search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic (cs)/Biologic (b) Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) (contRAst 2)

Primary Purpose

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Tofacitinib
Placebo to GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Placebo to Tofacitinib
csDMARDs
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis, Rheumatoid focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, GSK3196165, Otilimab, Tofacitinib, Placebo, DMARDs

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key inclusion criteria

  • >=18 years of age
  • Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age
  • Has active disease, as defined by having both*

    • >=6/68 tender/painful joint count (TJC), and
    • >=6/66 swollen joint count (SJC)
  • Has at least 1 bone erosion present on hand/wrist or foot radiographs
  • Has had an inadequate response to one or two of the csDMARDs:

    • methotrexate (MTX) 15-25 mg/week** oral or injected
    • hydroxychloroquine up to 400 mg/day or chloroquine up to 250 mg/day
    • sulfasalazine up to 3000 mg/day
    • leflunomide up to 20 mg/day***
    • bucillamine up to 100 mg/day (or up to 300 mg/day if permitted per local requirement)
    • iguratimod up to 50 mg/day

      • If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC.

        • A lower dose of 7.5 mg/week is acceptable if reduced for reasons of intolerance to MTX or per local requirement.

          • Concomitant use of leflunomide and methotrexate is not allowed, for safety reasons.

Key exclusion criteria

  • History of other inflammatory rheumatologic or systemic autoimmune disorder, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA, that may confound the evaluation of the effect of the study intervention.
  • Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections.
  • Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (either experimental or approved).

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

GSK3196165 90 mg

GSK3196165 150 mg

Tofacitinib 5 mg

Placebo sequence 1

Placebo sequence 2

Placebo sequence 3

Arm Description

Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): GSK3196165 90 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as standard of care (SoC).

Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): GSK3196165 150 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): Tofacitinib 5 mg cap twice daily + placebo SC injection once weekly. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: GSK3196165 90 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: GSK3196165 150 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: Tofacitinib 5 mg cap twice daily + placebo SC injection once weekly. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) at Week 12: superiority comparison with placebo
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). For comparison of GSK3196165 with placebo, the placebo sequences are combined into a single reporting group for Week 12 analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants achieving Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) total score less than or equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low disease activity (LDA)] at Week 12
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12: non-inferiority comparison with tofacitinib
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant hsCRP or ESR. Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 52
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 52
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving Disease Activity Score using 28 joint count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/liter [L]) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeters[mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeter [mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 52
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 52
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 52
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 52
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate (European league against rheumatism) EULAR response at Week 12
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12
Van der Heijde modified total sharp scores (mTSS) is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52 will be summarized.
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Short form (SF)-36 physical component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs will be included.
Change from Baseline in white blood cell (WBC) count at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 52 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 12 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 52 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Proportion of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events) (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities
Proportion of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities will be summarized.
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody
Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies will be determined
Number of participants with anti-GSK3196165 antibodies
Presence of anti-GSK3196165 antibodies will be determined.

Full Information

First Posted
May 16, 2019
Last Updated
August 23, 2023
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03970837
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic (cs)/Biologic (b) Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Acronym
contRAst 2
Official Title
A 52-week, Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Efficacy and Safety Study, Comparing GSK3196165 With Placebo and With Tofacitinib in Combination With Conventional Synthetic DMARDs, in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic DMARDs or Biologic DMARDs
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Only Asia cohort is early terminated.Limited efficacy demonstrated in the contRAst program does not support a suitable benefit/risk profile for otilimab as a potential treatment for RA. GSK has decided not to progress with regulatory submissions.
Study Start Date
June 5, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 29, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 18, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study [contRAst 2 (201791: NCT03970837)] is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of GSK3196165 in combination with csDMARD(s), for the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to csDMARD(s) or bDMARD(s). The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 6 weeks followed by a 52 week treatment phase in which participants will be randomized in a ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1 to receive GSK3196165 150 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) weekly, GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, tofacitinib capsules (cap) 5 mg twice a day or placebo (three arms, each placebo arm will have 12 weeks placebo followed by 40 weeks active treatment) respectively, all in combination with csDMARD(s). Participants who, in investigator's judgement will benefit from extended treatment with GSK3196165 may be included in the long-term extension study [contRAst X (209564: NCT04333147)]. For those participants who do not continue into the long term-extension study, there will be an 8 week safety follow-up visit following the treatment phase.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, GSK3196165, Otilimab, Tofacitinib, Placebo, DMARDs

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomized to one of six intervention arms in ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Double blinded
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1764 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GSK3196165 90 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): GSK3196165 90 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as standard of care (SoC).
Arm Title
GSK3196165 150 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): GSK3196165 150 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Arm Title
Tofacitinib 5 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Entire treatment period (52 Weeks): Tofacitinib 5 mg cap twice daily + placebo SC injection once weekly. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Arm Title
Placebo sequence 1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: GSK3196165 90 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Arm Title
Placebo sequence 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: GSK3196165 150 mg SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Arm Title
Placebo sequence 3
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
From Week 0-11: Placebo SC injection once weekly + placebo cap twice daily. From Week 12 onwards: Tofacitinib 5 mg cap twice daily + placebo SC injection once weekly. Participants will also receive a stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Intervention Description
GSK3196165 solution in vial/pre-filled syringe (PFS) to be administered SC.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
Tofacitinib cap (over encapsulated 5mg tablet) to be administered orally.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Intervention Description
Placebo sterile 0.9 percentage (%) weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution in vial/pre-filled syringe (PFS) to be administered SC.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
Placebo cap (containing lactose) to be administered orally.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
csDMARDs
Intervention Description
Stable dose of csDMARD(s) as SoC.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) at Week 12: superiority comparison with placebo
Description
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). For comparison of GSK3196165 with placebo, the placebo sequences are combined into a single reporting group for Week 12 analysis.
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants achieving Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) total score less than or equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low disease activity (LDA)] at Week 12
Description
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12: non-inferiority comparison with tofacitinib
Description
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant hsCRP or ESR. Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24
Description
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 52
Description
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12
Description
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24
Description
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 52
Description
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12
Description
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24
Description
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52
Description
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving Disease Activity Score using 28 joint count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/liter [L]) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeters[mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeter [mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 52
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 52
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 52
Description
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 52
Description
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate (European league against rheumatism) EULAR response at Week 12
Description
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24
Description
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52
Description
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12
Description
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24
Description
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52
Description
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12
Description
Van der Heijde modified total sharp scores (mTSS) is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52 will be summarized.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in Short form (SF)-36 physical component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Description
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Description
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Description
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI)
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs will be included.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Change from Baseline in white blood cell (WBC) count at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12 (International units per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 (International units per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 52 (International units per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 12 (Micromoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 (Micromoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 52 (Micromoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Title
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Description
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Proportion of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events) (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities
Description
Proportion of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities will be summarized.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody
Description
Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies will be determined
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Number of participants with anti-GSK3196165 antibodies
Description
Presence of anti-GSK3196165 antibodies will be determined.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key inclusion criteria >=18 years of age Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age Has active disease, as defined by having both* >=6/68 tender/painful joint count (TJC), and >=6/66 swollen joint count (SJC) Has at least 1 bone erosion present on hand/wrist or foot radiographs Has had an inadequate response to one or two of the csDMARDs: methotrexate (MTX) 15-25 mg/week** oral or injected hydroxychloroquine up to 400 mg/day or chloroquine up to 250 mg/day sulfasalazine up to 3000 mg/day leflunomide up to 20 mg/day*** bucillamine up to 100 mg/day (or up to 300 mg/day if permitted per local requirement) iguratimod up to 50 mg/day If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC. A lower dose of 7.5 mg/week is acceptable if reduced for reasons of intolerance to MTX or per local requirement. Concomitant use of leflunomide and methotrexate is not allowed, for safety reasons. Key exclusion criteria History of other inflammatory rheumatologic or systemic autoimmune disorder, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA, that may confound the evaluation of the effect of the study intervention. Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections. Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (either experimental or approved).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Flagstaff
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
86001
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poway
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92064
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92506
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tustin
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92780
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Van Nuys
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91405
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80230
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Collins
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80528
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33765
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Margate
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33063
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33134
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34652
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Palmetto Bay
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33157
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33705
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tamarac
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33321
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47715
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67207
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bowling Green
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42101
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lake Charles
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70601
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Monroe
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71203
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Grand Blanc
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48439
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48910
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novi
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48375
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Freehold
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07728
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11201
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27408
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Minot
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58701
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73103
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yukon
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73099
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15224
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wyomissing
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29204
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Myrtle Beach
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29572
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Summerville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29486
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909-1907
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79124
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78745
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Colleyville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76034
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78404
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77034
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77065
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77084
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tomball
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77375
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Glendale
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53217
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1114ABH
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1430EGF
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Quilmes
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1878GEG
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cordoba
State/Province
Córdova
ZIP/Postal Code
X5003DCE
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Miguel de Tucuman
State/Province
Tucumán
ZIP/Postal Code
T4000AXL
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Miguel de Tucumán
State/Province
Tucumán
ZIP/Postal Code
T4000BRD
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1015ABO
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1128AAF
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
5400
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Westmead
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gold Coast
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4222
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Woodville
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hobart
State/Province
Tasmania
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Box Hill
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3128
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Heidelberg West
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3081
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Blagoevgrad
ZIP/Postal Code
2700
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ruse
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ruse
ZIP/Postal Code
7002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sevlievo
ZIP/Postal Code
5400
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1784
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stara Zagora
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vidin
ZIP/Postal Code
3700
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bengbu
State/Province
Anhui
ZIP/Postal Code
233004
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guilin
State/Province
Guangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
541001
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shijiazhuang
State/Province
Hebei
ZIP/Postal Code
050051
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wuhan
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
430030
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Changsha
State/Province
Hunan
ZIP/Postal Code
410013
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
ZhuZhou
State/Province
Hunan
ZIP/Postal Code
412007
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baotou
State/Province
Inner Mongolia
ZIP/Postal Code
014010
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tongliao
State/Province
Inner Mongolia
ZIP/Postal Code
10050
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nanjing
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
210009
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Taizhou
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
225300
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Xuzhou
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
221009
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yancheng
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
224001
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jiujiang
State/Province
Jiangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
332000
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nanchang,
State/Province
Jiangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
330006
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Changchun
State/Province
Jilin
ZIP/Postal Code
130021
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jinzhou
State/Province
Liaoning
ZIP/Postal Code
121000
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Huzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
313000
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100032
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100144
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Changchun
ZIP/Postal Code
130012
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Changzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
213003
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chengdu
ZIP/Postal Code
610041
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
510080
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
510630
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
310005
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nanjing
ZIP/Postal Code
210008
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200040
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tianjin
ZIP/Postal Code
300052
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Xian
ZIP/Postal Code
710061
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
225000
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yanji
ZIP/Postal Code
133000
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barranquilla
ZIP/Postal Code
80020
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bogota
ZIP/Postal Code
110221
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bucaramanga
ZIP/Postal Code
680003
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Medellin
ZIP/Postal Code
50015
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Parnu
ZIP/Postal Code
80010
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
13419
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
50106
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
50406
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cahors
ZIP/Postal Code
46000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rendsburg
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
24768
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20095
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Magdeburg
ZIP/Postal Code
39120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1023
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Szekesfehervar
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Szentes
ZIP/Postal Code
6600
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
455-8530
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
457-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
466-8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
260-8712
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
284-0003
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
804-0025
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
807-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
814-0180
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
820-8505
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima
ZIP/Postal Code
734-8551
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
053-8567
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8604
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8648
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
063-0811
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
085-0032
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
673-1462
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
675-1392
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
312-0057
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
761-0793
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima
ZIP/Postal Code
891-0133
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
222-0036
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
231-8682
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
232-0024
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
236-0004
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
245-8575
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
252-0392
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kochi
ZIP/Postal Code
780-8522
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kochi
ZIP/Postal Code
781-0112
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto
ZIP/Postal Code
862-0976
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miyagi
ZIP/Postal Code
980-8574
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miyagi
ZIP/Postal Code
983-8512
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagano
ZIP/Postal Code
380-8582
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagasaki
ZIP/Postal Code
850-0832
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagasaki
ZIP/Postal Code
852-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagasaki
ZIP/Postal Code
857-1195
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Niigata
ZIP/Postal Code
940-2085
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Niigata
ZIP/Postal Code
957-0054
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
700-0013
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
700-8557
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
700-8607
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saga
ZIP/Postal Code
843-0393
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
359-1111
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
430-8558
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
104-8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
113-8431
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
113-8519
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
142-0054
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
142-8666
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
153-8515
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
198-0042
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
204-8585
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tottori
ZIP/Postal Code
683-8504
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wakayama
ZIP/Postal Code
649-2211
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yamaguchi
ZIP/Postal Code
750-8520
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
14068
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cheonan-si
ZIP/Postal Code
330-721
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daegu-si
ZIP/Postal Code
42601
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
41944
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gwangju
ZIP/Postal Code
61469
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Incheon
ZIP/Postal Code
400-711
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seongnam-si
ZIP/Postal Code
13620
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
04763
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
05505
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
06591
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
120-752
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
134-727
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
3080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Suwon
ZIP/Postal Code
16499
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mexico City
State/Province
Durango
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44650
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatán
ZIP/Postal Code
97070
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Luis Potosí
ZIP/Postal Code
78213
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-879
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-065
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Czestochowa
ZIP/Postal Code
42202
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-382
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-537
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
ZIP/Postal Code
05-825
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-040
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-282
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-033
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-127
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-644
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nowy Targ
ZIP/Postal Code
34-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Olsztyn
ZIP/Postal Code
10-117
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-702
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-113
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Siedlce
ZIP/Postal Code
08-110
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sochaczew
ZIP/Postal Code
96-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-192
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-793
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-088
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
52-416
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ekaterinburg
ZIP/Postal Code
620102
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650070
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Korolev
ZIP/Postal Code
141060
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krasnoyarsk
ZIP/Postal Code
660123
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
111539
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115404
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115522
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
129110
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630099
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Omsk
ZIP/Postal Code
644024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
190068
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634050
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ulyanovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
432063
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150007
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150030
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150062
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santander
ZIP/Postal Code
39008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10400
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muang
ZIP/Postal Code
40002
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rajathevee
ZIP/Postal Code
10400
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Romford
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
RM1 3PJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Northwood
State/Province
Middlesex
ZIP/Postal Code
HA6 2RN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kenilworth
State/Province
Warwickshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CV8 1JD
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
http://clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Links:
URL
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04333147?term=209564&draw=2&rank=1
Description
209564 contRAst X NCT04333147

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic (cs)/Biologic (b) Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs