HandiHaler®) within one year prior to screening.
  • Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease or condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patients at risk because of participation in the study or may influence either the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • All patients with an Aspartate Transaminase (AST) (serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGOT) >80 IU/L, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (Serum Glutamic-pyruvic Transaminase, SGPT) >80 IU/L, Bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL or Creatinine >2.0 mg/dL will be excluded regardless of the clinical condition. Repeat laboratory evaluation will not be conducted in these subjects.
  • Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
  • Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year.
  • Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy during the last year.
  • Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed).
  • Known active tuberculosis.
  • Patients with a history of asthma, cystic fibrosis, clinically not well-controlled bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, or pulmonary thromboembolic disease
  • History of thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated.
  • Patients with any respiratory tract infection or COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to the initial screening visit (Visit 1).
  • Patients with known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction. Patients whose symptoms are controlled on treatment may be included.
  • Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma
  • Use of systemic corticosteroid medication at unstable doses (i.e., less than six weeks on stable dose) or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 milligrams (mg) prednisolone per day.
  • Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day and in the investigator's opinion will be unable to abstain from the use of oxygen therapy.
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUD) or diaphragm with spermicide, or Norplant®).
  • Significant alcohol or drug abuse within the past 12 months
  • Known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, lactose, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or any other components of the HandiHaler® or Respimat® inhalation solution delivery system.
  • Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period.
  • Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.)
  • Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.

Sites / Locations

  • Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
  • China-Japan Friendship Hospital
  • West China Hospital
  • The First Afiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
  • Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
  • The First Hospital of China Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

(T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat®, then (T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler®

(T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler®, then (T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat®

Arm Description

From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received comparator treatment(T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18μg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device.

From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Performance Domain of the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) After 4 Weeks of Treatment
The score on the performance domain of the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The performance domain score is the sum of 7 questions (Q) within the domain (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10 and Q11), the range for each question went from 1 to 7 the higher the better. The score was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale following ((Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)/49)*100, the higher the better performance. The performance domain of PASAPQ) was analysed using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM), with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. Compound symmetry was used as a covariance structure for within-patient variation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

PASAPQ Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment
The total score on the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The Total score is the sum of 13 questions (Q1-Q13) and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale. This continuous secondary endpoint was analyzed using a similar MMRM model as for the primary endpoint.
Percentage of Patients Indicating Preference at Week 8
The percentage of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The questionnaire PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part II of the PASAPQ the stand-alone question 15 (Q15) was asked for a response to indicate the preference for the trial device, it had three possible answers: "I prefer Respimat", "I prefer Handihaler", "No answer to this question " and "no preference". Chi-squared test was used to analyze proportion of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8.
Overall Satisfaction Question Score From PASAPQ After 4 Weeks of Treatment
The overall satisfaction question score in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 4 and 8 is reported (after 4 weeks of treatment). In Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ: the Question 14 (Q14) asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study. Q14 had Likert-type response options of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied) and was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale (if a patient scored "x", the transfer to 0-100 scale was x/7*100). Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the overall satisfaction question score, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.
Score on Willingness to Continue at Week 8
The score on willingness to continue in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ the Question 16 (Q16) asked for a response between 0 and 100 with 0 indicating not willing to continue using the trial device and 100 indicating definitely willingness to continue. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the score on willingness to continue, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.

Full Information

First Posted
May 24, 2019
Last Updated
October 11, 2023
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03964207
Brief Title
A Study on Whether Patients Prefer the Spiriva® Respimat® or the Spiriva® Handihaler® for Treating Their Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Official Title
A Randomized, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Study to Compare Patient Acceptability/Preference of Tiotropium Respimat® With Tiotropium Handihaler® in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 25, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 16, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the patient acceptability/preference of Respimat® compared with Handihaler® in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate the superiority of Respimat®.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
(T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat®, then (T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received comparator treatment(T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18μg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device.
Arm Title
(T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler®, then (T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tiotropium Respimat® (T1)
Intervention Description
inhalation solution
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tiotropium Handihaler® (T2)
Intervention Description
Inhalation Powder
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance Domain of the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) After 4 Weeks of Treatment
Description
The score on the performance domain of the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The performance domain score is the sum of 7 questions (Q) within the domain (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10 and Q11), the range for each question went from 1 to 7 the higher the better. The score was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale following ((Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)/49)*100, the higher the better performance. The performance domain of PASAPQ) was analysed using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM), with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. Compound symmetry was used as a covariance structure for within-patient variation.
Time Frame
After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PASAPQ Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment
Description
The total score on the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The Total score is the sum of 13 questions (Q1-Q13) and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale. This continuous secondary endpoint was analyzed using a similar MMRM model as for the primary endpoint.
Time Frame
After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8)
Title
Percentage of Patients Indicating Preference at Week 8
Description
The percentage of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The questionnaire PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part II of the PASAPQ the stand-alone question 15 (Q15) was asked for a response to indicate the preference for the trial device, it had three possible answers: "I prefer Respimat", "I prefer Handihaler", "No answer to this question " and "no preference". Chi-squared test was used to analyze proportion of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8.
Time Frame
At Week 8.
Title
Overall Satisfaction Question Score From PASAPQ After 4 Weeks of Treatment
Description
The overall satisfaction question score in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 4 and 8 is reported (after 4 weeks of treatment). In Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ: the Question 14 (Q14) asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study. Q14 had Likert-type response options of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied) and was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale (if a patient scored "x", the transfer to 0-100 scale was x/7*100). Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the overall satisfaction question score, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.
Time Frame
At the end of 4 weeks of treatment
Title
Score on Willingness to Continue at Week 8
Description
The score on willingness to continue in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ the Question 16 (Q16) asked for a response between 0 and 100 with 0 indicating not willing to continue using the trial device and 100 indicating definitely willingness to continue. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the score on willingness to continue, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.
Time Frame
At Week 8.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All patients must have a diagnosis of COPD and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1 (Screening). Relatively stable, moderate to very severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% of predicted normal and FEV1/FVC <70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol. Male = exp [-10.61669 + 2.27078 × ln (- in cm) + 0.06622 × ln (age in year) + Mspline] Female = exp [-9.69716 + 2.09385 × ln (- in cm) + 0.02006 × ln (age in year) + Mspline] Historical data from spirometry measurements within the past 6 either at the site or at the other hospital may be used. If the measurements are not performed at the trial site a referral letter and signed copies of the measurement printouts must be provided to the trial site for source data verification. In case several qualifying spirometry measurements are available, the most recent one should be referred to as long as it was not performed during an exacerbation. Patients may not be randomised to the study without the availability of spirometry data at the actual study site. Male or female, age: ≥40 years of age Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded). Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonization (ICH) ICH-GCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial Patients must be able to inhale medication from the Tiotropium Respimat® and Tiotropium HandiHaler® Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures, and must be able to maintain records (patient diary) during the study period as required by the protocol Exclusion Criteria: Had visual, cognitive, or motor impairment that, as judged by the investigator, did not allow the patient to independently read and complete the PASAPQ questionnaire Patients have had used both Respimat® and HandiHaler® (including generic HandiHaler®) within one year prior to screening. Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease or condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patients at risk because of participation in the study or may influence either the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study. All patients with an Aspartate Transaminase (AST) (serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGOT) >80 IU/L, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (Serum Glutamic-pyruvic Transaminase, SGPT) >80 IU/L, Bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL or Creatinine >2.0 mg/dL will be excluded regardless of the clinical condition. Repeat laboratory evaluation will not be conducted in these subjects. Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction. Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year. Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy during the last year. Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed). Known active tuberculosis. Patients with a history of asthma, cystic fibrosis, clinically not well-controlled bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, or pulmonary thromboembolic disease History of thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated. Patients with any respiratory tract infection or COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to the initial screening visit (Visit 1). Patients with known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction. Patients whose symptoms are controlled on treatment may be included. Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma Use of systemic corticosteroid medication at unstable doses (i.e., less than six weeks on stable dose) or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 milligrams (mg) prednisolone per day. Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day and in the investigator's opinion will be unable to abstain from the use of oxygen therapy. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUD) or diaphragm with spermicide, or Norplant®). Significant alcohol or drug abuse within the past 12 months Known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, lactose, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or any other components of the HandiHaler® or Respimat® inhalation solution delivery system. Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period. Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.) Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100020
Country
China
Facility Name
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100029
Country
China
Facility Name
West China Hospital
City
Chengdu
ZIP/Postal Code
610041
Country
China
Facility Name
The First Afiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University
City
Guangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
510080
Country
China
Facility Name
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
City
Guangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
510120
Country
China
Facility Name
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200025
Country
China
Facility Name
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200032
Country
China
Facility Name
The First Hospital of China Medical University
City
Shenyang
ZIP/Postal Code
110001
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After the study is completed and the primary manuscript is accepted for publishing, researchers can use this following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement". Also, Researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to find information in order to request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website. The data shared are the raw clinical study data sets.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After all regulatory activities are completed in the US and EU for the product and indication, and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
For study documents - upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'. For study data - 1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by both the independent review panel and the sponsor, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor's publication plan); 2. and upon signing of a 'Data Sharing Agreement'.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing
Links:
URL
http://www.mystudywindow.com
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

A Study on Whether Patients Prefer the Spiriva® Respimat® or the Spiriva® Handihaler® for Treating Their Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs